Lalitha et al

Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, February 2010; 9 (1): 45-50

Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, 300001 Nigeria. All rights reserved

Available online at http://www.tjpr.org

Research Article

Stability-Indicating Reverse Phase HPLC Method for the Determination of Cefazolin

N Lalitha*, Pai PN Sanjay, MG Vyshak and Uvesh Kadri
Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy, Near Lalbagh Main Gate, Bangalore-560027, India

Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to establish the inherent stability of cefazolin through stress studies under a variety of ICH recommended test conditions and, also to develop a stability indicating assay. Methods: A stability-indicating HPLC assay method was developed and validated for cefazolin using an isocratic RP-HPLC method which employed an SS Wakosil II- C18 column (250 mm 4.6 mm i.d., 5 m) with a mobile phase consisting of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and methanol (5:2 v/v), and UV detection at 254 nm at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The stress testing of cefazolin was carried out under acidic, alkaline, neutral, oxidation and thermal conditions. Results: The drug peak was well resolved from the peaks of the degradation products. The proposed method was validated for sensitivity, selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision and solution stability. From the degradation studies it was found that the drug was thermally stable but unstable in acidic, alkaline, neutral and oxidative conditions. The response of drug was linear in the concentration Range of 1 - 50 g/ml with the number of theoretical plates, and tailing factor being 1341 and 1, respectively. Limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.1 and 0.2, g/ml respectively while recovery ranged from 95 100%. Method precision and precision of the system were within the limits of acceptance criteria. Conclusion: This study presents a simple and validated stability-indicating HPLC method for the estimation of cefazolin in the presence of degradation products. The developed method is specific, accurate, precise and robust. All the degradation products formed during forced degradation studies were well separated from the analyte peak. Keywords: Cefazolin; Stability-indicating assay; Reversed-phase HPLC

Received: 17 June 2009

Revised accepted: 30 October 2009

*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +91-9448685343, 8026760811; Fax: +918022225834

Trop J Pharm Res, February 2010; 9 (1): 45

Lalitha et al

INTRODUCTION
Stability is defined as the capacity of a drug substance or drug product to remain within established specifications to maintain its identity, strength, quality, and purity throughout the re-test or expiration dating periods [1]. Stability testing of an active substance or finished product provides evidence on how the quality of a drug substance or drug product varies with time. It is influenced by a variety of environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and light. Knowledge from stability studies enables understanding of the long-term effects of the environment on drugs. Stability testing provides information about degradation mechanisms, potential degradation products, possible degradation pathways of the drug as well as interaction between the drug and excipients in the drug product. The results are applied in developing manufacturing processes and selecting proper packaging, storage conditions, product's shelf life and expiration dates [2-4]. Because the distribution environment is highly variable, products must be distributed in a manner that ensures product quality will not be adversely affected. The effect of possible temperature and humidity fluctuations, outside of labelled storage conditions, during transportation of drug products can be evaluated on the basis of the stability analysis of the drug [4,5]. Determination of cefazolin by various methods has been described but the stability of cefazolin has only been evaluated with electrophoresis [6], calorimetry [7] and gamma radiations [8]. A number of high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) methods have been developed for the cephalosporins in plasma [9-13] but only a few stability-indicating HPLC methods for drug analysis has been reported [14,15]. The aim of the present study was to establish the inherent stability of cefazolin through stress studies under a variety of ICH-recommended tests conditions [2] and

to develop a stability-indicating assay for the drug [16]. Cefazolin sodium [17] is (6R, 7R)-3-(((5Methyl-1, 3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) thio -methyl)-8oxo-7-2-(1H-tetrazol-1-yl) acetamido)-5-thia1-azabicyclo (4.2.0) oct-2-ene-2-carboxylate with molecular formula C14H14N8O4S3. It is a first generation cephalosporin and it inhibits cell wall biosynthesis. Cephalosporins are bactericidal and have the same mode of action as other beta-lactam antibiotics (such as the penicillins). Modified cephalosporins have a much wider activity than the penicillins, and also show less toxicity and better stability [18].

