6 PDF
6 PDF
A Novel Association Rule Mining with IEC Ratio Based Dissolved Gas
Analysis for Fault Diagnosis of Power Transformers
Ms. Kanika Shrivastava 1, Mr. Ashish Choubey2
ME in High Voltage and Power System in Electrical Engineering, JEC, Jabalpur, (MP) 1
Assistant Professor, JEC, Jabalpur (MP) 2
[email protected] 1
Abstract
Dissolved gas Analysis (DGA) is the most important
component of finding fault in large oil filled
transformers. Early detection of incipient faults in
transformers reduces costly unplanned outages. The
most sensitive and reliable technique for evaluating
the core of transformer is dissolved gas analysis. In
this paper we evaluate different transformer
condition on different cases. This paper uses
dissolved gas analysis to study the history of
different transformers in service, from which
dissolved combustible gases (DCG) in oil are used
as a diagnostic tool for evaluating the condition of
the transformer. Oil quality and dissolved gasses
tests are comparatively used for this purpose. In this
paper we present a novel approach which is based
on association rule mining and IEC ratio method.
By using data mining concept we can categorize
faults based on single and multiple associations and
also map the percentage of fault. This is an efficient
approach for fault diagnosis of power transformers
where we can find the fault in all obvious
conditions. We use java for programming and
comparative study.
Keywords
DGA, ROGERSs ratio Method, IEC Method, Data
Mining, Association Rule Mining.
I.
Introduction
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
DGA
The collection and analysis of gases in an oilinsulated transformer was discussed as early as 1928.
Many years of empirical and theoretical study have
gone into the analysis of transformer fault gases.
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
III.
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
Ratio Codes
i
j
k
l
1-2
1-2
1-2
Joints
Flashover
without power
follow through
Arc with
Power follow
through
Continuous
Sparking to
floating
Potential
Partial
discharge with
tracking
j
k
Range
<0.1
>0.1,<1.0
>=1.0,<3.0
>=3.0
<1.0
>=1.0
<1.0
>=1.0,<3.0
>=3.0
Code
5
0
1
2
0
1
0
1
2
<0.5
>=0.5,<3.0
>=3.0
0
1
2
j
0
k
0
l
0
1-2
1-2
1
0
2
2
0
0
1
2
Diagnosis
Normal
Deterioration
Partial
Discharge
Slight
Overheating
<150 0 C
Overheating
150 0 C 200 0
C
Overheating
200 0 C 300 0
C
General
Conductor
Overheating
Winding
Circulating
Current
Core and Tank
circulating
currents,
Overhead
Fault
Type
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
37
Fault Type
C2H2/
C2H4
CH4/
H2
C2H4/C2H6
No Fault
0
<150
C
Thermal Fault
1500C-3000C
Thermal Fault
3000C -7000C
Thermal Fault
0
>700
C
Thermal Fault
Low Energy PD
High
Energy
PD
Low
Energy
Discharge
High
Energy
Discharge
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1 or 2
1 or 2
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
H2
CH4
C2H4
C2H6
C2H2
FAULT
CODE
FAULT TYPE
4.5925
24.797
13.8563
14.707
.003033
5.3862
.4166
.028271
.04776
.000408
Low Energy PD
1.6427
1.4899
.5277
7.4315
.00452
No fault
0
4.1159
.8980
2.5779
.9623
.03779
1.7011
1.1971
.8177
.117
.1293
1.8589
3.108
3.212
2.148
.00807
.3985
5.5257
4.442
.8250
.00277
1.3229
.4296
.04557
.000205
.01314
29.9914
1.8591
.5192
.7374
.05910
High Energy PD
10
4.4171
.3517
.1288
.0297
.005011
Null
0
11
1.7020
.2414
.2545
.2089
.00405
12
6.0646
12.025
15.713
.6513
.001383
13
.7323
3.0435
1.382
.2912
.00198
14
2.7011
1.1871
.7167
.217
.2293
15
.1487
.9906
.1008
.0745
.00965
16
6.8729
2.2421
.1700
.4064
.00599
No Fault
17
30.991
2.8591
.6192
.6374
.06910
High Energy PD
18
2.6080
18.9712
2.7400
39.848
.00415
19
4.3368
1.0566
.9231
.2002
.002501
20
5.7787
.5458
.07298
.1546
.00692
Low Energy PD
21
8.6976
1.0636
2.1259
.5134
.5348
22
3.1681
9.265
6.6307
2.9401
.02215
23
1.8012
1.231
.6167
.113
.2133
24
.7683
.7255
.00873
.1139
.00994
Null
25
2.545
.1450
.0044
.00074
.01355
Null
26
1.8421
.8287
.1761
.6180
.00252
No fault
27
.8573
6.3671
4.9939
5.0809
.000120
28
4.4798
45.47
342.5
35.39
21.562
29
31.9914
2.113
.5583
.6613
.0513
Low Energy PD
30
7.3779
.6711
.09027
.06864
.003792
Null
31
32
.5585
7.9165
.1546
4.3174
.0041
5.211
.000846
3.284
.01696
1.8652
8
8
38
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
IV.
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
V.
3.
4.
5.
40
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
IEC ( FT )
1500C-3000C Thermal Fault
Low Energy PD
No fault
<150 0C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
3000C -7000C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
High Energy PD
Null
<150 0C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
3000C -7000C Thermal Fault
No Fault
High Energy PD
1500C-3000C Thermal Fault
Null
Low Energy PD
High Energy Discharge
3000C -7000C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
Null
Null
No fault
1500C-3000C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
Low Energy PD
Null
Null
Null
IEC + DM
1500C-3000C Thermal Fault
Low Energy PD
No fault
<150 0C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
3000C -7000C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
High Energy PD
Low Energy PD
<150 0C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
3000C -7000C Thermal Fault
No Fault
High Energy PD
1500C-3000C Thermal Fault
No fault
Low Energy PD
High Energy Discharge
3000C -7000C Thermal Fault
High Energy Discharge
High Energy Discharge
Null
No fault
1500C-3000C Thermal Fault
>700 0C Thermal Fault
Low Energy PD
Low Energy PD
Low Energy Discharge
High Energy Discharge
Figure 8: Frquency
42
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
References
[1] DiGiorgio, J.B. (2005) Dissolved Gas Analysis of
Mineral Oil Insulating Fluids. DGA Expert System: A
Leader in Quality, Value and Experience 1, 1-17.
[2] Chu, D. and A. Lux, On-line monitoring of power
transformers and components: a review of key parameters.
Electrical
Insulation
Conference
and
Electrical
Manufacturing & Coil Winding Conference, 1999.
Proceedings, 1999: p. 669-675.
[3] Siva Sarma, D.V.S.S. and G.N.S. Kalyani, ANN
Approach for Condition Monitoring of Power Transformers
using DGA. 2004 IEEE Region 10 Conference, TENCON
2004. 2004. C: p. 444-447.
[4] Richard Green, Dissolved Gas Analysis in
Transformer Operations Plays Key Role, Pollution
Engineering, 2008.
Fault
Types,
VI.
Conclusion
Directions
and
Future
43
International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print): 2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970)
Volume 2 Number 2 June 2012
Networks in Fault Diagnosis of Power Transformer,
CICED2008 81-45 CP1778 Technical Session 1
Distribution network equipment .
[14] C. K Diwedi, M.B. Daigavane, Evaluation of
Moisture Content In Paper-Oil of Aged Power Transformer
Using RVM, Second International Conference on
Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology,
ICETET-09.
44