LID Handbook
LID Handbook
LID Handbook
HANDBOOK DEVELOPMENT
This document was prepared by the County of San Diego, Department of Planning and
Land Use (DPLU), MSCP Watershed Planning Program, in coordination with the staff of
several departments within the County. The LID Handbook Project Team consisted of
the following:
Project Management/Research
Christine A. Sloan, M.S.
LID Project Manager
Carter Jessop
Student Intern
Naomi Trejo
Student Intern
Project Direction/Technical Oversight
Thomas Oberbauer
Chief, Land Use
Joseph M. DeStefano II, MSE, CPP
Land Use/Env. Planning Manager
Please note:
The mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use by the County of San Diego.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
While this document was prepared by Staff of the County of San Diego, the preparation
of this handbook would not have been possible without the contribution of many experts
from the planning, design, development, and environmental professions.
We would like to extend our appreciation to the Bay Area Stormwater Management
Agencies Association and to Patrice Dawe, AIA, AICP. This document was primarily
adapted from BASMAAs Start at the Source Manual (1999) [1]. The drawings
contained in this document were created by Patric Dawe unless otherwise noted. In
addition, we would like to thank EOA, Incorporated for the use of select images.
The County especially would like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance provided by
the members of the LID Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). We are grateful for the
committees time commitment and all of the comments, multiple revisions, and
suggestions provided by the TAC in preparation of this document.
FINAL
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Scott Molloy, PE
County of San Diego
Department of Planning & Land Use
Matt Moore, PE
URS Corporation
Eric Brennecke, PE
County of San Diego
Department of Public Works
Jim Nabong
City of San Diego
Ron Coss
Sean ONeill
Bob Eisele
Janet Park
Tina Fransson
David Pohl
Karen Franz
San Diego Coastkeeper
Todd Galarneau
Mark Principe, PE
County of San Diego
Department of Public Works
Rob Hawk
Chris Kloss
The LID Center
Tom Langpap
Geocon Incorporated
FINAL
David Timber
County of San Diego
Department of General Services
Cid Tesoro, PE
County of San Diego
Department of Public Works
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 1
Section 1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Purpose and Organization of the LID Handbook ............................................... 1
1.2.
Stormwater Management .................................................................................... 3
1.2.1.
Background ................................................................................................. 3
1.2.2.
State and Federal Stormwater Regulations ................................................. 6
1.2.3.
Stormwater Management Plans and BMPs................................................. 6
1.3.
Overview of Low Impact Development (LID) ................................................... 8
1.3.1.
Goals of Low Impact Development............................................................ 9
1.3.2.
Benefits of LID ......................................................................................... 10
1.3.3.
Challenges and Limitations of LID Practices ........................................... 11
1.3.4.
LID and Stormwater Management Planning ............................................ 12
1.3.5.
LID and the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act.............................. 14
1.3.6.
LID and the Multiple Species Conservation Program .............................. 14
1.4.
Summary of LID Considerations in San Diego ................................................ 15
Section 2 Site Planning Practices.................................................................................. 17
2.1.
Site Assessment ................................................................................................ 17
2.2. Site Planning ..................................................................................................... 19
2.2.1.
Conserve Natural Areas, Soils, and Vegetation........................................ 20
2.2.2.
Minimize Disturbances to Natural Drainages........................................... 21
2.2.3.
Minimize and Disconnect Impervious Surfaces ....................................... 22
2.2.4.
Minimize Soil Compaction ....................................................................... 24
2.2.5.
Drain Runoff from Impervious Surfaces to Pervious Areas..................... 25
2.3.
LID Site Design Examples................................................................................ 27
2.3.1.
Residential................................................................................................. 29
2.3.1.1.
Clustered Low-Density Residential Design...................................... 29
2.3.1.2.
Single Residential Lot....................................................................... 30
2.3.1.3.
Multi-Family Residential Site........................................................... 31
2.3.1.4.
Residential Hillside Site.................................................................... 32
2.3.1.5.
Large Residential Flat Site................................................................ 33
2.3.2.
Commercial............................................................................................... 34
2.3.2.1.
Commercial Shopping Center........................................................... 34
2.3.2.2.
Commercial Office buildings............................................................ 35
2.3.2.3.
Commercial Restaurant..................................................................... 36
2.3.3.
Industrial ................................................................................................... 37
2.3.3.1.
Industrial Park................................................................................... 37
Section 3 Integrated Management Practices................................................................. 39
3.1.
Hydrologic Design ............................................................................................ 40
3.1.1.
Infiltration ................................................................................................. 40
3.1.1.1.
Infiltration Trench............................................................................. 41
3.1.1.2.
Infiltration Basin ............................................................................... 41
3.1.2.
Retention and Detention ........................................................................... 42
3.1.2.1.
Extended Detention (dry) Ponds....................................................... 43
3.1.3.
Biofilters ................................................................................................... 43
3.1.3.1.
Vegetated Swales / Rock Swales ...................................................... 44
3.1.3.2.
Vegetated Filter Strips ...................................................................... 44
FINAL DRAFT
-i-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
3.1.3.3.
Sand Filters ....................................................................................... 44
3.1.3.4.
Bioretention....................................................................................... 45
3.2.
Permeable Pavement Design............................................................................. 46
3.2.1.
Pervious Concrete ..................................................................................... 47
3.2.2.
Permeable Asphalt Concrete (AC)............................................................ 48
3.2.3.
Permeable Pavers ...................................................................................... 48
3.2.3.1.
Open Cell Unit Paver ........................................................................ 49
3.2.3.2.
Brick Pavers ...................................................................................... 49
3.2.3.3.
Natural Stone Pavers......................................................................... 50
3.2.3.4.
Concrete Unit Pavers ........................................................................ 50
3.2.4.
Subsurface Reservoir Bed......................................................................... 51
3.2.5.
Granular materials..................................................................................... 51
3.3.
LID Road Design .............................................................................................. 52
3.3.1.
Public Road Standards .............................................................................. 55
3.3.2.
Private Road Standards ............................................................................. 55
3.3.3.
Curb-Cuts.................................................................................................. 56
3.3.4.
Rural Swale Systems................................................................................. 56
3.3.5.
Concave Median ....................................................................................... 57
3.3.6.
Cul-de-sac Design..................................................................................... 57
3.4.
LID Parking Lot Design.................................................................................... 58
3.5. LID Driveway, Sidewalk, and Bike Path Design ............................................. 60
3.6.
LID Building Design......................................................................................... 63
3.6.1.
Dry-Well ................................................................................................... 63
3.6.2.
Rain Water Harvesting.............................................................................. 64
3.6.2.1.
Cisterns & Rain Barrels .................................................................... 64
3.6.2.2.
Large Scale Harvesting ..................................................................... 65
3.6.3.
Foundation Planting .................................................................................. 65
3.6.4.
Downspout to Swale ................................................................................. 65
3.6.5.
Vegetated Roofs........................................................................................ 65
3.7.
LID Landscaping Design .................................................................................. 67
3.7.1.
Soil Amendments...................................................................................... 68
3.7.2.
Street Trees ............................................................................................... 69
3.7.3.
Plant Species Selection for Infiltration Areas........................................... 69
3.7.4.
Landscape Maintenance for Stormwater Systems .................................... 70
Appendix 1 Glossary
Appendix 2 Bibliography
Appendix 3 San Diego LID Considerations
Appendix 4 Technical Fact Sheets
FINAL DRAFT
- ii -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Executive Summary
Urban runoff pollution is commonly considered the nations number one water quality
problem [2, 3]. Stormwater issues have increasingly become a key consideration in land
use planning and development over the last several years in San Diego County. The San
Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board) first approved San Diegos
Municipal Stormwater Permit in 1990 (Order No. 90-42) and renewed the permit in 2001
(Order No. 2001-01), which required all jurisdictions to develop and implement a
stormwater program. On January 24, 2007, the Board adopted the revised Municipal
Stormwater Permit (Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No.
