WCDMA Call Drop Problem Analysis
WCDMA Call Drop Problem Analysis
Call drop analysis is a useful way for optimization and trouble-shooting. Following discussion will give general ideas on this special topic.
Page 1
Upon completion of this course, you will be able to: Describe the categories for call drop causes Describe the flow of general call drop analysis Analyze common call drop cases
Page 2
Chapter 1 Principle of call drop Chapter 2 Analysis of call drop Chapter 3 Call drop cases
Page 3
Content: Calculation formula of call drop rate on signaling plane and measurement points. Calculation formula of call drop rate on user plane and measurement points.
Page 4
There are two types of call drop: signaling plane call drop and user plane call drop: Signaling plane call drop means RNC will send the message IU RELEASE REQUEST to CN after CN receives the IU connection setup complete User plane call drop means RNC will send the messageRAB release request to CN after CN receives the RAB setup complete
Page 5
Page 6
CN
Page 7
Usually, the typical causes for sending the IU_release message are as follows: OM intervention Repeated integrity checking failure RNC generated signaling connection release RL out-of-synchronization
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Chapter 1 Principle of call drop Chapter 2 Analysis of call drop Chapter 3 Call drop cases
Page 11
content main causes of high call drop rate troubleshooting of high call drop rate
Page 12
Page 13
Equipment Problem
Call drop arising from equipment problem Hardware problem Transmission problem Antenna and feeder fault Other causes
Page 14
UE
Measurement Report
NodeB
RNC
CN
Page 15
Page 16
Coverage: Coverage over shooting Coverage hole Signal fading Incomplete definition of adjacent cells unbalance of uplink/downlink
Page 17
Interference: Strong downlink interference (CPICH RSCP is not low, but Ec/Io is low) Strong uplink interference. On the basis of the RSSI scanning result or analysis of the SIB7, there is uplink interference
Page 18
Handover Problem
1
In the handover area, because of the signal fluctuation, the UE will continually handover between source cell and target cell. For intra-frequency hard handover, since there are intra-frequency interferences, call drops are likely to occur; for inter-frequency handover, since the compressed mode measurement is required, ping pong handover will bring serious influence on the communication quality.
Page 19
10
Chapter 1 Principle of call drop Chapter 2 Analysis of call drop Chapter 3 Call drop cases
Page 20
Page 21
11
Call drop location analysis: based on the location of the call drop event in the map window in the post processing tool, following information can be got: a. The place of the drop call b. At the edge of the 3G coverage or not c. Related cells d. Distance between related 3G cells and the drop call point
Page 22
Neighbor list analysis: to find out any cell not defined in the neighbor list, following information need to be got: a.Best serving cell before the call dropped b.Best serving cell after the call dropped c. Existing neighbor list of the best serving 3G cell
Page 23
12
Coverage analysis
Coverage analysis Analyze the pilot coverage to get information about: i) CPICH transmission power ii) Whether following coverage events take place or not: a. Coverage limited b. System interference c. Poor uplink coverage d. Poor downlink coverage e. Pilot pollution
Page 24
Coverage analysis
Coverage analysis Analyze the service coverage to get information about: a. Service related Maximum downlink transmission power b. SIR before the call dropped c. Max uplink transmission power allowed for UE d. Actual uplink transmission power before the call dropped
Page 25
13
Handover analysis
Handover analysis to get information about: i) Signal strength change of the target call and the serving cell a. insufficient handover area b. too late to start CM c. too late to add target cell d. interaction problem among 3 type of handover ii) Following cause exist or not:
Page 26
Signaling analysis
Signaling analysis: a. Signaling of different interface including: Iu, Iub, Iur, Uu b. Signaling of different layer including : NAS, RRC c. In addition, analyze signaling in UE side in conjunction with signaling in network side.
Page 27
14
Case 1
Fault description: The position of the drop call was not in the edge of the 3G coverage. The call dropped on cell SC209.
Page 28
Case1
Analysis: 1.Poor coverage :from the page shown ,we can find that 1) prior to the drop, the best server for the UE is not the same as that of the scanner. 2) the CPICH Ec/Io (and CPICH RSCP) degrades for UE ONLY while scanner shows no degradation.
Page 29
15
Case 1
Analysis: 2:Compared UE data with scanner data, it can be concluded that the best serving cell is not the signal strongest cell. The best serving cell should be picked out by the latest measurement control message and corresponding event measurement report. 3: Check the latest measurement control message . Corresponding measurement control shows theres no neighbor relation between SC209 and SC128.
Page 30
Case 1
Page 31
16
Case 2
Fault description : The position of the drop call was in the edge of the 3G coverage, the call dropped on cell SC314, the distance between cell SC314 was very far away from the drop call point.
Page 32
Case 2
Analysis 1. analyze the active set and monitor set information before call drop from UE measurement results
Page 33
17
Case2
Analysis 2 Analyze the scanner data in conjunction with the UE data
Page 34
case2
Troubleshooting the coverage should be enhanced here to avoid the call drop in this place
Page 35
18
case2
Conclusion To analyze the coverage, need to: 1)Analyze the pilot coverage in conjunction with the service coverage 2)Analyze the uplink coverage in conjunction with the downlink coverage 3)Analyze the scanner data in conjunction with the UE data 4)Analyze the CPICH RSCP in conjunction with CPICH Ec/Io, SC
Page 36
case3
Fault description: The call drop happened in the area of frequent change of best server shown by the scanner
Page 37
19
case3
Analysis 1.Compare Ec/Io from both scanner and UE at the time of the drop: the UE Ec/Io drop to < -18 dB while the scanner remained above -6 dB :
Page 38
case3
Analysis 2.Comparing the best servers from the UE and the scanner at the time of drop: for the scanner and UE SC506 is the best server prior to the drop. However, before the drop, the scanner selected SC505 as the best server while the UE continued to have only SC506 in its active set resulting in the drop call. Immediately after the drop, the UE camps on SC505:
Page 39
20
Case 3
Analysis 3. according the latest measurement control message, we can find SC506 is in the list. The drop call is not the case of missing neighbor.
Page 40
Case 3
Analysis 4. It seems that the best cell changes from SC506 to SC505 too fast for the UE to perform soft handover on time.
Page 41
21
Case 3
Analysis As the handover Reporting range of 1A event is 4.5dB, the hysteresis is 0dB, the delay trigger time is 320ms, the filter coefficient is 3 (1 second is required), so the requirement for the handover area is: the lasting time when (Ec/Io of 506 cell Ec/Io of 505 cell) < 4.5dB is about 2 seconds . The value in the circle as shown in the diagram cannot meet the requirement.
Page 42
Case3
Analysis Uu Interface messages that 1A event of SC505 was triggered at 54:04:
Page 43
22
Case3
Analysis But SC506 went bad too severe for the procedure of Active Set Update to be finished:
Page 44
Case3
Page 45
23
Case3
Conclusion handover analysis to get information about: 1)the signal strength change of the target call and the serving cell 2)whether following cause exist or not: insufficient handover area, too late to start CM, too late to add target cell, too early to delete serving cell, interaction problem among 3 type of handover 3)whether ping-pang handover exist or not
Page 46
Thank You
www.huawei.com
24