Design Studio Integration (Calculations)
Design Studio Integration (Calculations)
Eo
) to available
Eo
, outdoor
daylight factor concept is applicable only where the sky luminance distribution is known
or can reasonably be estimated. In this scenario, the average daylight level in Malaysia
E
) = 11250 lux
E
E
= 56.25% (x0.1)
= 5.62%
) = 11970 lux
E
E
= 59.85% (x0.1)
= 5.98%
Daylight Factor(%)
<2
2-5
Zone
Not adequately lit
Adequately lit
>5
Well lit
Distribution
Artificial lighting is needed
Artificial lighting may be
used for part of the day
Artificial lighting is not
required except at dawn,
but glare problem may
happen
Both of the area have daylight factors of 5.62% and 5.98% respectively, which is bright
and sufficient for the market activities.
1.2 Artificial Lighting
Lighting Standard MS1525 : 2007
Philips ST422B
15
2700
Warm White
3300 lm
Lumen Method
Location
Dimension of Room, L x W
2
Total Floor Area (m )
Mounting Height,
Hm
69.85
(m)
Room Index, K
Utilization Factor(UF)
Maintenance Factor(MF)
Standard Illuminance Level Required(lux)
Number of Fittings Required, N
12.7 x 5.5
( 12.7+ 5.5 ) x 2.5
= 1.54
0.44
0.75
500
For recessed down light,
ExA
N = F x UF x MF
=
500 x 69.85
3300 x 0.44 x 0.75
= 32
1 69.85
2.5
32
= 0.59
SHR =
Fittings Layout by approximately(m)
S
H
= 0.59
5.5
1.48
= 3.72
= 4 rows
Therefore, approximately 9 x 4 = 36 units
of luminaires required.
To achieve an uniform lighting arrangement throughout the L-shaped food kiosk, a total
of 60 recessed downlights are used.
Color Temperature, K
Color Designation
Lumens
2700
Warm White
1200 lm
Lumen Method
Location
Dimension of Room, L x W
2
Total Floor Area (m )
Mounting Height,
Hm
(m)
Room Index, K
Utilization Factor(UF)
Maintenance Factor(MF)
Standard Illuminance Level Required(lux)
Number of Fittings Required, N
14.16 x 6.5
(14.16+6.5) x 2.5
= 1.78
0.44
0.75
500
For fluorescent light,
ExA
N = F x UF x MF
=
500 x 92.04
1200 x 0.44 x 0.75
= 116.2
= 116
1 16
4
= 29
1 A
Hm N
SHR =
1 92.04
2.5
29
= 0.71
SHR =
Fittings Layout by approximately(m)
S
H
= 0.71
To achieve an uniform lighting arrangement throughout the L-shaped fruit kiosk, a total
of 41 track lights are used.
(m 2)
135.9
Volume of Zone
(m3)
461.9
Occupancy
Assume that,
Peak hour : 50 people
Non peak hour : 20 people
25
Material
Function
Plaster
Brick
Timber
Timber
Ceiling
Wall
Floor Finishing
Laminated
Table
Timber
Chair
Air
Total Sound Absorption by Materials
Time
Peak Hour
Non Peak Hour
Number of
People
50
20
Sound
Absorption(sa)
135.9
172
135.9
30
Absorption
Coefficientin
2000 Hz(s)
0.04
0.05
0.1
0.15
14
135.9
0.1
0.07
1.4
9.5
43
Area( m
Absorption Coefficient
in 2000Hz(s)
0.5
0.5
5.4
8.6
13.6
4.5
Sound Absorption(sa)
25
10
According to the tables above, the total sound absorption at fresh cut fruits kiosk at
2000Hz during peak hour and non peak hour are 68sa and 53sa respectively.
= 1.39s
The reverberation time for fresh cut fruits area during peak hour is 1.09s. According to
Acoustic Standard ANSI(2008), the reverberation time of fresh cut fruits area during
peak hour has already exceed the optimum reverberation time that is below 1.2s.
The reverberation time for fresh cut fruits area during non peak hour is 1.39s, which has
also exceed the optimum reverberation time, 1.2s.
In order to reduce the reverberation time, acoustic tiles with 0.6 absorption coefficient
acts as the finishing wall.
Material
Function
Plaster
Brick
Acoustic Tiles
Timber
Timber
Ceiling
Wall
Finishes
Floor Finishing
Laminated
Table
Chair
-
Timber
Air
Sound
Absorption(sa)
135.9
172-x
x
135.9
30
Absorption
Coefficientin
2000 Hz(s)
0.04
0.05
0.6
0.1
0.15
14
135.9
0.1
0.07
1.4
9.5
Area( m
5.4
8.6-0.05x
0.6x
13.6
4.5
Number of
Absorption Coefficient
People
in 2000Hz(s)
Peak Hour
50
0.5
Non Peak Hour
20
0.5
Assume reverberation time required for non peak hour is 1.2s.
43+0.55x
Sound Absorption(sa)
25
10
x = 15.62 m
2
Hence, 15.62 m area of acoustic tiles are needed in order to achieve reverberation
time of 1.2s, even though during peak hour, which is within the ANSI requirements.