R9-2007-0001) [4]. The revised permit contains standards and requirements which are
intended to further reduce the pollution that enters local streams, creeks, bays and
beaches. San Diego County jurisdictions are mandated by the permit to regulate new and
existing development and redevelopments (that add or increase impervious cover by
5,000 sq. ft.) to comply with stormwater requirements.
As part of the revised Municipal Stormwater Permit [4], San Diego jurisdictions must
initially encourage developments to incorporate minimal Low Impact Development
(LID) techniques into Priority Development Projects by January 2008. During this initial
phase the LID Handbook will serve as the guidance structure for these LID techniques
and the initial LID projects that will be monitored as LID standards and criteria are being
developed in the region. San Diego jurisdictions will collectively establish feasibility and
applicability criteria and develop specific LID requirements over the next couple years.
Once these specific criteria and requirements have been established and accepted by the
Board, the jurisdictions will have one year to incorporate the new LID requirements into
their local codes and ordinances. Therefore, by the year 2010, the County and other local
jurisdictions will each have an updated stormwater program with a comprehensive list of
BMPs, including the new LID standards and criteria.
The Permit is a product of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) [5]. The CWA passed in
1972 and was expanded to include stormwater regulation in 1990, making it illegal to
discharge pollutants into waterways. The Board is responsible for ensuring that federal
and state water regulations are implemented at the local level.
Stormwater runoff (also known as urban runoff in populated areas) is defined as
rainwater that flows over land, roofs & pavements and then enters our stormwater
infrastructure, i.e. our gutters and storm drains. It is important to note here, that all public
storm drains in San Diego (west of the Tecate Divide) drain directly to our beaches
without any wastewater treatment. As stormwater runoff flows over various structures
and pavement, the water picks up and carries sediments and pollutants such as pesticides,
fertilizers, oils, metals, bacteria, and animal feces down to our streams, lagoons, bays and
beaches.
For the above reasons, on-site stormwater management has become one of the critical
elements for preventing pollution from entering our storm drains. The County of San
Diego is required to reduce the discharge of pollutants in urban runoff to the maximum
FINAL DRAFT
ES-1
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL DRAFT
ES-2
12/31/2007
Section 1
LID Handbook
Introduction
FINAL
-1-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
must not be located within 100 feet of a building foundation or drinking water well as
required by the Stormwater Standards Manual. This standard would preclude the use of
LID on most sites and therefore it will need to be changed to allow for new LID
solutions, including those identified in this manual. Any and all specific LID solutions
must be designed and reviewed by a qualified and licensed professional before they can
be incorporated into a development project.
The LID Handbook should be the first guidance document referenced during the
development planning process. This includes new development or redevelopment (net
addition of less than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface, and/or less than 1 acre of
land disturbance) of residential, commercial, industrial, civic (e.g. parks and churches), or
public works projects. The LID Handbook should be used to reference LID planning
policies and procedures and general site designs for reducing stormwater quality impacts
from new development and redevelopment projects. Once a conceptual LID site plan is
developed, stormwater treatment, storm drainage and flood control facilities should be
designed based on the design criteria presented in the current version of the Stormwater
Standards Manual. During the construction phase, Best Management Practices (BMPs)
should be employed to comply with the San Diego County Watershed Protection,
Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (WPO) [7].
Section 2
Section 3
Provides a brief discussion of LID Integrated Management Practices (onsite LID techniques).
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Contains important Fact Sheets for specific design considerations for each
LID technique.
FINAL
-2-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Stream Response
Increased storm flow volume and frequency
FINAL
Channel erosion
Increased fine sediment and urban water
pollutant loads
Increased fish passage barriers
Reduced intergravel dissolved oxygen levels in
streambed
Loss of macroinvertebrate habitat
Reduced delivery of woody debris
Reduced bank stability and loss of bank habitat
structure and complexity
Reduced shading and temperature control
Reduced channel stability, sediment storage, in
stream cover for fish and insects, loss of pool
quality and quantity
-3-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Stream Response
Synthetic organic compounds and trace
elements: some acutely toxic; negative health
effects in fish; altered spawning and migration
of fish in presence of metals.
Nutrients: excessive aquatic plant growth;
excessive diurnal oxygen fluctuations
Synergistic influence of multiple pollutants
unknown
Around the country conventional development has resulted in increased runoff rates,
volumes, and increased flooding potential. Additionally, conventional development,
together with previous storm drain system design methods which did not provide storm
water quality treatment, resulted in the direct transport of pollutants to local streams,
rivers, lakes, lagoons, bays, and the Pacific Ocean. Urban development creates new
pollution sources as human population density increases and brings with it
proportionately higher levels of vehicle emissions and maintenance waste, municipal
sewage, pesticides, household hazardous waste, pet waste, trash, etc. which is either
washed or directly dumped into the storm drains [4]. Individually, residential homes and
businesses typically contribute relatively small amounts of runoff and pollutants.
However, numerous studies have shown that the collective discharge of untreated runoff
from large areas of conventional residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal
development often results in significant environmental impacts to local water resources
[13].
The volume and rate of runoff and the potential to transport pollutants to local water
bodies depends on a variety of factors, including developed and proposed land use and
management practices, and existing climatic, hydrologic and geologic conditions within a
drainage area. Numerous studies have shown that small storms, which occur more
frequently than relatively large storms, typically transport the greatest load of pollutants
to local water bodies [13]. In addition, the majority of pollutants are typically transported
during the first flush portion of a runoff event, which is often considered to be the first
half-inch of a storm event. Therefore, the sizing of structural treatment controls and LID
practices is most efficient and cost effective when they are designed to capture and treat
the most frequently occurring storm events as well as the first flush portion of runoff
producing storm events.
FINAL
-4-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Conventional Approach
LID Approach
Roof Runoff
Stormwater
Runoff
Allotment Runoff
Retention
rainwater tanks,
raingardens,
vegetated swales
Water Reuse
Conveyance
Road Runoff
At Source
Conveyance
curbs & gutters, pipes, drains
In route
Receiving Waters
Receiving Waters
Outfall
Improvements in stormwater management have been made in the County of San Diego
since 2001 with the passing of the first Stormwater Municipal Permit. Additional
stormwater improvements are now required as defined in the revised Stormwater
Municipal Permit in 2007 [4]. With the addition of almost one million new residents in
the San Diego region by 2030 [14], new development and redevelopment in San Diego
County will continue to present challenges for stormwater treatment and management. In
addition to the NPDES stormwater permit requirements discussed in Section 1.2.2;
effective management of both the quantity and quality of stormwater is vital to the longterm economic growth and quality of life in the County of San Diego. With the current
knowledge that conventional storm drainage systems are responsible for the degradation
of many of the nations water bodies, stormwater quality management must now also be
considered in the design of storm drainage for new development and redevelopment.
FINAL
-5-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
-6-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
In order to comply with the CWA, the state Water Code, and the above mentioned
County Ordinances, the County requires that property owners complete a Stormwater
Management Plan (SWMP) prior to issuance of any permit. The purpose of a SWMP is
to document Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented to prevent
pollutants from entering stormwater conveyances and receiving waters.
