Civil Miniproject VamshiKrishna
Civil Miniproject VamshiKrishna
A Mini project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the Requirement for the award of the degree of
08241A0150 08241A0154
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING GOKARAJU RANGARAJU INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (Affiliated JNTUH, Hyderabad) Bachupally, Nizampet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500090. july 2011
DECLARATION
We declare that this project entitled ROLE OF FLYASH IN CONCRETE has been done by us and has not previously formed as the basis for the awards of any degree or diploma or the similar title in this or any other institution.
08241A0150 08241A0154
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The satisfaction and euphoria that accompany the successful completion of any task would be incomplete without the expression of appreciation of simple matter to the people who made it possible because success is epitome of hard work, cogency for fulfillment of the mission, indefatigable perseverance and most of all those whose guidance and encouragement had made successful in winding up this opus.
We express our profound feeling of gratitude to prof. Dr. Venkat Ramana, Head of the department , Civil Engineering, Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute of Engineering And Technology for his constant words of encouragement and concrete suggestions which helped us in completion of this project. We would like to express our sincere thanks to M/S Surasani Constructions pvt. Ltd, for providing us an opportunity to complete our mini project successful, which is a part of course curriculum. This training would not have successfully completed without the guidance and support to Mr. M. Sridhar Reddy (Project Manager), Mr. C. Praveen Kumar(Site Engineer) and the entire project team. We are deeply indebled to the project team members who were always ready to help us during project time.
ABSTRACT
Fly ash is a fused residue of clay minerals present in coal. The high temperature generated when coal burns in thermal power plants, transforms the clay minerals in coal powder into a variety of fused fine particles of mainly aluminium silicate composition. Fly ash can be used in Portland cement concrete to enhance the performance of the concrete. Fly ash can be used for construction of road and embankment. This utilization has many advantages over conventional methods. Fly ash is most commonly used as a pozzolan in PCC applications.
Company details:
We are hereby making our project in M/S Surasani Constructions pvt. Ltd to successfully complete our project as per standard specification.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General 1.2 Use of fly ash in concrete 1.2.1 Fly ash effects in concrete 1.3 Objectives 1.4 Scope of work 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 General 2.2 Characteristics of fly ash 2.2.1 Physical Properties Of Fly Ash 2.2.2 Chemical Compositions Of Fly Ash 2.2.3 Morphology Of Fly Ash 2.2.4 Mineralogy of Fly Ash 2.3 High content of fly ash in concrete 2.4 Role of water in concrete: 2.5 Influence of Fly Ash on Water Content 2.6 High range water-reducers 2.6.1 Composition 2.6.2 Mechanism of Action 2.6.3 Effects Fresh State 2.6.3.1 Fresh concrete 2.6.3.2 Hardened State 2.6.3.3 Volume Change
3. DESIGN OF CONCRETE MIX 3.1 General 3.2 Material selection 3.2.1 Cement 3.2.2 Fly-Ash 3.2.3 Sand 3.2.4 Coarse Aggregate
3.2.5 Water 3.2.6 Super-plasticizer 3.3 Mixture proportioning procedure 3.4 Calculation of mix proportions
4. EXPERIMENTAL WORK
4.1 GENERAL 4.2 Planning 4.3 Estimation of required material 4.4 Procurement of material 4.5 Preliminary laboratory tests 4.6 Preparation and casting of test specimen 4.7 Mixing procedure 4.8 Compaction of test specimen 4.9 Specimen conditioning and testing
5. TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 General 5.2 Test results 5.2.1 Properties of fresh concrete 5.2.2 Properties of hardened concrete
6. CONCLUSION 7. BIBILOGRAPHY
INTRODUCTION
1.1
GENERAL
Cement is the most costly and energy-intensive component of concrete. The unit cost of concrete can be reduced by partial replacement of cement with fly ash. The disposal of fly ash is one of the major issues for environmentalists, as dumping of fly ash as waste material causes severe environmental problems. The utilization of fly ash instead of dumping it as a waste material can be partly used on economic grounds as pozzuolana for partial replacement of cement and partly because of its beneficial effects of lower water demand for similar workability, reduced bleeding and lower evolution of heat. It has been used particularly in mass concrete applications and large volume placement to control expansion due to heat of hydration and also helps in reducing cracking at early ages. The proportion of fly ash used as a cementitious component in concrete depends on several factors. The design strength and workability of concrete, water demand and relative cost of fly ash compared with cement are particularly important in mixture proportioning of concrete. One of the major developments in the area of fly ash utilization in concrete has been the technology of high-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete by Malhotra and Ramezanianpour [1] and Malhotra [2]. High fly ash concretes with fly ash/cementitious ratio up to 75% (by mass) and an aggregate/cement ratio of 6 have compressive and flexural strengths that are more than adequate for lean concrete base or subbase application in pavement structure [ 3]. Concrete containing 50% replacement by mass of class F fly ash can be designed to have 1- and 28-day cube strengths of 20 and 60 MPa, respectively [ 4]. High-volume fly ash concrete has adequate early-age and later-age strength developments and considerably lower temperature rise, and its applications should have a water content
of not less than 115 kg/m3 and a sufficient amount of a retarded version of superplasticizer to maintain satisfactory slump and placing characteristics [ 5]. 1.2 USE OF FLY ASH IN CONCRETE
It has been above 70 years to research and use fly ash. With its application, the action mechanism of fly ash had been recognized. During the initial stage, only its pozzolanic activity is paid attention [ 8 and 9]. Many researchers devoted themselves to the research of the potential activity of fly ash and the hydration process of fly ash cement. With the deepening of the cognition for fly ash properties, some people found that the particles of fly ash have the morphology that is different to other pozzolanic materials. It is the unique particle morphology to make it have the ability reducing water, which other pozzolanic materials do not have [ 10, 11, 12 and 13]. It influences not only the rheological property of fresh mortar but also the initial structure of hardened cement stone. In the end of 1970s, Jan de Zeeuw and Abersch [14] put forward that the role of fly ash, which its particle size is less than 30 , may be similar to that of the micro-particle of unhydrated cement in cement stone. In 1981, Danshen and Yinji [15] and Danshen [16] summarized the previous research results and put forward the hypothesis of "fly ash effects." They considered that fly ash has three effects in concrete, i.e., morphological, activated and micro aggregate effects. The three effects are relative each other. This shows that the morphological effect is the important aspect of fly ash effects. The morphological effect means that in concrete, mineral-powdered materials produce the effect due to the morphology, structure and surface property of the particle and the particle size distribution. From the influence of fly ash on the properties of cementbased materials, the morphology effect includes three aspects: filling, lubricating and well distributing. These roles depend on the shape, size distribution, etc., of fly ash and influence many properties of concrete. The pozzolanic effect is the main effect of FA, which states that the unfixed SiO 2 and Al2O3 in FA can be activated by Ca(OH)2 product of cement hydration and produce more hydrated gel. Since the gel produced from pozzolanic action can fill in the capillary in concrete, it effectively contributes to concrete strength, especially in concrete with high volume fly ash (often the generation of long-term strength is
mainly from pozzolanic effect). Taking the cement hydration as prerequisite, the contribution of pozzolanic effect to strength can also be regarded as one part of cement contribution. It should also be pointed out here that the above three effects of Fly ash infect co-affect with each other, but focus on the different performance of concrete, respectively. Since it is difficult and not necessary to distinguish the previously mentioned three effects, often they are collectively called "fly ash effect" or "pozzolanic effect. Roller-compacted concrete (RCC), a kind of widely used pavement material, is a sort of super-dry concrete with high density and high strength, resulting from its low water demand and formation by vibration and rolling. Incorporating FA into RCC to make RCC with fly ash (FRCC) can further reduce the cost and meanwhile specifically improve the performance. The specific improvement lies in the following aspects: (1) Incorporating FA by the method of super-substituting, a widely used design method, effectively increases the total amount of binder in RCC and makes it easier to compact. (2) Substituting Fly Ash for a part of cement in RCC can remarkably decrease the quantity of heat produced by cement hydration. (3) Formation by vibration and rolling, and also by its required low water-cement ratio, can somehow make up the early age strength of FRCC, which is often cut down by the incorporation of a large amount of FA in ordinary concrete. With the previously mentioned advantages, FRCC is gradually extended in pavement construction. Possessing so many favourable properties, amount of Fly Ash in FRCC can further be promoted and the performance of pavement can still be guaranteed, while taking rational ratio design as prerequisite. 1.2.1 Fly Ash effects in concrete Following are the effects which was found out in roller compacted concrete with high content of class F fly ash: 1. Since the pozzolanic reaction between FA and cement lags behind cement hydration, High Fly ash Roller Compacted Concrete (HFRCC) strength at early curing age is poor and decreases with increasing FA content. 2. Following the curing age, greater amounts of FA are activated and cause the strength of HFRCC to continuously develop.
