0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views6 pages

Writing Project 4: Argument Paper Overview:: Revised 04/17/2013 For Summer 2013

This document provides an overview and instructions for Writing Project 4: Argument Paper for an English Composition course. Students will write an argument paper on the same topic from Writing Project 2, taking a clear position and supporting it with evidence. The paper must include an audience analysis, consideration of counterarguments, and citations from at least five sources. A multi-draft process is outlined, with a first draft due for peer review and a final draft incorporating the feedback. The paper will be graded based on the strength of the argument, use of evidence, organization, style and mechanics.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views6 pages

Writing Project 4: Argument Paper Overview:: Revised 04/17/2013 For Summer 2013

This document provides an overview and instructions for Writing Project 4: Argument Paper for an English Composition course. Students will write an argument paper on the same topic from Writing Project 2, taking a clear position and supporting it with evidence. The paper must include an audience analysis, consideration of counterarguments, and citations from at least five sources. A multi-draft process is outlined, with a first draft due for peer review and a final draft incorporating the feedback. The paper will be graded based on the strength of the argument, use of evidence, organization, style and mechanics.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Page 1 of 6

ENGL 111 English Composition Statewide Online Course


Writing Project 4: Argument Paper
Overview:
For this assignment, you will build off the same topic used in the riting !ro"ect #$ %our purpose
is to ta&e a position on the issue or problem you synthesi'ed in riting !ro"ect # and to ma&e a
case for a claim about the topic(problem that will influence a reasonably s&eptical audience$
)ecause you ha*e wor&ed towards de*eloping a clear understanding of the scope of the problem
or issue in riting !ro"ect #, you are now in a position to ta&e an informed position on the issue
and to argue, for e+ample, for a specific definition of &ey terms, a specific e*aluation of a
proposal, a specific analysis of the causes of the problem, or a specific solution to the problem$
%our claim must be supportable with obser*able, measureable, and replicable e*idence$ ,*oid
claims that are deri*ed from moral or personal *alues, or which are simple claims of one
person-s or group-s sense of right and wrong, or which are based solely or primarily on
emotional appeals .re*iew Chapter 1/ for more on types of argumentati*e appeals0$
Claims are established as one or more of the four types of claims discussed in Chapter 1/$
,n effecti*e argument appeals to logic and reason .logos0, appeals to how readers and the writer
feel about an issue .pathos0, and see&s to pro"ect that the writer-s argument is fair, "ust, and
honest for all the sta&eholders .ethos0 .re*iew the section on 12hetorical ,ppeals to the
,udience3 in Chapter 4 for more on these types of appeals0$
%ou will need to use at least fi*e sources from the 5*y 6ech 7irtual Library databases in your
writing$ Some or all of these may come from the sources you found for your ,nnotated
)ibliography and(or used in riting !ro"ect #$ ,s you focus on your specific claim and
argument, you may want to do additional research to better support your position$ 6hus, your
bibliography for riting !ro"ect 4 will li&ely be similar to, but not identical with, your
bibliography for riting !ro"ect #$
%our draft must also include a fair and balanced discussion of at least one ma"or counter8
argument to your claim9respectfully and accurately summari'ing the opposing *iewpoint$ )e
sure your paper includes a clear, fair, and respectful refutation for this counter8argument$
%our claim about a solution to a problem or a position on a topic is your argument$ :owe*er, it
does little good to propose a solution to or an analysis of a situation that your readers are not
con*inced has anything to do with them$ So, do the audience analysis before underta&ing your
first draft$ %our purpose is to influence your readers, not "ust tell them what you thin& is right$ 6o
do that you need to thin& about what those readers are li&e, what moti*ates and interests them,
and why they should care about what you ha*e to say on this topic$ %our audience may not agree
with you in the end, but they should accept that your position is *alid, well8supported, and
capable of being held by a rational and credible person$
Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013
Page 2 of 6
Specifics:
;// points possible
1<// words minimum, double8spaced, using 6imes New 2oman 1;8point font
=L, or ,!, manuscript style with in8te+t documentation and or&s Cited or 2eferences
page .this page does not count in the minimum word count re>uirement0
Clear, arguable claim that is supportable with rational e*idence
Effecti*e use of counter8argument and rebuttal
,cademic tone? obser*ation of the con*entions of Standard English
,udience awareness
@se of at least fi*e print sources from the 5*y 6ech 7irtual Library databases, representing
two or more points of *iew on the position being argued
First draft must include a minimum ;//8word audience analysis$ 6his analysis should appear
as the first item in your first draft, before page 1 of the actual paper$ ,udience analysis is
to be remo*ed from the final draft$
Procedure:
COLLECT. 2e*iew the material that you collected from the 5*y 6ech 7irtual Library databases
for your ,nnotated )ibliography and riting !ro"ect$ %ou may decide to drop a couple of the
sources from the third pro"ect$ %ou may decide to add new material to replace items O2 to
add to the items from riting !ro"ect #$ 5n any e*ent, you will need at least fi*e items for
riting !ro"ect 4$ )e sure you &now enough about the authors and the organi'ations the
material comes from to establish the authority of these sources? remember you ha*e to say
something in your paper to boost your readers- confidence in what you are using as e*idence$
)e clear about why your topic is of interest to those authors as well as to your readers$ Loo&
o*er what your classmates are saying in the prewriting discussion forums$ Some may be
dealing with similar topics, and some may be using sources or ha*e ideas that might be
useful to you e*en if your classmate is writing about a different topic$ Note the changes they
are considering as they mo*e from the third into the fourth writing pro"ect$
@se "ournaling, brainstorming, branching, reader8response charts, and especially the double8
entry log that is e+plained in the te+tboo& to collect and organi'e your notes$
!art of the 1collecting3 process is to thin& carefully about our own audience$ =a&e a
distinction between the audience(readers that the authors of these readings may ha*e in mind
and the audience(readers ou ha*e in mind for your audience analysis$ )e sure you are
tal&ing about your audience and NO6 your topic in the audience analysis$
S!APE your writing$
Create a t"esis statement$ 6his statement should ma&e an arguable claim about the topic or
issue$ 6his time, you are ta&ing a position that ma&es sense to you in light of what you
learned in riting !ro"ect #$
#ntegrate t"e t"esis into an introduction. 6he introduction should present your main
claim(thesis$ 5t should also establish an 1essay map3 for your wor&$ 6his essay map should
establish the main supporting reasons for your claim$ )e sure each of these reasons can be
Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013
Page 3 of 6
supported with empirical .obser*able, measureable, replicable0 e*idence$ Go beyond
presenting *alues and common &nowledge as e*idence$ Finally, an introduction should at
least suggest why this issue is significant$
C"oose an organi$ationa% pattern. 2efer to Chapter 1/ for some suggested patterns for
argument papers$