Material to Reduce Reverberation Time - Acoustic Tiles
Acoustic tile decreases the volume of the room, resulting in shorter reverberation time,
and the tiles will absorb rather than reflect the sound. Acoustic tiles with a Noise
Reduction Coefficient (NRC) of 0.75 or better is recommended as the higher the
number, the better it is. The installation absorbs 65% of the noise in a room, creating a
quieter space.
2.2 Combined Sound Pressure Level - First Floor Fresh Cut Fruits Kiosk
The sound level assumption are made during peak hour(9am) where fruit business and
eateries are having high human activities, and non peak hour(2pm), lower number of
occupant in the market. Noise sources have been categorized as external traffic noise
and internal noises that creates by human activities within the market.
Peak Hour(9am)
(i) External Noise Sources
Sound penetrate from main road : 82 dB
Back Alley : 60 dB
Combined SPL for external noise sources:
82 = 10 log (
log
I mainroad
(I mainroad /1 x 1012)
(I mainroad /1 x 1012 )
I o
= 8.2
= antilog 8.2
60 = 10 log (
log
1.58 x 104
I backalley
I o
(I backalley /1 x 1012) = 6
12
) = antilog 6
12
) = 1 x 106
(I backalley /1 x 10
(I backalley /1 x 10
I backalley =
1 x 106
Total intensities,
SPLexternal
I external
1.58 x 104
1.59 x 104
= 10 log ( I external / I o
4
12
= 10 log( 1.59 x 10 /1 x 10
= 82.01 dB
6
+ 1 x 10
73 = 10 log (
log
I kiosk
(I kiosk /1 x 1012)
12
12
) =
(I kiosk /1 x 10
(I kiosk /1 x 10
I kiosk
= 7.3
= antilog 7.3
2.0 x 107
2.0 x 105
65 = 10 log (
log
I o
I seating
(I seating /1 x 10
12
I o
) = 6.5
3.16 x 10
I seating =
3.16 x 106
Total intensities,
SPLinternal
I internal
2.0 x 105
2.32 x 105
6
+ 3.16 x 10
= 10 log ( I internal / I o
5
12
= 10 log( 2.32 x 10 /1 x 10
= 73.65 dB
Total intensities,
SPL total
I total
I external
I internal
+
4
1.59 x 10
1. 82 x 10
+ 2.32 x 10
= 10 log ( I total / I o
4
= 10 log ( 1.82 x 10
12
/ 1 x 10
= 82.6 dB
70 = 10 log (
log
I mainroad
(I mainroad /1 x 1012 )
I o
=7
= antilog 7
I mainroad =
1 x 105
57 = 10 log (
I backalley
log
I o
5.01 x 10
Total intensities,
SPLexternal
I external
1 x 10
+ 5.01 x 10
1.05 x 105
= 10 log ( I external / I o
5
12
= 10 log( 1.05 x 10 /1 x 10
= 70.21 dB
62 = 10 log (
I kiosk
I o
log
12
(I kiosk /1 x 10
(I kiosk /1 x 1012)
12
(I kiosk /1 x 10
I kiosk
= 6.2
= antilog 6.2
) =
1.58 x 10
56 = 10 log (
log
I seating
1.58 x 10 6
6
I o
3.98 x 107
Total intensities,
SPLinternal
I internal
1.58 x 106 +
1.98 x 106
= 10 log ( I internal / I o
6
12
= 10 log( 1.98 x 10 /1 x 10
= 62.97 dB
3.98 x 107
Total intensities,
SPL total
I total
I external
1.05 x 105 +
1.25 x 105
I internal
1.98 x 106
= 10 log ( I total / I o
5
12
= 10 log ( 1.25 x 10
/ 1 x 10
)
= 70.97 dB
The use of perforated steel metal panel acts as the facade of the building, which forms
sound barriers due to the reflective material, noise will be bounce off, but is not
eliminated. Barriers incorporating absorptive materials mitigate sound waves, and
protect hearing and health. These barriers have a layer of absorbing material and air
beneath the perforated metal panel.
Material
Area( m
SRI(dB)
Brick Wall
54.4
42
Steel Panel
Window
14.2
45
Brick Wall
SRI = 10 log (1/T)
42 = 10 log (1/
T brick
T brick
)
)
105
= 6.31 x
T brick
T overall
= 3.16 x
T brick
10
= 5.66 x
68.6
5
10
Transmission Coefficient of
Material
5
6.31 x 10
5
3.16 x 10
SRI overall
= 10
= 10
log 10
log 10
1
5.66 x 105
17667.84
= 42.47dB
The overall transmission loss from the main road to the mezzanine fruit kiosk is
42.47dB, which means that the amount of sound vibration generated inside will
deducted by 42.47dB before transmitting through the walls or windows to the exterior,
and vice versa, The external noise at the main road is 82dB during peak hour, therefore,
the total sound level transmitted from main road junction to the interior of mezzanine
fruit kiosk is 82dB- 42.47dB = 39.53dB.
References
Cavanaugh, W. (2010). Architectural Acoustic. New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons.
Departments of Standards Malaysia. (2007) Malaysian Standard MS1525. (1st Edition)
Descottes, H. (2011). Architectural Lighting Designing with Light and Space. New York ;
Princeton Architectural Press.
Karlen, M., & Benya. J. (2004). Lighting Design Basics. Hoboken, New Jersey : John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Storey, S. (2002). Lighting Design. London : Pavilion Books.