3. Incorporating fly ash by high content and super-substituting method makes HFRCC easier to compact, and together with the amount of crystal phase Ca(OH) 2 and harmful pore reduction, HFRCC at long-term curing age becomes dense and homogeneous. These improved properties are more beneficial to flexural strength, which is more sensitive to inner structure characteristic than compressive strength.
Fig.1.1: SEM micrographs (8,000) of Portland cement (a) and low-calcium fly ash (b) 1.3 OBJECTIVES
In this project work, objective is to develop engineering database on the mechanical properties and to determine the necessary level of fluidity, generally termed as workability (as control of workability is one of the main objectives of mixture proportioning) of fly ash concrete incorporating VTPS fly ash and Ordinary Portland Cement, and it is compared with controlled concrete. Also four grades (M20, M25, M30 and M35) of concrete are targeted to select optimum percentage of cement replacement by fly ash as cementitious material, for obtaining maximum possible 28 days compressive strength. To evaluate the dose of superplasticizer for the same water-cement ratio of each grade of concrete to increase the slump value from 80-120mm.
1.4
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of project work is as under: Literature review regarding requirements of fly ash, material properties and characteristics of high performance concrete. 1. Preliminary laboratory test of fine aggregates, coarse aggregate for mix design. 2. Mix design and proportioning for ingredients. 3. Modification and correction in mix proportioning during concrete production to meet workability requirement. 4. Modification and correction in mix proportioning during concrete productions for moisture content of fine aggregates. 5. Water to binder (cement plus fly ash) ratio was kept 0.50,0.46,0.42 and 0.38 for M20, M25 ,M30 and M35 grade concrete respectively. 6. 150 mm size cubes were casted, cured in water tank and weighed for unit weight before compression testing for the determination of mechanical properties of concretes at 7 days and 28 days . 7. Superplasticizer dose was calculated for each grade of concrete for same W/C ratio to obtain slump value 80-120mm. 8. Test result interpretation for optimum selection of suitable part replacement of fly ash as cementitious material. 9. Compressive strength test and analysis for the determination of mechanical properties of concretes at 7 days and 28 days from the date of casting of the test specimen.
10
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 GENERAL Fly ashes from Vijayawada thermal power plants were used in the experiments of the present study.. A brief review of literature about the physical and chemical properties; mineralogy and morphology behavior of fly ashes is presented. Literatures regarding concrete applications of fly ashes have been used in construction are also discussed. Fly ash is produced from burning of pulverized coal in thermal power plants. The pulverized coal is fed into the boilers and burnt with the supply of additional air. The temperature in the boiler exceeds 1600 C and the most of the mineral matter present in the coal are fused and altered physically and chemically. The resulting residue is called coal combustion by-products namely bottom ash, economizer ash, air pre-heater ash, and electrostatic precipitator ash (fly ash). These ashes are handled and disposed off separately owing to their differing qualities by mechanical, hydraulic and pneumatic conveying systems. The quality of ash produced is dependent on various factors like source coal and its degree of pulverization, design of furnace, changes in coal supply, changes in boiler load, and firing condition. Because of this inherent variability of the material, it is necessary to study the characteristics and engineering behavior of fly ash in detail before its use in an application. Fly ash is a promising and economical alternative material to construction engineering applications. Review of literature shows that fly ash has been utilized in the construction of pavement construction, in high strength concrete, high performance concrete and in other applications. A. CHARACTERISTICS OF FLY ASH
As per ASTM C 618 1993[17], there are two classes of fly ash namely class F and class C. Class F fly ash is produced from burning anthracite or bituminous coal and is
11
pozzolanic in nature and class C is obtained from lignite or sub-bituminous coal. Class C fly ash possesses both pozzolanic and self-hardening property. Hence, it is necessary to characterize the material scientifically to utilize it in different applications. i. Physical Properties Of Fly Ash
The specific gravity, loss on ignition ( LOI) and specific surface area are the prominent physical properties of fly ashes. The specific gravity of fly ash may vary from 1.3 to 4.8. The iron oxide content plays a decisive role in the specific gravity of the material. The specific gravity is more for fly ashes containing more iron oxide and vice versa. The presence of opaque spherical magnetite and hematite particles in sufficient quantity will increase the value of specific gravity to about 3.6 to 4.8. On the other hand, as the amount of quartz and mullite increases, the specific gravity decreases. However, coal particles with some minerallic impurities will have lower specific gravity in the range 1.3 to 1.6. The range of specific gravity of Canadian fly ashes is reported to be in the range of 1.91 to 2.94 and that of American fly ashes in the range of 2.14 to 2.69. Dayal and Sinha (1999) [18] have reported the specific gravity of Indian coal ashes to range between 1.94 and 2.34 with a mean value of 2.16 and standard deviation of 0.21. The specific gravity of fly ash decreases as the particle size increases. The specific gravity increases when the fly ash particles were crushed. Typical values of the specific surface of Indian fly ashes (3267 to 6842 cm2/g) were comparable with that of the foreign ashes (2007 to 6073 cm2/g). ii. Chemical Compositions Of Fly Ash The main chemical compounds of class F fly ash are silica, alumina and iron oxide. Other minor constituents include oxides of calcium, magnesium, titanium, sulphur, sodium and potassium. Class C fly ash contains relatively higher proportion of calcium oxide and lesser proportion of silica, alumina and iron oxide than class F fly ash. Typical chemical compositions of various Indian fly ashes are summarized in Table 2.2. iii. Morphology Of Fly Ash
12
Fly ash is a heterogeneous material; with the degree of heterogeneity persisting at all levels viz macro, micro and nano structural levels (Sun Wei at al 2003)[51]. By using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA) technique the particle shape and surface characteristics of fly ash can be studied. (a) and spherical, which are termed as cenospheres Some of the particles are hollow [Fig2.1 (a)].. These cenospheres are also called floaters, as they are light in weight. Fly ashes contain small spherical particles within a large glassy sphere, called plerospheres [Fig. 2.1 (b)]. In some particles, where regions of a spherical particle melted or eroded away are known as clathrosphere [Fig. 2.1 (c)]. This indicates the intense chemical activity having occurred within the particles in the furnace zone during the short residence time. The exterior surfaces of solid and hollow spherical particles of low calcium oxide fly ashes are generally smoother than the high calcium oxide fly ashes, which may have surface coatings of materials rich in calcium1. In some fly ashes small sub-micron size particles may be sticking to the large spherical particles, due to the convexity of the surfaces. The studies conducted by Mehta (1998)[19] on low calcium fly ashes (CaO<5%) revealed that they contained small amount of hollow spheres, which were, either completely empty (cenosphere) or packed inside with smaller spheres (plerospheres).