Construction projects with a disturbed area of greater than 1-acre, must also prepare a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in order to receive a construction
permit. In a typical project, a SWPPP is a document consisting of narrative and a
separate sheet within the construction document set, usually in the Civil Engineering or
Landscape series, that outlines both a plan to control stormwater pollution during
construction (temporary controls) and after construction is completed (the permanent
constructed stormwater pollution prevention elements). The permanent controls are
usually found on the sheet within the construction documents.
The most economical and effective stormwater treatment and management strategies
arise in site planning and design. This document emphasizes ways to reduce the creation
of new runoff, and to infiltrate or detain runoff in the landscape.
LID Integrated Management Practices (IMPs) go beyond the previous set of stormwater
BMPs by requiring a new way of thinking about impervious land coverage and
stormwater management. They are a collection of proven methods and techniques that
integrate stormwater management into planning and design; reducing the overall
runoff, managing stormwater as a resource, and focusing filtration at the source.
LID practices are ecological structural controls and are therefore considered BMPs.
Planning and implementation of BMPs to protect surface water quality is required under
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit issued
to the unincorporated County of San Diego, incorporated cities, Port of San Diego and
Regional Airport Authority [4]. These permits require the county and cities to control
pollutants in stormwater discharges to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) and to
reduce pollutants to a level compatible with the beneficial uses designated for the
receiving waters.
FINAL
-7-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Principles of LID
Conserve natural resources that provide valuable natural functions
associated with controlling and filtering stormwater
Minimize & disconnect impervious surfaces
Direct runoff to natural and landscaped areas conducive to infiltration
Use distributed small-scale controls or Integrated Management Practices
(IMPs) to mimic the sites pre-project hydrology
Stormwater education leads to pollution prevention
LID is a stormwater management and design strategy that is integrated into design of the
development project. LID complements other urban planning techniques such as Smart
Growth Green Building and Sustainable Development by focusing on alternative
approaches to stormwater runoff management and treatment. Smart Growth and
Sustainable Development are land use planning terms that describe the efforts of
FINAL
-8-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
communities across the country to manage and direct growth in a way that reduces
damage to the environment and builds livable towns and cities. A sustainable community
preserves and enhances the quality of life of residents both within and between
communities, while minimizing local impact on the natural environment. Green or
sustainable building is the practice of creating healthier and more resource-efficient
models of construction, renovation, operation, maintenance, and demolition [15]. By
focusing on the watershed protection aspect of smart growth and sustainable
development, LID can be incorporated into Smart Growth, Green Building and
Sustainable Development practices. LID does not replace local land use planning; rather,
it is a complementary set of planning tools applied at the project level to better manage
stormwater in areas appropriately designated for growth.
Goals of LID
Protect Water Quality
Reduce Runoff
Reduce Impervious Surfaces
Encourage Open Space
Protect Significant Vegetation
Reduce Land Disturbance
Decrease Infrastructure Costs
FINAL
-9-
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Benefits of LID
Protects surface and ground water resources
Reduces non-point source pollution
Reduces habitat degradation
Applicable to greenfield, brownfields, and urban developments
Multiple benefits beyond stormwater (aesthetics, quality-of-life,
air quality, water conservation, property values)
Groundwater recharge (where needed)
Meets Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) and other
stormwater requirements
As new development increases over time, increased impervious area will result, effecting
hydrologic functions such as infiltration, groundwater recharge, and the frequency and
volume of discharges. These natural functions can be maintained with the use of LID
practices, which includes reduced impervious surfaces, functional grading, open channel
sections, disconnection of hydrologic flowpaths, and the use of bioretention/filtration
landscape areas.
In areas where groundwater recharge is desired, LID is beneficial because these practices
facilitate rainwater infiltration. Rainwater infiltration is needed for adequate groundwater
recharge, especially to provide adequate recharge to endure extended drought periods.
Groundwater recharge directly influences local water tables. Local water tables are often
connected to reservoirs as well as streams, providing seepage to streams during dry
periods and maintaining base flow essential to the biological and habitat integrity of
streams. A significant reduction or loss of groundwater recharge can lead to a lowering of
the water table and a reduction of base flow in receiving streams during extended dry
weather periods. Increased impervious area can reduce rainfall infiltration, which can
lead to increased risk of potential impacts from drought. LID practices increase natural
rainfall penetration and natural groundwater recharge, thus reducing potential impacts to
biological habitat and reduced base flow into reservoirs from extended drought periods.
However, in a few San Diego County areas served with municipal drinking water, the
potential for high groundwater exists due to the artificial introduction of imported water
into the groundwater system from septic system and/or irrigation return flows. The
artificial recharge from these sources in some cases may exceed natural pre-development
groundwater recharge. This in turn has caused some natural pre-development ephemeral
FINAL
- 10 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
streams to develop year-round perennial flows. Infiltration devices would not be feasible
in such areas as it could potentially exacerbate already high groundwater conditions and
in some cases contribute to artificial perennial stream flows. In this type of situation, rain
water harvesting in appropriately designed barrels or cisterns would be an appropriate
LID alternative to infiltration.
LID techniques can facilitate and remove stormwater pollutants. The natural processes
employed by LID practices allow pollutants to be filtered or biologically or chemically
degraded before stormwater reaches the water bodies. Section 303(d) of the Clean Water
Act [5] requires each state to set a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for all impaired
waterbodies. A TMDL is the maximum amount of pollution that a waterbody can receive
without violating state water quality standards. For example, Chollas Creek is impaired
for the pesticide Diazinon. Jurisdictions in this watershed must implement BMPs to
reduce Diazinon concentrations that discharge to the creek. To do so, these jurisdictions
plan to use LID practices to reduce impervious area, reduce impacts, and achieve TMDL
goals. The combination of runoff reduction and pollutant removal in LID practices is an
effective means of reducing pollution released to the environment and meeting Clean
Water Act requirements.
FINAL
- 11 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 12 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Multidisciplinary
Design Team
Urban Planner
Hydrologist
Geologist
Biologist
Landscape Architect
Stakeholders
Land Developer
Local Government
Community
Water Authority
Business Industry
Identify
Project
Objectives
LID uses the same strategies as the stormwater standards manual. Strategies fall under
the two broad categories of Planning Practices and Integrated Management Practices
(IMPs).
Common LID Planning Practices include site design planning based on natural land
contours and decreasing the impervious surface. These methods may include:
The basic LID strategy for handling runoff is to reduce the volume and decentralize
flows.
This is usually best accomplished by creating a series of smaller
retention/detention areas that allow localized filtration instead of carrying runoff to a
remote collection area to be treated [19]. These are known as LID Integrated
Management Practices (IMPs). Common LID IMPs include:
Bioretention
Vegetative Roof Systems
Vegetated / Rock Swales
Rain Collection Systems
Filter Strips
Permeable pavement and materials
FINAL
- 13 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Table 2. [20] Presents the variety of runoff management functions provided by the LID
IMPs. A more detailed description is provided in Section 3 and technical Fact Sheets are
provided in Appendix 4.
X
X
X
X
X
X
Water
Quality
Control
Evaporation
X
X
Detention
Infiltration
X
X
Retention
Filtration
IMP
Soil Amendments
Bioretention
Vegetated Filter Strips
/ Buffers
Grassed Swales
Rock Swales
Rain Harvesting
Street Trees
Vegetated Roofs
Permeable Materials
Rock Beds
Slow Runoff
Effect or Function
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
FINAL
- 14 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
natural habitat areas and other open spaces (such as disturbed and agricultural lands) that
can contribute to conservation objectives. The MSCP does not place a moratorium on
development, rather, in these areas an ordinance for addressing biological mitigation
provides incentives to develop in the less sensitive habitat areas and mitigate in the areas
that have been identified for preservation.
One of LIDs planning strategies is to conserve natural areas, soils, and vegetation.