EXPERIMENTAL
Materials Pure cefazolin was received as a gift from Karnataka Antibiotics Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bangalore, India. Cefazolin injection (Azolin Injection, 500mg, Biochem-Pharmaceutical Industries, Mumbai, India) was purchased from local drug market. HPLC grade methanol was purchased from Qualigens Fine Chemicals, Mumbai, India. Millipore water was obtained with Millipak 0.22 m filter. Buffer materials and all other chemicals were of analytical-reagent grade. Instrumentation conditions and chromatographic

The HPLC system consisted of model 10AT Shimadzu- SPD10A detector an SS Wakosil II- C18 column (250 mm 4.6 mm i.d., 5 m). Separation was carried out by isocratic elution with a mixture of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and methanol in the ratio of 5:2 (v/v) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The detector was monitored at 254 nm and the injection volume was 100 l.

Trop J Pharm Res, February 2010; 9 (1): 46

Lalitha et al

Preparation solutions

of

standard

and

sample

Standard preparation: A standard stock solution of 1 mg/ml of cefazolin in the mobile phase was prepared in a 10 ml volumetric flask. Working standard solutions were prepared by diluting the stock solution with the mobile phase to obtain cefazolin concentrations ranging from 0.1 100 g/ml. Sample preparation: Cefazolin sodium injection of 500 mg was dissolved in 2 ml water for injection and from this solution, a working sample solution of 2g/ml was prepared with the mobile phase in a 10 ml volumetric flask and filtered through a 0.22 m nylon syringe filter. Degradation studies Standard cefazolin with a concentration of 1 mg/ml was used in all the degradation studies. Standard cefazolin solutions were subjected to stress conditions in 0.1N HCl and 0.1N NaOH at of temperature of 80 C at time intervals. After completion of the degradation processes, the solutions were neutralized and diluted with mobile phase. For neutral studies, standard cefazolin of 1 mg/ml was dissolved in water and subjected to stress conditions at a temperature of 80 C at time intervals. For the oxidative studies, the standard cefazolin solution was subjected to stress conditions in 3 and 30% hydrogen peroxide at room temperature for 30 min. After the solutions had been subjected to the various stress conditions, 0.1 ml of the degraded solutions were withdrawn at the various intervals and subjected and analysed after suitable dilution to 10 g/ml with mobile phase. The chromatographic analysis of the degraded solutions (100 l each) were carried out under the same chromatographic conditions. Method validation Analytical method validation was carried out as per ICH method validation guidelines [16].

The validation parameters addressed were specificity, precision (inter-day and intra-day), linearity, accuracy, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and stability of cefazolin in mobile phase. A standard plot was constructed for cefazolin in the range of 0.1 50 g/ml. Accuracy was determined by fortifying the mixture of pre-analysed standard of three known concentrations of the drugs with the marketed sample.

RESULTS
Development and optimization of the stability-indicating HPLC method An isocratic method was found suitable to optimise the separation of major degradation products formed under various stress conditions. The best resolution was achieved with an initial run of a mixture of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and methanol in the ratio of 5:2 (v/v) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min; the retention time was observed to be 5.72 min. Degradation behavior HPLC data on samples (powder and solution combination) obtained on stress testing (alkaline, acidic, neutral, thermal and oxidative conditions) are indicated in Table 1. Acidic conditions The standard drug cefazolin at 80 C in 0.1 M HCl was degraded in 5 min. Within 10 min 87.5 % drug was degraded. The chromatogram showed major degradation products at retention times (RT) of 2.96 min and 3.93 min with the standard peak at 5.9 min. Alkali conditions The drug was highly degraded in 0.1 M 0 NaOH at 80 C, being degraded within 10 min. Three major degradation peaks at RT of 2.00, 2.26, and 2.96 min were observed while Trop J Pharm Res, February 2010; 9 (1): 47
0

Lalitha et al

Table 1: Degradation data for cefazolin Stress condition Standard drug Acidic Alkaline Neutral Neutral Oxidative (3% H2O2) Oxidative (30 %H2O2) Thermal Degradation time (min) 10 10 30 60 20 30 min 36 hr Area of peak* 1683293 108335 412316 1088441 746143 1712823 393803 1180032 Degradation (%) 87.53 61.88 17.01 33.29 70.33 95.6 29.89 Active drug present after degradation (%) 12.46 38.10 82.98 66.11 29.88 5.36 70.10

*Mean of three measurements Table 2: Recovery data for cefazolin (n = 3) Standard cefazolin (g/ml) 2 4 6 Test cefazolin( g/ml) 2 2 2 Total conc. (g/ml) 4 6 8 Peak area* 534115 761349 1102675 Analysed total amount (g/ml) 3.9 5.8 8 Recovery of standard (g/ml) 1.9 3.8 6 Recovery of standard (%) 95 95 100

Neutral conditions The degradation of standard cefazolin solution was highly labile in neutral medium 0 (water) at room temperature (27 2 C) with 33.3 % of the drug decomposed in 60 min. The major degradation product appeared at RT of 2.50 min and the standard peak at 5.97 min. Oxidative degradation The degradation of cefazolin in 3 % hydrogen peroxide (oxidative conditions) at different time interval of 20 min was 29.9 %, giving rise to one degraded peak at RT of 2 min with the hydrogen peroxide and standard peaks occurring at RT of 2.98 and 5.90 min, respectively. In 30 % hydrogen peroxide, 95.6 % drug was degraded in 10 min with the degradation peak occurring at RT of 1.97 min. Hydrogen peroxide and

standard peaks occurred at 3.01 and 5.95 min, respectively. After 20 min, the drug was completely degraded. Thermal degradation Under thermal degradation conditions, standard cefazolin solution was stable for 24 h. exposition at 50 C. After 48 h of thermal stress, 29.89 % of cefazolin was degraded, while 70.10 % (did not any degraded peaks) was recovered. Validation of method System suitability The retention time of cefazolin was 5.67 min. Efficiency and tailing factor at 5 % of the height of the main peak were determined, giving N = 1341.12, and tailing factor = 1.

Trop J Pharm Res, February 2010; 9 (1): 48

Lalitha et al

Linearity Ten-point calibration curves were obtained in a concentration range of 1 to 50 g/ml for cefazolin based on three independent determinations performed at each concentration. The response for the drug was linear and the calibration equation was y = 2 291171x - 26955 with R = 0.9989. Limit of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for cefazolin limit of

same column by two analysts on different days. The assay result indicated that the method had a high precision. Additionally, good separation, effective separation of the drug from its degraded product was always achieved which suggests that the method was selective for all the components tested. Solution stability The stability of cefazolin solution was established by keeping the solution at room temperature for 24 h. The result showed no significant change in concentration, thus confirming the stability of the drug in the solvent used for the analysis.

The limit of detection and limit of quantitation for cefazolin were 0.1 and 0.3 g/ml, respectively. Accuracy Recovery ranged from 95 100 %. The recovery study data are given in Table 2. Precision Method precision and precision of the system were within the limits of acceptance criteria. Assessment of the system precision showed that the relative standard deviation was 0.8033 and 0.5856 % for 4 and 2 mcg, respectively. The data for inter- and intra-day precision are given in Table 3. Ruggedness The ruggedness of the developed method was established by determining cefazolin in the same chromatographic system and the
Table 3: Inter and intra-day precision

DISCUSSION
In this study, the inherent stability of cefazolin was established based on tests utilising ICH recommended stress conditions. The drug degraded extensively in alkaline, acidic, neutral and oxidative conditions. Mild degradation was seen in thermal conditions without any degraded products. Drug peak was well resolved from the peak of its degradation product as well as those of the excipients in cefazolin sodium injection formulation. The developed method was simple, accurate, precise, specific, selective and rugged and, therefore, it should be suitable for the analysis of cefazolin and its degraded products of the drug product in the industry.

