0% found this document useful (0 votes)

368 views97 pages

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) : RCS: DD-A&T (Q&A) 823-198

The document provides an executive summary of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program as of December 2013. It notes both successes and challenges over the past year. Successes included completing critical design reviews, ship trials of the F-35B, and rolling out the 100th production aircraft. Ongoing challenges included software development risks, maturation of logistics systems, and reliability and maintainability issues. The program made progress resolving helmet technical issues and downselecting to the current helmet, but software integration remains the highest risk to completing development.

Uploaded by

Jose Juan Velazquez Garcia

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

368 views97 pages

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) : RCS: DD-A&T (Q&A) 823-198

Uploaded by

Jose Juan Velazquez Garcia

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 97

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-198

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)

As of FY 2015 President's Budget

Defense Acquisition Management

Information Retrieval
(DAMIR)

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Table of Contents

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations

Program Information
Responsible Office
References
Mission and Description
Executive Summary
Threshold Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Track to Budget
Cost and Funding
Low Rate Initial Production
Foreign Military Sales
Nuclear Costs
Unit Cost
Cost Variance
Contracts
Deliveries and Expenditures
Operating and Support Cost

3
4
4
5
6
7
10
11
14
17
21
70
71
71
72
78
86
92
93

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations

Acq O&M - Acquisition-Related Operations and Maintenance
APB - Acquisition Program Baseline
APPN - Appropriation
APUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost
BA - Budget Authority/Budget Activity
BY - Base Year
DAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
Dev Est - Development Estimate
DoD - Department of Defense
DSN - Defense Switched Network
Econ - Economic
Eng - Engineering
Est - Estimating
FMS - Foreign Military Sales
FY - Fiscal Year
IOC - Initial Operational Capability
$K - Thousands of Dollars
LRIP - Low Rate Initial Production
$M - Millions of Dollars
MILCON - Military Construction
N/A - Not Applicable
O&S - Operating and Support
Oth - Other
PAUC - Program Acquisition Unit Cost
PB - Presidents Budget
PE - Program Element
Proc - Procurement
Prod Est - Production Estimate
QR - Quantity Related
Qty - Quantity
RDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
SAR - Selected Acquisition Report
Sch - Schedule
Spt - Support
TBD - To Be Determined
TY - Then Year
UCR - Unit Cost Reporting

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Program Information
Program Name
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)
DoD Component
DoD
Joint Participants
United States Navy; United States Air Force; United States Marine Corps; United Kingdom; Italy; The Netherlands;
Turkey; Canada; Australia; Denmark; Norway
The F-35 Program is a joint DoD program for which Service Acquisition Executive Authority alternates between the
Department of the Navy (DoN) and the Department of the Air Force, and currently resides with the DoN.

Responsible Office
Responsible Office
Lt Gen Christopher Bogdan
F-35 Lightning II Program Office
200 12th St South
Suite 600
Arlington, VA 22202-5402
[email protected]

Phone
Fax
DSN Phone
DSN Fax

703-601-5504
703-602-7649
329-5504
--

Date Assigned December 6, 2012

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

References
F-35 Aircraft
SAR Baseline (Development Estimate)
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012
Approved APB
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012
F-35 Engine
SAR Baseline (Development Estimate)
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012
Approved APB
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Mission and Description

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35) Program will develop and field an affordable, highly common family of
next-generation strike aircraft for the United States (U.S.) Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and allies. The three
variants are the F-35A; F-35B; and the F-35C. The F-35A will be a stealthy multi-role aircraft, primarily air-to-ground,
for the Air Force to replace the F-16 and A-10 and complement the F-22. The F-35B variant will be a multi-role
strike fighter aircraft to replace the AV-8B and F/A-18A/C/D for the Marine Corps. The F-35C will provide the U.S.
Navy a multi-role, stealthy strike fighter aircraft to complement the F/A-18E/F. The planned DoD F-35 Fleet will
replace the joint services' legacy fleets. The transition from multiple type/model/series to a common platform will
result in a smaller total force over time and operational and overall cost efficiencies.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Executive Summary
The F-35 remains the DoD's largest cooperative acquisition program, with eight International Partners (IPs)
participating with the United States (U.S.) under Memorandums of Understanding for System Development and
Demonstration (SDD) and Production, Sustainment and Follow-on Development. Additionally, the program has two
FMS customers. The F-35 program has completed over twelve years of SDD, is currently executing LRIP and is
standing up operational sites across the country.
The F-35 program continues to make slow but steady progress and is moving forward in a disciplined manner.
There were many successes as well as challenges in 2013. Successes include: signing the restructured SDD
contract modification; completing the Block 3 Critical Design Review; announcing the decision to terminate
development of an alternate Helmet Mounted Display System (HMDS); completing the 2nd F-35B Ship-Trial period
(DT-II) operations on U.S. Ship WASP, accomplishing 95 Vertical Landings and 94 Short Takeoffs, with 19 night
takeoffs; rolling-out the 100th aircraft from the production facility at Fort Worth, Texas; and resolving lingering
technical design shortfalls to include the F-35C Arresting Hook, Lightning Protection and Fuel Dump.
In addition to our successes, challenges remain. Software development and integration continue to be the highest
risks the program faces as it completes development. Other areas that are of high interest and have warranted
specific management attention include the Autonomic Logistic Information System (ALIS), Prognostics and Health
Management System (PHM), overall Reliability and Maintainability (R&M), cracks found during F-35B durability
testing and F135 engine blade issues. These are typical challenges faced during a development program and
progress has been made against each of these in 2013.
As mentioned above, software development and integration remain the highest technical risks to completion of the
development program. Over the past two years, the Program Office has implemented significant changes in how
system software is developed, lab tested, flight tested, measured and controlled. These changes are showing
positive effects, and the program is moderately confident that the program will successfully release the Block 2B and
3I capability as planned in 2015 and 2016. Block 2B is the initial combat capability, which the U.S. Marine Corps
(USMC) plans to use to declare IOC. The Air Force plans to declare IOC with the Block 3I capabilities by August
2016. However, there is more risk to the delivery of Block 3F, required for Navy IOC and the Services' full warfighting
capability, by August 2018.
Maturation of the critical logistics systems products and sustainment operation processes continues to improve,
although slower than the Program Office would like, as the program continues to develop and field the F-35 weapon
system. Development of ALIS to meet Services IOC requirements continues to mature as the program stands up
operational sites. ALIS is no longer treated as a piece of support equipment, but rather like a weapon system.
Increasing emphasis on: regular design reviews, systems engineering discipline, software development planning
with baseline review boards, and focused metrics and upgraded/improved lab infrastructure.
One critical challenge the program made head way on in 2013 was the HMDS. For more than two years, the
program worked with industry teammates to conduct dedicated flight tests and develop solutions to address the
helmet's technical challenges. Those issues that hampered helmet function have been resolved, and the unit cost of
the helmet system has decreased. As a result of testing and mitigation of the HMDS issues, the parallel
development of an alternate helmet has been terminated. The current helmet has been deemed acceptable to
support USMC IOC in 2015, and the Generation 3 helmet - to be introduced to the fleet in LRIP Lot 7 in 2016 - will
meet program requirements to complete test and development in 2017. The Generation 3 helmet will include an
improved night vision camera, new Liquid-Crystal Displays, automated alignment, and software improvements. The
downselect to the current HMDS also resulted in a price guarantee that reduced the overall cost of the HMDS by 13
percent for the next five years.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

R&M remains an area for improvement. Fleet performances (full mission capability rates) have not met
expectations, or projected growth curves. To address these issues, the program is implementing a multi-phase
improvement process. The program is standing up a fully funded rigorous R&M program that will establish R&M
performance goals and hold the enterprise responsible for meeting these goals. In addition, the program is working
on accelerating aircraft retrofits and modifications to measure R&M improvements. The program has also stood up
a cost war room with participation from Lockheed Martin (LM), Pratt & Whitney (P&W), and their suppliers; and
started a second Business Case Analysis to guide future sustainment decisions.
As of late December 2013, the F-35 Program has flown more than 3,700 flights totaling more than 6,400 flight hours
on the development flight test program. The program completed 1,168 of 1,153 test flights planned for the year,
conducted 19 Safe Weapon Separations (GBU-31/-12/-32 & AIM-120), 4 Integrated Weapons Delivery Accuracy
Tests (GBU-12/-32/2 x AIM-120), completed the first 4-Ship Multi-function Advanced Data Link airborne connectivity
test with all variants (F-35A/B/C) and completed night/instrument meteorological conditions Flight Testing. All three
variants have completed their first lifetime (8,000 hours) of structural fatigue testing and have begun their second life
tests. On December 4, 2013 the 33rd Fighter Wing reached a new single-day sortie record by flying 45
operational training missions: the F-35B completed 32 flights, the F-35A had 10 flights, and the F-35C flew three
missions.
LM factory assembly operations are generally tracking to plan. Flight line operations are continuing to demonstrate
improvement, but continued improvement is needed. The Government accepted (DD-250) the last of 32 LRIP Lot 4
aircraft on November 22, 2013. This was four months late to the post-strike plan and eight months late to the
original pre-2010 contract date. On average, LRIP Lot 4 were delivered approximately five months late to the
Government contract dates. All LRIP Lot 5 aircraft are either in Final Assembly or in Flight Line operations. As of
December 24, 2013, ten LRIP Lot 5 aircraft have been delivered. LRIP Lot 5 DD-250 dates have averaged two and
a half months late to contract dates. The delivery goal for 2013 was reduced to 36 aircraft due to the Fort Worth,
Texas Joint Reserve Base runway maintenance shutdown in August 2013. By the end of 2013 the program had
delivered 35 of the 36 planned aircraft to the Government in 2013.
On September 27, 2013, the government signed the LRIP Lot 6 and LRIP Lot 7 production contracts with LM. These
contracts, valued at $8.3 billion (B) combined, will secure the production of 71 aircraft (to include IP aircraft) to be
delivered in 2014 through 2016. LRIP Lot 6 will mark the first delivery of F-35 IP aircraft for Italy and Australia, and
LRIP Lot 7 will mark the first delivery for Norway. In addition, LM will now be responsible to cover 100 percent of any
cost overruns and will share costs equally with the government (50/50 ratio) for known concurrency changes arising
from SDD testing and qualification. This agreement marks a reduction in aircraft cost from LRIP Lot 5 to Lot 6 and a
5 percent reduction from LRIP Lot 6 to Lot 7.
F135 engine deliveries continue to meet aircraft need dates. On October 23, 2013, a contract with P&W for the sixth
lot of F135 propulsion systems was signed. The LRIP Lot 6 contract is valued at $1.1B and covers 38 total engines.
This agreement marks a 2.5 percent reduction in F-35A/F-35C engine costs and 9.6 percent reduction in F-35B
engine costs.
In 2013, the program stood up new F-35 squadrons at Edwards Air Force Base (AFB), Nellis AFB, and Eglin AFB,
made Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort ready for F-35 operations, started up aircraft modification lines at Fleet
Readiness Center East and at the Ogden Air Logistics Center, opened the first overseas F-35 Final Assembly and
Checkout facility in Italy, qualified 65 pilots, including two for the United Kingdom (UK) and trained 414 maintainers
(including UK and Netherlands).
Affordability remains a top priority for the program. The program is attacking this issue head-on by focusing on cost
savings, cost reductions and cost avoidance in development, production, and O&S.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

The program has also implemented a strategy that will include event-based criteria and financial incentives for LM to
achieve certain program priorities in the areas of software, ALIS, and R&M.
On the international front, the program made significant progress with both our IPs and FMS countries. There were
many firsts during the past year to include the delivery and acceptance of two Netherlands F-35As, first Australian
and Italian aircraft under contract (LRIP Lot 6), first Norwegian aircraft under contract (LRIP Lot 7) and the first
Netherlands pilot in training. In addition, a major FMS accomplishment was the establishment of the initial Guiding
Principles for FMS integration into the overall program to include financial rules of engagement, and participations in
key functional areas such as sustainment.
In March 2012, in conjunction with the Milestone B decision, certification was made pursuant to section 2366b of title
10, United States Code (U.S.C.). However, at that time, the Milestone Decision Authority waived provision (3)(c),
which certifies that the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) has accomplished its duties pursuant to
section 181(b) of title 10, U.S.C., including an analysis of the operational requirements for the program. The JROC
accomplished the bulk of its duties under section 181(b); however, because the IOC dates remained "TBD" by the
Services, a waiver has been in place. In June 2013, the Services sent a joint report to the U.S. Congress detailing
their IOC requirements and dates; however, until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and
Logistics certifies that this provision has been satisfied, the waiver remains in place. The Department will continue
to review the F-35 program at least annually until the certification requirement for this provision is satisfied.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Threshold Breaches
F-35 Aircraft
APB Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Cost
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
O&S Cost
Unit Cost
PAUC
APUC
Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
PAUC
None
APUC
None
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC
None
APUC
None

F-35 Engine
APB Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Cost
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
O&S Cost
Unit Cost
PAUC
APUC
Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
PAUC
None
APUC
None
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC
None
APUC
None

Explanation of Breach
The RDT&E cost breach was first reported in the 2012 SAR. It is the result
of correcting an error made in the allocation of program funding to the two
subprograms. The breach is not in any way due to cost growth in the F-35
Engine development program.
During the March 26, 2012 APB build, the program office incorrectly
allocated an additional 3.3 percent of the total RDT&E funding estimate to
the F-35 Aircraft subprogram. This funding consisted of Other Government
Costs, International contributions to Engine development, and closeout costs
for Engine contracts.
The Program has corrected the allocation issue in the SAR data base,
which caused the Current Estimate for the F-35 Engine subprogram to
artificially breach the RDT&E threshold. The F-35 Aircraft subprogram
experienced a corresponding decrease in the Current Estimate for RDT&E.
The Milestone Decision Authority has been notified via a Program Deviation
Report and a revised APB with the correct funding allocation has
been submitted for approval.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Schedule

