Scribd
Upload
267 views10 pages

Attribute Gage R&R

This document is an attribute gage reliability and repeatability (Gage R&R) study report that contains: 1) Data from three operators making multiple measurements of 100 samples to determine attribute accuracy and consistency. 2) Charts and calculations showing the percentage of matches between operators and the known values, as well as accuracy levels. 3) Statistics on the reliability of the measurement process and each operator's accuracy and consistency based on the sample data. The report provides analysis of measurement accuracy and reliability to determine if the gage and operator variation is acceptable for the inspection process.

Uploaded by

César Meza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
267 views10 pages

Attribute Gage R&R

This document is an attribute gage reliability and repeatability (Gage R&R) study report that contains: 1) Data from three operators making multiple measurements of 100 samples to determine attribute accuracy and consistency. 2) Charts and calculations showing the percentage of matches between operators and the known values, as well as accuracy levels. 3) Statistics on the reliability of the measurement process and each operator's accuracy and consistency based on the sample data. The report provides analysis of measurement accuracy and reliability to determine if the gage and operator variation is acceptable for the inspection process.

Uploaded by

César Meza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Instructions

Page 1

Data Entry

Page 2

Report

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness


SCORING REPORT
DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:

Attribute Legend
1 pass
2 fail
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
-

Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2

(1)

3/10/1996
Allied Employee
3313 Spark Plug
F&SP

Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2

All operators
agree within and All Operators
between each
agree with
Other
standard

Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2

% APPRAISER SCORE ->


% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) ->

#DIV/0!
Known

Y/N
Agree

Y/N
Agree

#DIV/0!

0%

Known

Known

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) -> #DIV/0!


SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE(4) -> #DIV/0!

Note:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials


Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
All operators agreed within and between themselves
All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection
Page 3

Statistical Report - Attribute Gage R&R Study


DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:

3/10/1996
Allied Employee
3313 Spark Plug
F&SP

% Appraiser1
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
0
0
0
0
0
0

Source
Total Inspected
# Matched
False Negative (operator biased toward rejection)
False Positive (operator biased toward acceptance)
Mixed
95% UCL
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Calculated Score
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
95% LCL
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Screen % Effective Score3


0
0

Total Inspected
# in Agreement
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL

0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL

110.0%

110.0%
90.0%

80.0%

80.0%

70.0%

70.0%

% Efficiency

100.0%

40.0%

60.0%
50.0%
40.0%

30.0%

30.0%

20.0%

20.0%

10.0%

10.0%

0.0%

95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL

% Score vs Appraiser

90.0%

50.0%

0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

100.0%

60.0%

0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Screen % Effective Score vs Attribute4


0
0

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

% Appraiser

% Efficiency

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

%Score vs Attribute2
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
0
0
0
0
0
0

0.0%
Operator #1

Operator #2

Operator #3

Operator #1

Operator #2

Operator #3

Notes
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials


Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
All operators agreed within and between themselves
All operators agreed within & between themselves AND agreed with the known standard

Calculations

Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41

Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2

Page 5

Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2

Operator #3
Try #1

Calculations

42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92

Page 6

Calculations

93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
% Appraiser Score

#DIV/0!

Page 7

#DIV/0!

Calculations

Operator #3
Try #2

Y/N
Agree

Y/N
Agree

Page 8

Calculations

Page 9

Calculations

Page 10

You might also like