&eview and revise our out%ine. 2e*iew and re*ise your or&ing Outline from Session 1;
before you start your first draft$ 6his outline should be consistent with the organi'ational
pattern you already pic&ed$ %ou may find yourself returning to this list to re*ise it as you
write$ Edit any new ideas into this list so they don-t get lost or end up in confusing places in
your writing$
'&A(T your writing using the wor&ing outline you created$
)se *LA or APA st%e in8te+t citation and bibliographic documentation$ Select the style
.=L, or ,!,0 that is appropriate for the &ind of audience you ha*e in mind and for the
topic you are wor&ing with$
)se transitions +etween paragrap"s$ Solid de*elopment may re>uire more than one
paragraph to discuss any one particular point from your list$ hen that happens, effecti*e
paragraph transition can gi*e your readers a clear indication that you are still on the same
general point or that you are mo*ing on to a new point$
,e co"erent. )e sure the ideas you borrow are necessary in order to ma&e something clear to
your readers$ Aon-t borrow anything beyond what is absolutely needed, and don-t lea*e a
borrowed idea or passage hanging without any discussion of why it is important$
&eview to eliminate ob*ious errors in grammar, mechanics, synta+, citation, and
documentation$ E*en a first draft should be reasonably clear to your peer editorsB
Su+mit your first draft for peer re*iew$ 6his will be done using the G2O@! lin& found in
Class Session 1#$
&E-#SE your draft after you re*iew the feedbac& you recei*e from the peer re*iew$ Ao not turn
in your first draft later on as if it were the final draft. .o fina% draft wi%% +e accepted
wit"out a first draft/ and t"e two of t"em must s"ow significant c"anges 0not just spe%%1
c"ec2 c"anges3 +etween t"e two versions.
4rading Criteria:
Effecti*e introduction, includingC clear thesis that establishes an arguable and
empirically supported claim? essay map that identifies &ey sub8claims? attempt to
establish significance of topic? audience awareness in tone and style
Fair and accurate discussion of at least one alternate point of *iew, including
respectful, fair, and complete summary as well as logical and e*idence8based
refutation of that alternate point of *iew
6hesis is well8supported with logic and e*idence$ E*idence should include
empirical e*idence .facts, statistics, e+pert opinion0 from published sources to
support claims? e*idence may also include use of first8hand obser*ation, e+amples
from personal e+perience, inter*iews, polls, etc$
Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013
Page 4 of 6
riter-s language discernible from that of source authors$ Source information
discussed and reasonably connected to the claims you are ma&ing
Effort to establish credibility of sources used
Effecti*e organi'ation, coherence, and paragraph transitions
O*erall, readers are con*inced of the *alidity of the writer-s claim .whether or not
they agree0$ riter demonstrates that a reasonable person could rationally hold
this position
or&s Cited or 2eferences page .minimum of fi*e items0 in correct =L, or ,!,
style
Clear control of Standard English con*entions for grammar, style, mechanics, and
academic format
2efer to the section on 1Guidelines for 2e*ision3 in Chapter 1/ for &ey re*ision points$
P"ases of t"e Project 4:
Audience Ana%sis Session 56
(irst 'raft Session 56
Peer &eviews Session 54
(ina% 'raft Session 57
T"e Audience Ana%sis
'ue + t"e end of Session 56/ as part of t"e (irst 'raft
See the section on ,udience ,nalysis in Chapter ; in our te+tboo& for more discussion of the
parts of an audience analysis
6he audience analysis should be minimum ;// words in length, and should appear as the first
item in your first draft, before page 1 of the actual paper$ @se copy D paste to add your audience