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

F-35 Aircraft
Milestones
Concept Demonstration Contract Award
Milestone B
EMD Contract Award
Preliminary Design Review
CDR
CDR (CTOL&Common)
CDR (STOVL&Common)
CDR (CV&Common)
DAE (IPR 1)
1st Flt CTOL
DAE (IPR 2)
1st Flt STOVL
1st Flt CV
1st Production Aircraft Delivered
Milestone B Re-approval
Block 2B Fleet Release
USMC IOC
USAF IOC
Block 3F Fleet Release
USN IOC
Completed IOT&E
Full Rate Production Decision
DAB Milestone C

NOV 1996
OCT 2001
OCT 2001
APR 2003

Current APB
Development
Objective/Threshold
NOV 1996 NOV 1996
OCT 2001 OCT 2001
OCT 2001 OCT 2001
APR 2003 APR 2003

NOV 1996
OCT 2001
OCT 2001
APR 2003

FEB 2006
FEB 2006
JUN 2007
MAR 2006
DEC 2006
APR 2007
JUN 2008
JUN 2010
MAY 2011
MAR 2012
MAR 2015
TBD
TBD
AUG 2017
TBD
FEB 2019
APR 2019
APR 2019

FEB 2006
FEB 2006
JUN 2007
MAR 2006
DEC 2006
APR 2007
JUN 2008
JUN 2010
MAY 2011
MAR 2012
JUN 2015
JUL 2015
AUG 2016
AUG 2017
AUG 2018
FEB 2019
APR 2019
APR 2019

SAR Baseline
Dev Est

FEB 2006
FEB 2006
JUN 2007
MAR 2006
DEC 2006
APR 2007
JUN 2008
JUN 2010
MAY 2011
MAR 2012
SEP 2015
TBD
TBD
FEB 2018
TBD
AUG 2019
OCT 2019
OCT 2019

Current
Estimate

(Ch-1)
(Ch-1)
(Ch-1)

Change Explanations
(Ch-1) Service IOC dates have been established, per Congressional Report titled "F-35 Initial Operational
Capability" June 2013.
Memo
1/ Original MS B rescinded in June 2010 due to Nunn-McCurdy breach. MS B Re-approval completed March 2012.
2/ IOT&E completion is Program Office estimate based on 2011 program structure. It will be revised as necessary
to reflect approved Test and Evaluation Master Plan revision 4 data.
3/ FRP Decision will replace the DAB MS C. Also, the June 2010 Nunn-McCurdy Acquisition Decision
Memorandum directs that FRP will be MS C for this program.
4/ Jun 2015 2B Fleet Release forecast reflects full incorporation Technical Baseline Review test ground rules and
arresting hook redesign as well as the Block Review Board approval of the Block 2B Build Plan

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Acronyms and Abbreviations

CDR - Critical Design Review
CTOL - Conventional Takeoff and Landing
CV - Aircraft Carrier Suitable Variant
DAB - Defense Acquisition Board
DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive
EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development
Flt - Flight
FRP - Full Rate Production
IOT&E - Initial Operational Test and Evaluation
IPR - Interim Progress Review
MS - Milestone
STOVL - Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing
USAF - United States Air Force
USMC - United States Marine Corps
USN - United States Navy
F-35 Engine
Milestones
See Note

SAR Baseline
Dev Est
N/A

Current APB
Development
Objective/Threshold
N/A
N/A

Current
Estimate
N/A

Change Explanations
None
Memo
1/ Schedule milestones for the F-35 Engine subprogram are captured as part of the system-level schedule
milestones reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Performance
F-35 Aircraft
Characteristics
STOVL Mission
Performance - STO
Distance Flat Deck

Combat Radius NM CTOL Variant

Current APB
Development
Objective/Threshold
With four
With four
With two
1000#
1000#
1000#
JDAMs and
JDAMs and JDAMs and
two internal
two internal two internal
AIM-120s,
AIM-120s,
AIM-120s,
full
full
full
expendables, expendables, expendables,
execute a
execute a
execute a
600 foot
600 foot
600 foot
(450 UK
(450 UK
(450 UK
STOVL)
STOVL)
STOVL)
STO from
STO from
STO from
LHA, LHD,
LHA, LHD,
LHA, LHD,
and aircraft
and aircraft and aircraft
carriers (sea carriers (sea carriers (sea
level, tropical level, tropical level, tropical
day, 10 kts
day, 10 kts
day, 10 kts
operational
operational operational
WOD) and
WOD) and
WOD) and
with a
with a
with a
combat
combat
combat
radius of
radius of
radius of
550 nm
550 nm
450 nm
(STOVL
(STOVL
(STOVL
profile). Also profile). Also profile). Also
must
must
must
perform
perform
perform
STOVL
STOVL
STOVL
vertical
vertical
vertical
landing with
landing with landing with
two 1000#
two 1000#
two 1000#
JDAMs and
JDAMs and JDAMs and
two internal
two internal two internal
AIM-120s,
AIM-120s,
AIM-120s,
full
full
full
expendables, expendables, expendables,
and fuel to fly and fuel to fly and fuel to fly
the STOVL
the STOVL the STOVL
Recovery
Recovery
Recovery
profile.
profile.
profile.
690
690
590
SAR Baseline
Dev Est

UNCLASSIFIED

Demonstrated Current
Performance Estimate
TBD

(Ch-1)
Execute
581 ft.
STO with 2
JDAM
(internal), 2
AIM-120
(internal),
fuel to fly
456nm

TBD

613

(Ch-1)

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Combat Radius NM STOVL Variant

Combat Radius NM -CV
Variant
Mission Reliability CTOL Variant
Mission Reliability - CV
Variant
Mission Reliability STOVL Variant
Logistics Footprint CTOL Variant

550

450

TBD

456

730

600

TBD

610

98%

93%

TBD

97%

98%

95%

TBD

98%

95%

TBD

98%

Less than or
equal to 6 C17
equivalents

TBD

Less than
or equal to
6 C-17
equivalents

Logistics Footprint - CV
Variant

Less than or
equal to
34,000 cu ft.,
183 ST
Less than or
equal to 4 C17
equivalents

TBD

Less than (Ch-1)

or equal to
29,410 cu
ft., 243 ST
Less than (Ch-1)
or equal to
5 C-17
equivalents

Logistics Footprint Less than or

STOVL Variant L-Class equal to
15,000 cu ft,
104 ST
Sortie Generation Rates 4.0/3.0/2.0
- CTOL Variant
2.5 ASD
Sortie Generation Rates 4.0/3.0/1.0
- CV Variant
1.8 ASD
Sortie Generation Rates 6.0/4.0/2.0
- STOVL Variant
1.1 ASD
(USMC)
CV Recovery
Vpa.
Performance (Vpa)
Maximum
approach
speed (Vpa)
at required
carrier
landing
weight
(RCLW) of
less than
140 knots.

Less than or
equal to
15,000 cu ft,
104 ST
4.0/3.0/2.0
2.5 ASD
4.0/3.0/1.0
1.8 ASD
6.0/4.0/2.0
1.1 ASD

Less than or
equal to 8 C17
equivalent
loads
Less than or
equal to
46,000 cu ft.,
243 ST
Less than or
equal to 8 C17
equivalent
loads
Less than or
equal to
21,000 cu ft,
136 ST
3.0/2.0/1.0
2.5 ASD
3.0/2.0/1.0
1.8 ASD
4.0/3.0/1.0
1.1 ASD

Vpa at
required
carrier
landing
weight
(RCLW) of
less than
140 knots.

Vpa at
required
carrier
landing
weight
(RCLW) of
less than
145 knots.

TBD

Logistics Footprint STOVL Variant

UNCLASSIFIED

TBD

TBD
TBD
TBD

(Ch-1)

Less than (Ch-1)

or equal to
17,500 cu
ft, 102 ST
4.0/3.0/2.0
2.5 ASD
4.0/3.0/1.0
1.8 ASD
6.0/4.0/2.0
1.1 ASD
(Ch-1)
Vpa.
Maximum
approach
speed
(Vpa) at
required
carrier
landing
weight
(RCLW) of
less than
144 knots.

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Classified Performance information is provided in the classified annex to this submission.

Requirements Source
Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Change 3 dated August 19, 2008 as modified by Joint Requirements
Oversight Council Memorandum 040-12 dated March 16, 2012
Change Explanations
(Ch-1) Current estimate is based on Aircraft Configuration 240-4.7, as reflected in the October 2013 KPP status
update.
Memo
1/ The F-35 Program is currently in developmental testing, and will provide demonstrated performance with the
Block 3F full capability aircraft.
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ASD - Average Sortie Duration
CTOL - Conventional Takeoff and Landing
CU FT - Cubic Feet
CV - Aircraft Carrier Suitable Variant
IER - Information Exchange Requirement
JDAM - Joint Direct Attack Munitions
KTS - Knots
NM - Nautical Miles
RCLW - Required Carrier Landing Weight
ST - Short Tons
STO - Short Takeoff
STOVL - Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing
Vpa - Max Approach Speed
WOD - Wind Over the Deck
F-35 Engine
Characteristics
See Note

SAR Baseline
Dev Est
N/A

Current APB
Demonstrated Current
Development
Performance Estimate
Objective/Threshold
N/A
N/A
TBD
N/A

Requirements Source
Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Change 3 dated August 19, 2008 as modified by Joint Requirements
Oversight Council Memorandum 040-12 dated March 16, 2012
Change Explanations
None
Memo
1/ Performance characteristics for the F-35 Engine subprogram are captured as part of the system-level
performance characteristics reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Track to Budget
F-35 Aircraft
General Memo
F-35 is DoD's largest cooperative development program. In addition to DoD's funding lines, eight
International Partners are providing funding in the System Development and Demonstration (SDD)
Phase under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): United Kingdom, Italy, The Netherlands, Turkey,
Canada, Australia, Denmark, and Norway. All but Turkey and Australia were partners in the prior
phase. Associated financial contributions are reflected in the Annual Funding section as Appropriation
9999, RDT&E Non-Treasury Funds. RDT&E cost excludes Follow-on Development Funding.
RDT&E
Appn
Navy 1319
Project
2209
Navy 1319
Project
2262
Navy 1319
Project
2261

BA
04

3194
9999
Air Force 3600
Project
2025
Air Force 3600
Project

3831

Notes:

Defense- 0400
Wide
Project

PE
0603800N
Name
RDT&E, Navy CDP
0604800M
Name
RDT&E, Marine Corps
0604800N
Name
RDT&E, Navy EMD/JSF
RDT&E, Navy EMD/Joint
Reprogramming Center
RDT&E, Navy
EMD/Congressional Adds
0603800F
Name
RDT&E, Air Force CDP
0604800F
Name
RDT&E, Air Force EMD/Joint
Strike Fighter Quantity of RDT&E
Articles
The funding in this line was
inadvertently loaded into BA04.
AF intends to execute funding in
BA05. Correct load is:
FY15=$4,976K &
FY16=$4,979K .

(Sunk)

(Sunk)
(Sunk)

(Sunk)

0603800E
Name

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

RDT&E, DARPA

(Sunk)

Procurement
Appn
Navy 1506
Line Item
0147
Navy 1506
Line Item
0152
Navy 1506
Line Item
0592
Navy 1506
Line Item
0593
Navy 1506
Line Item
0605
Navy 1506
Line Item
0605
Air Force 3010
Line Item
000999
Air Force 3010
Line Item
ATA000
Air Force 3010
Line Item
F03500

BA
01

PE
0204146N
Name
JSF (Navy)
0204146M
Name
JSF (Marine Corps)
0204146M
Name
F-35 STOVL Mods
0204146N
Name
F-35 CV Mods
0204146N
Name
Initial Spares (Navy)
0204146M
Name
Initial Spares (Marine Corps)
0207142F
Name
Initial Spares (Air Force)
0207142F
Name
JSF (Air Force)
0207142F
Name
Mods (Air Force)

(Shared)

MILCON
Appn
Navy 1205
Project
Navy

Navy

1205
Project
1205

BA
01

PE
0212576N
Name
MILCON, USN
0216496M
Name
MILCON, USN
0816376N

UNCLASSIFIED

(Shared)

(Sunk)

(Shared)

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Project
Air Force 3300
Project
Air Force 3300
Project

Notes:

Name
MILCON, USN
0207142F
Name
MILCON, AF
0207597F
Name
MILCON, AF
PE 0207597F is a new PE

(Shared)

F-35 Engine
General Memo
F-35 is DoD's largest cooperative development program. In addition to DoD's funding lines, eight
International Partners are providing funding in the System Development and Demonstration (SDD)
Phase under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): United Kingdom, Italy, The Netherlands, Turkey,
Canada, Australia, Denmark, and Norway. All but Turkey and Australia were partners in the prior
phase. Associated financial contributions are reflected in the Annual Funding section as Appropriation
9999, RDT&E Non-Treasury Funds. RDT&E cost excludes Follow-on Development Funding.
RDT&E
Appn
Navy 1319
Project
2209
Navy 1319
Project
2262
Navy 1319
Project
2261

BA
04

3194
9999
Air Force 3600
Project
2025
Air Force 3600
Project
3831

UNCLASSIFIED

(Sunk)

(Sunk)
(Sunk)

(Sunk)

F-35

December 2013 SAR

inadvertently loaded into BA04.

AF intends to execute funding in
BA05. Correct load is:
FY15=$4,976K &
FY16=$4,979K .

Notes:

Defense- 0400
Wide
Project

0603800E
Name
RDT&E, DARPA

(Sunk)

Procurement
Appn
Navy 1506
Line Item
0147
Navy 1506
Line Item
0152
Navy 1506
Line Item
0605
Navy 1506
Line Item
0605
Air Force 3010
Line Item
000999
Air Force 3010
Line Item
ATA000
Air Force 3010
Line Item
F03500

BA
01

PE
0204146N
Name
JSF (Navy)
0204146M
Name
JSF (Marine Corps)
0204146M
Name
Initial Spares (Marine Corps)
0204146N
Name
Initial Spares (Navy)
0207142F
Name
Initial Spares (Air Force)
0207142F
Name
JSF (Air Force)
0207142F
Name
Mods (Air Force)

UNCLASSIFIED

(Shared)

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost and Funding

Cost Summary - Total Program
Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity - Total Program
BY2012 $M
BY2012 $M
TY $M
Current APB
Current APB
SAR Baseline
Current
SAR Baseline
Current
Appropriation
Development
Development
Dev Est
Estimate
Dev Est
Estimate
Objective/Threshold
Objective
RDT&E

59677.3

59172.9

55233.8

266665.8

260618.7

335680.7

335680.7 339266.0

226216.1

-- 296396.3

Recurring

202475.0

-- 266574.0

Non Recurring

23741.1

29822.3

34402.6

42869.7

Other Support

18030.9

21775.2

Initial Spares

16371.7

21094.5

4168.0

3701.9

4797.3

4421.0

0.0

330511.1

N/A

323493.5

395711.8

Procurement
Flyaway

Support

MILCON
Acq O&M
Total

UNCLASSIFIED

55233.8

54897.6

395711.8 398584.6

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost and Funding

Cost Summary - F-35 Aircraft
Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity - F-35 Aircraft
BY2012 $M
BY2012 $M
TY $M
Current APB
Current APB
SAR Baseline
Current
SAR Baseline
Current
Appropriation
Development
Development
Dev Est
Estimate
Dev Est
Estimate
Objective/Threshold
Objective
RDT&E
Procurement
Flyaway

47982.1

52780.9

45908.7

44410.1

42772.6

224332.9 224332.9 246767.1

217450.0

282647.8

282647.8 282770.5

189815.1

-- 248504.2

Recurring

168479.4

-- 221638.9

Non Recurring

21335.7

26865.3

27634.9

34266.3

Other Support

16129.3

19485.8

Initial Spares

11505.6

14780.5

4168.0

4582.5

3701.9

4797.3

4421.0

0.0

276483.0 276483.0

N/A

267060.6

331855.2

Support

MILCON
Acq O&M
Total

331855.2 329964.1

Confidence Level for Current APB Cost 50% This estimate, like all previous Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG) and Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation (CAPE) estimates, is built upon a product-oriented work breakdown structure; is based on historical
actual cost information to the maximum extent possible; and, most importantly, is based on conservative
assumptions that are consistent with actual demonstrated contractor and government performance for a series
of acquisition programs in which the Department has been successful.
It is difficult to calculate mathematically the precise confidence levels associated with life-cycle cost estimates
prepared for Major Defense Acquisition program (MDAPs). Based on the rigor in methods used in building
estimates, the strong adherence to the collection and use of historical cost information, and the review of applied
assumptions, we project that it is about equally likely that the estimates will prove too low or too high for
execution of the program described.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Quantity
RDT&E
Procurement
Total

SAR Baseline
Dev Est

Current APB
Development

14
2443
2457

UNCLASSIFIED

14
2443
2457

Current Estimate
14
2443
2457

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Summary - F-35 Engine

Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity - F-35 Engine
BY2012 $M
BY2012 $M
TY $M
Current APB
Current APB
SAR Baseline
Current
SAR Baseline
Current
Appropriation
Development
Development
Dev Est
Estimate
Dev Est
Estimate
Objective/Threshold
Objective
RDT&E

11695.2

12741.9

13264.2

Procurement

42332.9

46566.2

Recurring

Non Recurring

10823.7

10823.7 12125.0

43168.7

53032.9

53032.9 56495.5

36401.0

-- 47892.1

33995.6

-- 44935.1

2405.4

2957.0

6767.7

8603.4

Other Support

1901.6

2289.4

Initial Spares

4866.1

6314.0

MILCON

0.0

Acq O&M

0.0

54028.1

N/A

56432.9

63856.6

Flyaway

Support

Total
1

63856.6 68620.5

APB Breach

Quantity
RDT&E
Procurement
Total

SAR Baseline
Dev Est

Current APB
Development

14
2443
2457

UNCLASSIFIED

14
2443
2457

Current Estimate
14
2443
2457

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost and Funding

Funding Summary - Total Program
Appropriation and Quantity Summary - Total Program
FY2015 President's Budget / December 2013 SAR (TY$ M)
Appropriation

Prior

FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019

48972.0

1454.0

1514.1

1587.4

Procurement

33111.9

6057.0

6673.2

8883.5 10289.1 12039.7 12665.2 249546.4 339266.0

1235.0

56.0

207.0

66.7

228.6

328.5

175.7

2123.5

4421.0

0.0

PB 2015 Total

83318.9

7567.0

PB 2014 Total

85004.3

8577.1 10087.5 11578.2 12220.3 13394.9 12417.3 237931.9 391211.5

Delta

-1685.4 -1010.1 -1693.2 -1040.6

Acq O&M

221.5

17.3

0.0

Total

RDT&E
MILCON

1131.3

To
Complete

54897.6

8394.3 10537.6 11649.0 12589.7 12858.2 251669.9 398584.6

-571.3

UNCLASSIFIED

-805.2

440.9

13738.0

7373.1

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost and Funding

Funding Summary - F-35 Aircraft
Appropriation and Quantity Summary - F-35 Aircraft
FY2015 President's Budget / December 2013 SAR (TY$ M)
Appropriation

Prior

FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019

37646.9

1170.4

1255.3

1375.1

1086.8

Procurement

27969.8

5305.1

5848.5

7658.0

8771.1 10143.8 10543.3 206530.9 282770.5

1235.0

56.0

207.0

66.7

228.6

328.5

175.7

2123.5

4421.0

0.0

PB 2015 Total

66851.7

6531.5

7310.8

PB 2014 Total

68494.9

7303.6

8891.2 10093.3 10528.7 11316.2 10355.3 199929.6 326912.8

Delta

-1643.2

-772.1 -1580.4

Acq O&M

Quantity
Development
Production
PB 2015 Total
PB 2014 Total
Delta

17.3

0.0

Total

RDT&E
MILCON

220.8

To
Complete

9099.8 10086.5 10693.1 10736.3 208654.4 329964.1

-993.5

-442.2

-623.1

381.0

8724.8

0
150
150
150
0

0
29
29
29
0

0
34
34
42
-8

0
55
55
62
-7

UNCLASSIFIED

0
68
68
76
-8

0
90
90
100
-10

3051.3

To
Complete
0
0
96
1921
96
1921
100
1884
-4
37

Undistributed Prior FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019

14
0
14
14
0

42772.6

Total
14
2443
2457
2457
0

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Funding Summary - F-35 Engine

Appropriation and Quantity Summary - F-35 Engine
FY2015 President's Budget / December 2013 SAR (TY$ M)
Appropriation
RDT&E

Prior

To
Complete

FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019

Total

11325.1

283.6

258.8

212.3

44.5

0.7

0.0

0.0 12125.0

5142.1

751.9

824.7

1225.5

1518.0

1895.9

2121.9

43015.5 56495.5

MILCON

0.0

Acq O&M

0.0

PB 2015 Total

16467.2

1035.5

1083.5

1437.8

1562.5

1896.6

2121.9

43015.5 68620.5

PB 2014 Total

16509.4

1273.5

1196.3

1484.9

1691.6

2078.7

2062.0

38002.3 64298.7

-42.2

-238.0

-112.8

-47.1

-129.1

-182.1

59.9

Procurement

Delta
Quantity
Development
Production
PB 2015 Total
PB 2014 Total
Delta

0
150
150
150
0

0
29
29
29
0

0
34
34
42
-8

0
55
55
62
-7

UNCLASSIFIED

0
68
68
76
-8

0
90
90
100
-10

4321.8

To
Complete
0
0
96
1921
96
1921
100
1884
-4
37

Undistributed Prior FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019

14
0
14
14
0

5013.2

Total
14
2443
2457
2457
0

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost and Funding

Annual Funding By Appropriation - F-35 Aircraft
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft
0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway Support
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1996

23.2

1997

54.8

1998
Subtotal

---

16.9
94.9

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
1996

30.1

1997

70.2

1998

21.5

Subtotal

121.8

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft

3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1995

67.5

1996

65.4

1997

202.3

1998

357.2

1999

366.5

2000

200.3

2001

274.3

2002

302.6

2003

1210.1

2004

1584.1

2005

1465.8

2006

1678.6

2007

1632.4

2008

1359.0

2009

1197.5

2010

1567.4

2011

715.4

2012

1262.2

2013

958.2

2014

550.2

2015

435.3

2016

438.3

2017

325.2

2018

115.2

2019
Subtotal

-5

---

5.3
18336.3

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
1995

89.1

1996

84.9

1997

259.5

1998

454.5

1999

460.9

2000

248.3

2001

335.4

2002

366.3

2003

1443.6

2004

1838.4

2005

1657.5

2006

1840.8

2007

1747.3

2008

1428.6

2009

1242.9

2010

1602.8

2011

714.1

2012

1238.3

2013

925.5

2014

522.5

2015

405.8

2016

400.7

2017

291.5

2018

101.2

2019
Subtotal

-5

---

4.6
19705.0

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft

1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1994

23.7

1995

78.7

1996

64.6

1997

195.6

1998

360.4

1999

378.9

2000

191.7

2001

274.3

2002

367.1

2003

1089.5

2004

1548.2

2005

1510.3

2006

1657.3

2007

1470.7

2008

1285.0

2009

1271.2

2010

1440.5

2011

989.9

2012

960.1

2013

1079.4

2014

602.1

2015

813.6

2016

934.2

2017

753.5

2018

102.5

2019
Subtotal

-9

---

12.0
19455.0

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
1994

31.9

1995

103.9

1996

83.9

1997

250.9

1998

458.6

1999

476.5

2000

237.6

2001

335.4

2002

444.4

2003

1299.7

2004

1796.8

2005

1707.8

2006

1817.4

2007

1574.3

2008

1350.8

2009

1319.4

2010

1473.0

2011

988.1

2012

941.9

2013

1042.5

2014

571.8

2015

758.4

2016

854.0

2017

675.3

2018

90.1

2019
Subtotal

-9

---

10.3
20694.7

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft

9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds
Fiscal
Year

Quantity

End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
TY $M

Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
TY $M

Non
Recurring
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1996

11.3

1997

67.1

1998

72.1

1999

49.0

2000

25.2

2001

9.5

2002

255.8

2003

298.7

2004

484.1

2005

734.3

2006

801.3

2007

635.3

2008

574.0

2009

236.0

2010

143.2

2011

171.9

2012

130.8

2013

148.5

2014

18.1

2015

6.4

2016

2.6

2017

8.1

2018
Subtotal

---

3.1
4886.4

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
1996

14.7

1997

86.1

1998

91.7

1999

61.6

2000

31.2

2001

11.6

2002

309.6

2003

356.3

2004

561.8

2005

830.3

2006

878.7

2007

680.0

2008

603.4

2009

244.9

2010

146.4

2011

171.6

2012

128.3

2013

143.4

2014

17.2

2015

6.0

2016

2.4

2017

7.3

2018
Subtotal

---

2.7
5387.2

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft

3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

2006

107.6

2007

428.5

80.8

509.3

91.1

600.4

2008

983.1

172.3

1155.4

131.5

1286.9

2009

1009.2

277.6

1286.8

175.8

1462.6

2010

1471.2

355.7

1826.9

277.7

2104.6

2011

2751.2

569.1

3320.3

679.6

3999.9

2012

2041.5

369.6

2411.1

773.5

3184.6

2013

2074.6

98.3

2172.9

532.6

2705.5

2014

2034.6

616.6

2651.2

433.0

3084.2

2015

2526.8

711.5

3238.3

537.2

3775.5

2016

4041.1

617.8

4658.9

648.0

5306.9

2017

4078.9

746.4

4825.3

665.7

5491.0

2018

4762.1

650.2

5412.3

707.3

6119.6

2019

4657.9

594.1

5252.0

732.7

5984.7

2020

4585.3

465.3

5050.6

771.5

5822.1

2021

5843.8

578.7

6422.5

893.9

7316.4

2022

5942.6

588.8

6531.4

896.7

7428.1

2023

6089.0

604.2

6693.2

969.2

7662.4

2024

6206.5

612.2

6818.7

890.6

7709.3

2025

6348.5

622.7

6971.2

880.6

7851.8

2026

6509.7

639.4

7149.1

921.3

8070.4

2027

6632.9

650.2

7283.1

938.8

8221.9

2028

6763.0

656.6

7419.6

770.9

8190.5

2029

6900.5

647.0

7547.5

932.8

8480.3

2030

7052.6

656.7

7709.3

922.8

8632.1

2031

7243.0

679.1

7922.1

989.0

8911.1

2032

7342.4

686.1

8028.5

738.2

8766.7

2033

7636.3

707.1

8343.4

647.6

8991.0

2034

7875.1

727.9

8603.0

411.1

9014.1

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2035

8059.1

742.4

8801.5

414.8

9216.3

2036

8294.6

731.8

9026.4

360.7

9387.1

2037

7468.2

720.1

8188.3

374.1

8562.4

2038

556.3

34.2

590.5

48.0

638.5

Subtotal

1763

156317.7

17610.5

173928.2

20158.3

194086.5

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
2006

116.3

2007

452.5

85.4

537.9

96.2

634.1

2008

1022.9

179.3

1202.2

136.8

1339.0

2009

1035.6

284.9

1320.5

180.4

1500.9

2010

1478.3

357.5

1835.8

279.0

2114.8

2011

2707.2

560.0

3267.2

668.7

3935.9

2012

1977.7

358.0

2335.7

749.3

3085.0

2013

1976.5

93.7

2070.2

507.3

2577.5

2014

1904.0

577.0

2481.0

405.2

2886.2

2015

2320.0

653.3

2973.3

493.2

3466.5

2016

3638.1

556.2

4194.3

583.4

4777.7

2017

3600.2

658.8

4259.0

587.5

4846.5

2018

4120.8

562.6

4683.4

612.0

5295.4

2019

3951.6

504.0

4455.6

621.6

5077.2

2020

3813.7

387.0

4200.7

641.7

4842.4

2021

4765.1

471.9

5237.0

728.9

5965.9

2022

4750.7

470.6

5221.3

716.9

5938.2

2023

4772.3

473.5

5245.8

759.6

6005.4

2024

4769.0

470.3

5239.3

684.4

5923.7

2025

4782.4

469.2

5251.6

663.3

5914.9

2026

4807.7

472.3

5280.0

680.4

5960.4

2027

4802.6

470.9

5273.5

679.7

5953.2

2028

4800.8

466.2

5267.0

547.2

5814.2

2029

4802.4

450.2

5252.6

649.2

5901.8

2030

4812.0

448.1

5260.1

629.6

5889.7

2031

4845.0

454.2

5299.2

661.6

5960.8

2032

4815.2

450.0

5265.2

484.1

5749.3

2033

4909.7

454.6

5364.3

416.4

5780.7

2034

4964.0

458.9

5422.9

259.1

5682.0

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2035

4980.4

458.7

5439.1

256.4

5695.5

2036

5025.4

443.4

5468.8

218.5

5687.3

2037

4436.0

427.6

4863.6

222.3

5085.9

2038

324.0

19.9

343.9

27.9

371.8

Subtotal

1763

116280.1

13648.2

129928.3

15847.8

145776.1

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Aircraft

3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
Fiscal
(Aligned
Quantity
Year
with
Quantity)
BY 2012
$M
2006

2007

452.5

2008

1022.9

2009

1035.6

2010

1478.3

2011

2707.2

2012

1977.7

2013

1976.5

2014

1904.0

2015

2320.0

2016

3638.1

2017

3600.2

2018

4120.8

2019

3951.6

2020

3813.7

2021

4765.1

2022

4790.7

2023

4772.3

2024

4769.0

2025

4782.4

2026

4807.7

2027

4802.6

2028

4800.8

2029

4802.4

2030

4812.0

2031

4845.0

2032

4815.2

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2033

4909.7

2034

4964.0

2035

4980.4

2036

5064.2

2037

4434.8

2038
Subtotal

2
1763

362.7
116280.1

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft

1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

2007

96.9

2008

923.2

38.6

961.8

10.7

972.5

2009

1062.0

182.0

1244.0

206.1

1450.1

2010

2681.2

304.7

2985.9

560.9

3546.8

2011

1494.8

251.6

1746.4

431.8

2178.2

2012

1477.7

333.1

1810.8

746.7

2557.5

2013

1107.3

51.1

1158.4

557.3

1715.7

2014

1205.5

439.7

1645.2

575.7

2220.9

2015

883.5

762.3

1645.8

427.2

2073.0

2016

1196.2

547.7

1743.9

607.2

2351.1

2017

2012.0

672.1

2684.1

596.0

3280.1

2018

2769.5

568.9

3338.4

685.8

4024.2

2019

3332.3

523.8

3856.1

702.5

4558.6

2020

3419.2

350.2

3769.4

967.1

4736.5

2021

3394.8

361.6

3756.4

1101.8

4858.2

2022

3420.3

359.8

3780.1

932.7

4712.8

2023

3434.0

365.2

3799.2

815.1

4614.3

2024

3493.4

357.8

3851.2

867.2

4718.4

2025

3543.0

366.7

3909.7

770.2

4679.9

2026

3605.4

369.2

3974.6

636.9

4611.5

2027

3660.9

390.0

4050.9

430.5

4481.4

2028

3722.4

399.9

4122.3

381.2

4503.5

2029

3786.7

374.1

4160.8

326.1

4486.9

2030

3620.5

380.1

4000.6

313.8

4314.4

2031

2171.5

189.0

2360.5

217.0

2577.5

2032

2084.6

162.5

2247.1

127.6

2374.7

2033

1722.4

153.1

1875.5

112.9

1988.4

Subtotal

680

65321.2

9254.8

74576.0

14108.0

88684.0

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
2007

102.3

2008

960.6

40.2

1000.8

11.1

1011.9

2009

1089.8

186.8

1276.6

211.5

1488.1

2010

2694.2

306.2

3000.4

563.6

3564.0

2011

1470.9

247.6

1718.5

424.9

2143.4

2012

1431.5

322.7

1754.2

723.3

2477.5

2013

1054.9

48.7

1103.6

530.9

1634.5

2014

1128.1

411.5

1539.6

538.7

2078.3

2015

811.2

699.9

1511.1

392.2

1903.3

2016

1076.9

493.2

1570.1

546.6

2116.7

2017

1775.9

593.2

2369.1

526.0

2895.1

2018

2396.5

492.3

2888.8

593.4

3482.2

2019

2827.0

444.3

3271.3

596.0

3867.3

2020

2843.8

291.3

3135.1

804.3

3939.4

2021

2768.2

294.9

3063.1

898.3

3961.4

2022

2734.3

287.6

3021.9

745.6

3767.5

2023

2691.4

286.2

2977.6

638.9

3616.5

2024

2684.3

274.9

2959.2

666.3

3625.5

2025

2669.0

276.2

2945.2

580.2

3525.4

2026

2662.7

272.7

2935.4

470.4

3405.8

2027

2650.7

282.4

2933.1

311.7

3244.8

2028

2642.4

283.9

2926.3

270.6

3196.9

2029

2635.3

260.3

2895.6

227.0

3122.6

2030

2470.3

259.3

2729.6

214.1

2943.7

2031

1452.6

126.3

1578.9

145.2

1724.1

2032

1367.1

106.5

1473.6

83.7

1557.3

2033

1107.4

98.4

1205.8

72.6

1278.4

Subtotal

680

52199.3

7687.5

59886.8

11787.1

71673.9

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Aircraft

1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
Fiscal
(Aligned
Quantity
Year
with
Quantity)
BY 2012
$M
2007

2008

960.6

2009

1089.8

2010

2694.2

2011

1470.9

2012

1431.5

2013

1054.9

2014

1128.1

2015

811.2

2016

1076.9

2017

1775.9

2018

2396.5

2019

2827.0

2020

2843.8

2021

2768.2

2022

2734.3

2023

2691.4

2024

2684.3

2025

2669.0

2026

2662.7

2027

2650.7

2028

2642.4

2029

2635.3

2030

2470.3

2031

1486.7

2032

1401.2

2033

1141.5

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

Subtotal

December 2013 SAR

680

52199.3

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft

1205 | MILCON | Military Construction,
Navy and Marine Corps
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
TY $M
2004

24.4

2005

2006

0.1

2007

2008

0.2

2009

0.7

2010

34.1

2011

377.9

2012

172.2

2013

94.9

2014

2015

140.3

2016

16.3

2017

213.9

2018

192.6

2019

84.2

2020

175.8

2021

105.2

2022

79.8

2023

2024

300.1

Subtotal

2012.7

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

1205 | MILCON | Military Construction,
Navy and Marine Corps
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
BY 2012 $M
2004

27.8

2005

2006

0.1

2007

2008

0.2

2009

0.7

2010

34.1

2011

368.5

2012

165.2

2013

89.5

2014

2015

127.4

2016

14.5

2017

186.6

2018

164.8

2019

70.6

2020

144.5

2021

84.8

2022

63.1

2023

2024
Subtotal

228.0
1770.4

All DoN MILCON funding is reflected in the Aircraft subprogram.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft

3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air
Force
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
TY $M
2004

1.7

2005

10.0

2006

2007

2008

100.3

2009

116.0

2010

125.1

2011

139.6

2012

24.3

2013

13.5

2014

56.0

2015

66.7

2016

50.4

2017

14.7

2018

135.9

2019

91.5

2020

134.6

2021

66.6

2022

73.1

2023

167.0

2024

142.3

2025

122.1

2026

118.4

2027

129.9

2028

101.8

2029

102.7

2030

94.6

2031

71.7

2032

71.2

2033

37.5

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2034

24.8

2035

4.3

Subtotal

2408.3

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft

3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air
Force
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
BY 2012 $M
2004

1.9

2005

11.1

2006

2007

2008

104.1

2009

118.8

2010

125.0

2011

136.1

2012

23.3

2013

12.7

2014

51.8

2015

60.5

2016

44.9

2017

12.8

2018

80.4

2019

76.7

2020

110.7

2021

53.7

2022

57.8

2023

129.4

2024

108.1

2025

90.9

2026

86.4

2027

93.0

2028

71.4

2029

70.7

2030

63.8

2031

47.4

2032

46.2

2033

23.8

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2034

15.5

2035

2.6

Subtotal

1931.5

All Air Force F-35 MILCON funding is reflected in the Aircraft subprogram.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding By Appropriation - F-35 Engine

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1995

16.4

1996

15.9

1997

49.3

1998

87.1

1999

89.4

2000

48.8

2001

66.9

2002

409.8

2003

400.5

2004

435.8

2005

614.3

2006

586.3

2007

441.6

2008

596.0

2009

544.6

2010

466.1

2011

216.2

2012

101.8

2013

157.5

2014

62.1

2015

100.1

2016

84.3

2017

1.9

2018
Subtotal

-5

---

0.2
5592.9

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine

21.7

1996

20.6

1997

63.2

1998

110.8

1999

112.4

2000

60.5

2001

81.8

2002

496.0

2003

477.8

2004

505.8

2005

694.7

2006

643.0

2007

472.7

2008

626.5

2009

565.2

2010

476.6

2011

215.8

2012

99.9

2013

152.1

2014

59.0

2015

93.3

2016

77.1

2017

1.7

2018
Subtotal

-5

---

0.2
6128.4

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1994

5.8

1995

19.3

1996

15.8

1997

47.7

1998

87.8

1999

92.4

2000

46.7

2001

66.9

2002

350.4

2003

550.8

2004

533.2

2005

573.5

2006

528.1

2007

639.1

2008

563.9

2009

433.1

2010

445.7

2011

250.9

2012

187.6

2013

202.0

2014

221.5

2015

158.7

2016

128.0

2017

42.6

2018
Subtotal

-9

---

0.5
6192.0

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine

7.8

1995

25.5

1996

20.5

1997

61.2

1998

111.7

1999

116.2

2000

57.9

2001

81.8

2002

424.1

2003

657.1

2004

618.8

2005

648.5

2006

579.1

2007

684.1

2008

592.8

2009

449.5

2010

455.8

2011

250.4

2012

184.1

2013

195.1

2014

210.3

2015

147.9

2016

117.0

2017

38.2

2018
Subtotal

-9

---

0.4
6735.8

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine

0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway Support
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1994

