Writing Project 4: Argument Paper Overview:: Revised 04/17/2013 For Summer 2013
This document provides an overview and instructions for Writing Project 4: Argument Paper for an English Composition course. Students will write an argument paper on the same topic from Writing Project 2, taking a clear position and supporting it with evidence. The paper must include an audience analysis, consideration of counterarguments, and citations from at least five sources. A multi-draft process is outlined, with a first draft due for peer review and a final draft incorporating the feedback. The paper will be graded based on the strength of the argument, use of evidence, organization, style and mechanics.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views6 pages
Writing Project 4: Argument Paper Overview:: Revised 04/17/2013 For Summer 2013
This document provides an overview and instructions for Writing Project 4: Argument Paper for an English Composition course. Students will write an argument paper on the same topic from Writing Project 2, taking a clear position and supporting it with evidence. The paper must include an audience analysis, consideration of counterarguments, and citations from at least five sources. A multi-draft process is outlined, with a first draft due for peer review and a final draft incorporating the feedback. The paper will be graded based on the strength of the argument, use of evidence, organization, style and mechanics.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
Page 1 of 6
ENGL 111 English Composition Statewide Online Course
Writing Project 4: Argument Paper Overview: For this assignment, you will build off the same topic used in the riting !ro"ect #$ %our purpose is to ta&e a position on the issue or problem you synthesi'ed in riting !ro"ect # and to ma&e a case for a claim about the topic(problem that will influence a reasonably s&eptical audience$ )ecause you ha*e wor&ed towards de*eloping a clear understanding of the scope of the problem or issue in riting !ro"ect #, you are now in a position to ta&e an informed position on the issue and to argue, for e+ample, for a specific definition of &ey terms, a specific e*aluation of a proposal, a specific analysis of the causes of the problem, or a specific solution to the problem$ %our claim must be supportable with obser*able, measureable, and replicable e*idence$ ,*oid claims that are deri*ed from moral or personal *alues, or which are simple claims of one person-s or group-s sense of right and wrong, or which are based solely or primarily on emotional appeals .re*iew Chapter 1/ for more on types of argumentati*e appeals0$ Claims are established as one or more of the four types of claims discussed in Chapter 1/$ ,n effecti*e argument appeals to logic and reason .logos0, appeals to how readers and the writer feel about an issue .pathos0, and see&s to pro"ect that the writer-s argument is fair, "ust, and honest for all the sta&eholders .ethos0 .re*iew the section on 12hetorical ,ppeals to the ,udience3 in Chapter 4 for more on these types of appeals0$ %ou will need to use at least fi*e sources from the 5*y 6ech 7irtual Library databases in your writing$ Some or all of these may come from the sources you found for your ,nnotated )ibliography and(or used in riting !ro"ect #$ ,s you focus on your specific claim and argument, you may want to do additional research to better support your position$ 6hus, your bibliography for riting !ro"ect 4 will li&ely be similar to, but not identical with, your bibliography for riting !ro"ect #$ %our draft must also include a fair and balanced discussion of at least one ma"or counter8 argument to your claim9respectfully and accurately summari'ing the opposing *iewpoint$ )e sure your paper includes a clear, fair, and respectful refutation for this counter8argument$ %our claim about a solution to a problem or a position on a topic is your argument$ :owe*er, it does little good to propose a solution to or an analysis of a situation that your readers are not con*inced has anything to do with them$ So, do the audience analysis before underta&ing your first draft$ %our purpose is to influence your readers, not "ust tell them what you thin& is right$ 6o do that you need to thin& about what those readers are li&e, what moti*ates and interests them, and why they should care about what you ha*e to say on this topic$ %our audience may not agree with you in the end, but they should accept that your position is *alid, well8supported, and capable of being held by a rational and credible person$ Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013 Page 2 of 6 Specifics: ;// points possible 1<// words minimum, double8spaced, using 6imes New 2oman 1;8point font =L, or ,!, manuscript style with in8te+t documentation and or&s Cited or 2eferences page .this page does not count in the minimum word count re>uirement0 Clear, arguable claim that is supportable with rational e*idence Effecti*e use of counter8argument and rebuttal ,cademic tone? obser*ation of the con*entions of Standard English ,udience awareness @se of at least fi*e print sources from the 5*y 6ech 7irtual Library databases, representing two or more points of *iew on the position being argued First draft must include a minimum ;//8word audience analysis$ 6his analysis should appear as the first item in your first draft, before page 1 of the actual paper$ ,udience analysis is to be remo*ed from the final draft$ Procedure: COLLECT. 