Msho 2
Msho 2
Important preliminaries
Before starting on supporting details consider this slide.
I jumped to a spot in the project where faults were so clear they
stand by themselves. Within any one fault block there is almost no
stratigraphic thinning or thickening, while between blocks substantial
changes occur. On fault A you will see this overall difference result in an
apparent normal attitude at the top and a reverse fault attitude at the
bottom Also note that the drag effects often disagree with the fault
slope. These factors, plus the curved nature of the faults themselves tell
us we are looking at strong parallel movement. Some adjustments are
inevitable but strike slip is the nature of the main structure.
Within the main series we see probable salt intrusions affecting the
structure. This phenomenon makes it tough to track the faults at depth.
The first structural priority of this study is to understand the highly faulted
intermediate section.
On the slide pair that follows I ask you to spend time toggling back
and forth between the stacked input and my detuned output. I hope you
pay close attention to the lithologic character being brought out. Nowhere
is correlation quality more important than in complexly faulted zones. To
understand the importance of horizontal movement is basic to structural
geology. In short there are many facets to study.
On the next slide I show that mapping these faults has an economic
justification by pointing to previous drilling activity..
Please notice
I will
show you that a bunch of wells were drilled in
this faulted zone. I have no knowledge of their
targets, but since they are older, one would
assume they found oil in the zone we are
looking at.
Comments blanked
for security.
In any case you will just have to take my word that those wells
exist.
Most oil & gas will be long gone from this old field,
but we should be able to spot obvious trapping situations, and we may
find missed reservoirs. Early in the ADAPS development game I was
encouraged to see abrupt positive amplitude changes connected with
obvious trapping situations. Hopefully you will find some of these in the
next series.
Series start
I suggest you tab through
quickly to see how the fault
pattern holds for the eight
in-lines. At the end you will
be given a repeat option.
#2
Note the remaining
bright spots holding
steady.
?
?
#3
Deep plate movement
While we are here, some talk on
the difficulty presented by lateral
faults is in order. Old habits die
hard, and were used to searching
for nicely lined up vertical throws.
In cases where the stratigraphy is
constant, we might see no offsets
across major strike slip faults! It
could well be that once we start
looking intelligently we will find
that this type of structure (caused
by deep plate movement) is very
common.
#4
The more you work with
parallel faults the more
youre willing to believe
the quirky twists. Shear
is the determining thing.
Here it is horizontal. If
these faults were normal
the twists would have
been sheared off.
#5
Too much salt is bad, and it
certainly has given us problems in
seismic interpretation. While this is
pure conjecture, what might have
started as a major (but simple) set of
lateral faults turned into a complex
structure when weaknesses along
the faults allowed salt to be injected.
Since much current emphasis is on
deeper events, our challenge is to
extend our resolution downward.
#6
Fault A is probably major
here. Stratigraphic correlations across
the others are fairly good, with minor
layering changes, while theres almost
no matching in the upper zone on this
one. Deeper events do better, but this
is probably because the stratigraphy is
more constant down there.
#7
See comments on #5.
#8
End of interpreted series.
Click to repeat.