0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views6 pages

Mencari Hubungan Antara Paritas (Nullipara Dengan Primipara)

The document analyzes the relationship between parity (nullipara vs primipara) and history of abortion. It finds that among women with a history of abortion, the proportion of nulliparas was 27.0% and primiparas was 73.0%. A chi-square test showed no significant relationship between parity and abortion history. A logistic regression also found no significant relationships, with p-values of 0.091 for nullipara vs primipara and 0.363 for nullipara vs multipara.

Uploaded by

Esqy Ghea Askara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views6 pages

Mencari Hubungan Antara Paritas (Nullipara Dengan Primipara)

The document analyzes the relationship between parity (nullipara vs primipara) and history of abortion. It finds that among women with a history of abortion, the proportion of nulliparas was 27.0% and primiparas was 73.0%. A chi-square test showed no significant relationship between parity and abortion history. A logistic regression also found no significant relationships, with p-values of 0.091 for nullipara vs primipara and 0.363 for nullipara vs multipara.

Uploaded by

Esqy Ghea Askara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Mencari hubungan antara paritas (nullipara dengan primipara)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Paritas Ibu * Riwayat
Abortus
83 100,0% 0 0,0% 83 100,0%


Paritas Ibu * Riwayat Abortus Crosstabulation

Riwayat Abortus
Total Ya Tidak
Paritas Ibu 0 Count 10 17 27
Expected Count 12,0 15,0 27,0
% within Riwayat Abortus 27,0% 37,0% 32,5%
1 Count 27 29 56
Expected Count 25,0 31,0 56,0
% within Riwayat Abortus 73,0% 63,0% 67,5%
Total Count 37 46 83
Expected Count 37,0 46,0 83,0
% within Riwayat Abortus 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%


Chi-Square Tests

Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,921
a
1 ,337

Continuity Correction
b
,524 1 ,469

Likelihood Ratio ,929 1 ,335

Fisher's Exact Test

,358 ,235
Linear-by-Linear Association ,910 1 ,340

N of Valid Cases 83

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,04.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Risk Estimate

Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Paritas Ibu (0
/ 1)
,632 ,247 1,618
For cohort Riwayat Abortus
= Ya
,768 ,438 1,347
For cohort Riwayat Abortus
= Tidak
1,216 ,828 1,785
N of Valid Cases 83



\
Mencari hubungan antara paritas (nullipara dengan multipara)

crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Paritas Ibu * Riwayat
Abortus
98 100,0% 0 0,0% 98 100,0%


Paritas Ibu * Riwayat Abortus Crosstabulation

Riwayat Abortus
Total Ya Tidak
Paritas Ibu 0 Count 10 17 27
Expected Count 13,8 13,2 27,0
% within Riwayat Abortus 20,0% 35,4% 27,6%
>1 Count 40 31 71
Expected Count 36,2 34,8 71,0
% within Riwayat Abortus 80,0% 64,6% 72,4%
Total Count 50 48 98
Expected Count 50,0 48,0 98,0
% within Riwayat Abortus 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%


Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2,916
a
1 ,088

Continuity Correction
b
2,195 1 ,138

Likelihood Ratio 2,939 1 ,086

Fisher's Exact Test

,114 ,069
Linear-by-Linear Association 2,886 1 ,089

N of Valid Cases 98

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,22.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Risk Estimate

Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Paritas Ibu (0
/ >1)
,456 ,183 1,134
For cohort Riwayat Abortus
= Ya
,657 ,386 1,120
For cohort Riwayat Abortus
= Tidak
1,442 ,975 2,134
N of Valid Cases 98







Logistic Regression



Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
a
N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 154 100,0
Missing Cases 0 ,0
Total 154 100,0
Unselected Cases 0 ,0
Total 154 100,0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of
cases.


Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value
Ya 0
Tidak 1


Categorical Variables Codings
Frequency
Parameter coding
(1) (2)
Paritas Ibu 0 27 1,000 ,000
1 56 ,000 1,000
>1 71 ,000 ,000



Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower Upper
Step 1
a
Paritas

2,979 2 ,226

Paritas(1) ,786 ,465 2,856 1 ,091 2,194 ,882 5,455
Paritas(2) ,326 ,359 ,827 1 ,363 1,386 ,686 2,800
Constant -,255 ,239 1,135 1 ,287 ,775

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Paritas.
Paritas (1) adalah perbandingan antara nullipara dengan primipara. Nilai p (pada kolom sig) adalah
sebesar 0,091. Nilai OR pada kolom exp(B) adalah sebesar 2,19 dengan interval 0,88 sampai dengan
5,46.
Paritas (2) adalah perbandingan antara nullipara dengan multipara. Nilai p (pada kolom sig) adalah
sebesar 0,363. Nilai OR pada kolom exp(B) adalah sebesar 1,39 dengan interval 0,69 sampai dengan
2,80.

Hasil analisis disajikan sebagaimana tercantum pada tabel .

Abortus
Ya Tidak P OR (IK 95%)
n % n %
Paritas Nullipara 10 27,0 17 37,0 0,091 2,19 (0,885,46)
Primipara 27 73,0 29 83,0 0,363 1,39 (0,692,80)
Multipara 40 80,0 31 84,6 Pembanding
Total 77 50 77 50

You might also like