This strategy is in alignment with the goals of MSCP. Developments occurring within
the MSCP may already be meeting a fundamental LID objective by applying this
planning strategy of preserving sensitive lands and drainages. LID techniques specific to
the development projects footprint may still be necessary to achieve the other LID
objectives. On a landscape level, the creation of large preserve areas through
implementation of MSCP and other programs will serve as the foundation for watershed
protection in the San Diego region. Other LID/MSCP scenarios are expected to develop
as the MSCP and LID programs are implemented together and grow to compliment each
other.
FINAL
- 15 -
12/31/2007
Section 2
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 17 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Climate
Avg. Temperature
Avg. Precipitation
Prevailing winds
Areas of full or partial shade
Wildfire Hazard
Water
Water flow
Water quality
Drainage patterns
Riparian Zones
ESA
Flood Hazards
Depth to Groundwater
Seeps and Springs
Site Features
Existing structures noted to be
removed or retained
Location and height of walls/fences
Archeological sites
Easements
Aesthetics of and around the site
Aesthetic qualities on site
Soils
Soil Type
Permeability of soils
Expansive soils
Collapsible soils
Landslides
Depth to topsoil and subsoil
Erosion potential
Geotechnical Hazards
Plants & Habitat
Vegetation type
Evapotranspiration
Existing trees and shrubs
Weed species
Sensitive species
Vegetation to be removed
MSCP lands
Biological Open Space
Park lands, BLM, preserves
FINAL
- 18 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
The following sections define these LID site planning principles and how to apply them
while designing the LID project site plan.
FINAL
- 19 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 20 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 21 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 22 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
permeable asphalt-concrete (AC) are alternative materials that can preserve permeability
where a larger, more intensely used paved area is needed.
Pervious concrete and permeable AC designs can allow for very slow infiltration in areas
with low permeability by adding stone reservoirs under the permeable surfaces. In areas
where infiltration is not appropriate, these reservoirs can be fitted with an under drain to
allow filtration, storage, and evaporation, prior to drainage into the municipal stormwater
system. Urban and infill developments may have limited opportunities to reduce
impervious surfaces, in which case LID techniques such as the application of permeable
pavements with underdrains, raised sidewalks, rain water harvesting with appropriately
designed barrels or cisterns, vegetated roofs/modules/walls, street trees, etc., may be
more appropriate. When applying the strategies above, they must be reflected at all
levels of a project, from site planning to material application in order to ensure proper
implementation and the desired water quality benefit.
Disconnect Impervious Surfaces
Creating permeable surfaces between impermeable surfaces is an effective way to
intercept urban runoff and reduce runoff volumes. This technique can be achieved by
disconnecting continuously paved areas with landscaping and/or permeable materials and
by directing roof runoff into similarly permeable areas, vegetation, soils, and permeable
materials. This technique results in reduced stormwater peak flows and filtration of the
water before it drains to the municipal stormwater system and/or natural watercourses. It
also reduces the amount of runoff which enters the stormdrain or leaves the site as some
of the runoff is infiltrated into the sites permeable areas.
Any impervious surface which drains into a catch basin, drain, or other impermeable
conveyance structure is considered a Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA).
The DCIA is measured by adding together the square footage of all impervious surfaces
(see definition impervious surface area) that flow directly into a conveyance
stormwater system. These impervious surfaces are principally comprised of rooftops and
conventional pavements. Impervious surfaces that flow into a pervious area are not
directly connected to a conveyance system are not included in the calculation. However,
the pervious area receiving the impervious surface runoff must be of appropriate width,
location, slope, and design to effectively treat the runoff [23].
FINAL
- 23 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 24 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 25 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
more aesthetically pleasing and integrated relationship to the natural features of the site
and the projects surroundings. In redevelopment and other site-constrained projects
where the opportunities for surface drainage and surface infiltration systems are limited,
it may be possible to create underground storage systems to promote retention and/or
slow infiltration (e.g. permeable pavements, recharge bed, etc.) prior to releasing runoff
into the municipal stormwater system.
Important Note: Proposed stormwater Infiltration BMPs, including permeable
pavements, shall be reviewed by a qualified, licensed professional to provide a
professional opinion regarding the potential adverse geotechnical conditions created by
the implementation of the plans. Geotechnical conditions such as slope stability,
expansive soils, compressible soils, seepage, groundwater, and loss of foundation or
pavement subgrade strength should be addressed, and where appropriate, mitigation
recommendations should be provided. The impact on existing, proposed, and future
improvements should be included in the review.
FINAL
- 26 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 27 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
combining LID methods such as implementing a grass swale with permeable pavers as
overflow areas and a landscaped bioretention cell. The following pages show examples
of sites utilizing a treatment train approach to LID site-specific design.
Site planning is a complex and demanding process. Proper planning will involve
balancing IMP needs with site constraints as well as other development concerns. To be
successful, a new development must meet marketing, economic, regulatory, engineering,
environmental, construction, and design criteria. The following design examples attempt
to show that by recognizing stormwater as a resource, and making it a primary
consideration in site design, communities can be built to reward the investment, enhance
the natural environment, and create an ideal place for people to live and work.
FINAL
- 28 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
2.3.1. Residential
2.3.1.1.
FINAL
- 29 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
A single-family residential
lot may provide significant
opportunities for stormwater
management.
Because they
occur at the garden
level,
LID solutions can add aesthetic
richness that will directly
benefit the project and the
surrounding
community.
When the ratio of impervious
cover relative to land area is
low, landscape area can
accommodate a variety of
subtle filtration strategies.
Stormwater management
techniques can also provide
habitat for wildlife, create
shade, improve character,
provide
supplemental
irrigation water, and promote growth of landscape planting. When planning a
subdivision of small single family lots, the determination of whether lot-by-lot LID
infiltration solutions are appropriate must be carefully weighed. Consider all physical,
engineering, geotechnical and public health and safety constraints as well as the long
term maintenance and practicality of approaching infiltration at this level. Conserving
natural resources, disconnecting impervious surfaces by pitching driveways towards
yards and allowing roof runoff to run over the lawn before entering the stormdrain, are
infiltration techniques more appropriate for subdivision planning.
Homeowner education is a crucial component of successful stormwater management
techniques at all levels, but especially at the single lot scale. Residents need to be
educated on the purpose, operation, and proper care of various design elements,
particularly those requiring routine maintenance like cisterns which must periodically be
emptied and cleaned. If drywells are used, residents must also understand that they
are for rainwater only never as a place to dump oil, pesticides, paint thinner, solvents,
degreasers, household cleaners or other unwanted wastes.
The techniques for this type of development might include:
Unit pavers-on-sand patio
Not directly connected impervious driveway
Unit pavers-on-sand pathway
Roof downspout to swale
Vegetation for water retention (deep rooted trees)
Herbaceous vegetation at dripline of roof
FINAL
- 30 -
12/31/2007
2.3.1.3.
LID Handbook
Photograph Courtesy
of EOA, Inc.
In urban areas, many of the sites for new construction are infill or redevelopment sites.
These sites usually have higher densities (typically from 12 to 100 units per acre) which
demand a greater proportion of pavement and roof coverage.
Opportunities for on-site stormwater management still exist, even in the most densely
developed infill site, though they will require greater creativity or multiple use of space.
For instance, an underground/under pavement storage reservoir may be created to
promote filtration and stormwater storage prior to release into the municipal stormwater
system.
Urban high rise densities often result in the entire site being covered by buildings with a
minimal amount of landscaping. Although these sites present limited opportunities to
incorporate LID solutions, they are a highly efficient way to develop land and reduce
pressure on rural and undeveloped land. By allowing high density in urban cores (often
referred to as Smart Growth), rural lands can be preserved more effectively allowing a
watershed benefit by reducing impacts to water quality and encouraging groundwater
recharge and habitat conservation.
The techniques illustrated in this example are:
Not directly connected impervious driveway (pitched to lawn)
Turf block fire access road (with fire sign)
Multiuse lawn play area, fire access, and biofiltration
Roof downspout to landscaping
Rain harvesting
Vegetation for water retention (deep rooted trees)
Herbaceous vegetation at dripline of roof
FINAL
- 31 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 32 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 33 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
2.3.2. Commercial
2.3.2.1.
Shopping
centers
present
many
opportunities
for
stormwater
management, especially
in the parking areas.
Infiltration swales and
extended dry detention
basins can
be
incorporated into space
between parking aisles.
Recognizing that much
of the parking is only
necessary
during
peak times, such as the
holiday
season,
a
proportion of outlying
stalls may be paved
with permeable materials.
The utility functions inherent in any shopping center also need attention, such as
restaurant wash-down areas, trash collection areas, and service yards. These outdoor
work areas require specific techniques to prevent polluted runoff from entering the storm
drain system or local water bodies. Similarly, potential hazardous materials use within
the shopping center, i.e. dry cleaning establishments, requires special attention and
treatment. Finally, trash and other storage areas can be properly designed and
constructed to prevent pollutants from running off these areas into the storm drain
system.
If well designed, correctly installed, and properly maintained, stormwater management
techniques can enhance the aesthetic character of a shopping center and improve its
marketability.
The techniques illustrated in this example are:
Vegetated/rock swale along perimeter
Infiltration bed to divide parking aisles1
Permeable pavement parking stalls1
Notched curb to direct runoff from parking area into swale
Catch basin runoff directed to infiltration area1
Covered maintenance yard/service areas
Rain harvesting
1
FINAL
- 34 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 35 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Commercial Restaurant
Restaurants offer a strong contrast between infiltration opportunities and special activity
areas. Careful selection of materials such as brick or stone paving for outdoor patios can
enhance the restaurants aesthetic appeal while allowing for infiltration as appropriate.
Landscape plantings can also be selected for stormwater infiltration.
Parking can be provided in a variety of ways, with hybrid parking lots for staff, who stay
for long shifts, or with landscaped infiltration islands in lots with conventional paving for
patrons, who stay for shorter periods.
In contrast to these infiltration opportunities, restaurants have special activity areas that
need to be isolated from the storm drain system. Grease, stored items, trash, and other
food waste must be kept in properly designed and maintained special activity areas.
Local ordinances may have design guidelines for allowable square footage of covered
and uncovered areas.
The techniques illustrated in this example are:
Permeable pavement patio1
Catch basin runoff directed to infiltration area1
Hybrid parking lot
Vegetation at drip line
Concave landscape areas to infiltrate runoff1
Rain harvesting
Covered outdoor work area (trash, food waste, storage, equipment wash)
1
FINAL
- 36 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
2.3.3. Industrial
2.3.3.1.
Industrial Park
Industrial parks present special challenges when designing for stormwater management.
They usually require large paved areas for truck access and employee parking, and space
is usually limited. They also often have chemical storage and other special activity areas
that require that infiltration techniques are avoided.
Still, there are opportunities to incorporate design details to protect stormwater quality.
These include minimizing impervious surface area through the use of permeable
pavements, infiltration areas to collect runoff, and proper treatment of special activity
areas.
The techniques illustrated in this example are:
Vegetated/rock swale along perimeter
Catch basin runoff directed to infiltration area1
Permeable pavement fire lane
Notched curb to direct runoff from parking area into swale
Rain harvesting
Proper loading dock design
Covered maintenance yard/service areas
1
FINAL
- 37 -
12/31/2007
Section 3
LID Handbook
A variety of Low Impact Development (LID) design concepts and specific engineering
solutions are presented in this chapter and are further detailed as Fact Sheets in
Appendix 4. Each Fact Sheet illustrates an approach to design and construction of
developed areas for increasing stormwater infiltration, providing stormwater retention,
slowing runoff, and/or reducing impervious developed areas. The techniques presented
here are not all-inclusive, and are not appropriate for every site or condition, but it is
anticipated that, once the intent and utility of these design concepts and engineering
solutions are understood, planners and designers will use their ingenuity to develop the
appropriate treatment train of LID strategies consistent with water quality goals.
The various categories or types of development listed in Section 2 present unique
challenges which make certain LID solutions appropriate for some types of development
but not for others. For example, permeable pavement may be an effective and
appropriate solution for a low-rise office building, however, in a high-rise residential or
office building with virtually no part of the site left undeveloped and with parking
provided underground, permeable pavement would not be an effective or appropriate
solution. Additionally, downstream conditions on neighboring properties, manufactured
slopes, the location of structures and utilities among many other design aspects of a
project will present unique challenges for designers and engineers and may make what
are otherwise effective LID solutions inappropriate for the specific site. All LID
infiltration BMPs proposed for a specific project shall be reviewed and approved for
use in the project by the projects geotechnical engineer, civil engineer, or other
qualified licensed professional to avoid the potential for slope failure, water seepage or
migration under structures or on to neighboring property, conflicts with underground
utilities, or other potential conflicts with engineering and design objectives. Project
plans must be designed in accordance with local zoning regulations, ordinances, and
community plans.
Before specific LID solutions can be developed for a particular project, the project
designer must determine the appropriate development category for the project (e.g.,
multifamily residential). Once the designer has determined the appropriate development
category for the project a multitude of specific design considerations must be taken into
account when determining the projects runoff and hydrology conditions. These design
considerations include grading and the creation of slopes, selection of paving materials,
collection and channeling of roof, driveway, parking, and road surface runoff, grading,
soil conditions and the creation of slopes, and many other design aspects of the project.
The individual design aspect of a project may make little difference to the overall
hydrological characteristics of the project, but taken together, these design aspects create
significant changes to the natural hydrology of the project site and, likewise, significant
challenges in meeting stormwater quality goals. Consistent with the concept of starting at
the source, a combination of individual LID solutions may be required for a particular
project which taken collectively effectively mitigate the projects water quality impacts.
FINAL
- 39 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
3.1.1. Infiltration
Infiltration is the process where
water enters the ground and moves
downward through the unsaturated
soil zone. Infiltration is ideal for
management and conservation of
runoff because it filters pollutants
through the soil and restores
natural flows to groundwater and
downstream
water
bodies.
Attenuating
flow
through
infiltration, while
allowing
evaporation and evapotranspiration
is an effective
stormwater
management practice in blocking
the transport of pollutants to
receiving waters. An infiltration system is designed to match pre-development condition
infiltration rates and to infiltrate the majority of runoff from small storms into the soil
rather than discharging it into a surface water body. Infiltration basins can range from a
single shallow depression in a lawn, to an integrated swale, pond, and underground
storage basin network.
Site soil conditions generally determine if infiltration is feasible. In Soil Groups A and B
(see Appendix 3, Section B.1) infiltration is usually acceptable, but it is severely limited
in Soil Groups C and D. It is also limited where high groundwater, steep slopes, or
shallow bedrock is present. The base of an infiltration system must have a vertical
distance of at least 10 feet from the seasonal high groundwater mark (water table).
Infiltration is also not appropriate in or directly above manufactured slopes, where
infiltrated flows could cause slope failures, near building foundations, or where
downstream neighboring properties would be adversely affected.