13
Fig. 2.1 Scanning electron micrographs of inhomogeneous spherical particle types of fly ashes (a) cenosphere (b) plerosphere And (Hemmings and Berry, 1987) Diamond 1986[20] studied the particle morphologies of 13 low calcium fly ashes collected from Indiana. The salient features of the study are as follows. The fly ash contained spherical particles of wide size range about 1 m to more m with smooth surface. Some of the particles were covered with surface irregularities or deposits. Presence of plerospheres (Thin walled hollow spheres with smaller included spheres) and non-spherical particles were identified. The interior structure of a particle revealed the presence of iron rich magnetic grain on a sphere and in the adjacent sphere needle shaped particles of mullite crystals were present. Presence of heterogeneous structure of particles contained within a plerosphere was also identified. Plate like structures that constitute the surface of a sphere was also present occasionally. These structures may represent the magnetic plate. Garg (1995)[21] studied the morphology of Indian fly ashes. The fly ashes contained angular as well as rounded black particles, spheroid glass, and minute silica grains. Sharma (1993)[22] has classified Indian fly ashes based on the shape of particles as one of the parameters. According to him group- fly ashes contained mainly spherical particles with the size range between 2-25 m. The surfaces of glassy spheres in this group are predominantly smooth without any deposit, only some adherence was observed. Group- fly ashes contained a wide range of particles (2-35 m). Most of the particles were spherical in shape, but some sintering and surface depositions were also observed. (c) clathrosphere
14
Where as group- fly ashes which were of low reactive type contained mostly irregularly shaped and relatively coarser particles, which have undergone probably little or no fusion in the combustion process.
2.2.4 Mineralogy of Fly Ash Fly ash consists of both crystalline and amorphous phases. The crystalline phases could be quartz, mullite, silimanite, crystallite, cristobalite, sulphates of iron,
magnetite etc. The amorphous phases could be of silica and silicates predominantly of aluminium but containing calcium, magnesium, and iron in varying concentration with and without traces of sodium and potassium. The reactivity of fly ashes depends on the non crystalline or glass content in it. The chemical composition of the glass in the high calcium fly ash is different from the low calcium fly ash and hence the reactivity of both the ashes are different. The high calcium fly ashes are more reactive than low calcium fly ashes. Diamond (1986)[20] and Mehta (1998)[19] pointed out that the composition of glass in low calcium fly ashes is different from high calcium fly ashes. Typically low calcium fly ashes show a diffused halo with maxima at 2 = 21-25 and high calcium fly ashes at 30-34 . Garg (1999)[23] conducted XRD studies of Indian fly ashes and the crystalline constituents identified were quartz (SiO2), mullite (3 Al2O3. 2SiO2), hematite (Fe2 O3) and magnetite (Fe3 O4). The minerals present in fly ash obtained from Koradi thermal power plant (Nagpur) were quartz low (syn) most predominant, mullite- predominant, brookite, sillimanite and ferroselite (Gangadhara Rao et al. 1998)[24]. As reported by Garg (1999)[23] mentioned that quartz and mullite were the main crystalline constituents in British fly ashes and the American fly ashes contained magnetite and hematite in large proportions. The range of quantitative measurement in British fly ashes was quartz (1-6.5%); mullite (935%); magnetite and hematite (5% or less). For American fly ashes the proportions were quartz (0 - 4%); mullite (0
15
16%); magnetite (030%); and hematite (18%). The glass proportions in these fly ashes were found to range from 50 to 90%. b. HIGH CONTENT OF FLY ASH IN CONCRETE Poon, C.S.,et al.(2002)[25] Low calcium fly ash (ASTM Class F) has been widely used as a replacement of cement in normal and high strength concrete. In normal strength concrete, the replacement level can be more than 50%, while in high strength concrete, the replacement level is usually limited to 15 25%. The main objectives of using fly ash in high strength concrete are to reduce heat generation and to obtain better durability properties. However, in concrete mixes prepared at a low water-tobinder (w/b) ratio, 20% fly ash content may not be sufficient to suppress the excessive heat of hydration. In a laboratory investigation carried out at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, the temperature in-crease due to cement hydration of large concrete blocks (1000_1000_1000 mm) was measured. It was found that for 50 MPa concrete, a 25% fly ash replacement reduced the maximum temperature of the concrete by 6C, whereas for 100 MPa concrete, a 20% fly ash replacement did not result in a lower temperature rise. This seems to indicate that in concrete at a lower w/b ratio, the effect of a normal amount of fly ash is not significant in reducing the temperature rise due to cement hydration. In the past, concrete containing high volumes of low-calcium fly ash was mostly used in mass concrete, e.g., roller compacted dams and highway base courses [3], where high strength and high degree of workability were not required. High volume fly ash concrete for structural use was developed by the Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET) in 1985]. This type of concrete has typically 5060% fly ash as the total cementitious materials' content. Superplasticizers (high-range water reducing admixtures) are used to obtain a high degree of workability. Successful applications of this type of concrete included concrete columns with a compressive strength requirement of 50 MPa at 120 days, and piles with the compressive strength requirement of 45 MPa at 28 days.
16
It is known that fly ashes generally have negative effects on the concrete strength, particularly at early ages [6]. Using large quantities of this material in concrete seem to be in contradiction to the original aims of preparing high strength concrete. However, as observed by many researchers [79], fly ash concrete may have better strength performance when they are prepared at lower w/b ratios. At a w/b = 0.5, a 45% fly ash replacement resulted in about 30% reduction in 28-day compressive strength, but at a w/b = 0.3, the strength reduction was reduced to 17%. Also, the advances of concrete admixture technology allow concrete mixtures to be prepared with lower w/b ratios. It is therefore believed that high strength concrete can be obtained with large volumes of fly ash. The generation of fly ash and its use in India along with other countries is given in Table 2.1. In India, generally Class F type fly ash is found. The chemical [36] requirement of chemical composition for class C and Class F type ash in various countries is shown in Table 2.2. c. ROLE OF WATER IN CONCRETE: Before water is added, however close the solid particles are, there is always some space in the system. After water is added, a part of water is filled into these spaces, which is called as filling water. Other water forms the layer of water on the surface of the solid particle, which is called as the layer water. Because of the adsorption of the solid surface to water molecule, the part of water that is closer to the surface of solid will be restrained by solid particle and is not able to move freely. The water may be called as the adsorpted layer water. The layer water that is not restrained by solid particle is called as the free layer water. Mixing water is the sum of filling water, adsorpted layer water and free layer water. In the flow process of fresh mortar, filling water does not contribute to the fluidibility because it only fills in the space and cannot make the particles separate to decrease the moving resistance of particle. Of course, the filling water is able to move freely, but the fluidity of fresh paste means that cement particles move with water under the action of water. If only the water moves but the cement particle does not, it is not the fluidity of cement paste but the separation.
17
Country Standard No. Type of Fly Ash SiO2 min% (SAF) min% MgO min% SO3 min% CaO max% LOI max% Alkalies max% Moist. Max%
India IS 3812
Tu
35 70 5 3 12 1.5 -
45 5 1
70 70 5 4 5 4 -
6 12 12 7 3 3 3 3
1. In cement 2. In concrete
LOI S A F
18
19
When fresh mortar flows, adsorpted layer water moves with solid particle. It shows the property that a solid has. Thus, it does not contribute to the fluidibility too. In fact, this water can be exchanged with other in cement paste. This is a dynamic balance. As a part, the adsorbed layer water does not contribute to fluidity. But for any molecule of water, it is uncertain because it may be in the adsorbed layer or the free layer. It can be seen from these that only free layer water contributes to the fluidibility. In the flow process, free layer water makes the particles separate each other. The effort between particles decreases. Thus, if the shape of solid particles is not considered, in a certain degree, the thicker the free water layer, the better the fluidibility is. Fig. 2.1 shows the model of water action and their contribution to the fluidibility.
