Multivariable Control-Oriented Modeling of A Direct
Multivariable Control-Oriented Modeling of A Direct
a
2
A
2
_
T
w
T
3
T
1
2
_
(7)
The degree of refrigerant sub-cooling in a condenser with
a receiver is normally rather small, and the refrigerant in the
receiver can be assumed to be the saturated liquid refriger-
ant at condensing pressure. Therefore, after knowing the
real-time measured condensing pressure, the enthalpy of
refrigerant leaving the receiver, h
re2
, can be obtained using
the R22 State Equations (Cleland, 1986). Neglecting the en-
ergy loss in the refrigerant line and approximating the
refrigerant throttling process in an EEV as being isenthalpic,
the enthalpy of refrigerant entering the DX evaporator is
given by
h
r1
h
re2
(8)
The enthalpy of superheated refrigerant at compressor suc-
tion, h
rc1
, can be evaluated based on the real-time measured
pressure and the temperature of superheated refrigerant us-
ing the R22 State Equations. Neglecting the energy loss in
the refrigerant line between DX evaporator and compressor
suction owing to good thermal insulation, the enthalpy of
the refrigerant leaving the DX evaporator is given by
h
r2
h
rc1
(9)
The swept volume of the rotor compressor, V
com
, was calcu-
lated using the related compressors geometric parameters as
follows:
V
com
pr
2
l3
_
2 3
_
(10)
where l is the stroke of cylinder; r the radius of rotor and 3 the
rotor relative eccentricity.
The compressor displacement coefcient, l, was given by
l 1 0:015
_
_
P
c
P
e
_1
b
1
_
(11)
where b is the compression index which was assumed to be
constant at 1.18. P
c
and P
e
were the condensing pressure and
evaporating pressure, respectively.
Therefore, the refrigerant mass ow rate can be deter-
mined by
M
ref
sV
com
v
s
_
1 0:015
_
P
c
=P
e
1
b
1
__
(12)
where s is the compressor speed, v
s
specic volume of super-
heated refrigerant, which can be obtained from measured
pressure and temperature of refrigerant at compressor suc-
tion using the R22 State Equations.
Due to the signicant difference in thermal inertia for both
refrigerant and air, dynamic responses to changes on the air
side were much slower than that on the refrigerant side. When
theair sidewaitedfor alongtimetofullyrespond, therefrigerant
side was already in its steady state for a quite while. Thus the
same refrigerant mass ow rate at both the inlet and the outlet
of the DX evaporator was assumed. Therefore the energy
balance equation for the evaporator wall can be written as
Refrigerant side
h
1
Evaporator wall
T
1
,W
1
wet-region
T
3
dry-region
T
2
,W
2
Air side
T
w
h
2 superheated
region
two-phase region
Fig. 2 The schematic diagram of evaporator.
i nt e r na t i o na l j our na l of r e f r i ge r a t i on 3 1 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 8 4 1 8 4 9 844
_
C
p
rV
_
w
dT
w
dt
a
1
A
1
_
T
2
T
3
2
T
w
_
a
2
A
2
_
T
3
T
1
2
T
w
_
M
ref
h
r2
h
r1
(13)
The airside convective heat transfer coefcients for the
louver-nned evaporator in both dry-cooling and wet-cooling
regions were evaluated as follows (Chen, 2005):
a
1
j
e1
ry
C
p
Pr
2
3
(14a)
a
2
j
e2
ry
C
p
Pr
2
3
(14b)
where j
e1
, j
e2
are the Colburn factors, y the air velocity.
The supply air leaving the DX evaporator was assumed to
be at 95% saturated. The relationship between air moisture
content and temperature can be derived by plotting and curv-
ing tting:
W
1
_
0:0198T
2
1
0:085T
1
4:4984
__
1000 (15a)
Therefore
dW
1
dt
2 0:0198T
1
0:085
dT
1
dt
=1000 0 (15b)
Eqs. (1), (3), (4), (7), (13) and (15b), all of which were rst order
differential equations, formed the dynamic model of DX A/C
system. Since the objective of the model development was
to assist the design of a multivariable controller, it was sug-
gested (Tewari, 2002; Skogestad and Postletheaite, 1996) that
these differential equations should be written in state-space
representation, such that it did not formally distinguish be-
tween a multivariable system and a single variable system,
allowing an efcient design and analysis for a multivariable
system in the same manner as for a single variable system.
