2012 - Jan 2B ER PDF
2012 - Jan 2B ER PDF
January 2012
Publications Code UG030189
All the material in this publication is copyright
Pearson Education Ltd 2012
cool the body. There was much confusion between the terms sweating and
evaporation.
Question 4
The term hypothesis seemed unfamiliar to many candidates and, as such,
their attempts to construct a sentence that explained the observations made
in this investigation were disappointing. The examiners were looking for
answers that showed an understanding that light intensity affected the level of
carbon dioxide in the tubes. Candidates who repeated the information
describing the investigation or only made reference to the colour changes
gained no credit. In (b), credit was given for temperature, species of plant and
volume of indicator solution. Most candidates were able to gain at least one
mark showing that they have a good understanding of controlled variables.
Equally pleasing were answers to (c). Candidates appreciated the role of a
control to allow a valid comparison to be made between tubes A, B and C. Part
(d) expected students to offer explanations for the colours seen in the tubes.
The better candidates appreciated the roles of photosynthesis and respiration
and how the net change in carbon dioxide is affected by light intensity.
Weaker candidates described the colour changes or made reference to oxygen
gas. Only the best candidates appreciated that limewater can only show an
increase in carbon dioxide and, unlike hydrogencarbonate indicator, cannot
show a decrease in carbon dioxide.
Question 5
Most candidates coped well with having to draw the food chain, though a
surprising number included organisms not mentioned in the question. An
equally surprising number failed to put the arrows in the correct direction. In
(b)(i), most were able to appreciate that a hawk had more success with a
smaller number of pigeons in a group, but only the better candidates went on
to give a sensible explanation. Part (b) (ii) examined student knowledge of the
eye and a pleasing number of candidates appreciated the role of the ciliary
muscle, the suspensory ligaments and the lens in helping to focus on an
approaching hawk. Considerable confusion existed about the contraction /
relaxation, tightening / slackening and fattening / thinning of these eye parts.
The role of circular and radial muscles was not credited. Most candidates were
able to describe what happens to protein in the stomach and it was common
to award full marks for this part of the question.
Question 6
Part (a) of this question tested candidates understanding of a simple genetic
cross. Most chose a sensible upper and lower case letter to represent the
parental genotype but a surprising number chose different letters. In these
cases, no mark was given to the parental genotype but the concept of
transferred error was used to credit the gamete and offspring genotypes. In
(b)(i), a pleasing number appreciated the need to keep the plants isolated,
particularly from agents of cross-pollination such as insects. Many suggested
that Mendel himself transferred pollen from the anther to the stigma of the
same flower using a brush and due credit was given. Credit was also given to
those candidates who described self-pollination. In (b)(ii), no credit was given
for combinations of different letters such as T and D or T and d or T and S.
Defining genetic terms is a challenge for students but many appreciated that a
dominant allele is the one expressed in the heterozygote and that codominant
alleles are both expressed in the heterozygote.