Design Procedure For Statically Loaded Bolt
Design Procedure For Statically Loaded Bolt
Page 1 of 14
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
Page 2 of 14
09/02/2009
Page 3 of 14
Torque to Produce
this Force (Nm)
8.8
10.9
See Note 2
M3
2.3
3.25
3.9
1.3
1.8
2.1
M4
4.0
5.65
6.75
2.7
3.8
4.6
M5
6.55
9.2
11.1
5.5
8.0
9.5
M6
9.25
13.0
15.6
9.5
13.0
16.0
M8
17.0
23.9
28.7
23.0
32.0
39.0
M10
27.1
38.0
45.7
46.0
64.0
77.0
M12
39.5
55.5
66.7
80.0
110
135
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
12.9
09/02/2009
Page 4 of 14
M14
54.0
76.0
91.3
125
180
215
M16
75
105
126
195
275
330
M20
117
164
197
385
540
650
M24
169
237
284
60
930
1100
M27
221
311
374
980
1740
1650
M30
269
379
454
1350
1850
2250
M36
393
553
664
2280
3210
3850
Note 1
The Maximum Axial Force is based on not exceeding a combined stress of 90% of the
yield stress (or 0.2% proof stress for materials which do not exhibit a yield point) acting
on the previously defined stress area.
Note 2
The torque to create the maximum axial force is based on a coefficient of friction of
0.125 at the thread and the bolt head (or nut face). The value for friction can vary widely
in practice. (See table 5.1) Equation 5.1 or 5.2 enable torques for other frictional values
to be calculated.
* For an explanation of the material grading system, see Section 6
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 5 of 14
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 6 of 14
Where the bolt is screwed into a tapped hole in one of the joint members, the latter is
clearly not wholly in compression. This tends to reduce the stiffness of the joint
compared to the bolts. The following effective lengths are suggested:
Here, the effective joint length, lje is greater than the effective bolt length, resulting in a
less favourable stiffness ratio than for the case of a bolt in a through-drilled hole.
3.5.2 Area Ratio
The designer often has considerable freedom in selecting the cross sectional areas of the
bolt and joint members.
The bolt area will be determined by strength considerations. With a standard bolt, the
critical section is usually the thread root diameter, which is less than the nominal bolt
diameter, and is also subject to stress concentrations. The bolt shank may therefore be
waisted down or drilled axially to give a cross sectional area somewhat below the thread
root area, without loss of strength. A small length of the full shank diameter may have to
be retained near the joint interfaces for lateral location purpose, but the resulting bolt will
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 7 of 14
be more resilient than a standard one, and will therefore attract a smaller proportion of
any load applied to the joint. With a waisted bolt, it is also possible to increase the
underhead radius and thus relieve the stress concentration in this region. Both measures
increase the effective fatigue strength of the bolt which is important when the joint load
has a dynamic component.
The joint area should always be as large as possible, provided the joint members can be
made stiff enough to ensure reasonable parity of pressure over the whole joint interface.
It is pointless to employ large, thin flanges which will distort under the clamping load
and result in a concentration of load around the bolts, but little elsewhere. (See Fig 3.4)
For design purposes, we must try to estimate an effective area for use in calculating the
joint stiffness. If the diameter of the joint faces Dj, does not exceed the bolt head or
washer diameter DH, the compressive load in the joint may be assumed uniform, so that:
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 8 of 14
For irregular shaped joints, the joint diameter Dj may be estimated by drawing lines, at
452 to the bolt axis from the collar diameter of the bolt or nut to the joint interface, (see
Fig 3.5)
In order to ensure effective clamping of the joint by the bolts in a high duty connection,
the size and number of bolts should be chosen so that the joint diameters of adjacent bolts
touch or overlap slightly.
3.5.3 Modulus Ratio
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 9 of 14
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 10 of 14
The result can be plotted on a load/extension diagram as shown in Figure 3.8. It can be
seen from this diagram that the external load W is shared between an additional load on
the bolt and a reduction in compression of the joint, in proportion to their stiffnesses.
Thus by designing the joint members to be very stiff and the bolt to be resilient, and
applying a high preload to the bolt so that the joint faces do not separate when an external
load is applied, a large external load can be seen to cause a small increase in the bolt load
but a much larger decrease in the joint load. This has important implications later when
fatigue is considered on joints with fluctuating loads but, in the context of steady loads
applied and removed relatively infrequently, it is important to note the need for a preload
to prevent joint faces separating and also that the increase in the bolt load is likely to be
very small.
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 11 of 14
Figure 3.8 Load/extension diagram for a pre-loaded joint with an extension applied load
3.6.2 Choice of Preload
Having established that it is desirable to preload a bolted joint that is subsequently
subjected to a tensile load, we must now decide how much preload to apply. On the one
hand, we must ensure that the joint faces will not separate under the application of an
external load to the joint, and on the other we must not apply such a high preload that the
bolt will fail when we tighten it up. Let us define the minimum preload to avoid
separation of the joint members as Pmin and the maximum preload which can be applied
without causing failure of the bolt in service as Pmax
From Figure 3.8, it can be seen that the safety factor on separation of the joint faces is
equal to:
In order to ensure that the joint members do not separate, it is prudent to apply a high
safety factor to the condition of joint parting. A figure of at least 2 is suggested:
In practice, Wj is not usually known at the initial design stage, so a first assumption of
Pmin 2W can be used. We have now therefore specified a lower limit for the preload,
Pmin. The upper limit of preload must be such that the bolt will not fail, either during
tightening or under subsequent external load application. It is suggested that a maximum
value of preload, Pmax, is made equivalent to a nominal tensile stress at the minimum bolt
cross section of 85-90% of the bolt material yield strength is a good initial choice.
METHOD
ACCURACY REMARKS
Yield Control 5%
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 12 of 14
Torque
Wrench:
Strain
Calibrated
Torque
Calibrated
Uncalibrated
10-15%
15-25%
25-50%
Air-stall
Power
Wrenches
Calibrated
25-40%
Uncalibrated
30-100%
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
Page 13 of 14
Table 3.2 gives a guide to the accuracy of preload control offered by a range of
commercially available methods, together with comments on their limitations. In
selecting the method to be employed, the designer should be sure that his intentions are
within the capabilities of the service environment, as well as his assembly shop, if the
fasteners concerned will require periodic re-tightening in service.
3.6.4 Loss of Preload
The initial preload applied to the bolt tends to be degraded by subsequent application and
removal of the external load on the joint. This is due to embedding of the contacting
surfaces and flattening of surface roughness, and tends to occur rapidly with the first few
load applications, and more slowly thereafter. The effect is most pronounced with soft
materials and poorly finished surfaces.For design purposes, the amounts of embedding
shown in Table 3.3 may be taken as representative for pairs of steel surfaces.
Type of surface
Machined
Thread
Formed
Thread
Machined
Surface
Ground
Surface
Amount of embedding at
each interface (mm)
.005
-003
.004
.002
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
09/02/2009
http://www.co-design.co.uk/dpg/bol/bol3.html
Page 14 of 14
09/02/2009