Sample Analysis Design - Step 2 - Calibration/Standard Preparation
Sample Analysis Design - Step 2 - Calibration/Standard Preparation
1000000 900000 800000 700000 600000 cps 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 0.00
y = 17557x 2 R = 0.9992
10.00
20.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
40000
35000
30000
y = 676.92x 2 R = 0.9961
25000 cps
20000
15000
10000
5000
0 0.00
10.00
20.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Sample Analysis Design Standard Addition Method If the original sample was in solid form that you digested and subsequently converted into a solution; then in order to determine the concentration of the analyte in question, you must factor in the amount of total analyte in the solution and the dry weight of the sample powder
Sample Analysis Design Standard Addition Method This method works best if the slope of the calibration line is not too shallow
This will create more uncertainty in the location of the intersection between the cps of your unknown and the calibration line
Sample Analysis Design Standard Addition Method Ideally, the highest spike concentration should be approximately equal to the concentration of analyte in the unknown Need to have some idea of the concentration in the sample prior to analysis
Disadvantages:
Requires at least three aliquots for each sample Run lengths become much longer and more preparation time is required
Sample Analysis Design Isotope Dilution The amount of spike is selected so that the resulting ratio between spiked isotope and unspiked isotope is near unity maximizes precision Typically use the most abundant isotope as the reference -- maximizes sensitivity
Sample Analysis Design Isotope Dilution Check isotope ratio in unspiked sample to determine if the natural ratio in the sample matches with the predicted ratio If not -- interference in acting on one or both of the isotopes Always attempt to use interference free isotopes
Sample Analysis Design Isotope Dilution Prepare the spike to desired concentration Add spike as early as possible after equilibration of spike and sample you dont have to have complete sample recovery During any stage of the process complete equilibration is absolutely necessary
Sample Analysis Design Internal Standard Choice of IS depends upon which elements you are quantifying The IS should have similar properties in the plasma as element(s) of interest ICP-MS: similar in mass/ionization potential
Sample Analysis Design Internal Standard From previous slide, we assume that samples have little or no Th, As, or Re Its important to have an idea of whats in your sample prior to quantitative analysis Solid samples can use a naturally occurring element as IS, provided that you know the concentration in each sample
Sample Analysis Design Instrumental Drift Correct for instrument drift with: Internal standardization is a common procedure Use of drift corrector solutions (DCS)
Sample Analysis Design Instrumental Drift Drift Corrector Solutions (DCS): Measure the same solution intermittently throughout the course of the analytical session Change in ion signal is assumed to be linear between each DCS measurement
Sample Analysis Design Instrumental Drift The DCS should contain all elements of interest and can be matrix matched to samples
Example: use standard reference materials (SRMs) for DCS
Sample Analysis Design Instrumental Drift Apply a linear correction to samples between DCS solutions DCS1 + ((DCS2 - DCS1)*F) F = position dependent fraction
Sample Analysis Design Background & blanks Standard blank - blank used to monitor polyatomic ion interferences, gas peaks, and contamination from reagents; used for background subtraction Procedural blank - blank used to monitor contamination acquired during all stages of sample preparation; grinding, digestion, acidification, powdering, etc
Sample Analysis Design Background & blanks The more standard blanks that are run during an analytical session, the more information you will have with regards to monitoring change(s) in background levels throughout the entire session
Sample Analysis Design Background & blanks Outlier tests: 1. I know the truth 2. Looks different 3. Statistical proof
Sample Analysis Design Background & blanks Option 1 should be avoided - unscientific and invalid Option 2 is better but only if the measurement is repeated Option 3 is the best approach, but needs to be carried out carefully in order to avoid false negatives and positives
Sample Analysis Design Background & blanks Calculation of Limit of Detection (DL) and Limit of Quantification (QL) Easy way: LOD = 3*STDEVblank; LOQ = 10*STDEVblank