Communication Engineering
Communication Engineering
Super-hetrodyne Receiver
Downconvert RF signal to lower IF frequency
Main amplification takes place at IF
Communication Receiver
Downconvert RF signal to two IF frequency
The shortcomings of the TRF receiver are overcome by the super heterodyne receiver.
Heterodyne to mix two frequencies together in a nonlinear device or to transmit one
frequency to another using nonlinear mixing.
Also known as frequency conversion
High frequency down converted to low frequency.(IF)
A super heterodyne receiver converts all incoming radio frequency (RF) signals to a
lower frequency known as an intermediate frequency (IF). RF IF
DRAWBACKS OVERCOMED
Stability as high frequency is down converted to IF the reactance of stray
capacitances will not decrease as it was at higher frequencies resulting in
increased feedback.
No variation in BW- as IF range is 438 to 465 KHz (in case of AM receivers)
mostly 455KHz, appropriate for Q limit (120).
Better selectivity- as no adjacent channels are picked due to variation in BW.
RF section
Consists of a pre-selector and an amplifier
Pre-selector is a broad-tuned bandpass filter with an adjustable center frequency
used to reject unwanted radio frequency and to reduce the noise bandwidth.
QPSK System
Introduction:
The two successive bits in a bit stream are combined together to form a message
(symbol) and each message is represented by a distinct value of phase shift of the carrier.
So the signaling rate and bandwidth are reduced
Each symbol or message contains two bits with symbol duration Ts=2Tb
These symbols are transmitted by the same carrier at four (Quadrature) different phase
shifts.
QPSK System
QPSK Transmitter
VQPSK (t) =
Ps a1 cos( c t )
Ps a 2 sin( c t )
Symbol
a1(t)
a2(t)
11
01
00
1
-1
-1
1
1
-1
10
-1
VQPSK
Ps cos( c t )
Quadrant
Ps sin( c t )
I
Ps cos( c t ) Ps sin( c tII
)
Ps cos( c t ) Ps sin( c III
t)
IV
P cos( t ) P sin( t )
s
Phasor diagram:
Truth Table:
Binary Input
Q
0
0
1
1
-1350
1350
-450
450
0
1
0
1
Constellation diagram:
Bandwidth of QPSK:
Bandwidth of QPSK = of the BW of BPSK system
2 fb
BW =
= fb
2
Probability of symbol error:
Eb
The average probability of error in terms of
is
N0
Eb
N0
Pe erfc
Eb
(or )
2
N
0
E
1
erfc b
2
N0
Advances of QPSK:
1. Low error probability
2. Very good noise immunity
3. Requires half of the BPSK bandwidth, for a same bit error rate.
4. Because of reduction in BW, Information transmission rate of QPSK is higher.
Disadvantages:
Very complex generation and detection
PCM system
Block diagram:
Operarion of blocks
PCM Transmitter
Basic operations in PCM transmitter: Sampling, Quantizing and Encoding.
Low pass filter:
Used to prevent Aliasing (Aliasing: Mixing of low frequency signals with high
frequency signals) of message signal by attenuating the frequencies greater than fm.
So that proper sampling rate can be achieved at PCM transmitter.
Sampler:
A trian of narrow rectangular puses are used to sample the message signal.
For perfect reconstruction of message signal the sampling frequency must follow nyquist
criterian. (fs 2fm).
Quantizer:
Making the signal discrete in amplitude by approximating the sampled signal to the
nearest predefined or representation level.
Uniform quantization: Step size is same between any two adjacent levels, throughout the
signal range.
Non-uniform quantization: Mostly prefered, because it provides the production for low
level signals which are more precious than large amplitude samples.
Encoder:
Encodes the discrete set of samples.
Process: allocating some digital code to each level is called coding.
The codes are transmitted as a bit stream.
PCM Transmission path:
The path between PCM transmitter and PCM receiver over which the PCM signal travel
Ther will be more than one regenerative repeater ie., chain of regenerative repeaters.
Repeater:
Three basic operations: Equalization, Timing, Decision making.
Equalization: Shapes the receive signal; compensate the effects of amplitude and phase
distortions (produced by non-ideal transmission characteristics of the channel);
Timing circuitry: Provides periodic pulse train, which is obtained from received pulses.
Decision device: makes the decision whether the equalized PCM wave at its input has a
value 0 or 1 at the instant of sampling, by comparing the equalized PCM with the
reference level called Decision threshold.
Uotput: At decision devicde we can get a clean PCM signal without any trace of noise.
PCM Receiver:
Regenerating circuit: rehapes the pulse by removing the noise.
Decoder: noise removed signal is the input. Sample and hold circuit in the decoder is
used to convert the digitized word into its analog value.
LPF: Message signal will be recovered by passing the decoder output through a LPF
reconstructon filter whose cutoff frequency is equal to the message bandwidth fm.
The boundary between the core and cladding may either be abrupt, in step-index fiber, or
gradual, in graded-index fiber
Step Index Fibers
A step-index fiber has a central core with a uniform refractive index. An outside cladding
that also has a uniform refractive index surrounds the core;
however, the refractive index of the cladding is less than that of the central core.
The refractive index profile may be defined as
n(r) =
n1
r < a (core)
n2
r a (cladding)
Graded-Index
In graded-index fiber, the index of refraction in the core decreases continuously between
the axis and the cladding.
This causes light rays to bend smoothly as they approach the cladding, rather than
reflecting abruptly from the core-cladding boundary.
Figure. Two types of fiber: (Top) step index fiber; (Bottom) Graded index fiber
However, this scheme also has disadvantages. While radio stations broadcast 24 hours a
day, mobile communication typically takes place for only a few minutes at a time.
Assigning a separate frequency for each possible communication scenario would be a
tremendous waste of (scarce) frequency resources.
Additionally, the fixed assignment of a frequency to a sender makes the scheme very
inflexible and limits the number of senders.
channel interference.(In the highway example, interference between two cars results in an
accident.)
To avoid this type of interference, precise synchronization between different senders is
necessary. This is clearly a disadvantage, as all senders need precise clocks or,
alternatively, a way has to be found to distribute a synchronization signal to all senders.
For a receiver tuning in to a sender this does not just involve adjusting the frequency, but
involves listening at exactly the right point in time. However, this scheme is quite flexible
as one can assign more sending time to senders with a heavy load and less to those with a
light load.
Frequency and time division multiplexing can be combined, i.e., a channel ki can use a
certain frequency band for a certain amount of time as shown in Figure.
Now guard spaces are needed both in the time and in the frequency dimension. This
scheme is more robust against frequency selective interference, i.e., interference in a
certain small frequency band.
A channel may use this band only for a short period of time.
Additionally, this scheme provides some (weak) protection against tapping, as in this case
the sequence of frequencies a sender uses has to be known to listen in to a channel.
The mobile phone standard GSM uses this combination of frequency and time division
multiplexing for transmission between a mobile phone and a so-called base station (see
section 4.1).
Figure 4.3 illustrates the OSI model and provides a brief definition of the functions performed at
each layer. The intent of the OSI model is that protocols be developed to perform the functions of
each layer.
The designers of OSI assumed that this model and the protocols developed within this model
would come to dominate computer communications, eventually replacing proprietary protocol
implementations and rival multivendor models such as TCP/IP.
This has not happened. Although many useful protocols have been developed in the context of
OSI, the overall seven-layer model has not flourished. Instead, the TCP/IP architecture has come
to dominate. There are a number of rea- sons for this outcome.
Perhaps the most important is that the key TCP/IP protocols were mature and well tested at a
time when similar OSI protocols were in the development stage. When businesses began to
recognize the need for interoperability across networks, only TCP/IP was available and ready to
go. Another reason is that the OSI model is unnecessarily complex, with seven layers to
accomplish what TCP/IP does with fewer layers.
Figure 4.4 illustrates the layers of the TCP/IP and OSI architectures, showing roughly the
correspondence in functionality between the two.