Membrane Bioreactors
Membrane Bioreactors
(MBR)
MEMBRANE CLASSIFICATION
Microfiltration
(MF)
Ultrafiltration
(UF)
Nanofiltration
(NF)
Reverse
Osmosis
(RO)
MF and UF
Low Pressure
Size Exclusion
Pathogenic bacteria
and some viruses
MBR Systems,
polishing and post
treatment
NF and RO
Higher Pressure
Size Exclusion plus
diffusion charge
Pathogenic bacteria,
viruses, dissolved
solids and ions
Secondary polishing
and post treatment
HOLLOW FIBRE
MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
PROCESS BASICS
sludge floc
water
dis. solids
bacteria
viruses
membrane
suction
kinet. energy
PROCESS BASICS
DN
discharge
SCT
SS
conventional technology
membrane technology
effluent
SS
Deni
Nitri
UF not
Sec. Clarif.
TWO CONFIGURATIONS:
External
Submerged
Gross Flux
Net Flux
Transmembrane Pressure
The difference between average/concentrate pressure
and the permeate pressure is the driving force.
The TMP is a means to assess fouling
TMP = feed pressure permeate pressure
Fouling
The build up of impurities on the membranes such as
colloidal materials. Fouling reduces flux through the
membrane and increase the TMP.
Micro fouling is the build up of impurities in the
membrane pores.
Permeability
P = Flux / TMP
Recovery
Recovery is the concept of restoring the hydraulic
characteristics of the membrane.
Recovery is achieved by membrane cleaning.
PROCESS VARIABLES
Temperature
Pore size
Membrane flux rate (L/m2.hr)
Membrane life
SYSTEM ADVANTAGES
Small footprint
Complete retention of suspended solids and most
soluble compounds
Independant control of hydraulic and solid retention
times
Ability for slow-growing species to flourish (nitrifying bacteria,
etc.)
Effluent disinfection
SYSTEM DISADVANTAGES
Membrane costs
High capital costs
Membrane complexity
Membrane fouling
LEADING MANUFACTURERS
Zenon Environmental Inc. (CANADA)
General Electric
Mitsubishi Rayon Cooperation (JAPAN)
Kubota Cooperation (JAPAN)Flat Plate
US Filter (USA)
Hollow Fiber
IMPORTANT POINTS
AIR SUPPLY
Air suply:
For biological process
For cleaning the membrane to prevent fouling
(Judd, 2006)