Scribd
Upload
401 views

Syntactic Categories

The document discusses identifying syntactic categories based on distributional properties rather than semantic definitions. It outlines tests to categorize words based on how they distribute in sentences, such as combining with determiners for nouns or auxiliary verbs for verbs. Words can belong to multiple categories depending on the sentence. The document provides examples applying the distributional tests to categorize words as nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, or prepositions.

Uploaded by

Unknown
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
401 views

Syntactic Categories

The document discusses identifying syntactic categories based on distributional properties rather than semantic definitions. It outlines tests to categorize words based on how they distribute in sentences, such as combining with determiners for nouns or auxiliary verbs for verbs. Words can belong to multiple categories depending on the sentence. The document provides examples applying the distributional tests to categorize words as nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, or prepositions.

Uploaded by

Unknown
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Identifying Syntactic Categories

Syntactic categories are distributional not semantic

One of the fundamental problems with the way traditional parts of speech are defined is
that they are often a mixture of semantic and syntactic features, and the definitions are not
usually explicit enough to be useful. For example, nouns are often said to be a person, place,
thing or idea, while verbs are said to be actions or states of being. We can immediately
see various problems with this kind of definition. For example, in (1a) fighting is a verb,
while in (1b), fighting is a noun. But semantically, it seems that fighting in both words
is describing an action. The reason we say that the two words are of different categories
is because of their syntactic behaviour: in (1a) fighting combines with an auxiliary verbs
might and be, while in (1b) it combines with a Determiner the.
(1)

a.
b.

John might be fighting with Bill.


The fighting was fierce.

We can see another problem with the semantic definition of verbs as states of being if we
compare verbs and adjectives, as in (2). In (2a) we cannot say that fear is an action, so
it must be a state of being. But then we cant distinguish (2a) from afraid (2b) which is
also a state of being. But afraid is an adjective and not a verb. We can tell this again, by
distributional properties: in (2a) fear agrees with the subject fears vs. fear, but in (2b)
afraid cant stand by itself without is. This is why (2c/d) are ungrammatical: in (2c) fear
as a verb cant combine with is and afraid cant behave like a verb by having agreement
with the subject.
(2)

a.
b.
c.
d.

John fears ghosts.


John is afraid of ghosts.
*John is fear ghosts.
*John afraids of ghosts.

Ways of identifying syntactic categories

Instead of semantic properties to determine syntactic categories, we will use groups of


distributional tests (not definitions) to determine the category of a word. Remember also,
that words can fall into more than one category, so the category of a word is always relative
to the sentence it is in.

Syntactic Categories

2.1

NOUNS

Traditionally: Person, place, or thing


Distributionally:
modified by Adjectives
follow determiners (the, a, this etc. or the possessive my, your etc.)
can be singular or plural
cant take an object
Frame: X is/are a pain in the neck.

2.2

VERBS

Traditionally: Action (sometimes state)


Distributionally:
can combine with auxiliary verbs can, will, might etc. or to.
can agree with the subject
takes tense (-ed), aspect (-en) affixes
can take an object
Frame: They can X or They X-ed the banana.

2.3

ADJECTIVES

Traditionally: State (modifying), qualities, attributes


Distributionally:
follows very
modifies noun (and follows determiner)
cant take an object
takes derivational affixes like -ish, -some
Frames: She is very X; or I want the X book.

Syntactic Categories

2.4

ADVERBS

Traditionally: Modifier of anything other than a noun.


Distributionally:
takes -ly suffix
Cannot appear where adjectives often appear (e.g. between determiner and
noun.)
Can appear between Subject and Aux.
Frames: Bill treats Fred X; John can X do that.

2.5

PREPOSITIONS

Traditionally: locations, space, directions


Distributionally:
take no morphology
can take an object
can be modified by right
Frame: He is right X. (doesnt work for of, with and perhaps a few other Ps for
semantic reasons.)

Lexical vs. Functional Categories

There are two kinds of lexical items (words). lexical categories are open class, in that there
is an unlimited number of them, and new words are added all the time both to the language
as a whole, and also to individual speakers mental lexicons. Functional categories, on the
other hand are closed class in that they have a small and fixed number of items. These
are also the words that traditional grammar usually doesnt give semantic definitions for
either. Since the number of closed class elements is small, it is usually easier to just list
them. Here is a partial listing.
CONJUNCTIONS (Conj): and, or, etc.
DETERMINERS (D): This, that, the, a, my, your, our, his, her, their, each, every,
some, etc.
COMPLEMENTIZERS (C): that, if, for (all followed by a clause)
AUXILIARIES/MODALS (T): is, have, can, must, should, would, etc.
Syntactic Categories

Examples

4.1

Nouns

Here are some examples of the noun tests in action:


(3)

a.
b.
c.

4.2
(4)

Verbs
a.
b.
c.
d.

4.3
(5)

4.4
(6)

4.5
(7)

Dogs/cats/people/tables/cars are a pain in the neck.


(Frame test (also
plural))
The dog/my dog/Bills dog is a pain in the neck.(Determiner/possissive test)
* Johns fight Bill
(Cant take an object (Bill ))

John can/might/will leave/eat dinner.


(Combines with Auxiliary verb)
John wants to leave.
(Combines with to)
eat/ate/eaten; sing/sang/sung; walk/walked/walked
(Inflects for tense or
aspect)
John ate dinner.
(Can take an object).

Adjectives
a.
b.
c.

John is very happy/sad/unhelpfull/busy.


I want the big/red/first/top book.
* I am proud Bill

(Frame test)
(Frame test).
(Cant take an object).

Adverbs
a.
b.
c.

* The quickly man


(Cant appear between Det and N)
John treats Bill well/nicely/better
(Frame test)
John can usually/often/never/ do that.
(Frame test)

Prepositions
John is right outside/inside/under the table/behind me.
behind take objects.)

Syntactic Categories

(right test; also under,

You might also like