Fig. 2.2: The model of water action and their contribution to fluidibility.
In fresh mortar, the amount of filling water depends on the packing density of system. The higher the packing density, the less the filling water is. The amount of adsorpted layer water depends on the specific surface area and surface property of solid particles. It is the product of the specific surface area and the thickness of the adsorpted layer. The thickness of adsorpted layer depends on the water affinity of solid particles. The thickness of free water layer depends on the amount of free layer water and the specific surface of solid particles. Under the condition of same amount of free layer water, the larger the specific surface of solid particles, thinner the free water layer is. Of course, the increase of the amount of free layer water will increase the thickness free water layer.
14
2.5.1 Influence of Fly Ash on Water Content The particle of fly ash is different from one of cement in particle size, specific surface and particle shape. They will influence the distribution of water in fresh mortar. This is the essential reason of the influence of the morphological effect on the fluidibility of fresh mortar. 2 3
The high-range water reducers presently used in the market can be classified [ 26] according to their chemical nature in the following main groups: Beta-naphthalene sulphonate formaldehyde condensates; Melamine sulphonate formaldehyde condensates; Modified ligno-sulphonates; Esters of sulphonic acids; Salts of carboxylic/hydroxy carboxylic acids. 4 2.6.2 Mechanism of Action
The mechanism of actin of high-range water reducers is mainly based on their ability to be adsorbed on the surface of cement particles and modify the rheological behaviour of the cement matrix. The rate of adsorption of high-range water reducers depends on the chemical and mineralogical composition of the cement, its fineness and in that calcium aluminate adsorbs very rapidly the high-range water reducer molecules, while calcium silicate in the first hours of hydration adsorbs only a lower amount of the high-range reducers. The increase of workability can be correlated with the following properties. 1. The value of zeta potential of the electric double layer that is formed on the surface of the cement particles by the polar groups of adsorbed superplasticizer chains [27]. 2. The molecular weight of the super plasticizer.
15
The rate of workability loss is correlated to the retardation produced on the hydration of cement. 2.6.3 Effects The different properties of concrete indicate the specific way of using the admixture that produces the desired modification. It is intended that if use of the admixture is not indicated, the corresponding way of using the admixture does not exert a particular action on the specific property cited. 2.6.3.1 Fresh State Unit Mass Unit mass of concrete is usually increased when high-range water reducers are used. Workability superplasticizers dramatically increase the ability of concrete to flow. a. Cohesion: Cohesion is largely improved by the use of high-range water reducer as a consequence of the reduction of water in concretes. b. Air content:Air content may be slightly increased, especially in the case of use of high dosages of the admixtures as superplasticizers. c. Slump loss:At the same initial workability, slump loss may be higher in concretes with high-range water reducers than in concrete without admixture. At the same water/cement ratio, slump loss of concrete with superplasticizers may be higher or lower than the control concrete without admixture as a function of the type of superplasticizers used. d. Pumpability: Pumpability of concrete is improved by the use of superplasticizers, as a consequence of the increase in workability, and due to cohesion in case of use as high-range water reducers. e. Segregation: Segregation decreases when the admixture is either used as a high-range water reduced or as a superplasticizers, provided that an adequate mix design of the concrete is done.
16
f. Setting state: Generally the admixture used as a superplaticizer mildly retards the setting of concrete, while use, as a high-range water reducer at normal dosage does not give significant retardation. g. Plastic shrinkage: Plastic shrinkage cracking can be increased by the use of high-range water reducers if the ambient conditions are such that evaporative demands are greater than the reduced bleeding capacity of the high-range water reduced concrete. h. Bleeding: Bleeding is reduced by the use of high-range water reducers. If the aggregate size distribution is not properly designed, bleeding can be increased when superplasticizers is used. 2.6.3.2 Hardened State a. Strength: The strength of concretes is considerably increased by the use of high-range water reducers as a consequence of the reduction of the water/cement ratio, while strength is not substantially modified in case of use as a superplasticizers. b. Porosity: Capillary absorption of concrete is directly linked to its capillary porosity, which is influenced by the water/cement ratio, that can be largely reduced by the use of the admixture as a high-range water reducer. c. Freeze-thaw attack: High-range water reducers-superplasticizers normally induce some air entrainment in the concrete mixes, but some of the air bubbles introduced are than those of air entraining agents and therefore are not useful to increase the freeze-thaw durability of concretes [28]. d. Attack by aggressive solutions: The resistance of concrete to attack, by aggressive solutions is increased by high-range water reducers because of the reduction of concrete capillarity porosity. The use of the admixture as superplastisizer does not change the resistance of the concrete [28,29,30]. 2.6.3.3 Volume Change a. Creep: The use of high-range water reducers reduces creep due to the reduction of the water/cement ratio of the concrete. 17
b. Drying shrinkage: The shrinkage of concrete is reduced by high-range water reducers mainly because of the reduction of the water content of the concrete. When a concrete is manufactured with the admixture used as a superplasticizers. Its shrinkage, for the same percentage of moisture loss, has been found [29] to be higher then in a concrete produced with the same quantity of water but without the use of the superplasticizers. On the other hand it has been also shown that with the same curing condition, the shrinkage of a superplasticized concrete is similar to that of a corresponding plain concrete. The concrete can be drawn that the better dispersion of cement particles in a superplasticized concrete produces a finer capillary under normal ambient conditions, so that the shrinkage of superplasticized concrete is practically similar to that of a normal concrete manufactured with the same amount of water.
18
Following the preliminary laboratory tests of materials incorporated in the concrete, the mix proportions were selected to ensure the workability and surface finishes of fresh concrete and shall have the required strength (not less then the target mean strength, and durability, when hardened).
As stated earlier Mix Designing Methods according to Indian Bureau of Standard is adopted as a general guideline along with the field experience of Project Guide for this work programme to arrive at mix proportioning for four grade of concrete (M20, M25,M30 and M35) with superplasticizer.
3.2
MATERIAL SELECTION
For the development of concrete in the laboratory, materials used were ordinary Portland cement, superplasticizers. 3.2.1 Cement 53 grade Ordinary Portland cement was used for this study program, as this cement [31] is widely used in this country.. The physical and chemical requirement of 53 grade Ordinary Portland Cement as per IS 12269: 1987, is given in Table 3.1. fly ash, fine aggregates, coarse aggregate, water and
19
Table 3.1:Physical and chemical requirements of 53 grade OPC cement Sl.no Test Conducted Results Requirements as per
IS:12269-1987(Ra1999) 1. 2. 3. 4. Brand of cement Type of cement Normal Consistency Intial setting time Mahagold 53 GradeOPC 28.0% 140 Minutes Not specified Shall not be less than 30 minutes 5. Final setting Time 225 Minutes Shall not be more than 600 minutes 6. Compressive strength:
(avg of three results) 3 days 44.6 Mpa Shall not be less than 27.0 Mpa 7 days 55.0 Mpa Shall not be less than 37.0 Mpa 28 days FINENESS(by Awaited Blains 326.0 m2/kg Shall not be less than 53.0 Mpa 7. Shall not be less than 225.0 m2/kg Shall not be more than 10 mm Not less than 0.66
air permeability method) 8. SOUNDNESS(by Chateliers method) 9. Ratio of % of alumina to 1.22 that of iron oxide 10. 11. 12. Insoluble Residue(%) Magnesia(%) 0.51 1.11 Le- 1.0 mm
Since, different brands of cement have different strength development characteristics and rheological behaviour in the compound compositions and fineness permitted in IS: 12269, therefore cement from single supplier of same brand was used.