2e*iew the material that you collected from the 5*y 6ech 7irtual Library databases for your ,nnotated )ibliography and riting !ro"ect$ %ou may decide to drop a couple of the sources from the third pro"ect$ %ou may decide to add new material to replace items O2 to add to the items from riting !ro"ect #$ 5n any e*ent, you will need at least fi*e items for riting !ro"ect 4$ )e sure you &now enough about the authors and the organi'ations the material comes from to establish the authority of these sources? remember you ha*e to say something in your paper to boost your readers- confidence in what you are using as e*idence$ )e clear about why your topic is of interest to those authors as well as to your readers$ Loo& o*er what your classmates are saying in the prewriting discussion forums$ Some may be dealing with similar topics, and some may be using sources or ha*e ideas that might be useful to you e*en if your classmate is writing about a different topic$ Note the changes they are considering as they mo*e from the third into the fourth writing pro"ect$ @se "ournaling, brainstorming, branching, reader8response charts, and especially the double8 entry log that is e+plained in the te+tboo& to collect and organi'e your notes$ !art of the 1collecting3 process is to thin& carefully about our own audience$ =a&e a distinction between the audience(readers that the authors of these readings may ha*e in mind and the audience(readers ou ha*e in mind for your audience analysis$ )e sure you are tal&ing about your audience and NO6 your topic in the audience analysis$ S!APE your writing$ Create a t"esis statement$ 6his statement should ma&e an arguable claim about the topic or issue$ 6his time, you are ta&ing a position that ma&es sense to you in light of what you learned in riting !ro"ect #$ #ntegrate t"e t"esis into an introduction. 6he introduction should present your main claim(thesis$ 5t should also establish an 1essay map3 for your wor&$ 6his essay map should establish the main supporting reasons for your claim$ )e sure each of these reasons can be Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013 Page 3 of 6 supported with empirical .obser*able, measureable, replicable0 e*idence$ Go beyond presenting *alues and common &nowledge as e*idence$ Finally, an introduction should at least suggest why this issue is significant$ C"oose an organi$ationa% pattern. 2efer to Chapter 1/ for some suggested patterns for argument papers$
&eview and revise our out%ine. 2e*iew and re*ise your or&ing Outline from Session 1; before you start your first draft$ 6his outline should be consistent with the organi'ational pattern you already pic&ed$ %ou may find yourself returning to this list to re*ise it as you write$ Edit any new ideas into this list so they don-t get lost or end up in confusing places in your writing$ '&A(T your writing using the wor&ing outline you created$ )se *LA or APA st%e in8te+t citation and bibliographic documentation$ Select the style .=L, or ,!,0 that is appropriate for the &ind of audience you ha*e in mind and for the topic you are wor&ing with$ )se transitions +etween paragrap"s$ Solid de*elopment may re>uire more than one paragraph to discuss any one particular point from your list$ hen that happens, effecti*e paragraph transition can gi*e your readers a clear indication that you are still on the same general point or that you are mo*ing on to a new point$ ,e co"erent. )e sure the ideas you borrow are necessary in order to ma&e something clear to your readers$ Aon-t borrow anything beyond what is absolutely needed, and don-t lea*e a borrowed idea or passage hanging without any discussion of why it is important$ &eview to eliminate ob*ious errors in grammar, mechanics, synta+, citation, and documentation$ E*en a first draft should be reasonably clear to your peer editorsB Su+mit your first draft for peer re*iew$ 6his will be done using the G2O@! lin& found in Class Session 1#$ &E-#SE your draft after you re*iew the feedbac& you recei*e from the peer re*iew$ Ao not turn in your first draft later on as if it were the final draft. .o fina% draft wi%% +e accepted wit"out a first draft/ and t"e two of t"em must s"ow significant c"anges 0not just spe%%1 c"ec2 c"anges3 +etween t"e two versions. 