Review Notes Admin Law
Review Notes Admin Law
Administrative agencies have no inherent powers, their powers cannot be assumed nor can such powers be conferred by
court.
Read: Makati Stock Exchange vs. SEC, 14 SCRA 620, Radio Communications of the Phil., vs. Board of Communications, 80
SCRA 471,Cooperative Development Authority vs. Dolefil Agrarian Beneficiaries Cooperative, Inc., 382 SCRA 552
Statutes conferring powers on admin agencies must be liberally construed to enable them to discharge their assigned duties
in accordance with the legislative purpose.
Read: Matienzo vs. Abellera,162 SCRA 11
A. Investigatory powers
It includes 1) inspection of records and premises 2) investigation of the activities of persons or entities coming under its
jurisdiction 3) or securing, requiring the disclosure of information by means of records, reports, statements, testimony of
witnesses and production of documents.
It is a useful aid or tool in the agencys performance of its rule-making or quasi-judicial functions (eg., LTFRB re Uber, Grab
Car, ERC re price manipulation of power producers,etc.).
As distinguished from judicial functions, the latter is the power and authority to adjudicate upon the rights and obligations
before it. The power to investigate consists only of investigating the facts and making findings and recommendations thereto.
In admin proceedings, respondent has the option of engaging the services of counsel or not.
An agency can only compel attendance and presence of witnesses and punish for contempt in case of non-compliance if
such powers have been conferred upon it. In admin proceedings, technical rules of procedure and evidence are not required.
Read: Catura vs. Court of Industrial Relations 37 SCRA 303
B.Rule- making powers
It simply means the power to make rules and regulations necessary to carry out its functions and to implement the law it is
entrusted to enforce. It is also called administrative legislation, delegated legislation, ordinance making and quasi-legislation.
The statutory grant of rule-making power to administrative agencies is a valid exception on non-delegation of legislative
power provided 2 conditions are present namely:
a. The statute is complete in itself, setting forth the policy to be executed by the agency.
b. The statute fixes a standard and fixes the boundaries of the agencys authority.
A valid rule or regulation duly promulgated by an administrative agency has the force and effect of law and is binding on the
agency and all those dealing with the agency.
An administrative agency may make only rules and regulations within the limits of the power s granted to it by the law
creating it and in case of conflict between the basic law and the rule or regulation, the former prevails. Rule promulgation of
administrative agencies cannot override, supplant, modify or amend the law but must remain consistent with the law they
intend to carry out.
Legislative and interpretative rules- The power to create new and additional provisions that have the effect of law is
legislative while interpretative rules interpret existing laws and provide guidelines to the law that they interpret (rendering of
an opinion, statement of policy). The distinction is important because due process generally apply to legislative rulings.
Legislative rules may require notice and hearing if the law so requires and the rule adds a burden to the governed.
Publication is also required for legislative rulings except if they are internal regulations.
Read: Olsen and Co.,Inc., vs. Aldanese 43 Phil. 259, Philippine Lawyers Association vs. Agrava 108 Phil. 173
C. Adjudicatory powers
Otherwise known as quasi-judicial function, it is a term which applies to the actions, discretion, et., of public administrative
officers or bodies that are required to investigate facts, ascertain the existence of facts, hold hearings and draw conclusions
from them as a basis for their official action and to exercise discretion of judicial nature. A government agency performs
adjudicatory functions when it renders decisions or awards that determine the rights of adversarial parties which have the
same binding effect as a judgment of a court of law that even the courts of justice have to respect.
a. Extent/Limitation (pp. 231-235, De Leon)
Depends largely on enabling act and the grant of power must be found in the law itself.
1) A statute passed by Congress must be clear in its terms when clothing administrative bodies with quasi-judicial functions,
and such conferment cannot be implied from a mere grant of power to a body or agency.
2) The delegation by Congress to executive or administrative agencies of functions of judicial, or at least quasi-judicial
functions which are incidental to the exercise by such agencies of their executive/administrative powers is not a violation of
the doctrine of separation of powers.
Read: Lovina vs. Moreno G.R. No. L-17821, Miller vs. Mardo G.R, No. L-15138,PHILEX Mining Corp. vs. Zaldivia 43 SCRA
479