Lecture 3
Lecture 3
Bernstein)
3.1 Almost Complex Structure
Let J C
(T, J) and
(T
0,1
, i)
We now compute = (T
0,1
)
.
(1)
k
p
k
(T) = c
2k
(T
1,0
T
0,1
) = c
i
(T
1,0
)c
2ki
(T
0,1
) = ( c
i
(T
1,0
))( c
j
(T
0,1
)
k k k i i j
wherethelastequalitycomesfromrearrangingthesum. Nowwehavec
i
(T
0,1
) = (1)
i
c
i
(T
1,0
)andsincewe
can identity T
1,0
with (T, J) we have
(1)
k
p
k
(T) = ( c
i
(T, J))( (1)
j
c
j
(T, J))
k i j
Thus the existence of an almost complex structure implies that one can nd classes c
i
H
2i
(M,Z) that
when taken mod 2 give the Stiefel-Whitney class and that satisfy the above Pontryagin relation.
Problem. Show that S
4k
does not admit an almost complex structure.
Remark. Topologicalobstructionstotheexistenceofanalmostcomplexstructureingeneralarenotknown.
3.2 Hermitian Structure
Denition 10. A hermitian structure or a real vector space V consists of a triple
J an almost complex structure
:V V
symplectic (i.e.
=)
g:V V
g a metric (i.e. g
=J
=J
g
. On the other hand (J, ) determines a hermitian structure if and only if
(J) = (J
1
)
=J
=J
+J = 0. Then we have (J
gA=g}
Sp(V, ) ={A
A=}
J Gl(V, J) ={A:AJ =JA}
Now if we form h=g+i we obtain a hermitian metric on V. And we have structure group
Stab(h) =U(V, h) =O(v, h)Sp(V, ) =Gl(V, J)O(V, g) =Sp(V, )Gl(V, J)
we note U(V, h) is the maximal compact subgroup of Gl(V, J).
Problem. 1. Show Explicitly that given J one can always nd a compatible (or g)
2. Show similarly that givne can nd compatible g.
3.3 Integrability of J
Since we have a Lie bracket on T we can tensor it with C and obtain a Lie bracket on T C. The since
T C = T
1,0
T
0,1
, integrability conditions are thus that the complex distribution T
1,0
is involutive i.e.
[T
1,0
, T
1,0
]T
1,0
. HowfaristhisgeometryfromusualcomplexstructureonC
n
? IdeaisifonecanformM
C
thecomplexicationofM (thinkofRP
n
CP
n
orR
n
C
n
,indeedifM isrealanalyticitisalwayspossible
to do this. Then M
C
has two transverse foliations by the integrabrility condition (from T
1,0
and T
0,1
). Say
i 1 2 n
functions z : M
C
C cut out the leaves of T
1,0
(i.e. the leaves are given by z = z = . . . = z = c).
1 n
Then when one restricts the z
i
i to a neighborhood U M, obtains maps z , . . . , z : U C such that
<dz
1
, . . . , dz
n
>=T
1
,0
=Ann(T
0,1
. That is one obtains a holomorphic coordinate chart. Moreover in this
chart one has
J = i(dz
k
z
k
+dz
k
z
)
k
k
Remark. This is similar to the Darboux theorem of symplectic geometry
More generally we have
Theorem 4. (Newlander-Nirenberg) If M is a smooth manifold with smooth almost complex structure J
that is integrable then M is actually complex.
Note. This was most recently treated by Malgrange.
NowT
1,0
closedunder[,]happensifandonlyifforX T, XiJX T
1,0
onehas[XiJX, Y iJY] =
ZiJZ. That is [X, Y][JX, JY] +J[X, JY] +J[JX, Y] = 0
Denition 11. We dene the Nijenhuis tensor as N
J
(X, Y) = [X, Y][JX, JY] +J[X, JY] +J[JX, Y]
Problem. Show that N
J
is a tensor in C
2
T
T).
Thus one has J integrable if and only if N
J
=0.
9
Remark. N
J
=0 is the analog of dC
3
T
)
Now if we view J End(T) =
1
(T) =
i
then J acts on dierential forms,
(M) by
J
() =
i
vi
= (e
i
vi
). And one computes
J
() =
J
()+ (1)
thus
J
Der
0
(
(M)).
Note. L
J
is denoted d
c
Denition 12. We dene the Nijenhuis bracket [,] :
k
k+l
by L
[J,K]
= [L
J
, L
K
]
One checks [L
J
, L
J
] =L
N
J
hence N
J
= [J, J].
3.4 Forms on a Complex Manifold
Inamannersimilarwithourtreatmentoffoliations,wewishtoexpressintegrabilityintermsofdierentiable
forms. LetT
0,1
(orT
1,0
)beclosedunderthecomplexiedLiebracket. SinceAnn T
0,1
=T
1
,0
=<
1
, . . . ,
n
>
(Ann T
1,0
= T
1
,0
), =
1
. . .
n
is a generator for det T
1
,0
= K. Where here K is a complex line
bundle. The condition for integrability is then d
n,0
=
0,1
n,0
for some . Taking d again one obtains
0 =d
n,0
d =d, hence =0. We call K =
n
T
CandT
0,1
=AnnK ={X
X
= 0},i.e. wecanrecover
the complex structure from K
More fully, there is a decomposition of forms
p q
T
C= T
1
,0
T
0
,1
p,q
=
p,q
(M)
p,q
that is a ZZ grading.
Since d
n,0
= we have integrability if and only if d = +, where here =
p,q+1
d and
=
p+1,q
d.
Problem. Show that without integrability
d=++d
N
where N
J
2
T
T and d
N
=
N
J
. Also determine the p, q decomposition of d
N
.
3.5 Dolbeault Cohomology
Assuming N
J
=0 one has
2
=
2
=+ =0. Thus one gets a complex
:
p,q
(M)
p,q+1
(M).
The cohomology of this complex is called the Dolbeault cohomology and is denoted
Ker |
p,q
=H
p,q
(M).
Im |
p,q1
10
This is s Z x 2 g&ed ring. The symbol dB can be de&mined from the oomputation p, rnp] = qi. N m
givenarealform~f SF*-(0) thtm
i e &p t i c , s i n c e ~ = ~ ~ * ~ + ( ~ ~ = $ ~ o + ~ ( w ~ m d ) andsoP.'#b. Aeneedi rn~<monMeompad.
Maw suppose E + M is a compltx vector bundle, huw dcw pone make E srrmpstible with the corn*
structure J on M?
The aohorn(~1~gy of this conplm is called Do& Jt whomulogkt with oahm in.E and iS h a t e d I$E (M, E).
Elliptic theory t& us tbat M compact impzis HsB(M, E) is finite dimensional. We note that Bl w. o is a
holomwrphic structure an K and henoe K is a halomarpbic he bundle.