20
3.2.3 Sand
Natural River Sand was used which is locally available in Hyderabad region. The specific gravity was found 2.57. Fineness Modulus is also determined using 10mm to 150 m and is found 2.972 as shown in Table 3.3. The fineness modulus gives the idea about average size of particles in the fine aggregates. The value 2.972 indicates medium size sand. The details of sieve analysis are presented in Table 3.2, and the grading curve is shown in Figure 3.1. With sieve analysis data and fineness modulus value, sand is considered as zone II grading sand of IS: 383 1970, which is considered as good fine aggregate for concrete production. The grading limits of zone II sand for fine aggregates as per IS: 383-1970 is also presented in Table 3.5.1, Table 3.5.2 for reference only.
21
GRADING OF FINE AND COURSE AGGREGATE Table3.2: Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate Weight Of sample: 2000gm Sieve Size mm 40 20 10 4.75 2.36 1.18 600 300 150 L.P Weight % Weight Cumulative % Retained(gm) Retained Weight Retained 0 0 0 36 150 560 476 554 202 22 0 0 0 1.80 7.50 28.0 23.80 27.70 10.10 1.10 0 0 0 1.80 9.30 37.30 61.10 88.80 98.90 100 % Passing
Table: 3.3.1 Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregate (20mm) Weight of sample =5000gm Sieve Size mm 40 20 12.5 10 4.75 2.36 1.18 600 300 150 Weight % Retained(gm) Weight Retained 0 0 310 4500 150 150 6.20 90.0 3.0 0.80 Cumulative % Weight Retained 0 6.20 96.20 99.20 100 100 100 100 100 100 % Passing
22
Table 3.3.2: Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregate (12.5mm) Weight of sample =5000gm Sieve Size mm 20 12.5 10 4.75 2.36 1.18 600 300 150 Weight Retained(gm) 0 50 1125 % Weight Retained 0 1.0 22.50 Cumulative % Weight Retained 0 1.0 23.50 100 100 100 100 100 100 % Passing
Fineness Modulus of Coarse Aggregate =6.245 Table 3.4: Combined Sieve Analysis Of 20mm And 12.5mmCoarse Aggregate Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative % Sieve size % Passing % Passing Passing (mm) 20mm 12.5mm When 20mm and 12.5mm are mixed in 60:40 ratio 40 20 12.5 10 4.75 100 93.80 3.80 0.80 0 100 100 99.0 76.50 0 100 96.30 41.90 31.30 0 Requirements Of Cumulative % Passing for 20mm graded aggregates as per IS:3831970(RA2002) 100 95-100 -25-55 0-10
Table 3.5.1: Grading limits for Coarse Aggregates IS Sieve Designation Percentage Passing for Single Sized aggregate nominal size (by weight) 20mm 85100 0-20 0-5 12.5mm 85-100 0-45 0-10 10mm 100 85-100 0-20 0-5 Percentage Passing for graded Aggregate of nominal size (by weight) 20mm 95-100 25-55 0-10 12.5mm 100 90-100 40-85 0-10 -
23
Table 3.5.2: Grading limits of Fine Aggregates IS: 383-1970 IS Sieve Designation 10mm 4.75mm 2.36mm 1.18mm 600 micron 300 micron 150 micron Percentage Passing by Weight for Grading-1 Grading-11 Grading-111 Grading-1V 100 90-100 60-95 30-70 15-34 5-20 0-10 100 90-100 75-100 55-90 35-59 8-30 0-10 100 90-100 85-100 75-100 60-79 12-40 0-10 100 95-100 95-100 90-100 80-100 15-50 0-15
3.2.4 Coarse Aggregate Crushed 20mm maximum size was used. The specific gravity was found 2.65 .The sieve analysis is presented in table 3.3.1,3.3.2. And the grading curve is shown in figure 3.2 . This confirming to the grading requirement as per IS: 383-1970, Which is suitable for good quality concrete [34] the fineness modulus is also determined and it is found to be 6.48,Details are presented in Table 3.3
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Percentage Passing
90.7
98.2
62.7 38.9
11.2 1.1
2 3 IS Sieve Size (m m )
24
Percentage passing
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 1 0 0
20 12.5 Graded 0 5 10 15 20 25
Figure 3.2: Grading curve for coarse aggregate 3.2.5 WATER Ordinary tap water was used in the production of concrete. 3.2.6 SUPERPLASTISIZER A High Range Water Reducing used was CONPLAST SP430 of FOSROC CHEMICAL PVT. LTD. This super plasticiser is in dark brown colour, in an aqueous solution. This is commercially available super plasticizer. 3.3 MIXTURE PROPORTIONING PROCEDURE
The basic steps involved in the Indian Standard method of concrete mix design can be summarized as follows: Step 1: Determination of Target Mean Strength or field strength Target Mean Strength is determined as follows: ft =fck + k s Where ft = target mean compressive strength at 28 days, fck = characteristics compressive strength at 28 days,
25
k = a statical value depending upon the accepted portions of low results and the number of tests, s = assumed standard deviation,
Note: As per IS: 456-2000, the value of k is taken 1.65, assuming that characteristic strength is expected to fall not more than 5 percent of test result. And value of s is also taken from IS 456-2000 table 8, which is given for each grade of concrete. The value of s for M20 and M25 is 4 MPa and 5 MPa for M30 and M35 grade of concrete. Step2: Selection of water-cement ratio: The water-cement ratio is chosen from table no. IS: 456-2000[36], which specify the minimum cement content, maximum water cement ratio and minimum grade of concrete for the different exposure conditions with Normal Weight Aggregates of 200 mm Nominal Maximum Size. The value selected is compared with available relations in SP: 23-1982[35], for the determination of water-cement ratio for the target mean compressive strength at 28 days. It is noted here that water-cement ratio for the determined target mean compressive strength at 28 days gives lower value than specified maximum value in table 5 of IS: 456-2000. Even curve-E, which is applicable for 53 grade of OPC, in figure 47 of SP: 23-1982[35], which consider 28 days compressive strength of cement, incorporated in the mix proportions, also gives slightly lesser value of water-cement ratio. Step 3: Estimation of mixing water The approximate water content is selected from the table 35 and 38 of SP: 23-1982[], applicable for normal concrete mix, which considers the aggregate type (whether crushed or uncrushed), maximum size of the aggregate and required slumps as a measure of level of workability. Step 4: Estimation of air content The estimated entrapped air content is taken (2%) from table No. 41 of SP: 23-1982[], based on nominal maximum size of the aggregate.
26
Step 5: Determination of cement content: The cement content is calculated from the selected water-cement ratio and estimated water content. The cement content so calculated is compared with the minimum required cement content as per the durability consideration as stipulated in the IS: 456-2000[]. The greater of the two values is adopted. It is noted that the quantity adopted is inclusive of the addition of part supplementary cementitious material to OPC. Step 6: Estimation of percentage of sand in total aggregates The percentage of sand in total aggregates depends upon the grading of sand to be incorporated in the mix. The general guideline is obtained from the figure 45 of SP: 23-1982[35], which is based on maximum size of coarse aggregates and the required slump value targeted. It is to be noted that concrete with superplasticizers will have different percentage of sand than concrete without super plasticizer for the same w/c ratio. Apart from the guidelines given in the figure 45 of the SP: 23-1982[35] for the calculation of the percentage of sand in total aggregates, percentage of fine aggregates is also seen in relation to the ratio of total fine contents (cement plus fly ash plus fine aggregates) to total coarse aggregate content per m3 of mature. If it was not found in the specified range then the percentage is adjusted accordingly. The ratio of total fines to aggregates is a very important factor which influence the quality of concrete very much, varies with the water-cement ratio of concrete for a given slump range values.