Hence the model in state-space representation may be
expressed in the following compact format:
_
X D
1
$g
1
_
X; U
_
D
1
$g
2
_
Z
_
(16)
where the state variables X T
1
; T
2
; T
3
; T
w
; W
1
; W
2
T
and
_
X dX=dt, the input variables U f ; s
T
, and the disturbance
variables Z Q
load
; M
T
, g
1
, g
2
are the functions, dened as
follows:
g
1
X; U
_
_
C
p
rf T
1
T
2
k
spl
f
rf W
1
W
2
C
p
rf T
2
T
3
a
1
A
1
_
T
w
T
2
T
3
2
_
C
p
rf T
3
T
1
rfh
fg
W
2
W
1
a
2
A
2
_
T
w
T
3
T1
2
_
a
1
A
1
_
T
2
T
3
2
T
w
_
a
2
A
2
_
T
3
T
1
2
T
w
_
s
vs
Vcoml
h
r2
h
r1
0
_
_
(17a)
g
2
Z
_
_
Q
load
M
0
0
0
0
_
_
(17b)
D
_
_
0 C
p
rV 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 rV
0 0 C
p
rV
h1
0 0 0
C
p
rV
h2
0 0 0 rV
h2
h
fg
0
0 0 0
_
C
p
rV
_
w
0 0
1 0 0 0 20:0198T
1
0:085=1000 0
_
_
(18)
Table 2 Operating condition of the DX A/C system
T
1
13.25
C P
c
1.812 10
6
Pa
W
1
9.03/1000 kg/kg dry air P
e
0.486 10
6
Pa
T
2
24
C Q
load
4.49 kW
W
2
11.35/1000 kg/kg dry air M 0.96/1000 kg/s
T
3
17
C M
ref
0.042 kg/s
T
w
13
C s 3960 rpm
SH 6
C f 0.347 m
3
/s
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
23.00
23.25
23.50
23.75
24.00
24.25
24.50
Simulation
Experiment
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Time (s)
Fig. 3 Simulated and measured air temperature in the
conditioned space in response to a step change in
compressor speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
10.6
10.8
11.0
11.2
11.4
11.6
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
(
g
/
k
g
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 4 Simulated and measured air moisture content in
the conditioned space in response to a step change in
compressor speed.
Table 1 Numerical values of the system parameters
C
p
1.005 kJ/kg A
1
4.14 m
2
r 1.2 kg/m
3
A
2
17.65 m
2
h
fg
2450 kJ/kg V
h1
0.04 m
3
V 77 m
3
V
h2
0.16 m
3
i nt e r na t i ona l j o ur na l o f r e f r i g e r a t i o n 3 1 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 8 4 1 8 4 9 845
The developed dynamic model expressed in state-space
representation, i.e., Eq. (16), was nonlinear since the relation-
ship between state variables and input variables was nonlin-
ear. In most cases, a DX A/C system was designed to operate
in the vicinity of a predetermined set point given that thermal
space cooling load did not signicantly change. As long as the
control systemcan properly regulate the dynamic deviation of
the controlled objectives from the set points, the controlled
system can be well represented by a linearized model around
the set points. Hence, the state variables, X, and control in-
puts, U, can be expressed as follows, respectively:
Xxx
0
(19a)
Uuu
0
(19b)
where x
0
and u
0
are the state vector and input vector, both evalu-
ated at a steady state operating point, and x and u represent the
small dynamic deviation from x
0
and u
0
, respectively. For the DX
A/C system to be modeled, the sensible and moisture content load
disturbance can be regarded as being constant at a steady state.
Therefore the linearized model describing the systems dynamic de-
viation at an operating point can be written as
_ x
vg
1
vX
x
0
;u
0
x
vg
1
vU
x
0
;u
0
uA
_
x
0
;u
0
_
xB
_
x
0
;u
0
_
u (20)
Therefore the linearized dynamic model of the DX A/C sys-
tem in state-space representation, which is highly suitable for
designing multivariable control, can be written as
_
_
_
_ xAxBu
yCx
(21)
where the output variables ydT
2
;dW
2
T
, the dynamic devia-
tions of air temperature and moisture content from their set
points, respectively, and A, B, C were the coefcient matrices.
At a particular operating point, where T
2
24
C,
W
2
0.0135 kg/kg dry air, T
1
13.25
C, W
1
0.00903 kg/kg
dry air and the air owrate f 0.347 m
3
/s, the systemmatrices
A, B and C were calculated as follows:
A
_
_
5:731 0 0:0756 4:1883 5287 5287
0:0045 0:0045 0 0 0 0
0 4:6577 12:692 8:0346 0 0
0:0139 0:0067 0:0206 0:0412 0 0
0:0006 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0:0045 0:0045
_
_
(22a)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
12.00
12.25
12.50
12.75
13.00
13.25
13.50
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 5 Simulated and measured temperature of the air
leaving evaporator in response to a step change in
compressor speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
8.0
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.8
9.0
9.2
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
(
g
/
k
g
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 6 Simulated and measured moisture content of the
air leaving evaporator in response to a step change in
compressor speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
58.0
58.5
59.0
59.5
60.0
60.5
61.0
R
H
(
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 7 Simulated and measured relative humidity in the
conditioned space in response to a step change in
compressor speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Latent cooling capacity
Sensible cooling capacity
C
o
o
l
i
n
g
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
(
k
W
)
Time (s)
Total cooling capacity
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 8 Simulated and measured output cooling capacities
in response to a step change in compressor speed.