Infiltration basins can be either open or closed. Open infiltration basins, which include
ponds, swales, and other landscape features, are usually vegetated the vegetation
maintains the porous soil structure, reduces erosion, and utilizes water through
evapotranspiration. In arid regions, Xeriscaped rock-lined basins are common. Closed
infiltration basins can be constructed under the land surface with open graded crushed
stone, leaving the surface to be used for parking or other uses (see Fact Sheet 11).
Subsurface, closed basins are generally more difficult to maintain and more expensive
than surface systems, and are used primarily where high land costs demand that the land
surface be used for economic use.
FINAL
- 40 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Other design considerations include clogging that may occur in very fine or poorly
drained soils and impacts on slope stability if located uphill from hillside sites.
Infiltration basins are best installed at the end of construction, after the site is fully
stabilized. If possible, flows should be bypassed until the site is stabilized, as
construction-related runoff may contain a high proportion of silts that can clog the basin
floor.
Infiltration systems have been used by CALTRANS and local jurisdictions in California
for about three decades [25], though heavy clay soils sometimes limit their local
application. The basic design goal of infiltration systems is to provide opportunities for
rainwater to enter the soil. This is generally accomplished by retarding the flow of
runoff, and by bringing it into contact with the soil, either by holding it in ponds or
subsurface reservoirs or moving it slowly along the ground surface. Infiltration basins
are most economical if placed near the source of runoff, but they should be avoided on
steep, unstable slopes, near building foundations, within 100 feet of water wells, or other
structures.
Infiltration Practices are discussed below:
3.1.1.1.
Infiltration Trench
Infiltration trenches temporarily hold
stormwater runoff within a sub-surface
trench prior to infiltration into the
surrounding soils. An infiltration trench is
similar in function to an infiltration basin
except that an infiltration basins stored
volume is held above ground, while an
infiltration trenchs stored volume is held
below ground.
Photograph: City of Encinitas, Detention/Infiltration Area
FINAL
- 41 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 42 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
3.1.2.1.
Extended Detention (dry) Ponds
Photograph: City of Encinitas, Volleyball Court/ Detention Area
Extended detention (dry) ponds can be
used for both pollutant removal
and flood control. These ponds store
water during storms anywhere from a
day to a few days, discharge it to
adjacent surface waters, and are dry
between
storms.
Clay
or
impervious soils should not affect
pollutant removal effectiveness, as
the main removal mechanism is settling.
Extended detention ponds are generally
appropriate for developments of ten
acres or larger, and have the potential for
multiple uses including flood control
basins, parks, playing fields, tennis courts, open space, and overflow parking lots. It is
important to consider design elements to improve pond safety. Most importantly,
detention basin side slopes should be constructed at 3:1 or flatter. This prevents people
from accidentally falling into deep water.
For more information on Dry Ponds please see Fact Sheet 3 in Appendix 4.
3.1.3. Biofilters
Biofilters can include rock and vegetated swales, filter strips or buffers, sand filters, and
bioretention. Biofilters are effective if flows are slow and depths are shallow. Shallow
and low-velocity flows are generally achieved by grading the site and sloping pavement
in a way that promotes sheet flow of runoff. The slow movement of runoff through
vegetation provides an opportunity for sediments and particulates to be filtered and
degraded through biological activity [25]. In draining soils, the biofilter also provides an
opportunity for stormwater infiltration, which further removes pollutants and reduces
runoff volumes.
Furthermore, biofiltration devices can be designed with soil
amendments to allow for some flow attenuation.
Photograph Courtesy of EOA, Inc.
FINAL
- 43 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
regions of the County, rock swales and Xeriscaping are appropriate to meet State water
conservation goals.
Biofilters are especially applicable to parking lots, parkways, and along highways as the
long aisles can be sloped into linear grass or rock swales to collect and treat runoff from
pavement surfaces. Adjacent pavement elevations should be set slightly higher than the
adjacent biofilter. If water enters at concentrated points, as opposed to sheet flow,
erosion control should be included at inlets and outlets [26].
3.1.3.1.
Vegetated Swales / Rock Swales
Photograph Courtesy of EOA, Inc.
Vegetated or rock swales can be a
particularly effective design strategy in
large conventionally paved parking
lots.
Parking lot drainage can
be integrated with landscaping to
provide
filtration,
evaporation,
infiltration
and
detention
of
stormwater.
Swales provide low
maintenance and act as linear biofilters
along the perimeter of the lot or along
internal islands.
Stormwater is
directed to these linear landscaped
spaces and travels slowly over rocks
and vegetated surfaces, allowing pollutants to settle and slow runoff velocities. Check
dams or gravel weirs can also be added to swales to further slow and spread concentrated
flows.
For more information on Swales please see Fact Sheet 4 in Appendix 4.
3.1.3.2.
Vegetated Filter Strips
Filter strips are areas of either planted or native vegetation, situated between a potential,
pollutant-source area and a surface-water body that receives runoff. The term 'buffer
strip' is sometimes used interchangeably with filter strip. Vegetated filter strips are broad
sloped open vegetated areas that accept shallow runoff from surrounding areas as
distributed or sheet flow.
For more information on Vegetated Filter Strips please see Fact Sheet 5 in Appendix 4.
3.1.3.3.
Sand Filters
Sand filters have proven effective in removing several common pollutants from storm
water runoff. Sand filters generally control storm water quality, providing very limited
flow rate control [27]. The purpose of sand filters is to manage the first flush, which
typically contains the highest concentration of pollutants.
For more information on Sand Filters please see Fact Sheet 6 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 44 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
3.1.3.4.
Bioretention
Bioretention systems are essentially a surface and sub-surface water filtration system. In
function they are similar to sand filters. However, whereas sand filters provide water
quality treatment via passage of stormwater through a sand medium, Bioretention
systems incorporate both plants and underlying filter soils for removal of contaminants.
For more information on Bioretention please see Fact Sheet 7 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 45 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
It must be crushed stone, not rounded river gravel. Rounded river gravel will rotate
under pressure, causing the surface structure to deform. The angular sides of a
crushed stone base will form an interlocking matrix, allowing the surface to remain
stable.
Depending on the use of the surface, a permeable, engineered base section may need to
be added to support the intended load. This pertains to applications subject to heavy
vehicle loads, but is also important for large areas where settling could result in unwanted
puddling on surfaces such as pedestrian walkways.
When used properly, permeable pavement can facilitate biodegradation of the oils from
cars and trucks, help rainwater infiltrate soil, decrease urban heating, replenish
groundwater, allow tree roots to breathe, and reduce total runoff [29].
Pervious concrete and permeable asphalt are two emerging paving materials with similar
properties. Like their impervious, conventional counterparts, both make a continuous,
smooth paving surface. They differ from their conventional counterparts in that they
FINAL
- 46 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
allow water to pass through the surface course to the rock base course that serves as a
reservoir and infiltration basin for stormwater. Both pervious concrete and permeable
Asphaltic Concrete share similar design considerations.
Conventional Concrete and Asphalt
Conventional concrete and asphalt (technically known as Portland cement concrete
and asphaltic concrete, respectively) are impervious pavements widely used in site
development. Because of their ease of installation, flexibility, durability, economy,
and load bearing capabilities, concrete and asphalt are the most commonly used
pavement materials. With a runoff coefficient of near 1.0, conventional concrete
and asphalt pavements are principal contributors to impervious land coverage in
most development. In site design for stormwater quality, these materials are best
used sparingly. If more permeable pavement materials cannot be used, minimizing
the area of concrete and asphalt surfaces through clustering and other techniques
will reduce the resulting impervious land coverage. For remaining area, designing
asphalt and concrete pavement surfaces to slope towards pervious areas instead of
into directly-connected collection structures will reduce their negative impact on
water resources.