It is noted that that the water-cement ratio 0.46, 0.42 and 0.38 was kept for the production of M20, M25,M30 and M35 concrete for slump range 80-120 mm in this project work. Step 7: Determination of fine and coarse aggregates With the quantities of cement, fly ash, water and percentage of sand in total aggregates already determined, the content of fine aggregates and coarse aggregates is calculated from the following equations:
27
-(2) for FA
V = [W + C/Sc + F/Sp + {1 /(1- p)} * (Ca / Sca)] x 1/1000 -(3) for CA. Where V = absolute volume of fresh concrete i.e. gross volume (1 m3) minus the volume of entrapped air, W = mass of water (kg) per m3 of the concrete, C = mass of cement (kg) per m3 of the concrete, Sc = specific gravity of cement, F = mass of fly ash (kg) per m3 of the concrete, Sp = specific gravity of fly ash,(2.16) P = ratio of fine aggregate to total aggregates by absolute volume fa = total mass of fine aggregates (kg) per m3 of the concrete, Sfa = specific gravity of saturated surface dry fine aggregates, Ca = total mass of coarse aggregates (kg) per m3 of the concrete, Sca = specific gravity of saturated surface dry coarse aggregates. Step 8: Adjustment of the trial mixture proportions The trial mixture proportions were adjusted according to the following guidelines to achieve targeted slump (as a measure of workability). (A) Moisture content as a part of quality control during production of concrete. It is necessary to provide moisture content correction to dry batching. In this project work sand and coarse aggregate are dried in room temperature after sufficient amount of water sprinkled on the aggregate to avoid further absorption of water from the estimated mixing water quantity. The same quality control was maintained for each batch of concrete produced. (B) Initial slump- If initial slump is not achieved in the desired range, then the mixing water is adjusted so as to maintain water cement ratio same. With a change in mixing water quantity, sand quantity is also adjusted accordingly.
28
Step 9: Selection of Optimum mixture proportions Once trial mixes have adjusted, test specimens i.e. 150 mm cubes are cast from the concrete produced and finally from the strength tests result of the specimens, optimum of proportioning of mixture is suggested. 3.4 CALCULATION OF MIX PROPORTIONS:
The target strength of the concrete is fixed based on the standard deviation. Considering good degree of quality control on ingredients, batching, mixing, placement, curing and testing of concrete, Standard deviation is assumed 4 N/mm2 for M20 and M25 and 5 N/mm2 for M30 and M35. Thus, Target Mean Strength is determined from the following relation, which is already stated. ft = fck + k s ft = 20 + 1.65 * 4 = 26.60 N/mm2 for M20 ft =25 + 1.65 * 4 = 31.60 N/mm2 for M25 ft =30 + 1.65 * 5 = 38.25 N/mm2 for M30 ft =35 + 1.65 * 5 =43.25N/mm2 for M35
The water-cement ratio is selected for each grade of concrete as per table no. 5 of IS: 456-2000. Absolute volume method as discussed in previous paragraph was used to determine the quantities of different ingredients. Preliminary trials of mix were carried out to exactly determine unit water content, fine aggregates percentages and slump (as a measure of workability) of the concrete for each batch corresponding to the three grades viz, M20, M25 and M30 and M35.
29
EXPERIMENT WORK
4.1
GENERAL
As discussed in previous chapters, the selection of materials, judicious mix proportioning and proper workmanship (quality control) leads to high performance concrete, which is required exhibit enhance strength and durability. In establishing these requirements, careful consideration of properties of local available materials has to be accounted for. Hence in this chapter main consideration is given to the planning, material procurement, preparation of sample specimen, and finally testing them as per IS code requirements.
4.2 PLANNING In construction generally four mix (grades) are popular, which is M20, M25, M30 and M35. So these four grades were chosen for experiments. Six variables of fly ash replacement was taken which are control mix 0%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35% partially replacement of cement by fly ash. Study was carried out on both without plasticiser and with-plasticiser Table 4.1 shows the nomenclature of different batches.
4.3 ESTIMATION OF REQUIRED MATERIAL: Twenty four batches were to be made. Each batch would have 6 numbers of cubes. According to above planning it was decided to cast 144 cubes. So after mix designing quantity of material calculated taking account of 20% loses. Table 4.2 shows the quantities of material required.
30
Table 4.1: Nomenclature of Different types of mix compositions Cube ID CM200 CF201 CF202 CF203 CF204 CF205 CM250 CF251 CF252 CF253 CF254 CF255 CM300 CF301 CF302 CF303 CF304 CF305 CM350 CF351 CF352 CF353 CF354 CF355 Cementetious Material 100 Percentage Cement 85 Percentage Cement + 15 Percentage Flyash 80 Percentage Cement + 20 Percentage Flyash 75 Percentage Cement + 25 Percentage Flyash 70 Percentage Cement + 30 Percentage Flyash 65 Percentage Cement + 35 Percentage Flyash 100 Percentage Cement 85 Percentage Cement + 15 Percentage Flyash 80 Percentage Cement + 20 Percentage Flyash 75 Percentage Cement + 25 Percentage Flyash 70 Percentage Cement + 30 Percentage Flyash 65 Percentage Cement + 35 Percentage Flyash 100 Percentage Cement 85 Percentage Cement + 15 Percentage Flyash 80 Percentage Cement + 20 Percentage Flyash 75 Percentage Cement + 25 Percentage Flyash 70 Percentage Cement + 30 Percentage Flyash 65 Percentage Cement + 35 Percentage Flyash 100 Percentage Cement 85 Percentage Cement + 15 Percentage Flyash 80 Percentage Cement + 20 Percentage Flyash 75 Percentage Cement + 25 Percentage Flyash 70 Percentage Cement + 30 Percentage Flyash 65 Percentage Cement + 35 Percentage Flyash Grade of concrete M20 M20 M20 M20 M20 M20 M25 M25 M25 M25 M25 M25 M30 M30 M30 M30 M30 M30 M35 M35 M35 M35 M35 M35 W/(C + F) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38
31
Cementitious Material 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash 65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash
Mix No:
W/(C + F)
Quantities in Kg/m3 Cement Flyash FA 315.00 267.75 252.00 236.25 220.50 204.75 340.00 289.00 272.00 255.00 238.00 221.00 0.00 47.25 63.00 78.75 94.50 110.25 0.00 51.00 68.00 85.00 102.00 119.00 759 752 750 747 745 742 750 742 739 736 734 732
Water CA 1152 1141 1139 1135 1131 1127 1139 1127 1123 1118 1114 1111 157.5 157.5 157.5 157.5 157.5 157.5 156.4 156.4 156.4 156.4 156.4 156.4
S.Pl
CM200 CF201 CF202 CF203 CF204 CF205 CM250 CF251 CF252 CF253 CF254
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
2.20 2.00 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.63 2.30 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.10
65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash CF255 0.46 Table No:4.2 Mixture Proportions for M 20, M25 Grades of concrete
Note : FA- Fine aggregates, CA Coarse aggregates, Spl. Super plasticizer (in Kg/m3)
40
Table No: 4.3 Mixture Proportions for M20, M25 Grades of concrete
Quantities in Kg/m Cement 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash 65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash 65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash CM300 CF301 CF302 CF303 CF304 CF305 CM350 CF351 CF352 CF353 CF354 CF355 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 370.00 314.50 296.00 277.50 259.00 240.50 400.00 340.00 320.00 300.00 280.00 260.00 Flyash 0.00 55.50 74.00 92.50 111.00 129.50 0.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
3
Cementitious Material
Mix No:
W/(C + F)
Water FA 740 731 729 726 723 720 730 721 718 715 712 709 CA 1124 1110 1106 1102 1098 1094 1109 1095 1090 1086 1081 1076 155.4 155.4 155.4 155.4 155.4 155.4 152 152 152 152 152 152
S.Pl
2.88 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.40 2.40 3.24 3.24 2.88 2.88 2.64 2.64
Note: FA- Fine aggregates, CA Coarse aggregates, Spl. Super plasticizer (in Liter/m3)
41
4.4 PROCUREMENT OF MATERIAL Fly ash was procured from VTPS. Ordinary Portland cement of grade 53 was used. Locally available materials for fine and coarse aggregate ware used. 4.5 PRELIMINARY LABORATORY TESTS
The testing of physical properties such as sieve analysis, unit weight and fineness modulus of fine and coarse aggregates were carried out in a standard manner. The results are shown in Tables 3.3 as already mentioned, which were required in designing mix of concrete. 4.6 PREPARATIONS AND CASTING OF TEST SPECIMEN
Water to binder (cement and fly ash) ratio was kept 0.50, 0.46, 0.42 & 0.38 for M20, M25, M30 & M35 grade of concrete respectively. Each grade of concrete having 0, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 percentage part replacement of Ordinary Portland cement to VTPS fly ash, with super plasticizers with same water content for a given mix proportion. 4.7 MIXING PROCEDURE The 20 mm coarse and fine aggregates were initially fed into the concrete mixer. Cement, fly ash fed and then 10 mm size coarse aggregate fed. Superplasticizer is well mixed in half water. Start the mixer for one minute to dry mix the aggregates and binder, and then gradually half quantity of water is pored. While the mixer was in operated condition, remaining water and superplasticizer mix added into the mixer. The mixing time was 2.2 to 3.5 minutes (approximately) from the time when all the mix ingredients had been charged into the mixer. 4.8 COMPACTION OF TEST SPECIMENS
Cubes were casted in three layers. For all specimens steel moulds were used.