i nt e r na t i o na l j our na l of r e f r i ge r a t i on 3 1 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 8 4 1 8 4 9 846
B
_
_
55:035 0
0:098 0
172:5 0
0 5:931
0 0
0:00003 0
_
_
; C
_
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
_
(22b)
Theeigenvaluesof thelinearizedmodel for theDXA/Csystem
are showninEq. (23) for the operating point. All the eigenvalues
have the negative real parts, suggesting that the DXA/Csystem
represented by the linearized model was asymptotically stable.
l
sys
_
_
2:46e 017
4:51e 003
2:85e 002
6:15e 001
5:12e 000
1:27e 001
_
_
(23)
4. Model validation
Simulation results using the linearized dynamic model, i.e.,
Eq. (18), have been compared with the experimental data
obtained from the experimental DX A/C system for the pur-
pose of model validation. The simulation results and experi-
ment results were the open-loop responses to step changes
in compressor and supply fan speeds, respectively.
When the systemwas operating around a steady state con-
dition, step changes were introduced to the controllable in-
puts such as compressor speed and supply fan speed. The
same operating conditions and step changes were also input
to the model to obtain simulation results to facilitate the
comparison.
The following comparisons were based on the steady state
operational condition of around 24
C indoor air temperature
and 11.3 g/kg moisture content, or 60% RH in conditioned
space. The numerical values of both the system parameters
used in the simulation and the operating condition of the
DX A/C system are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The
linearization of the model was also based on this operating
condition. Figs. 38 present the comparisons between the sim-
ulation results and experimental data in response to a step
change in compressor speed from 3960 rpm to 4488 rpm
(from 66 Hz to 75 Hz), introduced at 420 s. When the compres-
sor speed increased, the temperature and moisture content of
0 200 400 600 800 1000
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 9 Simulated and measured temperature of the air
leaving evaporator in response to a step change in supply
fan speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000
8.0
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.8
9.0
9.2
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
(
g
/
k
g
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 10 Simulated and measured moisture content of the
air leaving evaporator in response to a step change in
supply fan speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000
23.00
23.25
23.50
23.75
24.00
24.25
24.50
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 11 Simulated and measured air temperature in the
conditioned space in response to a step change in supply
fan speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000
11.00
11.05
11.10
11.15
11.20
11.25
11.30
11.35
11.40
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
(
g
/
k
g
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 12 Simulated and measured air moisture content in
the conditioned space in response to a step change in
supply fan speed.
i nt e r na t i ona l j o ur na l o f r e f r i g e r a t i o n 3 1 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 8 4 1 8 4 9 847
the air in conditioned space decreased due to the increased
output cooling capacity of the DX A/C system, as shown in
Figs. 3 and 4. As seen in both gures, there existed a good
agreement between the simulated responses and the experi-
mental results. Similar observations can be obtained for other
operating parameters such as the temperature and moisture
content of air leaving the DX evaporator (Fig. 5 and 6), indoor
air relative humidity (Fig. 7) and output cooling capacities
(Fig. 8). In Fig. 8, it is seen that the increase in output latent
cooling capacity was more than that in output sensible cooling
capacity, when the total output cooling capacity was in-
creased due to the increase in compressor speed, which
resulted in a lower evaporating temperature or a lower evap-
orator wall temperature. Hence, as seen in Fig. 7, indoor air
RH was reduced due to the increased output latent cooling
capacity.
On the other hand, the comparisons between the simula-
tion results and experimental data, in response to a step
change in supply fan speed from 2448 rpm to 2160 rpm (from
41 Hz to 36 Hz), introducedat 290 s, are illustratedinFigs. 914.
When the supply fan speed was reduced, the temperature and
moisture content of the air leaving the DX evaporator de-
creased, as shown in Figs. 9 and 10, respectively. Again, in
both gures, a good agreement between the simulated results
and measured experimental data can be observed. Similar ob-
servations of agreement can also be found for other systems
parameters as shown in Figs. 1114.
The comparisons shown in Figs. 314 conrmed that the
developed model after linearization was experimentally vali-
dated to be able to both capture the transient change of sys-
tem parameters in a timely manner, and to represent the
steady state operation with an acceptable accuracy. Although
there were a number of points where there existed noticeable
differences between the measured and the simulated re-
sponses possibly due to the fact that the model developed
was a simplied one, the general trends for both were consis-
tent. Hence, this model was a good representation of the DXA/
C system during both the steady state and transient operating
conditions. More importantly, the model was written in state-
space representation, thus suitable for multivariable control-
ler design.
