Scribd
Upload
2K views

HW 2

- Three point charges are arranged on a line, with charges q3 and q2 located at the origin and x2 = 4.5 cm, having values of +5.00 nC and -3.00 nC. - Charge q1 is located at x1 = 1.00 cm. For the net force on q3 to be zero, q1 must be positive and have a magnitude of 0.148 nC. - This can be shown by setting the electric forces from q1 and q2 on q3 equal, and solving the resulting equation for q1.

Uploaded by

Lencie Dela Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views

HW 2

- Three point charges are arranged on a line, with charges q3 and q2 located at the origin and x2 = 4.5 cm, having values of +5.00 nC and -3.00 nC. - Charge q1 is located at x1 = 1.00 cm. For the net force on q3 to be zero, q1 must be positive and have a magnitude of 0.148 nC. - This can be shown by setting the electric forces from q1 and q2 on q3 equal, and solving the resulting equation for q1.

Uploaded by

Lencie Dela Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Physics 21

Fall, 2014

Solution to HW-2

21-15 Three point charges are arranged on a line. Charge


q3 = +5.00 nC and is at the origin. Charge q2 = 3.00 nC
and is at x2 = 4.50 cm. Charge q1 is at x1 = 1.00 cm. What
is q1 (magnitude and sign) if the net force on q3 is zero?

q3

q1

q2

x3=0

x1

x2

We can work this problem without using vectors by thinking


it through. Since q2 and q3 have opposite sign, the force on
q3 exerted by q2 is attractive (towards the right). If the
total force on q3 is to be zero, the force exerted by q1 must
be repulsive (toward the left). Thus q1 and q3 must have the
same sign, and q1 must be positive.
We can find the magnitude of q1 by equating the magnitude
of the forces on q3 exerted by q1 and q2 :
1 |q1 q3 |
1 |q2 q3 |
=
2
40 x1
40 x22
Cancelling like terms on both sides of the equation, we find
2

 2
1.0 cm
x1
(3 nC) = 0.148 nC.
|q2 | =
|q1 | =
x2
4.5 cm
We already concluded that q1 was positive.
A more general way to solve this problem is to use the vector
expressions for the Coulomb force. We want
0 = F1 on 3 + F2 on 3 ,
where
0=

1 q1 q3 (r3 r1 )
1 q2 q3 (r3 r1 )
+
.
40 |r3 r1 |3
40 |r3 r2 |3

and we can evaluate the forces using the locations of the


charges. Because q1 is at the origin, r3 = 0. Also, r1 = x1i
and r2 = x2i. Substituting for the vectors gives
#
"
1
q1 q3 (0 x1 )i q2 q3 (0 x2 )i
0=
+
40
|0 x1 |3
|x2 |3


q2 x2
q3 q1 x1
+
i
=
40 |x1 |2
|x2 |2

21-17 Three point charges are located on the positive x


axis of a coordinate system. Charge q1 = 1.0 nC is 2.0 cm
from the origin, charge q2 = 4.0 nC is 4.0 cm from the
origin and charge q3 = 6.0 nC is located at the origin. What
is the net force (magnitude and direction) on charge q1 =
1.0 nC exerted by the other two charges?
This problem is very similar to 21-13, and the same diagram
applies. Here we need the sum F of F2 on 1 and F3 on 1 , which
is


q1 q2 (r1 r2 ) q1 q3 (r1 r3 )
1
,
+
F=
40
|r1 r2 |3
|r1 r3 |3
where, as before, r3 = 0, r1 = x1i, and r2 = x2i. Then
"
#
1
q2 (x1 x2 )i q3 (x1 x3 )i
F=
q1
+
40
|x1 x2 |3
|x1 x3 |3


1
q2 (0.02 m) q3 (0.02 m)
=
q1
+
i
40
(0.02 m)3
(0.02 m)3
Substituting the other numbers leads to


4 nC(.02 m) 6 nC(.02 m)
9
F = (9 10 )(1 nC)
+
i
(.02 m)3
(.02 m)3
= 2.25 104 N i

21-13 In an experiment in space, one proton is held fixed


and another proton is released from rest a distance d away.
What is the initial acceleration of the proton after it is released?
From Physics 11 you know that F = ma, or a = F/m. So
just find the electrostatic force on one proton due to the
other proton, and then divide by the mass. Well drop the
vector notation and just find the magnitude:
a=

e2
1
40 mp d2

2
 1.602 1019 C
= 9 10 N m /C
(1.67 1026 kg) d2
9

When you substitute for d, dont forget to convert to meters.