FINAL
- 47 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 48 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
support structure surrounding an open cell where the grass or gravel is placed. Some
systems have hollow rings or honeycombs with a base, while others have open cells
without bases. The plastic grids are flexible, allowing for use on uneven surfaces. These
systems work well in overflow parking areas, driveways and sidewalks. Open-celled unit
pavers can also be made out of concrete.
Concrete block pavers and brick pavers are designed to set on sand or fine gravel and
form an interlocking pavement surface. Modular block pavers are designed to bear heavy
loads and are well suited for industrial and commercial parking lots, utility access,
residential access roads, driveways, and walkways.
For more information on Unit Pavers please see Fact Sheet 10 in Appendix 4
3.2.3.1.
FINAL
- 49 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
at intensities between 0.06 and 0.12 inches per half hour [31]. The larger the joints, the
greater the permeability.
Brick is available in a wide range of colors and finishes, and can be set in a variety of
patterns. When laid on sand, it creates a very suitable walking or riding surface. Though
it was widely used for roads in the early part of the last century, it is today generally used
for driveways, pathways, plazas, and patios.
Because brick is a relatively soft material, brick pavements can develop a rich character
over time as the surface becomes slightly worn with use and the natural colors and
textures are exposed. Brick is generally comparable in cost with other solid unit pavers,
though shipping costs and special finishes or colors can affect the price.
3.2.3.3.
Natural Stone Pavers
Natural stone paving materials are available in a wide variety of shapes and colors.
Because of their high cost and relative brittleness, they are usually laid in thin pieces on a
mortar bed over concrete which makes an impervious pavement. Some natural stone
materials, such as flagstone and granite, are available in thicker slabs suitable for placing
on sand. When laid in a random pattern with wide sand, gravel, or soil joints (from 1/2 to
4 inches) random cut stone can create a highly permeable pavement. The joints can be
planted with small groundcovers or left bare. Smaller, square-cut stones can also be
made into permeable pavements. The cobblestone walks of older European cities are a
familiar example of natural stone pavement. Stones set in these tighter sand joints can be
expected to have permeability similar to brick-on-sand.
Because of their high cost, natural stone pavements are generally limited to patio areas or
walkways where they can be attractive accents. Some stone materials, such as flagstone
and slate, are relatively brittle and suitable for pedestrian areas only. Paving made of
harder stone, such as granite, can bear vehicular loads.
3.2.3.4.
Concrete Unit Pavers
Solid, pre-cast concrete unit pavers are available in a wide variety of colors, shapes, sizes,
and textures. They are designed to be set on sand and form an interlocking pavement
surface that can bear heavy traffic loads. Their permeability and performance is similar
to brick-on-sand. Some manufacturers are now producing concrete unit pavers with
small voids to increase permeability (e.g. Ecostone). The cost of concrete unit pavers
is generally the lowest of all unit pavers, though it can vary depending on shipping,
special colors or finishes. A monitored demonstration site of Ecostone concrete pavers at
the San Diego County Operations Center detected no runoff from the pavers during the
2005-2006 and 2006-2007 wet seasons.
For more information on Unit Pavers please see Fact Sheet 10 in Appendix 4
FINAL
- 50 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 51 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 52 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Increased access Create paths to open space and other opportunities for
pedestrians and bicyclists in subdivisions where alternative street layouts such as
loop networks and cul-de-sacs are utilized.
Traffic calming features Traffic circles, chicanes, chokers, and center
islands, offer the opportunity for stormwater management through the use
of bioretention areas or infiltration within these areas while providing pedestrian
safety [34]. (For definitions and examples of chicanes and chokers, see Traffic
Calming: Roadway Design to Reduce Traffic Speeds and Volumes [34])
Drainage options:
Maintain drainage Preserve natural drainage patterns to the extent feasible and
avoid locating streets in low areas or highly permeable soils.
Uncurbed roads Build uncurbed roads using vegetated swales where feasible.
Urban curb/swale system Runoff runs along a curb and enters a surface swale
via a curb cut, instead of entering a catch basin to the storm drain system.
Concave medians Depress median below the adjacent pavement and design to
receive runoff by curb inlets or sheet flow. This can be designed as a landscaped
swale or a biofilter.
FINAL
On roads where bicycle traffic is especially high, such as designated bike routes
wider roads may be advisable to provide adequate space.
Typical Fire Department standards require greater paved width for emergency
vehicle access. A principal concern is that emergency access may be blocked if a
- 53 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
vehicle becomes stalled in the lane. Grid street systems and loop road systems
provide multiple alternate emergency access routes to address this concern,
though there may be a marginal increase in response times.
Hillside sites have special access concerns and fire risks. Because of the potential
for lanes to be blocked by a single vehicle with no comparable alternate route,
reduced street widths may not be advisable on long cul-de-sac streets or
narrow hillside sites.
Road Drainage. Concrete curb and gutters are commonly required along both sides of
a residential road, regardless of number of houses served. The curb and gutter serves
several purposes: it collects stormwater and directs it to underground conveyance
drainage systems, it protects the pavement edge, it prevents vehicle trespass onto the
pedestrian space, it provides an edge against which street sweepers can operate, and it
helps to organize on-street parking. Curb and gutter systems also provide a directly
connected conduit to natural water bodies and may act to collect and
concentrate pollutants. There are two alternatives to typical curb and gutter systems that
meet functional requirements while lessening the streets impact on stormwater quality.
Note that both of these alternatives are discussed and recommended in the Countys
SUSMP.
Private Roads (see [1], and [9]):
1. Rural swale system: road sheet flows to vegetated swale or gravel shoulder, curbs
at street corners, culverts under driveways and road crossings;
2. Urban curb/swale system: road slopes to curb, periodic swale inlets drain to
vegetated swale biofilter.
Driveways and parking areas:
1. Design residential driveways with shared access, flared (single lane at street) or
wheelstrips (paving only under tires); or, drain into landscaping prior to
discharging to the stromwater conveyance system.
2. Uncovered parking on private residential lots may be: paved with a permeable
surface; or, designed to drain into landscaping prior to discharging to the
stormwater conveyance system;
3. Where landscaping is proposed in parking areas, incorporate landscape areas into
the drainage design.
4. Overflow parking may be constructed with permeable paving.
5. Reduce overall imperviousness associated with parking lots by providing compact
car spaces, minimizing stall dimensions, incorporate efficient parking lanes.
Public (non-circulation element) roads - The design of public roads shall use at least one
of the following LID features [9]:
FINAL
- 54 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 55 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
3.3.3. Curb-Cuts
On streets where a more urban
character is desired or where a
rigid pavement edge is required,
curb and gutter systems can be
designed to empty into drainage
swales. These swales can run
parallel to the street, in the
parkway between the curb and the
sidewalk, or can intersect the street
at cross angles, and run between
residences,
depending on
Photograph courtesy of Mike Campbell (RBF consulting)
topography. Runoff travels along
the gutter, but instead of being emptied into a catch basin and underground pipe, multiple
openings in the curb direct runoff into surface swales or infiltration/detention basins. If
lined with vegetation or gravel/rock and gently sloped, these swales function as biofilters.
Because concentration of flow will be highest at the curb opening, erosion control must
be provided, which may include a settlement basin for ease of debris removal.
For more information on Curb-Cuts please see Fact Sheet 17 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 56 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Maintenance practices for surface systems are different than most urban Public Works
Department practices, and some employee retraining may be required to facilitate
maintenance of road systems using surface swales instead of concrete curbs and
underground pipes. One advantage of surface drainage systems is that problems, when
they occur, are easy to fix because they are visible and on the surface.