analysis to your first draft file before posting$
1. Audience profi%e. Aescribe and define your target audience$ ho do you want to
inform and influenceE hat are these &inds of people li&eE hat are the
characteristics that ma&e this topic useful, interesting, or important to these &inds of
peopleE .approximately 2-4 sentences0
2. Audience1su+ject re%ations"ip$ Aiscuss what your audience probably already &nows
9if anything9about the topic or problem you are in*estigating$ 6hin& about what
they may not &now$ 6hin& about why they might thin& your claim is important to
them$ hat attitudes or biases do you e+pect in your audienceE .approximately 2-4
sentences$0
3. Audience1writer re%ations"ip. Consider what you may ha*e in common with your
audience and what separates you from your audience$ Consider whether your
audience will trust what you ha*e to say or not$ ,re you 1one of them,3 or do they
need to &now something you before they are li&ely to ha*e confidence in youE
Aiscuss the persona you want to pro"ect to your readers$ .approximately 2-4
Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013
Page 5 of 6
sentences$0
T"e (irst 'raft
'ue + t"e end of Session 56
First drafts consist of the following elementsC
1. , left8hand bloc& header that includes your name, instructor-s name, class(section,
and date
2. , separate title for the paper, centered on the title line and in the same si'e, style, and
font as the rest of the document9not underlined$ @se an original title that suggests
your main point or approach .not 1,rgument !aper30$
3. =L, or ,!, formatting, including in8te+t documentation and a separate or&s Cited
or 2eferences page at the end$
4. =inimum 1;<F words for draft stage$ .1<// words for the final draft$0
5. , minimum ;//8word audience analysis$ 6his analysis should be posted at the
beginning of the draft paper, before page 1 of the actual paper$ @se copy D paste to
add your audience analysis to your first draft file before posting$ 6he audience
analysis will not be included in the word8count re>uirement for the draft itself$ 6he
audience analysis must +e removed from t"e fina% draft that is due in Session 1F$
5nstructions for posting your first draft for peer re*iew can be found in the Class Session ; folder$
Peer &eviews
'ue + t"e end of Session 54
%ou will be writing peer re*iews of at least two classmates- first drafts in Session 14$ Full
instructions for "ow to post peer re*iews can be found in the Class Session ; folder$ Full
instructions for "ow to respond to peers8 drafts can be found in the Class Session 14 folder$
(ina% 'raft
'ue + t"e end of Session 57
Final drafts must consist of the following elementsC
1. (ina% drafts must c%ear% +e re%ated to t"e ear%ier/ first drafts. , progression of
thin&ing from one draft to the ne+t must be e*ident$ =a"or changes in organi'ation,
new e+amples or ideas, or deletion of elements from the first to the final draft are
e+pected, but the final must still be clearly a de*elopment of that first draft$
2. .o fina% draft wi%% +e accepted unti% a first draft "as +een su+mitted9e*en if the
first draft is late and worth no points, it must precede the final draft$
3. 6he audience analysis must +e removed from the final draft$
4. 6he final draft must be properly formatted in =L, or ,!, style, must include a title
bloc&, and must include both in8te+t citations in the body of the paper and a or&s
Cited or 2eferences list at the end$ 6he or&s Cited or 2eferences list is NO6
included in the word count re>uirement$
Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013
Page 6 of 6
5. 6he final draft is to be a minimum of 59:: words in %engt".
Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013

You might also like