42
4.9 SPECIMEN CONDITIONING AND TESTING After casting, the specimens were stored for 24 h in the laboratory environment (27 5 ) and then demoulded and stored in curing tank at room temperature till the time of testing. The compressive strength of the cubes was determined after 7 and 28 days of casting.
Table 4.4: Properties of hardened concrete (M 20, M25 grades):Compressive Strength 7- days 28.83 25.84 23.31 20.27 19.53 17.83 28.12 26.34 25.38 23.81 21.74 21.38 28- days 37.34 36.90 35.07 33.25 32.18 29.05 51.58 50.27 47.01 46.42 43.59 38.44
Cementitious Material 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash 65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash 65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash
Mix No: CM200 CF201 CF202 CF203 CF204 CF205 CM250 CF251 CF252 CF253 CF254 CF255
W/(C + F) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Note: 1. Test for compressive strength was carried out on 150x150x150mm cubes 2. Each value is average of three test results
43
Table 4.5: Properties of hardened concrete (M 30, M35 grades):Compressive Strength Cementitious Material Mix No: W/(C + F) 7- days 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash 65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash 100 % Cement 85 % Cement + 15 % Flyash 80 % Cement + 20 % Flyash 75 % Cement + 25 % Flyash 70 % Cement + 30 % Flyash 65 % Cement + 35 % Flyash CM300 CF301 CF302 CF303 CF304 CF305 CM350 CF351 CF352 CF353 CF354 CF355 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 30.22 27.7 26.36 25.69 24.99 24.32 36.93 35.77 34.06 33.4 29.92 27.61 28- days 54.67 52.61 51.62 47.31 45.00 42.86 57.83 54.82 53.40 50.41 48.76 46.42
Note: 1. Test for compressive strength was carried out on 150x150x150mm cubes 2. Each value is average of three test results
44
5.1 GENERAL The results of all the tests carried out on VTPS fly ash mix concrete and control concrete are presented and discussed in this chapter.
45
Density Kg/cum
M20 M25
Percentage Flyash
46
Slump and Vee Bee Time The replacement of cement (by mass) with five percentage of fly ash (0%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%) increased the workability. For the economical consideration the SPL dosage will be reduced due to increment of Flyash Percentage to maintain the slump between 80 120 mm. This is due to the ball Bearing action of the spherical particles of fly ash. Results are shown in Fig. 5.2. (a), 5.2 (b), 5.2 (c), 5.2 (d)
S l um p Gr a ph f or M 2 5 Gr a de c onc r e t e
130
Slump (mm)
Percentage Flyash
47
Slum p Graph for M30 Grade concrete 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Persentage Flyash
Slump (mm)
w ith SP
Slump (mm)
w ith SP
Percentage Flyash
48
5.2.2 PROPERTIES OF HARDENED CONCRETE: 7 Days compressive strength The replacement of cement (by mass) with five percentage of fly ash (15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%) content reduced the compressive strength of concrete (for M35 Grade) 3.14%,7.77%,9.55%,18.98%,25.23%respectively. This is probably due to non-contribution in compressive strength of fly ash at early age. Results are shown in Fig. 5.3. 28 days compressive strength The replacement of cement (by mass) with five percentage of fly ash (15%,20%,25%,30%,35%) content improves the strength gain but still reduced(for M35 Grade) by 5.2%,7.66%,12.83%,15.68%, and 19.73% respectively with super plasticizer. Fly ash starts reaction with Ca(OH) 2 after 14 days. Results are listed in Fig. 5.3 (a).
Strength in MPa
Percentage of Flyash
Fig. 5.3 (a): Variation in Compressive Strength with Fly ash Increase
49
Strength in MPa
45
40 35
30 25
20 15 0 5 10
Percentage of Flyash
15
20
25
30
35
40
Fig. 5.3 (b): Variation in Compressive Strength with Fly ash Increase
Strength in Mpa
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Percentage of Flyash
50
Strength in MPa
55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Percentage of flyash
Fig. 5.3(d): Variation in Compressive Strength with Fly ash Increase
51
56 days compressive strength (Imaginary graphical representation) The replacement of cement (by mass) with five percentage of fly ash (15%,20%,25%,30%,35%) content of (ex:for M35 grade) concrete given strength almost equal to control mix. This shows that fly ash reaction continues for longer time up to 90 days or more. Results are listed in Fig. 5.3 (e).
Strength MPa:
Percentage of Flyash
52
4.2.6.1.1.1 CONCLUSIONS
In this chapter conclusions of the so far done study/Experimental work of this project are given. Following conclusions are given from the present study: VTPS Fly ash (class F) incorporation in the mix ingredient enhances performance of concrete by improving workability, flow-ability, finishibility and compactibility in fresh state of concrete in both plasticizerised as well as unplasticizeried concrete. Increasing fly ash content decreases the strength. Although the strength of High Fly ash Concrete (HFC) is very poor at early curing age, it develops rapidly with longer curing age, resulting in long-term strength almost equal to that of control mix (with no fly ash). By the analysis fly ash effect in HFC becomes positive after 7 days of curing age, and it develops rapidly. The contribution of fly ash in HFC with 56-day curing age to strength is equal or approaches 80%, and is more remarkable compressive strength. Finally, cement contribution to strength of HFC can be divided into two aspects. The first is through the hydrated products produced in the hydration of itself, and the second is the fly ash effect activated by it. At early curing age, the former is the dominant factor, while the latter is more significant afterward. After 56 days, the contribution of fly ash effect to strength of HFC approaches 80%. Incorporating fly ash by high content and super-substituting method makes HFC easier to compact, and together with the amount of crystal phase Ca(OH)2 and harmful pore reduction, HFC at long-term curing age becomes dense and homogeneous. With the current data and results, it is very possible to design a mix with VTPS fly ash as supplementary material in concrete that will be more durable and economical.
