Mean Life Time of Cosmic Ray Muon
Mean Life Time of Cosmic Ray Muon
Abstract:
We measured the mean lifetime of muons that were produced by cosmic rays high in the
atmosphere and made their way to sea level. We stopped some of the muons in a cube of plastic
scintillator and used photomultiplier tubes (PMT) to detect the light that they and their decay
electrons produced. We processed the PMT signals using standard NIM electronics and
measured the time intervals between them using a time to amplitude converter and a
multichannel analyzer. From the distribution of decay time intervals, we determined that the
stopped muons had a mean lifetime of (2.174 ± 0.019) µs. This is slightly less than the accepted
value for free muons, about 2.197 µs, but our smaller value may be due to the capture of negative
muons in the scintillator material.
I. INTRODUCTION
Cosmic Rays:
A steady rain of particles accelerated by intergalactic magnetic fields and moving with
relativistic speeds falls on the Earth at all times. We know these particles as cosmic rays [1].
The intensity of cosmic rays increases with increasing altitude, which shows that cosmic rays
come from outer space. The intensity also varies with geomagnetic latitude, which shows that
cosmic rays consist of charged particles that are deflected by the Earth’s magnetic field [2].
Muons:
The muon is a fundamental particle with the same charge and spin as an electron, but with a
mass about 207 times greater than an electron’s. Like the electron, the muon experiences only
the weak and electromagnetic interactions. For this reason, electrons and muons are both called
leptons. Unlike the electron, however, the muon is unstable. So for many purposes, the muon
can be considered to be a heavy, unstable electron.
Origin of Muons:
The muons we studied were produced high in the earth’s atmosphere by collisions between
air molecules and the so-called primary cosmic rays, which come from outer space. The
approximate composition of the primary cosmic radiation is 87% protons and 13% neutrons, the
latter being bound in nuclei [3].
The charged particles that reach the Earth’s surface are not primary, but secondary; that is,
they are produced by nucleon–nucleus interactions. The most abundant products of these
interactions are pions, which may be either electrically neutral or charged. Neutral pions decay
into gamma-ray pairs in about 10-16 seconds. Charged pions decay into muons and neutrinos in
about 10-8 seconds according to these schemes:
π+ → μ+ + υμ
π- → μ - + ῡ μ
Figure 1 illustrates this process of production and decay. Muons make up more than half
of the cosmic radiation reaching the surface of the Earth, the other half being mainly electrons,
positrons and photons [4].
Decay of Muons:
During the 1940s, experiments conducted using nuclear emulsions showed that a muon
decays into an electron with a kinetic energy that may have any value from zero to about 50
MeV. This means that there must be at least three particles among the decay products, two of
which must be neutral because they produce no tracks in the emulsions. Now we know that a
muon decays into an electron, and two different types of neutrinos, in the processes shown below
and in Figure 2:
µ- → ℮- + υμ + ῡe
µ+ → ℮+ + υe + ῡµ
The decay of the muon is characterized by a decay constant λ and a mean lifetime τ,
which are defined in terms of the relationship
dN = -λNdt = -1/τ Ndt
Here, N represents the number of muons present at some time (usually taken to be t=0) and dN
represents the change in that number during a subsequent small time interval dt.
This relationship can be integrated to give the number of muons remaining as a function of
time:
N(t) = N(0) e-λt = No e-t/τ
This expression also describes the expected distribution of time intervals between the arrival of a
single muon in a detector and its decay into an electron.
The mean lifetime of free muons has been measured to high precision. A recent value is
τ = (2.197034±0.000021) μs [7]
If negative muons are stopped in a material such as a plastic scintillator, they may become
attracted to and captured by nuclei of the atoms making up that material. This process does not
occur with positive muons, which are repelled by the positive nuclei. Nuclear capture results in a
shorter observed lifetime for negative muons stopped in materials. For carbon, which makes up
much of the plastic scintillator material, the lifetime of stopped negative muons is
τ =( 2.0263 ± 0.0015 ) µ s [8]
Scintillator:
The scintillator is the large black cube at the top of Figure 3. It converts the energy deposited by
charged particles that pass through it into visible light. These flashes are picked up by the
photomultiplier tubes attached to the left-hand side of the cube and converted to an electrical
signal. The scintillator used in this particular experiment is a transparent plastic with special
light-emitting molecules added. It is made by Rexon Components, Inc, and its dimensions are 12
x 12 x 12 inches. It and the photomultiplier tubes are enclosed in a black, opaque covering to
exclude stray light.
Photomultiplier tubes:
Photomultiplier tubes make use of the photoelectric effect to convert the faint light emitted by
the scintillator into a more easily analyzed burst of electrons. Light from the scintillator first
falls on a photocathode, which emits a small number of so-called photoelectrons. Shaped
electric fields direct them through a series of dynodes, which are electrodes made of a material
with good secondary electron emission. [9] Each dynode emits more electrons than it receives,
creating a large shower of electrons at the output electrode. In this experiment, the
photomultipliers used are Rexon model 2000P, Serial Numbers 9738 and 9739. A bias voltage
of negative 2000 V is applied to each tube, and a voltage-divider circuit apples the appropriate
voltage to each dynode. The output of the photomultiplier tubes is shown in Figure 4. The
oscilloscope input is terminated in 50 ohms.
Electronic Components:
The main signal processing electronic components used in this experiment are shown
in the block diagram of Figure 5. They include:
- Fast Timing Amplifier (Ortec FTA 820)
- Constant Fraction Discriminator (Ortec 583B)
- Coincidence Circuit (Lecroy 465)
- Time to Amplitude Converter (Ortec 567)
- Timer and Counter (Ortec 871)
- Multi-Channel Analyzer (Amptek MCA8000A)
FTA
FTA
The main function of the electronics is to make sure that every signal that is counted is
genuine and related to the decays of muons. The Fast Timing Amplifier (FTA) is a broadband
amplifier that increases the amplitude of the pulses coming from the photomultiplier tubes.