5.7

1995

13.4

1996

4.0

Subtotal

23.1

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine

7.7

1995

17.7

1996

5.2

Subtotal

30.6

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine

9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds
Fiscal
Year

Quantity

End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
TY $M

Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
TY $M

Non
Recurring
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

1996

2.7

1997

3.9

1998

5.1

1999

5.7

2000

1.8

2001

0.5

2002

43.3

2003

124.3

2004

54.1

2005

0.3

2006

2007

75.0

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013
Subtotal

---

0.3
317.0

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine

3.5

1997

5.0

1998

6.5

1999

7.2

2000

2.2

2001

0.6

2002

52.4

2003

148.3

2004

62.8

2005

0.3

2006

2007

80.3

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013
Subtotal

---

0.3
369.4

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine

3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

2006

9.8

2007

47.5

6.9

54.4

27.7

82.1

2008

123.6

35.0

158.6

30.9

189.5

2009

127.0

63.9

190.9

33.3

224.2

2010

176.7

72.6

249.3

59.1

308.4

2011

353.2

91.6

444.8

136.6

581.4

2012

275.3

65.7

341.0

123.0

464.0

2013

262.5

11.9

274.4

89.6

364.0

2014

282.1

31.2

313.3

47.5

360.8

2015

359.9

17.4

377.3

116.2

493.5

2016

600.9

25.2

626.1

136.6

762.7

2017

640.6

47.3

687.9

140.7

828.6

2018

772.4

39.5

811.9

169.2

981.1

2019

775.3

38.1

813.4

190.2

1003.6

2020

814.3

32.5

846.8

175.6

1022.4

2021

1046.6

41.8

1088.4

244.2

1332.6

2022

1075.9

42.1

1118.0

215.5

1333.5

2023

1114.8

43.8

1158.6

267.4

1426.0

2024

1143.7

43.7

1187.4

247.9

1435.3

2025

1175.5

44.1

1219.6

214.9

1434.5

2026

1213.3

45.8

1259.1

264.5

1523.6

2027

1242.1

45.5

1287.6

275.4

1563.0

2028

1272.8

45.7

1318.5

216.3

1534.8

2029

1304.8

48.3

1353.1

262.1

1615.2

2030

1339.5

48.7

1388.2

280.8

1669.0

2031

1388.8

50.9

1439.7

294.6

1734.3

2032

1431.3

49.6

1480.9

202.7

1683.6

2033

1482.5

50.9

1533.4

197.6

1731.0

2034

1548.0

51.7

1599.7

174.6

1774.3

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2035

1590.9

52.8

1643.7

178.8

1822.5

2036

1635.1

51.7

1686.8

154.7

1841.5

2037

1494.4

51.2

1545.6

161.6

1707.2

2038

49.5

2.7

52.2

20.7

72.9

Subtotal

1763

28170.6

1389.8

29560.4

5350.5

34910.9

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine

10.6

2007

50.2

7.3

57.5

29.2

86.7

2008

128.6

36.4

165.0

32.2

197.2

2009

130.3

65.6

195.9

34.2

230.1

2010

177.6

72.9

250.5

59.4

309.9

2011

347.6

90.1

437.7

134.4

572.1

2012

266.7

63.6

330.3

119.2

449.5

2013

250.1

11.3

261.4

85.4

346.8

2014

264.0

29.2

293.2

44.4

337.6

2015

330.4

16.0

346.4

106.7

453.1

2016

541.0

22.7

563.7

122.9

686.6

2017

565.4

41.7

607.1

124.2

731.3

2018

668.4

34.2

702.6

146.4

849.0

2019

657.7

32.3

690.0

161.4

851.4

2020

677.3

27.0

704.3

146.1

850.4

2021

853.4

34.1

887.5

199.1

1086.6

2022

860.1

33.7

893.8

172.2

1066.0

2023

873.7

34.3

908.0

209.6

1117.6

2024

878.8

33.6

912.4

190.5

1102.9

2025

885.5

33.2

918.7

161.9

1080.6

2026

896.1

33.8

929.9

195.3

1125.2

2027

899.4

32.9

932.3

199.4

1131.7

2028

903.5

32.4

935.9

153.6

1089.5

2029

908.1

33.6

941.7

182.4

1124.1

2030

913.9

33.2

947.1

191.7

1138.8

2031

929.0

34.0

963.0

197.1

1160.1

2032

938.7

32.5

971.2

132.9

1104.1

2033

953.2

32.7

985.9

127.0

1112.9

2034

975.8

32.6

1008.4

110.0

1118.4

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2035

983.1

32.6

1015.7

110.6

1126.3

2036

990.6

31.3

1021.9

93.8

1115.7

2037

887.7

30.4

918.1

96.0

1014.1

2038

28.8

1.6

30.4

12.1

42.5

Subtotal

1763

20625.3

1112.8

21738.1

4081.3

25819.4

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Engine

3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
Fiscal
(Aligned
Quantity
Year
with
Quantity)
BY 2012
$M
2006

2007

50.2

2008

128.6

2009

130.3

2010

177.2

2011

347.6

2012

266.7

2013

250.1

2014

264.0

2015

330.4

2016

541.0

2017

565.4

2018

668.4

2019

657.7

2020

677.3

2021

853.4

2022

860.1

2023

873.7

2024

878.8

2025

885.5

2026

896.1

2027

899.4

2028

903.5

2029

908.1

2030

913.9

2031

929.0

2032

938.7

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

2033

953.2

2034

975.8

2035

983.1

2036

994.1

2037

891.2

2038
Subtotal

2
1763

32.8
20625.3

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine

1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M

Total
Flyaway
TY $M

Total
Support
TY $M

Total
Program
TY $M

2007

27.4

2008

246.1

1.3

247.4

1.2

248.6

2009

298.0

54.3

352.3

65.6

417.9

2010

599.0

118.4

717.4

127.6

845.0

2011

400.5

112.6

513.1

122.3

635.4

2012

191.4

57.7

249.1

62.0

311.1

2013

236.9

26.6

263.5

169.8

433.3

2014

227.1

21.6

248.7

142.4

391.1

2015

225.5

32.2

257.7

73.5

331.2

2016

342.0

20.3

362.3

100.5

462.8

2017

545.5

31.5

577.0

112.4

689.4

2018

752.3

28.1

780.4

134.4

914.8

2019

850.9

127.6

978.5

139.8

1118.3

2020

891.8

80.8

972.6

215.0

1187.6

2021

895.9

72.2

968.1

257.5

1225.6

2022

917.5

74.3

991.8

186.9

1178.7

2023

932.8

73.5

1006.3

212.6

1218.9

2024

960.9

87.1

1048.0

200.7

1248.7

2025

982.5

82.8

1065.3

203.7

1269.0

2026

1010.8

86.6

1097.4

174.4

1271.8

2027

1032.0

66.9

1098.9

108.2

1207.1

2028

1055.2

63.0

1118.2

102.5

1220.7

2029

1079.5

63.7

1143.2

97.1

1240.3

2030

1019.3

56.7

1076.0

96.8

1172.8

2031

389.3

41.7

431.0

57.6

488.6

2032

358.9

43.7

402.6

46.0

448.6

2033

295.5

42.0

337.5

42.4

379.9

Subtotal

680

16764.5

1567.2

18331.7

3252.9

21584.6

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine

28.9

2008

256.1

1.4

257.5

1.2

258.7

2009

305.8

55.7

361.5

67.3

428.8

2010

601.9

119.0

720.9

128.2

849.1

2011

394.1

110.8

504.9

120.3

625.2

2012

185.4

56.0

241.4

60.0

301.4

2013

225.7

25.3

251.0

161.8

412.8

2014

212.5

20.2

232.7

133.3

366.0

2015

207.0

29.6

236.6

67.5

304.1

2016

307.9

18.3

326.2

90.5

416.7

2017

481.5

27.8

509.3

99.2

608.5

2018

651.0

24.3

675.3

116.3

791.6

2019

721.9

108.2

830.1

118.6

948.7

2020

741.7

67.2

808.9

178.9

987.8

2021

730.5

58.9

789.4

210.0

999.4

2022

733.5

59.4

792.9

149.4

942.3

2023

731.1

57.6

788.7

166.6

955.3

2024

738.3

66.9

805.2

154.3

959.5

2025

740.1

62.4

802.5

153.5

956.0

2026

746.5

64.0

810.5

128.8

939.3

2027

747.2

48.4

795.6

78.4

874.0

2028

749.1

44.7

793.8

72.7

866.5

2029

751.3

44.3

795.6

67.6

863.2

2030

695.5

38.7

734.2

66.0

800.2

2031

260.4

27.9

288.3

38.5

326.8

2032

235.4

28.6

264.0

30.2

294.2

2033

190.0

27.0

217.0

27.3

244.3

Subtotal

680

13370.3

1292.6

14662.9

2686.4

17349.3

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Engine

1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
Fiscal
(Aligned
Quantity
Year
with
Quantity)
BY 2012
$M
2007

2008

256.1

2009

305.8

2010

601.9

2011

394.1

2012

185.4

2013

225.7

2014

212.5

2015

207.0

2016

307.9

2017

481.5

2018

651.0

2019

721.9

2020

741.7

2021

730.5

2022

733.5

2023

731.1

2024

738.3

2025

740.1

2026

746.5

2027

747.2

2028

749.1

2029

751.3

2030

695.5

2031

270.0

2032

245.0

2033

199.7

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

Subtotal

December 2013 SAR

680

13370.3

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Low Rate Initial Production

F-35 Aircraft
Approval Date
Approved Quantity
Reference
Start Year
End Year

Initial LRIP Decision

10/26/2001
465
Original MS B Acquisition
Decision Memorandum
(ADM)
2006
2015

Current Total LRIP

2/24/2010
336
Based on March 2012 MS
B Re-approval ADM
2006
2018

The Current Total LRIP Quantity is more than 10% of the total production quantity due to the necessity to prevent a
break in production and to ramp up to full rate production.
The Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition Technology and Logistics) approved the LRIP quantity of 465 (in six
LRIP lots) in the original MS B ADM dated October 26, 2001. The LRIP quantity has been revised to 336 (in eleven
LRIP lots) based on the FY 2015 PB.
F-35 Engine
Approval Date
Approved Quantity
Reference
Start Year
End Year

Initial LRIP Decision

10/26/2001
465
Original MS B Acquisition
Decision Memorandum
(ADM)
2006
2015

Current Total LRIP

2/24/2010
336
Based on March 2012 MS
B Re-approval ADM
2006
2018

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Foreign Military Sales

F-35 Aircraft
Country
Japan

Israel

Date of
Total
Quantity
Memo
Sale
Cost $M
9/2/2013
6
1300.0 Japan signed an amendment to add two F-35A's
delivered from a Japan F-35 Final Assembly and
Checkout in 2017. There is an option to purchase
36 additional F-35A aircraft.
9/30/2010
19
2623.3 All 19 aircraft will be the F-35A aircraft.

F-35 Engine
FMS information for the F-35 Engine subprogram are reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.

Nuclear Costs
F-35 Aircraft
None
F-35 Engine
None

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Unit Cost
F-35 Aircraft
Unit Cost Report
BY2012 $M
Current UCR
Baseline
(MAR 2012 APB)

Unit Cost
Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost

Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC)

Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost

Current Estimate
(DEC 2013 SAR)

BY
% Change

276482.2
2458
112.483

267060.6
2457
108.694

-3.37

224333.7
2443
91.827

217450.0
2443
89.009

-3.07

BY2012 $M
Revised
Original UCR
Baseline
(MAR 2012 APB)

Unit Cost

BY2012 $M

BY2012 $M
Current Estimate
(DEC 2013 SAR)

BY
% Change

276482.2
2458
112.483

267060.6
2457
108.694

-3.37

224333.7
2443
91.827

217450.0
2443
89.009

-3.07

The DoD average F-35 Aircraft Unit Recurring Flyaway (URF) Cost consists of the Hardware (Airframe, Vehicle
Systems, Mission Systems, and Engineering Change Order) costs over the life of the program. The URF
assumes the quantity benefits of 61 FMS aircraft and 612 International Partner aircraft.
F-35A (Conventional Take Off and Landing) URF - $66.0 M (BY 2012)
F-35B (Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) URF - $76.8M (BY 2012)
F-35C (Carrier Variant) URF - $78.2 M (BY 2012)

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

F-35 Aircraft
Unit Cost History

Original APB
APB as of January 2006
Revised Original APB
Prior APB
Current APB
Prior Annual SAR
Current Estimate

Date
OCT 2001
MAR 2004
MAR 2012
MAR 2007
MAR 2012
DEC 2012
DEC 2013

BY2012 $M
PAUC
APUC
74.567
60.632
94.837
73.845
112.529
91.827
104.363
83.467
112.529
91.827
108.235
88.244
108.694
89.009

TY $M
PAUC
81.298
100.407
135.065
113.318
135.065
133.054
134.296

APUC
68.934
81.826
115.697
94.857
115.697
114.184
115.747

SAR Unit Cost History

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

Initial PAUC
Dev Est
135.065

Econ
2.643

Qty
0.000

Sch
1.028

Changes
Eng
Est
0.000 -3.427

Oth
0.000

UNCLASSIFIED

Spt
-1.013

Total
-0.769

PAUC
Current Est
134.296

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

Initial APUC
Dev Est
115.697

Econ
2.580

Qty
0.000

Sch
1.034

Changes
Eng
Est
0.000 -2.545

Oth
0.000

Spt
Total
-1.019 0.050

APUC
Current Est
115.747

SAR Baseline History

Item/Event
Milestone I
Milestone B
Milestone C
IOC
Total Cost (TY $M)
Total Quantity
Prog. Acq. Unit Cost (PAUC)

SAR
Planning
Estimate (PE)
N/A
MAR 2001
TBD
TBD
24800.0
N/A
N/A

SAR
Development
Estimate (DE)
NOV 1996
NOV 2011
APR 2019
TBD
331855.2
2457
135.065

SAR
Production
Estimate (PdE)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Current
Estimate
NOV 1996
MAR 2012
APR 2019
JUL 2015
329964.1
2457
134.296

The Service IOC reflected in the above table is the United States Marine Corps Objective date. In addition, the Air
Force IOC objective date is August 2016, and the Navy IOC objective date is August 2018.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

F-35 Engine
Unit Cost Report
BY2012 $M
Current UCR
Baseline
(MAR 2012 APB)

Unit Cost
Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost

Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC)

Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost

Current Estimate
(DEC 2013 SAR)

BY
% Change

53916.4
2458
21.935

56432.9
2457
22.968

+4.71

42332.9
2443
17.328

43168.7
2443
17.670

+1.97

BY2012 $M
Original UCR
Baseline
(MAR 2012 APB)

Unit Cost

BY2012 $M

BY2012 $M
Current Estimate
(DEC 2013 SAR)

BY
% Change

53916.4
2458
21.935

56432.9
2457
22.968

+4.71

42332.9
2443
17.328

43168.7
2443
17.670

+1.97

The DoD average F-35 Engine Unit Recurring Flyaway (URF) Cost consists of the Hardware (Propulsion and
Engineering Change Order) costs over the life of the program. The URF assumes the quantity benefits of 61
FMS engines and 612 International Partner engines.
F-35A (Conventional Take Off and Landing) URF - $11.7 M (BY 2012)
F-35B (Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) URF - $28.0 M (BY 2012)
F-35C (Carrier Variant) URF - $11.5 M (BY 2012)

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

F-35 Engine
Unit Cost History

Original APB
APB as of January 2006
Revised Original APB
Prior APB
Current APB
Prior Annual SAR
Current Estimate

Date
MAR 2012
N/A
N/A
N/A
MAR 2012
DEC 2012
DEC 2013

BY2012 $M
PAUC
APUC
21.989
17.328
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
21.989
17.328
21.771
16.599
22.968
17.670

TY $M
PAUC
25.990
N/A
N/A
N/A
25.990
26.170
27.929

APUC
21.708
N/A
N/A
N/A
21.708
21.480
23.125

SAR Unit Cost History

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

Initial PAUC
Dev Est
25.990

Econ
0.492

Qty
0.000

Sch
0.190

Changes
Eng
Est
0.000 1.337

Oth
0.000

UNCLASSIFIED

Spt
-0.080

Total
1.939

PAUC
Current Est
27.929

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

Initial APUC
Dev Est
21.708

Econ
0.483

Qty
0.000

Sch
0.191

Changes
Eng
Est
0.000 0.824

Oth
0.000

Spt
-0.081

Total
1.417

APUC
Current Est
23.125

SAR Baseline History

Item/Event
Milestone A
Milestone B
Milestone C
IOC
Total Cost (TY $M)
Total Quantity
Prog. Acq. Unit Cost (PAUC)

SAR
Planning
Estimate (PE)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

SAR
Development
Estimate (DE)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
63856.6
2457
25.990

UNCLASSIFIED

SAR
Production
Estimate (PdE)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Current
Estimate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
68620.5
2457
27.929

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Variance
F-35 Aircraft

SAR Baseline (Dev Est)

Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Adjustments
Total Changes
CE - Cost Variance
CE - Cost & Funding

Summary Then Year $M

RDT&E
Proc
44410.1
282647.8

MILCON
4797.3

Total
331855.2

+172.3
----1221.7
---1049.4

+6729.8
-+1486.6
--10131.1
--1781.2
-3695.9

+114.3
----311.4
---197.1

+7016.4
-+1486.6
--11664.2
--1781.2
-4942.4

-82.3
----505.8
---588.1
--1637.5
42772.6
42772.6

-426.0
-+1039.1
-+3912.5
--707.0
+3818.6
-+122.7
282770.5
282770.5

-14.4
----164.8
---179.2
--376.3
4421.0
4421.0

-522.7
-+1039.1
-+3241.9
--707.0
+3051.3
--1891.1
329964.1
329964.1

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

SAR Baseline (Dev Est)

December 2013 SAR

Summary Base Year 2012 $M

RDT&E
Proc
47982.1
224332.9

MILCON
4168.0

Total
276483.0

-----1524.6
---1524.6

-----7016.7
--1737.2
-8753.9

-----270.2
---270.2

-----8811.5
--1737.2
-10548.7

-----548.8
---548.8
--2073.4
45908.7
45908.7

----+2590.1
--719.1
+1871.0
--6882.9
217450.0
217450.0

-----195.9
---195.9
--466.1
3701.9
3701.9

----+1845.4
--719.1
+1126.3
--9422.4
267060.6
267060.6

Previous Estimate: December 2012

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

RDT&E

Current Change Explanations

Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Realignment of costs between Aircraft subprogram and Engine subprogram (Air Force)
(Estimating)
Increase due to realignment of program funding and Actual Funding Investment (Air
Force) (Estimating)
Realignment of costs between Aircraft subprogram and Engine subprogram (Navy)
(Estimating)
Decrease due to realignment of program funding, Congressional reductions and Actual
Funding Investment (Navy) (Estimating)
Realignment of costs between Aircraft subprogram and Engine subprogram
(International) (Estimating)
RDT&E Subtotal
Procurement

Base
Year
N/A
+46.0

Then
Year
-82.3
+47.5

-174.9

-155.0

+5.1

+16.9

-21.9

-22.7

-368.1

-364.1

-35.0

-28.4

-548.8

-588.1

Current Change Explanations

Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate) and
extended program from FY 2037 to FY 2038 (Air Force) (Schedule)
Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate) and
extended program from FY 2032 to FY 2033 (Navy) (Schedule)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Revised estimate of subcontractor cost due to the incorporation of the latest actuals
from early LRIP lots (Air Force) (Estimating)
Revised estimate of subcontractor cost due to the incorporation of the latest actuals
from early LRIP lots (Navy) (Estimating)
Revised estimate of Airframe cost due to the incorporation of the latest actuals from
early LRIP lots (Air Force) (Estimating)
Revised estimate of Airframe cost due to the incorporation of the latest actuals from
early LRIP lots (Navy) (Estimating)
Increase due to the incorporation of latest Prime and subcontractor Labor Rates and
exchange rates (Air Force) (Estimating)
Increase due to the incorporation of latest Prime and subcontractor Labor Rates and
exchange rates (Navy) (Estimating)
Increase due to slower International Partner (IP) procurement quantity profile (Air Force)
(Estimating)
Increase due to slower IP procurement quantity profile (Navy) (Estimating)
Updated methodologies, material costs, and learning curves (Air Force) (Estimating)
Updated methodologies, material costs, and learning curves (Navy) (Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support)
Decrease in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of

UNCLASSIFIED

Base
Year
N/A

Then
Year
-426.0

0.0

+158.3

0.0

+880.8

+160.6

+167.1

-516.3

-759.5

-189.1

-347.0

+899.5

+1323.5

-379.6

-695.7

+2386.5

+3512.6

+854.2

+1563.8

+566.1

+832.9

+104.4
-1381.0
+84.8
+44.3

+191.4
-2032.3
+155.7
+46.7

F-35

December 2013 SAR

customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Air Force)
(Support)
Decrease in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Navy)
(Support)
Increase in Initial Spares due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Air Force)
(Support)
Increase in Initial Spares due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Navy)
(Support)
Procurement Subtotal
MILCON

-191.4

-531.5

-724.6

-943.8

+153.8

+551.6

-1.2

+170.0

+1871.0

+3818.6

Current Change Explanations

Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Increase due to revised estimate of MILCON requirements (Air Force) (Estimating)
Decrease due to revised estimate of MILCON requirements (Navy) (Estimating)
MILCON Subtotal

UNCLASSIFIED

Base
Year
N/A
+8.6
+23.1
-227.6
-195.9

Then
Year
-14.4
+9.1
+64.4
-238.3
-179.2

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Variance
F-35 Engine

SAR Baseline (Dev Est)

Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
CE - Cost Variance
CE - Cost & Funding

Summary Then Year $M

RDT&E
Proc
10823.7
53032.9

MILCON
--

Total
63856.6

+42.4
---+956.1
--+998.5

+1258.9
-+271.3
--1593.4
--493.2
-556.4

---------

+1301.3
-+271.3
--637.3
--493.2
+442.1

-11.7
---+314.5
--+302.8
+1301.3
12125.0
12125.0

-79.8
-+196.1
-+3606.9
-+295.8
+4019.0
+3462.6
56495.5
56495.5

------------

-91.5
-+196.1
-+3921.4
-+295.8
+4321.8
+4763.9
68620.5
68620.5

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

SAR Baseline (Dev Est)

Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
CE - Cost Variance
CE - Cost & Funding

December 2013 SAR

Summary Base Year 2012 $M

RDT&E
Proc
11695.2
42332.9

MILCON
--

Total
54028.1

----+1245.4
--+1245.4

-----1446.4
--335.4
-1781.8

---------

-----201.0
--335.4
-536.4

----+323.6
--+323.6
+1569.0
13264.2
13264.2

----+2517.8
-+99.8
+2617.6
+835.8
43168.7
43168.7

------------

----+2841.4
-+99.8
+2941.2
+2404.8
56432.9
56432.9

Previous Estimate: December 2012

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

RDT&E

Current Change Explanations

Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Realignment of costs between Aircraft subprogram and Engine subprogram (Air Force)
(Estimating)
Decrease due to realignment of program funding, Congressional Reductions, and
Actual Funding Investment (Air Force) (Estimating)
Realignment of costs between Aircraft subprogram and Engine subprogram (Navy)
(Estimating)
Decrease due to realignment of program funding, Congressional Reductions, and
Actual Funding Investment (Navy) (Estimating)
Realignment of costs between Aircraft subprogram and Engine subprogram
(International) (Estimating)
Realignment of cost between Aircraft subprogram and Engine subprogram
(International) (Estimating)
RDT&E Subtotal
Procurement

Base
Year
N/A
+8.7

Then
Year
-11.7
+8.9

+174.4

+155.0

-104.7

-108.4

+21.9

+22.7

+191.7

+208.6

+30.7

+27.7

+0.9

0.0

+323.6

+302.8

Current Change Explanations

Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate) and
extended program from FY 2037 to FY 2038 (Air Force) (Schedule)
Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate) and
extended program from FY 2032 to FY 2033 (Navy) (Schedule)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Updated exchange rates (Air Force) (Estimating)
Updated exchange rates (Navy) (Estimating)
Increase due to incorporation of latest actual costs from LRIP lots (Air Force)
(Estimating)
Increase due to incorporation of latest actual costs from LRIP lots (Navy) (Estimating)
Increase due to slower International procurement quantity profile (Air Force)
(Estimating)
Increase due to slower International procurement quantity profile (Navy) (Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support)
Decrease in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Air Force)
(Support)
Increase in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of customer
requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Navy) (Support)
Increase in Initial Support due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Air Force)
(Support)

UNCLASSIFIED

Base
Year
N/A

Then
Year
-79.8

0.0

+30.0

0.0

+166.1

+26.0
+944.7
+253.8

+27.5
+1384.5
+350.8

+630.6

+923.8

+591.8

+818.0

+57.1

+83.4

+13.8
+8.5

+18.9
+8.4

+2.0

-34.6

+23.4

+3.0

+59.2

+239.6

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Increase in Initial Support due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Navy)
(Support)
Procurement Subtotal

UNCLASSIFIED

+6.7

+79.4

+2617.6

+4019.0

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Contracts
Appropriation: RDT&E
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
18981.9
N/A
14

JSF Air System SDD

Lockheed Martin
Fort Worth, TX 76101
N00019-02-C-3002, CPAF
October 26, 2001
October 26, 2001
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
20029.8
N/A
14

Estimated Price at Completion ($M)

Contractor
Program Manager
34139.0
33631.6

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to execution of
contract modifications that adjusted tasks, estimated cost and available fee; and the removal of unearned award
fee.
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change

Cost Variance

Schedule Variance
-433.6
-392.6
-41.0

-245.5
-221.0
-24.5

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to additional effort in Mission Systems software development
and test, additional contractor Program Office resources, additional Indirect/Overhead expense (which follows direct
account performance) and increased Training Systems effort. Material transfer in Production Operations was a
favorable offset.
The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to delayed Mission Systems software builds, delayed
Weapons Integration progress, and delayed Training Systems deliveries. Indirect/Overhead and Laboratory
Development were favorable offsets.
Contract Comments
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
The Estimated Price at Completion reflects the revised program schedule and content following the Technical
Baseline Review (TBR) that was conducted in 2010. The TBR recommendations are the basis of a program replan
which resulted in formal contractual implementation of an Over Target Baseline (OTB) (OTB #3) and an OTS in
2013. A Schedule Risk Assessment was completed in January 2014. The Estimated Price at Completion may be
adjusted as impacts of the program restructure and TBR are finalized.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

Appropriation: RDT&E
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
4827.8
N/A
33

December 2013 SAR

JSF Propulsion F135 SDD

Pratt & Whitney
East Hartford, CT 06118
N00019-02-C-3003, CPAF
October 26, 2001
October 26, 2001
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
6610.1
N/A
33

Estimated Price at Completion ($M)

Contractor
Program Manager
8211.8
8234.0

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to execution of
contract modifications that adjusted tasks, estimated cost and fee.
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change

Cost Variance

Schedule Variance
+19.5
-20.0
+39.5

-40.1
-26.8
-13.3

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to favorable retroactive 2010 and 2012 general and
administrative rate adjustments, less labor resources and more cost effective skill mix to support Flight Test, labor
efficiencies and less engineering requirements for Lift Fan work scope and less labor required than planned in
Propulsion System Analysis due to a number of issues impacting flight test flying hours.
The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to late spares and manufacturing priorities in Flight Test
Facilities and Logistics Support, delays with Rolls Royce Affordability tasks and Lift Fan testing delays and late
hardware.
Contract Comments
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
Schedule extensions and cost overruns associated with the approved program restructures that were executed in
2008 and 2011, all of which incorporated Over Target Baselines.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
3899.2
N/A
32

December 2013 SAR

JSF Air System LRIP 4

Lockheed Martin
Ft. Worth, TX 76101
N00019-09-C-0010, FPIF
March 11, 2009
January 19, 2010
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
5599.9
N/A
32

Estimated Price at Completion ($M)

Contractor
Program Manager
5754.0
5708.8

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
modifications that drove the approximately $1.7 billion Target Price changes to include: Sustainment definitization in
January 2012 ($765M increase to Target Price), Production Non-Recurring definitization and increased
Concurrency Cap for the aircraft Contract Line Items (CLINs) in May 2012 ($917M increase to Target Price), and
Northrop Grumman Corporation Block Load Unwind in December 2012 ($52M increase to Target Price).
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change

Cost Variance

Schedule Variance
-344.2
-372.2
+28.0

-104.2
-199.3
+95.1

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to the implementation of material-related corrective actions that
enabled performance to be earned for previously issued hardware.
The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the implementation of material-related corrective actions
that enabled performance to be earned for previously issued hardware. The favorable net change is also due to
schedule recovery for previously late aircraft (all aircraft were DD 250'd as of month-end November 2013).
Contract Comments
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
As a whole, the LRIP 4 CLINs consist of multiple contract types including Fixed Price Incentive Fee as well as Cost
Plus Incentive Fee and Cost Plus Fixed-Fee. For this reason, the overall contract type is mixed and there is not a
true contract ceiling.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
1133.9
1229.9
37

December 2013 SAR

JSF Propulsion F135 LRIP 4

Pratt & Whitney
East Hartford, CT 06118
N00019-09-C-0015, CPIF/FPIF
August 02, 2008
May 13, 2011
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
1156.3
1231.6
37

Estimated Price at Completion ($M)

Contractor
Program Manager
1161.4
1171.4

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to the following
contract modifications: Netherlands engine, laser measurement, class spacers and thermal sensor engineering
changes.
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change

Cost Variance

Schedule Variance
-41.6
-40.0
-1.6

-4.6
-56.4
+51.8

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to cost increases for spare parts and raw material increases
for High Pressure Compressor Variable Vanes and Integrally Bladed Rotors.
The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to schedule recovery from previously late to baseline plan
for hardware, spare parts, spare modules, support equipment and tooling.
Contract Comments
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
Note: variance explanations are based on the final six months of cost performance reporting for this contract. The
last cost performance report was received in July 2013.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
3949.6
N/A
32