5. Conclusions
A dynamic mathematical model of a DX A/C system has been
developed based on the principle of energy and mass conser-
vation, and is reported in this paper. The dynamic model writ-
ten in state-space representation was linearized at its
operating point, which makes it highly suitable for designing
a multivariable control algorithm, such as MIMO control.
The linearized model was experimentally validated. It is
expected that the validated model could pave the way for fu-
ture work of designing an MIMO controller for simultaneously
controlling indoor air temperature and humidity in a space
served by a DX A/C system.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the nancial supports from both
the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (B-Q796) and The
Hong Kong Polytechnic University for the work reported in
this paper.
r e f e r e n c e s
Bordick, J., Gilbridge, T.L., 2002. Focusing on buyers needs: DOEs
engineering technology program. Energy Engineering 99 (6),
1838.
Chen, W., 2005. Modeling and Control of a Direct Expansion (DX)
Variable-air-volume (VAV) Air Conditioning System. PhD
thesis, Department of Building Services Engineering, Hong
Kong Polytechnic University.
Cleland, A.C., 1986. Computer sub-routines for rapid evaluation of
refrigerant thermodynamic properties. International Journal
of Refrigeration 9, 346351.
Fanger, P.O., 2001. Human requirements in future air-conditioned
environments. International Journal of Refrigeration24, 148153.
He, X.D., Liu, S., Asada, H.H., 1997. Modeling of vapor
compression cycles for multivariable feedback control of
HVAC systems. Transaction of the ASME: Journal of Dynamic
Systems, Measurement, and Control 119, 183191.
0 200 400 600 800 1000
58.0
58.5
59.0
59.5
60.0
60.5
61.0
R
H
(
)
Time (s)
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 13 Simulated and measured relative humidity in the
conditioned space in response to a step change in supply
fan speed.
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Latent cooling capacity
Sensible cooling capacity
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
(
k
W
)
Time (s)
Total cooling capacity
Simulation
Experiment
Fig. 14 Simulated and measured output cooling capacities
in response to a step change in supply fan speed.
i nt e r na t i o na l j our na l of r e f r i ge r a t i on 3 1 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 8 4 1 8 4 9 848
He, X.D., Liu, S., Asada, H.H., Itoh, H., 1998. Multivariable control
of vapor compression systems. HVAC & R Research 4 (3),
205230.
Krakow, K.I., Lin, S., Zeng, Z.S., 1995. Temperature and humidity
control during cooling and dehumidifying by compressor and
evaporator fan speed variation. ASHRAE Transactions 101 (1),
292304.
Li, Z., Deng, S.M., 2007a. An experimental study on the inherent
operational characteristics of a direct expansion (DX) air
conditioning (A/C) unit. Building and Environment 42, 110.
Li, Z., Deng, S.M., 2007b. A DDC-based capacity controller of
a direct expansion (DX) air conditioning (A/C) unit for
simultaneous indoor air temperature and humidity control.
Part I: Control algorithms and preliminary controllability tests.
International Journal of Refrigeration 30, 113123.
Li, Z., Deng, S.M., 2007c. A DDC-based capacity controller of
a direct expansion (DX) air conditioning (A/C) unit for
simultaneous indoor air temperature and humidity control.
Part II: Further development of the controller to improve
control sensitivity. International Journal of Refrigeration 30,
124133.
Lin, J.L., Yeh, T.J., 2007. Modeling, identication and control of air
conditioning systems. International Journal of Refrigeration
30, 209220.
Rasmussen, B.P., Alleyne, A.G., 2004. Control-oriented modeling
of transcritical vapor compression systems. Transaction of the
ASME: Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and
Control 126, 5464.
Skogestad, S., Postletheaite, I., 1996. Multivariable Feedback
Control Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Shah, R., Rasmussen, B.P., Alleyne, A.G., 2004. Application of
a multivariable adaptive control strategy to automotive air
conditioning systems. International Journal of Adaptive
Control and Signal Processing 18, 199221.
Tao, C., He, X.D., Asada, H.H., 2004. Nonlinear observer design for
two-phase ow heat exchangers of air conditioning systems.
Proceedings of the American Control Conference, USA, 1534
1539.
Tao, C., He, X.D., Asada, H.H., Kasahara, S., 2005. Heat exchanger
dynamic observer design. ASHRAE Transactions 111, 328335.
Tewari, A., 2002. Modern Control Design with Matlab and
Simulink. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
i nt e r na t i ona l j o ur na l o f r e f r i g e r a t i o n 3 1 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 8 4 1 8 4 9 849