FINAL
- 57 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
Landscaped detention areas (see Fact Sheet 3) can be installed within and/or at
the perimeter of parking lots to capture and infiltrate or detain runoff.
Parking groves, which include permeable landscaped areas designed with
grades several inches below the impervious parking surface can delineated by flat
concrete curbs, shrubs, trees and bollards (see Fact Sheet 22).
Permeable surfaces can be installed in down gradient parking stalls and in
overflow parking areas. Permeable materials that can be utilized include
permeable pavers, permeable AC, and pervious concrete. In some circumstances,
gravel or wood chips can also be used.
Stormwater runoff from the top floor of parking garages can be drained to
planter boxes located at the perimeter of the parking lot or at street level.
- 58 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
For more information on Hybrid Parking, Lots Parking Groves, and Overflow Parking
please see Fact Sheets 21-23 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 59 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Driveways, sidewalks, and bike paths add a significant amount of impervious coverage to
a community and are an element of a sites design that can be altered to minimize directly
connected impervious areas. Driveways often slope directly to the street and storm drain
system and contribute significantly to stormwater pollution. There are three primary
strategies that can be implemented to reduce these impacts, including:
Driveways
Driveways offer a relatively simple opportunity to improve both the aesthetics and
permeability of residential developments.
By allowing tandem parking, shared
driveways, or rear alley access, municipalities can reduce mandated driveway
requirements. For designers and developers, the driveways intimate relationship with
the residence, and its relative freedom from government regulation, make it an element
that can be designed to increase permeability and market appeal. Some treatments, such
as turf-block or gravel, require greater maintenance than poured-in-place asphalt or
concrete designs. Other materials, such as brick or unit pavers, require a greater initial
expense.
Not Directly-Connected Impervious Driveway
A conventional driveway that drains to the storm drain system is a directly connected
impervious area which collects and concentrates pollutants. The easiest way to reduce
the impact of a conventional impervious driveway on water quality is to slope it to drain
onto an adjacent turf or groundcover area. By passing driveway runoff through a
permeable landscaped area, pollutants can be dispersed and cleansed in the soil.
Crushed Aggregate Driveway
Gravel and other granular materials can make a suitable permeable pavement for rural
and other low-traffic driveways. Because it is lightly used by very slow moving vehicles,
a well-constructed driveway of granular material can serve as a relatively
FINAL
- 60 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 61 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
3.6.1. Dry-Well
If a gutter and downspout system is used to collect rainwater that falls on a roof, runoff
becomes highly concentrated. If the downspout is connected to a dry-well, this
runoff can be stored and slowly infiltrated into the soil. A dry-well is constructed by
digging a hole in the ground and filling it with an open graded aggregate. An
underground connection from the downspout conveys water into the dry well, allowing it
to be stored in the voids. To reduce sedimentation from lateral soil movement, the sides
and top of the stone storage matrix can be wrapped in a permeable filter fabric,
though the bottom may remain open. A perforated observation pipe can be inserted
vertically into the dry-well to allow for inspection and maintenance. In practice, drywells receiving runoff from single roof downspouts have been successful over long
periods because they contain very little sediment. They must be sized according to
the amount of rooftop runoff received, but are typically 4 to 5 feet square, and 2 to 3 feet
FINAL
- 63 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
deep, with a minimum of 1 foot soil cover over the top (maximum depth of 10 feet). To
protect the foundation, dry-wells must be set away from buildings as required based on
soil type, and must follow local building codes. They must be installed in soils
that accommodate infiltration. In poorly drained soils, dry-wells have very limited
feasibility unless designed with an underdrain. Dry-wells must receive approval from a
qualified, licensed professional.
For more information on Dry Wells please see Fact Sheet 25 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 64 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
3.6.2.2.
Large Scale Harvesting
Examples exist around the world of harvesting water from much larger buildings than
could be served by a rain barrel, including vertically elevated as well as horizontally
spread harvesting structures. For example, in downtown Seattle the King County
Government Center collects enough roof runoff to supply over 60 percent of the toilet
flushing and plant irrigation water requirements, saving approximately 1.4 million
gallons of potable water per year [42]. A smaller public building in Seattle, the Carkeek
Environmental Learning Center, drains roof runoff into a 3500-gallon cistern to supply
toilets [43]. The Natural Resources Defense Council office in Santa Monica is another
example of a medium-scale rain harvesting application [44].
For more information on Rain Harvesting please see Fact Sheet 26 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 65 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Vegetated roofs fall into two categories: intensive and extensive. Intensive roofs are
designed with a relatively deep soil profile and are often planted with ground covers,
shrubs, and trees. Intensive green roofs may be accessible to the public for walking or
serve as a major landscaping element of the urban setting. Extensive vegetated roofs are
designed with shallow, light-weight soil profiles and ground cover plants adapted to the
harsh conditions of the roof top environment [38].
For more information on Vegetated Roofs please see Fact Sheet 29 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 66 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
In the natural landscape, most soils infiltrate a high percentage of rainwater through a
complex web of organic and biological activities that build soil porosity and
permeability. Roots reach into the soil and separate particles of clay, insects excavate
voids in the soil mass, roots decay leaving networks of macropores, leaves fall and form
mulch over the soil surface, and earthworms burrow and ingest organic detritus to create
richer, more porous soil. These are just a few examples of the natural processes that
occur within the soil [39]. In the developed environment, a certain amount of soil must
be covered with impervious surface, but the remaining landscape can be designed and
maintained to maximize its natural permeability and infiltration capacity.
One simple strategy to improve infiltration is to use the grading of landscape surfaces.
If a landscape surface is graded to have a slightly concave slope, it will hold water. The
infiltration value of concave vegetated surfaces is greater in permeable soils. Soils of
heavy clay or underlain with hardpan provide less infiltration value. In these cases
concave vegetated surfaces must be designed as retention/detention basins, with proper
outlets or underdrains to an interconnected system.
Aeration techniques such as drilling, scarifying, and roto-tilling can break up soil and
enhance percolation. In addition, by properly amending the soil and increasing soil
organic matter, water holding capacity can be significantly increased
Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 1990
The State of Californias Department of Water Resources is updating their Water
Conservation Landscape Ordinance to establish specific standards for landscape design
and irrigation design to assure efficient and responsible use of all available water
resources for all citizens within the State. The Ordinance is also intended to implement
the new development landscape design requirements of California Assembly Bill 1881,
update to the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act [40]. These design requirements
will support landscapes that are essential to the quality of life here in San Diego County.
The requirements will also assure that we continue to meet a variety of landscaping
objectives, including preventing erosion, filtering, treating, and utilizing storm water runFINAL
- 67 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
off. Landscape design, installation, maintenance, and management can and should be
water efficient.
All landscape improvements shall conform to the County of San Diegos Landscape
Water Conservation Design Manual. Where a local water agency serving a proposed
project has adopted more stringent water conservation landscape requirements, the
landscaping and irrigation design shall comply with the water agencys requirements.
Where appropriate for the site and the intended stormwater management technique, the
landscaping may include natural features such as rock and stone.
Where service is available to the project site and appropriate for the intended use,
recycled or reclaimed water shall be used for irrigation.
FINAL
- 68 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
Local community planning areas often have specific guidelines for the type and
location of trees planted along public streets or rights-of-way. The extent and
growth pattern of the root structure must be considered when trees are planted in
bioretention areas or other stormwater facilities with under-drain structures or
near paved areas such as driveways, sidewalks, utilities or streets.
For more information on Street Trees please see Fact Sheet 31 in Appendix 4.
FINAL
- 69 -
12/31/2007
LID Handbook
FINAL
- 70 -
12/31/2007