JSF Air System LRIP 5

Lockheed Martin
Ft Worth, TX 76101
N00019-10-C-0002, FPIF
July 06, 2010
December 14, 2012
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
4772.8
N/A
32

Estimated Price at Completion ($M)

Contractor
Program Manager
5027.4
0.0

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
modifications that drove the approximately $823M Target Price changes include: Production Non-Recurring and
Tech Assist definitization in April 2013 ($464M increase to Target Price) and Annualized Sustainment definitization
in September 2013 ($409M increase to Target Price); Target Price increases were offset by a fee decrement of
$50M in January 2013 for government-funded concurrency.
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change

Cost Variance

Schedule Variance
-130.5
-62.1
-68.4

-185.9
-339.1
+153.2

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to primarily driven by Out-of-Station effort and labor
performance inefficiencies within Final Assembly including Seam Validation failures/non-conformances, material
non-conformances and material availability impacting production flow.
The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to primarily driven by re-baselining both labor and material
to the definitized target dates in February 2013.
Contract Comments
As a whole, the LRIP 5 Contract Line Item Numbers consist of multiple contract types including Fixed Price Incentive
Fee as well as Cost Plus Incentive Fee and Cost Plus Fixed-Fee. For this reason, the overall contract type is mixed
and there is not a true contract ceiling.
The Program Manager's Estimate is TBD.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
1122.3
1122.3
36

December 2013 SAR

JSF Propulsion F135 LRIP 5

Pratt & Whitney
Hartford, CT 06118
N00019-10-C-0005, CPIF/FPIF
December 28, 2011
April 24, 2013
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
1016.4
1026.4
36

Estimated Price at Completion ($M)

Contractor
Program Manager
1008.5
1016.4

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
definitization in April 2013 which lowered the ceiling price from the previous Undefinitized Contract Action price.
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change

Cost Variance

Schedule Variance
-26.7
--26.7

-19.4
--19.4

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable cumulative cost variance is due to raw material and manufacturing cost increases for the Fan and
High Pressure Compressor Integrally Bladed Rotors, Nozzle D-Flaps war on cost savings not realized, Externals
Fueldraulic Systems cost savings initiatives were not achieved and engine assembly and tooling costs exceeded
the plan.
The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to schedule recovery from previously late to baseline plan for
hardware, spare parts, spare modules, support equipment and tooling.
Contract Comments
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
Contract is more than 90% complete, but the contractor declared an Over Target Schedule (OTS) in November 2013
for spare parts, support equipment and tooling that will not be completed within the period of performance. The
Government program office is reviewing the request and working the final details with extending the contract. If the
OTS is accepted by the Government, the 90% complete will change.
The previous cumulative variance is not populated since this is the first time the F135 LRIP 5 is being reported. This
caused an incorrect cost and schedule variance and an incorrect net cost and schedule variance. Correct values are
stated below:
Cost Variance -26.7
Schedule Variance -19.5
Net Cost Variance -29.7
Net Schedule Variance +132.5

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Deliveries and Expenditures

F-35 Aircraft
Delivered to Date

Plan to Date

Development
Production
Total Program Quantity Delivered

Total Acquisition Cost

Expended to Date
Percent Expended
Total Funding Years

Actual to Date

14
82
96

14
71
85

Total Quantity
14
2443
2457

Expended and Appropriated (TY $M)

329964.1
Years Appropriated
55985.7
Percent Years Appropriated
16.97%
Appropriated to Date
45
Percent Appropriated

Percent
Delivered
100.00%
2.91%
3.46%

21
46.67%
73383.2
22.24%

The above data is current as of 3/10/2014.

Planned deliveries in 2013 were primarily delayed due to specialty metals, propulsion system issues, and runway
shut down due to Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth, Texas, runway re-surfacing
Totals reflect United States aircraft only-no International Partner aircraft
F-35 Engine
Delivered to Date

Plan to Date

Development
Production
Total Program Quantity Delivered

Total Acquisition Cost

Expended to Date
Percent Expended
Total Funding Years

Actual to Date

14
82
96

14
71
85

Total Quantity
14
2443
2457

Expended and Appropriated (TY $M)

68620.5
Years Appropriated
14896.4
Percent Years Appropriated
21.71%
Appropriated to Date
45
Percent Appropriated

Percent
Delivered
100.00%
2.91%
3.46%

21
46.67%
17502.7
25.51%

The above data is current as of 3/10/2014.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Operating and Support Cost

F-35 Aircraft
Assumptions and Ground Rules
Cost Estimate Reference:
The Department's Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation (CAPE) office updated its O&S cost estimate for the
December 2013 SAR.
Sustainment Strategy:
The F-35 weapon system sustainment strategy is based on the following tenets:
(1) the program office will serve as the Product Support Manager
(2) the long term Product Support Integrator is yet to be determined
(3) the program will inject competition in areas where feasible
(4) program will continually improve Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) of the weapon system to drive down O&S
costs
Antecedent Information:
The F-35 family of aircraft variants will replace the following current aircraft: F-16C/D, A-10, F/A-18C/D, and AV8B. The F-35 O&S estimate is based on legacy fleet history only when F-35 specific data is not available.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

Cost Element
Unit-Level Manpower
Unit Operations
Maintenance
Sustaining Support
Continuing System Improvements
Indirect Support
Other
Total

Unitized O&S Costs BY2012 $K

F-35 Aircraft
Cost per Flying Hour ($)
8.792
7.275
10.019
3.132
3.336
0.000
0.000
32.554

F-16C/D (Antecedent)
Cost per Flying Hour ($)
10.042
5.632
5.501
2.075
2.291
0.000
0.000
25.541

Unitized Cost Comments:

Comparing the costs of the 5th Generation F-35 to legacy aircraft is challenging. The cost table above compares an
adjusted F-16C/D Cost per Flying Hour (CPFH) to a forecast of the CPFH for the F-35A variant. The F-35A CPFH
figure is based on the Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL) variant only. The F-35A CTOL variant will make
up the majority of the DoD F-35 aircraft procurement, accounting for 1,763 of 2,443 total aircraft currently planned for
United States (U.S.) forces.
The F-16C/D CPFH figures were developed in a joint effort between CAPE and the Air Force Cost Analysis
Agency. The figures have been normalized for comparison to the F-35A CPFH forecast. The starting point for the
F-16C/D CPFH is an average of actual cost incurred for this fleet during FY 2008 through FY 2010. In order to
enable the direct comparison of the CPFH figures, the actual F-16C/D CPFH is adjusted to reflect the cost of fuel,
the number of flight hours forecast for the F-35A, and FY 2013 inflation indices. The F-16C/D figures include costs
that F-16 shares with other Air Force platforms: Systems Engineering/Program Management (SEPM), maintenance
training costs, certain software development efforts, and information systems. Costs for mission planning are
included in the F-35A CPFH figure, but equivalent costs for the F-16C/D are not available, and no adjustment was
made for this element of cost. Finally, the F-16C/D figures assume full funding of requirements consistent with the F35A CPFH figures.
Although the unitized costs for the entire F-35 program decreased slightly when compared to figures from the 2012
Milestone (MS) B estimate, the F-35A CTOL unitized cost figure shown in the Table above increased slightly relative
to the comparable MS B figure. There are three considerations that result in a slight increase for the F-35A unitized
cost shown above: 1) discrete modelling for Air Force squadrons by geographic location and active or reserve
components; 2) no change in the fuel burn rate for the F-35A variant; and 3) updated Depot-Level Repairable (DLR)
reliabilities and costs as discussed in detail in the following section on Total O&S Costs.
Given the significant increase in military capabilities provided, it is reasonable to expect F-35A to cost more to
operate and sustain than 4th generation legacy aircraft.
Total O&S Cost $M

Base Year
Then Year

Current Development APB

Objective/Threshold
F-35 Aircraft
617000.0
678700.0
1113272.6
N/A

Current Estimate
F-35 Aircraft
F-16C/D (Antecedent)
597773.6
N/A
1016516.0
N/A

Total O&S Costs Comments:

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

The Total O&S Cost figures above reflect the CAPE independent life-cycle estimate of O&S costs, updated in 2013
in accordance with tasking from the annual Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) review of the F-35 program. The
O&S cost estimate includes all three U.S. aircraft variants, is based on a forecast 30-year service-life, and is based
on planned usage rates provided by the relevant military service. The planned F-35 usage rates, in terms of aircraft
flight hours per year, are as follows: F-35A CTOL @ 250 hrs./yr.; F-35B Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing @ 302
hrs./yr.; and F-35C Carrier Variant @ 316 hrs./yr. The total life-cycle cost estimate is not a simple extrapolation of
the F-35A flying hour cost shown in the unitized O&S cost table above. Total O&S costs are updated using FY 2013
inflation indices, and include updated forecasts of labor escalation rates for military, civilian, and contractor
personnel. A comparable total cost figure for the antecedent system (i.e., F-16C/D) is not available.
The 2013 CAPE estimate of F-35 total life cycle O&S costs incorporates updated information regarding several key
cost elements relative to the CAPE O&S cost estimate prepared for the MS B review in early 2012. This includes
updated fuel burn rates for the F-35B and F-35C variants, use of historical escalation rates for government
personnel, discrete modeling for Air Force squadrons by geographic location and active or reserve components,
and updated DLR costs. The updated information results in increased cost forecasts for certain cost elements, and
decreased cost forecasts for other elements. The 2013 CAPE total O&S estimate is approximately three percent
lower (in BY 2012 dollars) and nine percent lower (in TY dollars) than the total O&S cost estimate prepared for the
2012 MS B re-approval DAB review.
For the first time, in 2013, the CAPE O&S cost estimate incorporates actual information on component reliabilities
obtained from the ongoing F-35 flight operations, including flight test and field operations. This program information
is provided from the DoD test community, through the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, and includes actual
reliability information on many F-35 components based on data collected during approximately 8,500 hours of flight
operations. The data include the F-35A and F-35B variants, and flight operations through October 2013.
The reliability information has been compared to expected reliabilities for this stage of the program, for the A and B
variants, based on reliability growth curves. The 2013 CAPE O&S estimate includes an increase of $15 billion
(BY12 $) in DLR costs, relative to the 2012 Milestone B estimate, because component reliability information
obtained from actual flight operations data is not consistent with expectations.
CAPE will continue to work with the DoD operational test community to improve the processes and methods used to
incorporate actual data and information on component reliabilities and removal rates, obtained from ongoing flight
operations, into the CAPE life-cycle O&S cost estimate for the F-35 program. This information will be used,
together with reliability improvement forecasts, to update the life cycle O&S cost estimates as the program
proceeds to and beyond IOC.
The December 2012 SAR identified a few disciplined initiatives designed to reduce sustainment cost. Among
those were a sustainment Business Case Analysis (BCA) to identify cost reduction areas, an Industry day to foster
competition in selected areas of the program, R&M improvements to optimize maintenance approach and a
Targeted Affordability Program with emphasis on total ownership cost. Phase II of the BCA is complete and
consisted of Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS), technical refresh, software and hardware
maintenance, Depot planning, site activation and component repair as well as Support Equipment management
repair and training systems. Working in parallel with the prime contractor to reduce cost via competition, the prime
has executed a competition for Support Equipment which has resulted in approximately seven percent reduction in
Support Equipment procurement costs. Since last year, the F-35 program office has assembled a readiness cell to
identify problem areas through use of metrics and analytical data for solutions to reach availability goals of 60
percent or greater across all variants. In combination, program office implemented a fully funded R&M improvement
program which includes diagnostics and analysis of select initiatives as candidate improvements. These
candidates are identified from readiness cell inputs that have the highest impact or potential for redesign to
maximize air system availability. The Program Executive Officer has approved implementation of the top 20

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

engineering retrofit candidates by year end. The goal is to have 20 candidates implemented in 50 percent of the
LRIP 2, 3 and 4 aircraft. The Targeted Affordability Program synchronizes these efforts enterprise wide with the
standup of the Cost War Room (CWR) in September 2013. The CWR is led by the program office in conjunction
with Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney, and is working on integrating both International Partner and U.S.
Services. The CWR is specifically designed to be enterprise driven by defined sustainment cost reduction targets.
At present, the CWR has generated approximately $17 billion (B) of cost saving initiatives in analysis and
approximately $24B in the implementation and execution phase. The net effect of current initiatives will be
incorporated in the Programs 2014 Annual Cost Estimate.
The F-35 program office estimate of $916.8B TY$ ($541.1B BY 2012 dollars) differs from the CAPE estimate in
primarily four areas: reliability, depot overhaul, government/contractor manpower and F-35A fuel consumption. In
each of these cases, the F-35 program office elected to use the latest technical data provided by F-35 personnel
working in conjunction with the Services. The CAPE used a different data source for reliability as described above.
In the case of depot overhaul, government/contractor personnel, and F-35A fuel consumption the CAPE used
different technical assumptions than the program office. Incorporating the same technical baseline for these four
areas results in less than two percent difference between the CAPE and F-35 program estimates, as opposed to
the current ten percent difference.

Category
Prior SAR Total O&S Estimate December 2012

O&S Cost Variance

Base Year
2012 $M
617,014.431

Change Explanation

Discrete modeling of U.S. Air Force AC/RC mix & application

of historical cost escalation
Spare Parts Unit Database updated & application of historical
cost escalation
Revised labor rates

Cost Estimating Methodology

+18,082.128

Cost Data Update

-54,552.986

Labor Rate
Energy Rate
Technical Input
Programmatic/Planning Factors
Other
Total Changes
Current Estimate

-10,614.199
0.000
-6,652.916 Increased fuel efficiency
+11,517.132 Updated indirect cost factors and inflation guidance
+22,979.962 Reliability risk for depot-level repairs added
-19,240.879
597,773.552

Disposal Costs:
Program maturity is not at a point where disposal costs can be estimated within an acceptable margin of error.

UNCLASSIFIED

F-35

December 2013 SAR

F-35 Engine
Assumptions and Ground Rules
Cost Estimate Reference:
O&S costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Aircraft
subprogram.
Sustainment Strategy:
O&S costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Aircraft
subprogram.
Antecedent Information:
O&S costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Aircraft
subprogram.
Unitized O&S Costs BY2012 $K
F-35 Engine
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
--

Cost Element
Unit-Level Manpower
Unit Operations
Maintenance
Sustaining Support
Continuing System Improvements
Indirect Support
Other
Total

No Antecedent (Antecedent)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
--

Unitized Cost Comments:

O&S costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Aircraft
subprogram.
Total O&S Cost $M
Current Development APB
Objective/Threshold
F-35 Engine
Base Year
Then Year

N/A
N/A

Current Estimate
F-35 Engine
N/A
N/A

No Antecedent
(Antecedent)
N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A

Total O&S Costs Comments:

O&S costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Aircraft
subprogram.
Disposal Costs:
O&S costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Aircraft
subprogram.

UNCLASSIFIED

EPAWSS Sales Sheet
No ratings yet
EPAWSS Sales Sheet
2 pages
23 March 2022 ACC F-16 Mishap Beauregard Parish LA, AIB Report For Public Release
No ratings yet
23 March 2022 ACC F-16 Mishap Beauregard Parish LA, AIB Report For Public Release
36 pages
Military Embedded Systems July August 2017
No ratings yet
Military Embedded Systems July August 2017
48 pages
SDI and the Alternatives
From Everand
SDI and the Alternatives
Simon P. Worden
No ratings yet
Doing Business in Vietnam
No ratings yet
Doing Business in Vietnam
93 pages
Elta El-L8260-2
No ratings yet
Elta El-L8260-2
2 pages
Mission 03 Briefing Slides
No ratings yet
Mission 03 Briefing Slides
11 pages
Drone-Centric Warfare
No ratings yet
Drone-Centric Warfare
4 pages
2.0o OMAHA MODIFIED
No ratings yet
2.0o OMAHA MODIFIED
6 pages
JDAM Adaptive Control
100% (1)
JDAM Adaptive Control
31 pages
Mach One
From Everand
Mach One
Mike Lithgow
3/5 (1)
F-35 Program History - From JAST To IOC
No ratings yet
F-35 Program History - From JAST To IOC
50 pages
History Greatest Battles2
100% (1)
History Greatest Battles2
118 pages
Women in Defence Services
No ratings yet
Women in Defence Services
3 pages
Report
No ratings yet
Report
8 pages
The Ten Rules of Masking
No ratings yet
The Ten Rules of Masking
9 pages
Flight Simulation Where Is The Challenge
No ratings yet
Flight Simulation Where Is The Challenge
381 pages
Air To Air Autonomous UCAV
100% (1)
Air To Air Autonomous UCAV
19 pages
F 35 Sar 2018 PDF
No ratings yet
F 35 Sar 2018 PDF
100 pages
F-16 MMC
No ratings yet
F-16 MMC
2 pages
Stealth Technology PDF
100% (1)
Stealth Technology PDF
21 pages
20-F-0568 DOC 32 F-35 SAR Dec 2019 Full-1
No ratings yet
20-F-0568 DOC 32 F-35 SAR Dec 2019 Full-1
107 pages
Air and Missile Defense - Defining The Future
No ratings yet
Air and Missile Defense - Defining The Future
6 pages
Balakot OSINT Analysis
100% (1)
Balakot OSINT Analysis
42 pages
Defiance Vital Ground Mjg0410
50% (2)
Defiance Vital Ground Mjg0410
258 pages
Ys%, XLD M Dka S%L Iudcjd Ckrcfha .Eiü M %H: The Gazette of The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
No ratings yet
Ys%, XLD M Dka S%L Iudcjd Ckrcfha .Eiü M %H: The Gazette of The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
40 pages
$$ag 300 V33 All
No ratings yet
$$ag 300 V33 All
190 pages
MINELAYINGNOV06
100% (1)
MINELAYINGNOV06
60 pages
Bolt Action Belgian Army List
100% (1)
Bolt Action Belgian Army List
6 pages
F35 Sar 2016
No ratings yet
F35 Sar 2016
95 pages
2015 China Military Power Report
No ratings yet
2015 China Military Power Report
98 pages
Industry Day 2017 Briefings
100% (1)
Industry Day 2017 Briefings
214 pages
"Attack in Brandenburg": Tactical Vignette 98-3 What'S Your Next MOVE??
No ratings yet
"Attack in Brandenburg": Tactical Vignette 98-3 What'S Your Next MOVE??
2 pages
Relaciones Usa Vietnam
No ratings yet
Relaciones Usa Vietnam
39 pages
Ballistic Missile Defense in The Asia-Pacific Region: Cooperation and Opposition
No ratings yet
Ballistic Missile Defense in The Asia-Pacific Region: Cooperation and Opposition
29 pages
Codex - Eldar Corsairs - Gear
No ratings yet
Codex - Eldar Corsairs - Gear
42 pages
SNSRMGMT Fact Sheet
No ratings yet
SNSRMGMT Fact Sheet
1 page
The Nuances of Air Control in Great Power Competition - What The No-Fly Zone Debate Is Missing
No ratings yet
The Nuances of Air Control in Great Power Competition - What The No-Fly Zone Debate Is Missing
7 pages
Viet Nam: Structural Policy Country Notes
No ratings yet
Viet Nam: Structural Policy Country Notes
18 pages
F-35 .
No ratings yet
F-35 .
27 pages
F-35 Sar 2017/18sar
100% (1)
F-35 Sar 2017/18sar
100 pages
United States Air Force Aircraft Accident Investigation Board Report
No ratings yet
United States Air Force Aircraft Accident Investigation Board Report
28 pages
F-35 2013 Sar
No ratings yet
F-35 2013 Sar
97 pages
Strategy and Force Planning in A Time of Austerity: Decremental Spending
No ratings yet
Strategy and Force Planning in A Time of Austerity: Decremental Spending
11 pages
Red Tide Manual PDF
No ratings yet
Red Tide Manual PDF
16 pages
jp3 32
No ratings yet
jp3 32
106 pages
Wargame Random Event Cards (WREC)
No ratings yet
Wargame Random Event Cards (WREC)
8 pages
JB LaClave Spain210308
No ratings yet
JB LaClave Spain210308
3 pages
The Asset Management Industry and Financial Stability: International Monetary Fund - April 2015
No ratings yet
The Asset Management Industry and Financial Stability: International Monetary Fund - April 2015
43 pages
Record 1504
No ratings yet
Record 1504
15 pages
Cruise Missile
100% (1)
Cruise Missile
17 pages
ADR Uzbekistan
No ratings yet
ADR Uzbekistan
80 pages
List of Active Indian Military Aircrafts 1
No ratings yet
List of Active Indian Military Aircrafts 1
9 pages
Fred Meyer Obituary (Reflector)
No ratings yet
Fred Meyer Obituary (Reflector)
1 page
Uzbekistan Overview June09
100% (1)
Uzbekistan Overview June09
47 pages
John Richard Boyd
No ratings yet
John Richard Boyd
12 pages
Imperium Sheet
No ratings yet
Imperium Sheet
4 pages
OA Version 9780980544077 The Italian Difference
No ratings yet
OA Version 9780980544077 The Italian Difference
0 pages
Effects of Chaff Screening and RCS
100% (1)
Effects of Chaff Screening and RCS
14 pages
ED 8wing Major Troy Paisley
No ratings yet
ED 8wing Major Troy Paisley
2 pages
Strategic Implications of Us Fighter Force Reductions: Air-To-Air Combat Modeling Using Lanchester Equations
No ratings yet
Strategic Implications of Us Fighter Force Reductions: Air-To-Air Combat Modeling Using Lanchester Equations
84 pages
Soviet Military Power 1985
100% (8)
Soviet Military Power 1985
145 pages
An Assessment of Historical Operations and Future Possibilities
No ratings yet
An Assessment of Historical Operations and Future Possibilities
76 pages
Montgomery Testimony Final 31 March
No ratings yet
Montgomery Testimony Final 31 March
9 pages
Wh40k - DeathWatch - Codex 7E 12
No ratings yet
Wh40k - DeathWatch - Codex 7E 12
4 pages
CAE MAD-XR Datasheet
100% (1)
CAE MAD-XR Datasheet
2 pages
AN/ALE-55 Fiber-Optic Towed Decoy: Delivering Protection Against Current and Future RF Missile Threats
No ratings yet
AN/ALE-55 Fiber-Optic Towed Decoy: Delivering Protection Against Current and Future RF Missile Threats
2 pages
FY22 NDAA Agreement Summary
No ratings yet
FY22 NDAA Agreement Summary
19 pages
Component Hand Reciepts
No ratings yet
Component Hand Reciepts
498 pages
Vietnam Country Profile
No ratings yet
Vietnam Country Profile
2 pages
Tuesday Landmark A Doug Hayward
100% (1)
Tuesday Landmark A Doug Hayward
25 pages
Air Dominance
No ratings yet
Air Dominance
40 pages
Test and Evaluation Trends and Costs For Aircraft and Guided Weapons
No ratings yet
Test and Evaluation Trends and Costs For Aircraft and Guided Weapons
223 pages
P7742 PDF
No ratings yet
P7742 PDF
15 pages
Human Consequences of Agile Aircraft
No ratings yet
Human Consequences of Agile Aircraft
186 pages
First Electro Optical System of The 21st Century
No ratings yet
First Electro Optical System of The 21st Century
8 pages
Maradmin 094-13 - Fiscal Year 2013 (Fy 13) Officer Retention Board Numbe...
No ratings yet
Maradmin 094-13 - Fiscal Year 2013 (Fy 13) Officer Retention Board Numbe...
12 pages
Anao MPR 2016 17 Pdss4 Mrh90helicopters
No ratings yet
Anao MPR 2016 17 Pdss4 Mrh90helicopters
12 pages
We'll Weather The Weather Whatever The Weather Whether We Like It or Not
No ratings yet
We'll Weather The Weather Whatever The Weather Whether We Like It or Not
17 pages
US Army EADSIM PDF
No ratings yet
US Army EADSIM PDF
2 pages
Radars For The Detection and Tracking of Cruise Missiles: Lee O. Upton and Lewis A. Thurman
No ratings yet
Radars For The Detection and Tracking of Cruise Missiles: Lee O. Upton and Lewis A. Thurman
12 pages
Airborne Solutions
No ratings yet
Airborne Solutions
8 pages
ALR-69A Radar Warning Receiver (RWR)
No ratings yet
ALR-69A Radar Warning Receiver (RWR)
2 pages
Thaad Final Project
No ratings yet
Thaad Final Project
13 pages
Future Integrated Modular Avionics For Jet Fighter Mission Computers
100% (4)
Future Integrated Modular Avionics For Jet Fighter Mission Computers
11 pages
Bolter Action
No ratings yet
Bolter Action
3 pages
Nco Dining in Program
100% (2)
Nco Dining in Program
4 pages
Thales A400M Press Kit 151209
100% (2)
Thales A400M Press Kit 151209
4 pages
Research Paper Final
No ratings yet
Research Paper Final
10 pages
Forces, Battle of Jakobovo, 19 July 1812
100% (1)
Forces, Battle of Jakobovo, 19 July 1812
3 pages
Unclassified Ad Number: From
No ratings yet
Unclassified Ad Number: From
84 pages
Mcdonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle
100% (1)
Mcdonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle
21 pages
Three Dimensional Warriors: Second Edition
From Everand
Three Dimensional Warriors: Second Edition
Robbin F. Laird
No ratings yet
3 Ekman Saab
100% (1)
3 Ekman Saab
34 pages
United States Navy Supercarrier - Cvn-68 Uss Nimitz: by Jdog
No ratings yet
United States Navy Supercarrier - Cvn-68 Uss Nimitz: by Jdog
16 pages
SWG Program Update
No ratings yet
SWG Program Update
20 pages
F-22 Raptor Export Policy
No ratings yet
F-22 Raptor Export Policy
101 pages
Body Mm07797 Pirate IRST LQ March14
No ratings yet
Body Mm07797 Pirate IRST LQ March14
2 pages
U Dai Fts T Unmanned Aircraft Systems January 9, 2009: Unmanned Warfare Ousd (At&L)
No ratings yet
U Dai Fts T Unmanned Aircraft Systems January 9, 2009: Unmanned Warfare Ousd (At&L)
32 pages
Usaf Joining F-22s With F-35s To Maximize Its 5th Generation Capabilities
No ratings yet
Usaf Joining F-22s With F-35s To Maximize Its 5th Generation Capabilities
38 pages
Applying CORBA in Military Combat System - Presentation-FINAL
No ratings yet
Applying CORBA in Military Combat System - Presentation-FINAL
13 pages
National Security Network Report F 35 FINAL
No ratings yet
National Security Network Report F 35 FINAL
39 pages
C2 Lab: Michael Koester Interoperability Test Director C2 Systems Branch/JITC (520) 538-4230 Michael - Koester@disa - Mil
No ratings yet
C2 Lab: Michael Koester Interoperability Test Director C2 Systems Branch/JITC (520) 538-4230 Michael - Koester@disa - Mil
35 pages
M S 01 Intro Intro Motivation
No ratings yet
M S 01 Intro Intro Motivation
13 pages
Direct Voice Input
No ratings yet
Direct Voice Input
26 pages