For d = 3 mm = 0.003 m, the result is
2

a = 1.54 104 m/s .

Note that the terms in the denominators are lengths and


must be positive. The quantity in brackets must be zero, so
we obtain
3

2
x2 x1
4.5 1.0
q1 = q2 =
(3.0 nC) = 0.148 nC
x1 x2
1.0 4.5

This formula agrees with the previous result. Because we


were careful with the signs, the formula gives the correct
answer for any combination of signs of the three charges and
for the two vector components x1 and x2 . (We took x3 = 0.)
August 24, 2014

21-46 Two particles having charges q1 = 0.600 nC and


q2 = 5.00 nC are separated by a distance of d = 1.60 m. At
what point along the line connecting the two charges is the
total electric field due to the two charges equal to zero?

q1
0

q2
x

Since both charges are positive, its easy to keep track of the
direction of the electric field. The field at x from q1 points
to the right, and the one from q2 points to the left. These
two fields must be equal in magnitude for their vector sum
to be zero. Therefore
1
q2
1 q1
=
2
40 x
40 (x d)2
Cancelling the common factor of 1/(40 ), we can rewrite
the above equation as
r
q2
dx
(d x)2
q2
=

=
2
x
q1
x
q1
Solving for x, we find
x=

d
p
1 + q2 /q1

Substituting the specific numbers given above leads to

YF 21-50 mod A point charge q1 = 4.00 nC is at the


point x = 0.60 m, y = 0.80 m, and a second point charge
q2 = +6.00 nC is at the point x = 0.60 m, y = 0. (a,b)
Calculate the x and y components of the net electric field
at the origin due to these two point charges. (c,d) Calculate
the x and y components of the net electric field at the point
x = 0.90 m, y = 0.40 m due to these two point charges.
Use the vector expression given in class for the field E at r
due to a charge Q at point r . Apply this formula to get the
field at r due to Q1 ; apply it again to get the field at r due
to Q2 , and then add the results (superposition).
E (at r) =

1 Q (r r )
40 |r r |3

Remember, r = field point; r = charge point.


y

Q1 = -4.0 nC
(0.6, 0.8)

(0.9, 0.4)
Q2 = +6.0 nC
(0.6, 0.0)
x

(a,b) Find E at origin, r = 0i+0j. For Q1 , r = 0.6i+0.8j, so


r r = 0.6i 0.8j and |r r | = 1.0 m. For Q2 , r = 0.6i,
so r r = 0.6i and |r r | = 0.6 m.

x = 0.412 m.
Note that instead of taking the square root and solving a linear equation for x, one could also set up a quadratic equation. One must identify the correct root of the quadratic
equation, but the result is the same.

"

4 nC(.6 i .8 j)m 6 nC(.6 i)m


+
(1.0 m)3
(.6 m)3



 
1 2.4
3.6
3.2
nC
=
+ j

i
40
13
(.6)3
13
m2
h
i
1
nC
=
14.3 i + 3.2 j
40
m2


= 128.3 i + 28.77 j N/C

1
E=
40

(c,d) Find E at point r = 0.9 i+0.4 j. For Q1 , r = 0.6i+0.8j,


so rr = 0.3 i0.4 j and |r r | = 0.5 m. For Q2 , r = 0.6i,
so r r = 0.3 i + 0.4 j, and |r r | = 0.5 m.
"

4 nC(.3 i .4 j)m 6 nC(.3 i + .4 j)m


+
(0.5 m)3
(0.5 m)3
#
"
i(1.2 + 1.8) + j(1.6 + 2.4) nC
1
=
40
0.125
m2
i nC
1 h
=
4.8 i + 32 j
4
m2
 0

= 43.2 i + 287.7 j N/C

1
E=
40

You might also like