+ 4 + 2 + I I 1 + I I 2 + 3: University of Santa Clara, Santa Clara CA 95053
+ 4 + 2 + I I 1 + I I 2 + 3: University of Santa Clara, Santa Clara CA 95053
276
University
of Santa Clara,
Mathematics
5 ( 2 ) , October, 1980.
and
the
"*'
()+4(^)+("32)--)
+ ii
("t1)+iiri2)+(":3)-'-
etc. See [2], for example. But there is another way to get the squares out of
Pascal's Triangle, and this is not so well known:
(j)+a)*(?)*a)-'.-.(":,)+("2V(T)+(")--'-
1981]
277
2
2
2
2
2
11
13
15
17
19
64
81
5
14
30
55
91
140
25
49
16
36
6
20
50
105
196
1
1
7
27
77
182
8
35
112
1
1
9
44
156
1
10
54
1
11
where J(n, k) is the Implicit Triangle entry in the nth row, kth diagonal,
n = 1, 2, 3, ..., Zc = 0, 1, 2, 3, ... .
(The zeroth row is missing from this new triangle.)
278
[Aug.
I(n
- 1, k - 1) + I(n
- 1, k) = I(n9
k).
-i.>'-+*<-i.-{'l:l)*ti:l)*(i:l)
+ (r-3
+ e: ?M\-VC:: D+ (V)
-(Z:a*'(Z:iHi;:;MV)
-(:?) ( V M S :;)("*-')
= T(n, Zc).
This is not really surprising, since the Implicit entries are linear combinations of Pascal entries, and these linear combinations carry along the properties of Pascal's Triangle.
Tko.on.2m 2 {"ChAAJi>m(U Stocking Tke.on.em")'*
k+r
Tke.on.em")
k=n
I(n9
P) =
( - l ) k " 2 , " 1 J ( n + 1,
k).
k=r+l
I(n
- k, k)
=Fn+2.
k=0
( exploits the fact that proceeding up a diagonal we eventually get all O's.)
Tkconem 5 (" Attcnncuting
n+1
(-l)*J(n, k) = 0, n = 2, 3, 4, ... .
k=o
Vnoo^k*- All of these theorems follow from the fact that the Implicit entries are linear combinations of the Pascal entries.
And then there are properties different from, but analogous to, properties
of Pascal's Triangle. For examples,
Tkconem 6 {"Luc<u Hambcn Tkconem");
]T l(n
k=0
- ks n + 1 - Ik) =
Lk+1.
1981]
279
J^I(n9
k=o
Vtioofa.
Both of t h e s e theorems may be proved j u s t a s t h e i r a n a l o g u e s a r e
proved f o r P a s c a l ' s T r i a n g l e . Theorem 7 may be proved v e r y e a s i l y w i t h t h e a i d
of Theorem 8.
ThdOKOm S ["Co&&&sL(U.2.nt Tkzotiejfn")'
e x p a n s i o n of (2x + 1) (as + l ) n _ 1 e
I(n9
k)
i s the coefficient
of xn~k
in the
we can see that the Implicit Triangle is formed from the binomial coefficients
of two overlapping Pascal Triangles:
- = U)+(V)-
+ l ) n ~ 1 = x(x + l ) n _ 1 + (x + l ) n .
(a + 1)
a
a
a
a
a
(3a + 1)
(4a + 1)
(5a + 1)
(2a + 1)
(a + 2)
(3a + 3)
(6a + 4)
(a + 3)
(4a + 6)
(a + 4)
(a + 5)
k) = G(n - 1, k - 1) + G(n - 1, k)
G(n9 0) = a9 G(rc, n) = 1;
xn~k
P/LOO^: The Generalized Implicit Triangle is again just the overlap of Pascal flT7frTangle and Pascal's Triangle with every entry multiplied by a - 1. The
theorem follows from the identity
(ax + l)(x
+ I)"1-1
= (x + l) n + (a - l)x(x
+ l)n-1.
Since each entry of the Generalized Implicit Triangle is a linear combination of entries from Pascal's Triangle9 those foregoing theorems whose proofs
were based on linear combinations will hold in the general cases with appropriate modifications; for example5 the row sums will be of the form 2n~ (a + 1).
280
[Aug.
Had Vern Hoggatt been able to coauthor this article he would no doubt have
found many more results. Perhaps our readers will celebrate his memory by
looking for further results themselves.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
University
of Evansville,
Evansville
IN 47702
are understood
for all n, and we write an ^ un if (1) holds for some B and all n,
Suppose r is any irrational number and s is any real number. Put
cm = [mr - s] = the greatest integer less than or equal to mr -
s,