53
5 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Malhotra, V.M.and Ramezanianpour, A.R. (1994), Fly ash in concrete, Energy Mines and Resources Canada, pp. 307. [2] Malhotra, V.M. (1994), Dealing with High Volume Fly Ash
Concrete,Advances in Concrete Technology (2nd ed.),, CANMET, Ottawa, pp. 445482. [3] Haque, M.N. et al. (1961), High fly ash concrete, ACI Mater. J. 81 1, pp. 5460 [4] Swamy, R.N., Mineral admixtures for high strength concrete. Indian Concr. J., pp. 265271. [5] Bisaillon,A., et al. (1994), Performance of high -volume fly ash concrete in large experimental monoliths, ACI Mater. J. 91 2 pp. 178187. [6] Ghosh, S. and Nasser, K.W. (1996), Effects of high temperature and pressure on strength and elasticity of lignite fly ash and silica fume concrete, ACI Mater. J. 93 1 pp. 5160. [7] Alhozaimy, A. Pet al. 1 (1996), Effects of curing conditions and age on chloride permeability of fly ash mortar, ACI Mater. J. 93, pp. 8795. [8] Watt, J.D. et al. (1965), The composition and pozzolanic properties of pulverised fuel ashes: II. Pozzolanic properties of fly ashes, as deter-mined by crushing strength tests on lime mortars, J. Appl. Chem. 15 (12), pp. 595604. [9] Throne, D.J. et al. (1966), The composition and pozzolanic properties of pulverised fuel ashes: III. Pozzolanic properties of fly ashes as deter-mined by chemistry methods, J. Appl. Che m. 16 (2), pp. 33 39.
54
[10]
Davis, R.E et al. (1937), Properties of mor -tars and concretes containing Portland pozzolan cement, J. Proc. -Am. Concr. Inst. 33 (5) 577612.
[11]
Peris Mora E. et al,(1993),Influence of different sized fractions of a fly a sh on workability of mortars, Cem. Concr. Res. 23, pp. 917 924.
[12]
Banfill, P.F.G. 1982, An experimental study of the PFA on the rheology of fresh concrete and cement paste, International Symposium, The Use of PFA in Concrete.
[13]
Hoggs, D.W. (1980), The effect of pulverized-fuel ash upon the workability of cement and concrete, Mag. Concr. Res. 32, pp. 219.
[14]
Jan, H. et al.(1980),The Utilization of Fly Ash and Slag, Proceedings of 8th International Conference, in Chinese, pp. 214.
[15]
Danshen, S. Z. et al. (1981), Inquiry of fly ash effects, J. Ceram. 9 (1), pp. 57 63.
[16]
Danshen S. (1989), The Concrete of Fly Ash, Publishing House of Railway of China, Beijing, , pp. 152.
[17]
ASTM C-618. (1993). Specification for fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolana for use as a mineral admixture in Portland cement concrete: ASTM 618. Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 4.02, West Conshoocken, Pa., 310-312
[18]
Sinha, R., and Dayal, U.(1999), Design and Maintainance of Ash Dykes, in V.S. Raju et.al, Management of Ash ponds, Narosa Publishing house, New Delhi, pp.41-69.
[19]
Mehta, P.K.(1998),Role of pozzolanic and cementitious material in sustainable development of the concrete industry,ACI International, SP -178 pp. 1-25.
[20]
Diamond S. (1986),Particle morphologies in fly ash, Cement and Concrete Research, Volume16,Issue 4 Pages 569-579.
55
[21]
Garg M. and Singh M. (1995), Phosphogypsum - Fly ash cementitious binder - Its hydration and strength development, Cement and Concrete Research, Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 752-758
[22]
Sharma, R. C. et al., (1993), Semi-theoretical method for the assessment of reactivity of fly ashes, Cement and Concrete Research, Volume 23, Issue 1,Pages 41-45
[23]
Garg, M. and Singh, M, (1999), Cementitious binder from fly ash and other industrial wastes,Cement and Concrete Research, Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 309-314
[24]
Rao, G. et al (1998), Thermal characteristics of a class F fly ash,Cement and Concrete Research, Volume 28, Issue 6 Pages 841-846
[25]
Poon, C.S. et al.,(2000), A study on high strength concrete prepared with large volumes of low calcium fly ash Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 30 pp. 447-455
[26]
Ramachandran, V.S.(1984) Concrete Admixtures Handbook; Properties, Science and Technology, Noyes Publications, NJ, USA.
[27]
Collepardi, M., Corradi, M. and Valente M., (1981), Influence of polymerisation of sulphonated naphthalene condensate and its interaction with cement, Developments in the Use of Superplasticisers, American Concrete Institute, ACI SP-68, pp.485-98.
[28]
Mielenz, R. C. and Sprouse , J. H., (1978) Super-plasticisers in Concrete, V. M. Malhotra, editor, American Concrete Institute, ACI SP-62, Vol. I, pp. 1.
[29]
Brooks, J. J., Wainwright, P. J. and Neville, A. M.,(1978) Time-dependent properties of concrete containing Mighty admixtures, Super-plasticizers in Concrete, V. M. Malhotra, editor, American Concrete Institute, ACI SP-62, Vol. 2, pp. 425-50.
56
[30]
Mukherrijee, P.K. and Chojnacki, B., (1978) Laboratory evaluation of a concrete superplasticizing admixture, Super-plasticizers in concrete, V. M. Malhotra, editor, American Concrete Institute, ACI SP-62, Vol. I, pp. 403-24.
[31]
[32]
Mokashi, A.Y(1995), Development of High Strength Concrete using Fly Ash M.Tech. Thesis, Department of Civil Engg. IIT Delhi
[33]
Singh, P.K.H. (1994), A study on hopper; collected fly ash as part replacement of fine aggregate in ceme nt concrete. M.Tech. Thesis, Department of Civil Engg. IIT Delhi
[34]
Mittal, A., Development of High Performance Concretes for Containment Dome of Kaiga Atomic Power Project, Indian Concrete Journal, April, 1998.
[35]
SP: 23-1982, Hand Book on Concrete mixes, Indian Bureau of Standards, New Delhi.
[36]
IS 456-2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice, Fourth Edition, Indian Bureau of Standards, New Delhi.
[37]
IS: 8112-1989, Specifications for 43-Grade Portland Cement, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India.
[38]
IS: 383-1970, Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates From Natural Sources for Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India.
[39]
IS: 10262-1982, Recommended Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India.
[40]
IS: 516-1959, Indian Standard Code of PracticeMethods of Test for Strength of Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India.
[41]
57
[42] [43]
ASTM-C-494,Standard Specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ACI 116 R, Cement and concrete Technology, Manual of concrete practice (USA)
[44] [45]
Neville, A.M., Properties of concrete, ELBS publications (UK).(1991) Krishna Raju, N., Design of Concrete mixes, CBS publishers and distributors, New Delhi.
[46]
Priyadarshi, A. K.(1999), Use of fly ash as construction material, M.Tech. Thesis, Department of Civil Engg., IIT Delhi.
[47]
Nawy E.G.(2001), Fundamentals of high performance concrete, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[48] [49]
Sinha S. N., Design of concrete Structures, Tata McGraw Hills Pub. Malhotra, V. M., Testing Hardened Concrete: Non destructive Methods, ACI Pub.
[50]
Singh, M. P.(2002), High Performance Concrete, M.Tech. Thesis, Department of Civil Engg., IIT Delhi.
[51]
Sun Wei et al.(2003),Analysis of mechanism on water -reducing effect of fine ground slag, high-calcium fly ash, and low-calcium fly ash Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 33 pp. 1119-1125.
58