4rading Criteria: Effecti*e introduction, includingC clear thesis that establishes an arguable and empirically supported claim? essay map that identifies &ey sub8claims? attempt to establish significance of topic? audience awareness in tone and style Fair and accurate discussion of at least one alternate point of *iew, including respectful, fair, and complete summary as well as logical and e*idence8based refutation of that alternate point of *iew 6hesis is well8supported with logic and e*idence$ E*idence should include empirical e*idence .facts, statistics, e+pert opinion0 from published sources to support claims? e*idence may also include use of first8hand obser*ation, e+amples from personal e+perience, inter*iews, polls, etc$ Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013 Page 4 of 6 riter-s language discernible from that of source authors$ Source information discussed and reasonably connected to the claims you are ma&ing Effort to establish credibility of sources used Effecti*e organi'ation, coherence, and paragraph transitions O*erall, readers are con*inced of the *alidity of the writer-s claim .whether or not they agree0$ riter demonstrates that a reasonable person could rationally hold this position or&s Cited or 2eferences page .minimum of fi*e items0 in correct =L, or ,!, style Clear control of Standard English con*entions for grammar, style, mechanics, and academic format 2efer to the section on 1Guidelines for 2e*ision3 in Chapter 1/ for &ey re*ision points$ P"ases of t"e Project 4: Audience Ana%sis Session 56 (irst 'raft Session 56 Peer &eviews Session 54 (ina% 'raft Session 57 T"e Audience Ana%sis 'ue + t"e end of Session 56/ as part of t"e (irst 'raft See the section on ,udience ,nalysis in Chapter ; in our te+tboo& for more discussion of the parts of an audience analysis 6he audience analysis should be minimum ;// words in length, and should appear as the first item in your first draft, before page 1 of the actual paper$ @se copy D paste to add your audience analysis to your first draft file before posting$ 1. Audience profi%e. Aescribe and define your target audience$ ho do you want to inform and influenceE hat are these &inds of people li&eE hat are the characteristics that ma&e this topic useful, interesting, or important to these &inds of peopleE .approximately 2-4 sentences0 2. Audience1su+ject re%ations"ip$ Aiscuss what your audience probably already &nows 9if anything9about the topic or problem you are in*estigating$ 6hin& about what they may not &now$ 6hin& about why they might thin& your claim is important to them$ hat attitudes or biases do you e+pect in your audienceE .approximately 2-4 sentences$0 3. Audience1writer re%ations"ip. Consider what you may ha*e in common with your audience and what separates you from your audience$ Consider whether your audience will trust what you ha*e to say or not$ ,re you 1one of them,3 or do they need to &now something you before they are li&ely to ha*e confidence in youE Aiscuss the persona you want to pro"ect to your readers$ .approximately 2-4 Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013 Page 5 of 6 sentences$0 T"e (irst 'raft 'ue + t"e end of Session 56 First drafts consist of the following elementsC 1. , left8hand bloc& header that includes your name, instructor-s name, class(section, and date 2. , separate title for the paper, centered on the title line and in the same si'e, style, and font as the rest of the document9not underlined$ @se an original title that suggests your main point or approach .not 1,rgument !aper30$ 3. =L, or ,!, formatting, including in8te+t documentation and a separate or&s Cited or 2eferences page at the end$ 4. =inimum 1;<F words for draft stage$ .1<// words for the final draft$0 5. , minimum ;//8word audience analysis$ 6his analysis should be posted at the beginning of the draft paper, before page 1 of the actual paper$ @se copy D paste to add your audience analysis to your first draft file before posting$ 6he audience analysis will not be included in the word8count re>uirement for the draft itself$ 6he audience analysis must +e removed from t"e fina% draft that is due in Session 1F$ 5nstructions for posting your first draft for peer re*iew can be found in the Class Session ; folder$ Peer &eviews 'ue + t"e end of Session 54 %ou will be writing peer re*iews of at least two classmates- first drafts in Session 14$ Full instructions for "ow to post peer re*iews can be found in the Class Session ; folder$ Full instructions for "ow to respond to peers8 drafts can be found in the Class Session 14 folder$ (ina% 'raft 'ue + t"e end of Session 57 Final drafts must consist of the following elementsC 1. (ina% drafts must c%ear% +e re%ated to t"e ear%ier/ first drafts. , progression of thin&ing from one draft to the ne+t must be e*ident$ =a"or changes in organi'ation, new e+amples or ideas, or deletion of elements from the first to the final draft are e+pected, but the final must still be clearly a de*elopment of that first draft$ 2. .o fina% draft wi%% +e accepted unti% a first draft "as +een su+mitted9e*en if the first draft is late and worth no points, it must precede the final draft$ 3. 6he audience analysis must +e removed from the final draft$ 4. 6he final draft must be properly formatted in =L, or ,!, style, must include a title bloc&, and must include both in8te+t citations in the body of the paper and a or&s Cited or 2eferences list at the end$ 6he or&s Cited or 2eferences list is NO6 included in the word count re>uirement$ Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013 Page 6 of 6 5. 6he final draft is to be a minimum of 59:: words in %engt". Revised 04/17/2013 for Summer 2013