These pulses include noise as well as signals generated by charged particles passing through the
scintillator. The Constant Fraction Discriminator (CFD) is used to exclude noise pulses and to
generate a precise timing signal. The Coincidence Circuit (CC) produces an output pulse only
when the two photomultiplier tubes detect scintillations within about 50 nanoseconds of one
another. This further reduces the effects of noise. The Time to Amplitude Converter (TAC) is
used to measure the time interval between successive outputs of the Coincidence Circuit. In a
sense, the TAC behaves like a stopwatch. A pulse at the Start input starts the stopwatch, and a
pulse at the Stop input stops it. The output of the TAC is a positive signal whose amplitude, in
the range 0 – 10 V, is proportional to the time interval between Start and Stop pulses. In this
experiment, the maximum interval was set to 20 µs. The Multichannel Analyzer (MCA) sorts
the TAC pulses into a spectrum with counts on the vertical axis and bin number, proportional to
the amplitude of the TAC pulse, on the horizontal axis. A time calibration of the apparatus
permits the horizontal axis to be labeled in terms of time intervals.
Time Calibration:
We performed a time calibration by sending pairs of identical pulses with known and
variable time spacing through our circuit. The pulses were obtained from a double-pulse
generator and the TAC output was sent to the MCA. We used Microsoft Excel to calculate a
linear regression formula for the time calibration as shown below. The equation:
y = 0.0195x + .1635
simply means that the time corresponding to channel ‘x’ is 0.1635μs + 0.0195 μs*x.
See Appendix A for linear regression formulas for first two time calibrations.
Time Calibration # 3
20
18
f(x) = 0.0195009043585039 x + 0.163483829512503
16
R² = 0.999996625051903
14
12
Time (us)
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Channel Number
The value t1 returned by the fitting program corresponds to τ, the time constant for the
equation and is our value for the mean observed lifetime. In this run, we found that = (2.15 ±
0.02) µs, where the quoted uncertainty is that associated with the fitting process alone. Other
uncertainties, such as those associated with the time calibration, are not included.
The value y0 represents a constant background, presumably due to so-called accidental
coincidences. These can arise if two unrelated charged particles pass through the detector during
the 20-µs TAC time window. The background count per channel was estimated using the
following expression:
( Rs∗Δt∗Rs ) T
N A=
N CH
Here,
Rs = rate of start stop pulses at TAC (about 20 s-1)
Δt = TAC time window (20 µs)
T = duration of run (1.94 days or 1.68 105 s)
NCH = Number of channels in spectrum (1024)
The estimated background count per channel was equal to 1.31, which is in close agreement with
y0 value of 1.47 as shown in Table 1.
Data Summary:
Our results for four different data runs are summarized in Table 2 below. The weighted
average of the measured mean lifetime is (2.174 ± 0.019) µs. The quoted uncertainty represents
the average fitting error only. Possible additional uncertainties associated, for example, with the
time calibrations, have not been assessed or included.
IV. CONCLUSION
We measured the mean lifetime of muons stopped in a plastic scintillator and obtained
an average value of (2.174 ± 0.019) µs, which is close to the accepted value of 2.197 µs for
the lifetime of free muons. The fact that our measured lifetime is smaller than the accepted
value is probably due to the capture of negative muons by the scintillator material.
V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to acknowledge Midshipman 2/C R. M. Simpson for his assistance in every
phase of the experiment and Professor David Correll for his guidance throughout the
course of experiment.
VI. REFERENCES
[1] Rossi, Bruno Benedetto. Cosmic rays. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
[2] Friedlander, Michael W. A thin cosmic rain: particles from outer space. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard UP, 1989,2000.
[5] The Speed and Decay of Cosmic-Ray Muons: Experiments in Relativistic Kinematics-
The Universal Speed Limit and Time Dilation. Tech. MIT Department of Physics, November 29,
2010. Print.
[6] Muon Decay. Digital image. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 07 Nov. 2011.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Muon_Decay.png>
[7] K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), Journal of Physics G 37, 075021 (2010).
[9] Measurement of Muon Lifetime. Tech. University of Michigan, November, 2001. Print.
[10] www.originlab.com
APPENDIX A
TIME CALIBRATIONS
a. Calibration 1:
CHANNEL # TIME (us)
196.94 4
401.86 8
610.96 12
810.96 16
20 Time Calibration # 1
15
f(x) = 0.019499781975 x + 0.149100141855
Time (us)
R² = 0.999929319897504
10
0
100200300400500600700800900
Channel Number
This calibration was done on 07OCT2011 and was used for Run 1 and Run 2.
b. Calibration 2:
CHANNEL # TIME (us)
94.98 2
197.10 4
299.21 6
401.88 8
504.58 10
607.01 12
709.42 14
811.97 16
914.00 18
Time Calibration # 2
20
f(x)15
= 0.01952412087 x + 0.15084029446
Time (us)
R² = 0.999999438596675
10
5
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Channel
This calibration was done on 28NOV2011 and was used for Run 3.
c. Calibration 3:
CHANNEL # TIME (us)
94.23 2
197.00 4
299.00 6
401.55 8
504.55 10
607.00 12
709.16 14
813.23 16
914.00 18
Time Calibration # 3
20
f(x) =15
0.019500904359 x + 0.16348382951
R² = 0.999996625051903
Time (us)
10
5
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Channels
This calibration was done on 04DEC2011 and was used for Run 3 and Run 4.
APPENDIX B
EXPONENTIAL FITS TO THE DATA FOR ALL FOUR RUNS
a. Run 1:
b. Run 2:
e. Run 4: