Dynamic Simulation and Chemical Engineering
Dynamic Simulation and Chemical Engineering
Simulation
and
Chemical
Engineering
DOCUMENT HISTORY
This document is based on the presentation of Kyriakopoulou, D., Poulou, S. and Athanassiou, V. in the 3rd Pan-Hellenic Chemical Engineering Conference. 31 May - 2 June
2001.
For comments on this document please contact Dr. Vassilis Harismiadis
([email protected]).
OWNERSHIP
This document, the concepts, ideas, designs and commercial offers included therein are
the sole property of Hyperion Systems Engineering Ltd.
Copyright 2006, Hyperion Systems Engineering, All rights reserved
1 SUMMARY
In dynamic simulation, natural and chemical phenomena are expressed with algebraic and
differential equations based on engineering principles. The mathematical models created
are used for analysing how process behaviour varies with time. For the typical case of a
process industry, we describe/model the plant subunits and their regulatory control. The
relevant equations are solved repeatedly in the time domain and the values of temperature, pressure, flow and composition as well as the valve openings and the process control
system output are calculated at every point of interest. Thus, the interactions between the
process subunits can become obvious. Further, the process reaction to disturbances (such
as feed variation, instruments failure or change of operation strategy) can be fully investigated.
2 INTRODUCTION
Many of the operations in the Process Industry are naturally dynamic, such as the start-up
and shutdown of a unit, the changeover from one product to another, the operation of
batch reactors or adsorption/regeneration trains etc. Actually, it is practically impossible for
a process unit to operate under strictly constant conditions (steady state). On the other
hand, the industrial process units are becoming increasingly complex with applications of
new technologies that include thermal integration, modern process design and advanced
process control systems. The units are required to operate non-stop for longer periods of
time at optimal conditions. The need for flexibility, regarding processes or equipment, continuously increases. It is, further, well known that big and fast changes in the plant operating conditions should be avoided, since the effects of moving from one operational region
to another can be unanticipated and possibly dangerous. Thus, one need to be aware of
the danger zones and when these occur.
In brief, the behaviour of the process unit on the whole is not a simple sum of the plants
subunits actions. Safety, environmental, and economic factors highlight the importance of
understanding the design and operating of the plant, as well as the sufficient training of the
plant personnel at a time of an ever-increasing worldwide need for highly qualified and capable operators. Dynamic simulation is the only economically effective solution to these
needs, since it yields a lot more information than what traditional steady state simulation
offers. This is because dynamic simulation allows us to study a plants behaviour in a wide
range of operation conditions, like during start-up or shutdown. Further, it can incorporate
algorithms describing the process unit safety or regulatory control philosophy. Thus, it is
possible to use a dynamic model for the investigation and improved understanding of the
unit's behaviour based on design or operational data.
3.1
3.2
Operation Optimisation
A dynamic model of a process unit can be use to optimise operations. Some typical examples are:
Creating, testing and verifying procedures for the safe start-up and shutdown of the
process or for the minimisation of time that plant equipment stays out of operation.
Finding ways to move the plant operation to equally feasible and safe but more profitable conditions.
Addition of new process lines, before or after start up, for improved plant controllability
during transients.
3.3
The process design can be relatively easily modified and troubleshot with a dynamic simulator.
Technical assessment of alternative design solutions.
Dynamic studies: Analysis of
controllability, de-bottlenecking,
depressurising, feed differentiation effects etc.
Determination of characteristic
equipment parameters (instrument minimum sampling time or
permissible noise levels, controller tuning parameters, control
valves characteristics etc.)
Compressor performance verification and avoiding compressor
surge.
Effects to plant controllability
due to equipment modifications.
3.4
Rapid assessment of
alternative solutions to
what-if scenarios.
Achievement of optimal
plant conditions, after
an
unanticipated
change.
Incident investigation
and procedures for future prevention.
Estimation of functional
parameters for instrumentation.
3.5
4 REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
Nisenfeld A. E., 1982. Principles of Operation and Control, ISA, Monograph Series 3.
AspenTech Modelling Philosophy, 1998. AspenTech Ltd.
Gas Injection Plant, 1997. SAST Ltd.
CYPRUS
Hyperion Systems Engineering Ltd.
Nimeli Court, 1st Floor, 41-43 Agiou Nicolaou Street,
CY-2408 Nicosia, Cyprus
Tel: +357.22.840700, Fax: +357.22.590009
UK
Broner Metals Solutions Ltd
UTH
HTU
UTH
GREECE
Hyperion Systems Engineering SA
10 12 Doryleou Street GR-11521 Athens, Greece
Tel: +30.210.8704900, Fax: +30.210.6433368
RUSSIA
OOO Hyperion Systems Engineering (RUS)
7, Korovy Val Street, Entrance 1, Office 9, 117049 Moscow, Russia
Telephone: +7095.5040477 Fax: +7095.5040478
BAHRAIN
Hyperion Systems Engineering Co. W.L.L.
Diplomat Tower, Building 315, 9th Floor, Office No 905, Road 1705, Block 317,
Manama, Diplomatic Area, Kingdom of Bahrain
Tel: +973.17.531270, Fax: +973.17.531271
INDIA
Hyperion Systems Engineering (India) Private Limited
Gandhi Empire, Plot No 2, S. No 595/1, 5th Floor, Sareen Estate
Kondawa Rd, Mouji Munjeri, Bibewadi, Pune-411040, India
Tel: +91.20. 39845800, Fax: +91.20. 39845900
e-mail: [email protected]
Web site: www.hyperion.com.cy
HTU
HTU
UTH
UTH