Scribd
Upload
245 views1 page

F 0733384

Ford is shifting from a centralized structure under Henry Ford II to a more integrated global structure. Under the new plan, specific models and components will be developed at various technical centers around the world with specialized expertise, rather than all in Detroit. This will allow Ford to avoid duplication, reduce costs, and develop cars tailored for different markets. However, a previous attempt to build a "world car" in Europe failed, with little commonality between the American and European versions. Ford hopes the new centers of excellence approach will work better by leveraging specialized expertise around the globe.

Uploaded by

nitcvishesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
245 views1 page

F 0733384

Ford is shifting from a centralized structure under Henry Ford II to a more integrated global structure. Under the new plan, specific models and components will be developed at various technical centers around the world with specialized expertise, rather than all in Detroit. This will allow Ford to avoid duplication, reduce costs, and develop cars tailored for different markets. However, a previous attempt to build a "world car" in Europe failed, with little commonality between the American and European versions. Ford hopes the new centers of excellence approach will work better by leveraging specialized expertise around the globe.

Uploaded by

nitcvishesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

FORD’S GLOBAL STRATEGY: CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE

In 1986 Ford passed its bigger competitor, General Motors, with earnings of
$3.3billion. Ford’s market share is about 20 per cent. But success, in many instances,
may be only temporary, and Ford’s chairman, Donald E. Petersen, is concerned about
complacency. Indeed, the company has to work hard to maintain its reputation for
stylish, aerodynamics cars and high quality.

Under the former leadership of Henry ford II, the company was very centralized.
But Petersen’s plan is to make Ford an integrated global enterprise. Thus, a great deal of
authority for the development of specific models or components is now centralized in the
company’s various technical centers around the world rather than in Detroit. Under this
plan, the car or its components are developed in the technical center with the best
expertise in a particular field, anywhere in the world. This could save the company a lot
of money by avoiding duplication in development and reducing tooling costs. For
example, Ford of Europe, located in England for developing the platform for the new
model that will replace the European Sierra and the American Tempo and Topaz. Ford
will sell the new cars in Europe and in the United States. Similarly, in Japan Mazda
(Ford owns 25 per cent of the company), which has much experience in building small
cars, will be the centre for developing the platform for the replacement for the Escort.
The North American center of excellence will focus on midsize cars. Similar centers are
planned for major components such as transmissions and engines. While these centers of
excellence develop platforms and key components, exterior and interior styling will be
the responsibility of companies in the various regions.

The concept of the centers of excellence may seem promising, yet a previous
attempt in the early 1980s to build a “world car” in Europe failed. It is said that the
American car, the Escort, shared only one part with its European counterpart, namely, a
seal in the water pump.

1. What do you think of Ford’s overall decentralization with centralized authority


for development of specific cars and components at the technical centers?

2. Why does Ford think that the concept of having centers of excellence located in
various parts of the world will be the correct organization structure for the twenty-
first century?

You might also like