Actual conc. (g/ml) 1 2 4 6 8 10

Inter-day measured conc. (g/ml) g/ml) RSD (%, n = 3) 0.9 1.8153 2.0 1.9191 3.9 1.7236 5.7 0.5500 7.7 1.6507 10.2 0.6146

Intra-day measured conc. (g/ml) g/ml) RSD (%, n = 3) 0.9 0.6509 2.0 0.9329 3.9 1.3516 5.6 1.2570 8.2 1.9843 10.1 1.0525

Trop J Pharm Res, February 2010; 9 (1): 49

Lalitha et al

CONCLUSION
This study presents a simple and validated stability-indicating HPLC method for the estimation of cefazolin in the presence of its degradation products. The developed method is specific, accurate, precise and robust. All the peaks of the degradation products formed during forced decomposition studies were well separated from the analyte peak. This demonstrates that the developed method was specific and stability-indicating. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of a commercial cefazolin injection formulation, as no interference due to excipients or other components present was observed.

5.

6.

7. 8. 9.

10.

11.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are grateful to Karnataka Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bangalore, India, for providing some materials free of charge, and to all our research colleagues at the firms Department of Quality Assurance for their support
12.

13. 14.

REFERENCES
1. FDA Guidance for Industry. Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Drug Products (Draft Guidance), Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, USA, 1998. ICH Good Manufacturing Practice for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. International Conference on Harmonisation, IFPMA, Geneva, 2000. Carstensen JT, Rhodes CT. A rational approach to stability testing and analytical development for NCE, drug products marketed product stability testingIn: In: Drug Stability: Principles and Practices, Wolfgang G,, Ed, New York, Marcel Dekker, 2000; pp 41581. Emmanuel OA. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Handbook. In: Effect of Packaging on Stability of Drugs and Drug Products, Shayne CD, Shayne CG, Eds,, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey, 2008; pp 641-686.. 15.

2.

16.

3.

17. 18.

4.

ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Q1F: Stability Data Package For Registration Applications in Climatic Zones III and IV, EMEA, London, 2003. Beverly N, Brenda C, Stephen S. The use of capillary electrophoresis to monitor the stability of a dual-action cephalosporin in solution. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1995; 14: 73-83. Pikal MJ, Dellerman KM. Stability testing of pharmaceuticals. Int. J. Pharm. 1989; 50: 233252. Jacobs GP. Stability of cefazolin and other new cephalosporins following gamma irradiation. Int. J. Pharm. 1983; 17: 29-38. Sosnowska NS, Ociosa A, Fuks L. Selectivity of similar compounds identification using IR spectrometry: -Lactam antibiotics. J. Molec Str. 2006; 792-793: 110-114. Al-Rawithi S, Hussein R, Raines DA, Al-Showaier I, Kurdi W. Sensitive assay for the determination of cefazolin or ceftriaxone in plasma utilizing LC. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal, 2000; 22(2): 281286. Sorensen LK, Snor LK. Determination of cephalosporins in raw bovine milk by highperformance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr A, 2000; 882(1-2): 145-151. Signs SA, File TM, Tan JS. High-pressure liquid chromatographic method for analysis of cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 1984; 26: 652-655. Joshi S. HPLC separation of antibiotics present in formulated and unformulated samples. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002; 28: 795-809. Xu QA, Trissel LA. Stability-Indicating HPLC Methods for Drug Analysis, American Pharmacists Association, USA and the Pharmaceutical Press, UK, 2008. Bakshi M, Singh B, Singh A, Singh S. The ICH guidance in practice: Stress degradation studies on ornidazole and development of a validated stability-indicating assay. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2001; 26(5-6): 891-897. Steven W. BioPharm International - Analytical Methods: A Statistical Perspective on the ICH Q2A and Q2B Guidelines for Validation of Analytical Methods, Rockville, MD 20850, 2006. http://www.statisticaloutsourcingservices .com/Methval.pdf. Accessed 2 December 2008. USP 27/NF-22. The United States Phamacopoeial Convection Inc. Rockville, MD, 2004, p 328. Deshpande AD, Baheti KG, Chatterjee NR. Degradation of b-lactam antibiotics. Current Sci. 2004; 87: 1684-1695.

Trop J Pharm Res, February 2010; 9 (1): 50