0 2 2 2 0 dy dt 0 0 0 ∞ −∞ iωt ∞ −∞ iωt
0 2 2 2 0 dy dt 0 0 0 ∞ −∞ iωt ∞ −∞ iωt
Example continued
Substitute into the differential equation and we find
2
0 2 + 2ib g () = f ()
R
1
0 it dt = 1 e it 0
We find also f () = 2
2
(t t )e
We find a relationship between the g () and f (), and then we
can write for the response g ()
0
g () =
e it
1
2
2 0 2 + 2ib
e i(tt )
d
02 2 + 2ib
Example continued
The integral is hard to do (we might get to later), but the point
is we have reduced the problem to doing an integral
Assume b < 0 , then we find for y (t) with t > t 0 ,
0
y (t) = e b(tt )
sin [ 0 (t t 0 )]
0
q
where
= 02 b 2 and y (t) = 0 for t < t 0
You can convince yourself that this is consistent with the b = 0
case described in the book (see Eq. 12.5 in chapter 8)
0
d 2y
dy
+ 2b
+ 02 y = f (t)
2
dt
dt
Lets say f (t) is zero for t < 0, and also y (t) = 0 for t < 0, and
then we turn on the driving force f (t)
Using our insight, and the principle of superposition, we assume
that the response (y (t)) depends on the entire history of the force
f (t 0 ) from 0 < t 0 < t,
Z t
y (t) =
G (t, t 0 )f (t 0 )dt 0
0
f (t )
0
Z
d2
d
2
0
0
f (t 0 )(t 0 t)dt 0
+ 2b + 0 G (t, t ) dt =
dt 2
dt
0
continued
We see that the Green function G (t, t 0 ) solves the differential
equation,
2
d
d
2
+ 2b + 0 G (t, t 0 ) = (t 0 t)
dt 2
dt
Note also that G (t, t 0 ) = 0 for t < t 0
We already solved that! It was
q just the response y (t) due to a
-function impulse, with 0 =
02 b 2
sin [ 0 (t t 0 )]
0
Notice that the response only depends on t t 0 , as we expect
This was for the underdamped case (b < 0 ), and would not
work for critical or overdamped cases!
0
G (t, t 0 ) = e b(tt )
Finally we can write the solution y (t) for any driving force f (t)
turned on at t = 0, for the damped oscillator in the underdamped
regime,
Z
y (t) =
G (t, t )f (t )dt =
0
e b(tt )
sin [ 0 (t t 0 )] 0 0
f (t )dt
0
0
~ we have
Then, since E = ,
2 =
0
1
1
40 |~r ~r 0 |
R
= (r~0 )(~r
1
(~r ~r 0 )
0
2 G (~r ,~r 0 ) =
1
(~r ~r 0 )
0