Guidelines PDF
Guidelines PDF
This guideline was written to provide guidance about the appropriate use of screening tools for breast cancer and to help physicians and patients make informed decisions about screening for breast cancer in asymptomatic women of all ages. Due to the addition of important research related to breast screening, this guideline will continue to be reviewed on an anuual basis.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Screening Procedures
Mammography, clinical breast examination and breast self-examination can be used as screening procedures. Breast ultrasound and MRI are not currently recommended for routine screening.
Exclusions
The recommendations in this guideline do not apply to: Women with signs and symptoms suggesting breast cancer; Women with a personal history of breast cancer; Men.
Breast Implants
Women with breast implants should be referred for diagnostic mammography at age appropriate intervals.
The above recommendations are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. They should be used as an adjunct to sound clinical decision making.
BACKGROUND
Epidemiology
Breast cancer is one of the most serious health concerns of Canadian women and is the most common form of cancer in women excluding non-melanoma skin cancer. Breast cancer accounts for 30% of all new cancer cases.1,2,3,4 In 2001, 1,644 Alberta women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and 425 women died of the disease.5 Breast cancer accounts for nearly 21% of all cancer deaths in Alberta women.1
Mammography Screening
A normal screening mammography does not rule out breast cancer in the presence of persistent palpable abnormalities. Further evaluation may still be required.
Risk Factors
The lifetime risk for breast cancer is one in nine. The risk however, varies over a womans lifetime. Table 1 reflects the age specific risk of breast cancer for women.6
Table One Probability of Developing Breast Cancer in the Next Five Years, by Age, for Women Who Reside in Alberta and Currently Do Not Have Breast Cancer Age 35 Probability 1/384
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Increasing age, being born in North America and northwest Europe, and having two or more first degree relatives with a history of breast cancer are identified as the strongest risk factors. There are many other identifiable risk factors, but few are amenable to change. It is estimated that up to 80% of women who develop breast cancer have no risk factors other than being female, and in a higher risk age group.7 Evidence from the WHI8 studies indicate that in any single year, 0.08 percent more women in the HRT group developed breast cancer than women in the placebo group, suggesting that the effect of HRT on the risk of breast cancer is small.
SELECTED REFERENCES
1. National Cancer Institute, Canadian Cancer Statistics, 1997. 2. Statistics Canada. HEALTH REPORTS. Catalogue 82.003XPB.1997;9(1). 3. Gaudette LA, Silberger C, Altmayer CA et al. Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality. HEALTH REPORTS. Statistics Canada, Catalogue 82.003- XPB. 1996;8(2):29-37. 4. Bondy M, Luskbader E, Halabi S, et al. Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1994;86:620-25. 5. Alberta Cancer Board. Alberta cancer registry (2003). Cancer statistics 6. Bryant HE, Brasher PMA. Risks and probabilities of breast cancer: short term versus lifetime probabilities. CMAJ 1994;150(2):211-216. 7. Alberta Cancer Board. A Snapshot of Cancer in Alberta. 1996. 8. Womens Health Initiative. NIH Publication No. 02-5200 October 2002. 9. Tabar L, Faberberg G, Day N, et al. What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. International Journal of Cancer, 1987; 55: 547- 551. 10. Smart C, Hendrick R, Rutledge J, Smith R. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer, April 1995; 75(7): 1619-1626. 11. American Cancer Society. Workshop on Guidelines for Breast Cancer Detection. Chicago, March 1998.
Radiation Risk
The risk of mammographically-induced cancer is generally considered to be negligible. Some experts have expressed concern over the theoretical risk of radiation-induced breast cancers, especially among younger women. However, the studies which have raised this concern involved much higher levels of radiation than are found in present day mammography.17,18 The radiation dose delivered by mammography is lower than that of an ordinary chest X-ray.
12. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA, July 1996; 276(1): 33-38. 13. Feig S. Determination of mammographic screening intervals with surrogate measures for women aged 40-49 years. Radiology, 1994; 193: 311-314. 14. Duffy S, Chen H, Tabar L, et al. Sojourn time, sensitivity and positive predictive value of mammography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-49. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1996; 25(8): 1139-1145. 15 Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen H, et al. Tumour development histology and grade of breast cancers: prognosis and progression. International Journal of Cancer, 1996; 66: 413-419. 16. Kopans D, Halpern E, Hulka C. Statistical power in breast cancer screening trials and mortality reduction among women 40-49 years with particular emphasis on the national Breast Screening Study of Canada. Cancer 1994; 74: 1196-1203. 17. Mettler F, Upton A, Kelsey C, et al. Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment. Cancer, March 1996; 77(5): 903-909. 18. NIH Consensus Statement. Breast Cancer Screening of Women Ages 40-49. January 1997; 15(1). 19. Dodd GD. Screening for Breast Cancer. CANCER SUPPLEMENT. August 1, 1993; 72(3):1038-1042 20. Maxwell CJ, Parboosingh J, Kozak JF, Desjardins-Denault SD. Factors Important in Promoting Mammography Screening among Canadian Women. Canadian Journal of Public Health,Sept 1997; 88(5):346-350. 21. Gentleman JF, Lee J. Who Doesnt get a Mammogram? Statistics Canada, Catalogue 82-003-XPB, Health Reports, Summer 1997. Vol.9, No.1 22. Bates B. A Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. (pp317-328) 4th Edition, 1987 J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.
TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK
The Early Detection of Breast Cancer Working Group is a multidisciplinary team composed of a family physician, general practitioners, radiologists, general surgeons, a gynecologist, oncologist, pathologist, epidemiologist, Medical Officer of Health, nurse, medical student, public representatives, the Canadian Cancer Society, and Breast Cancer Policy Council representatives. The Working Group encourages your feedback. If you need further information or if you have difficulty applying this guideline, please contact: Clinical Practice Guidelines Manager TOP Program 12230 - 106 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T5N 3Z1 Phone: 780.482.0319 or toll free 1.866.505.3302 Fax: 780.482.5445 Email: [email protected] Website: www.topalbertadoctors.org
Early Detection of Breast Cancer - April 1999 Reviewed - August 2000 Reviewed - March 2002 Reviewed - November 2004
By Telephone: Cross Cancer Institute (780) 432-8422 Edmonton Genetics Clinic (780) 407-7333 Cancer Genetics Research Clinic (403) 670-2438
Referral Criteria
The following are offered as considerations for selecting women who may benefit from genetic counselling. The criteria do not necessarily define women at increased risk of developing breast carcinoma who merit earlier or more frequent mammographic screening.
Personal or close family history of breast cancer < 35 years; ovarian cancer < 50 years; bilateral breast cancer
- first onset < 50 years; or breast and ovarian cancer Two related family members with breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer with onset in both < 50 years Three or more related family members with breast and/or ovarian cancer, one onset < 50 years Four or more related family members with breast and/or ovarian cancer, any age Ashkenazi descent, breast and/or ovarian cancer, any age Any case of male breast cancer Known mutation in a cancer susceptibility gene such as the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is present in a family member Families which may not meet the above criteria, but have a strong family history suggestive of the presence of a mutated cancer susceptibility gene
Region Examined
BREASTS
Palpation INFRACLAVICULAR Palpation SUPRACLAVICULAR Inspection BREAST, AREOLA, NIPPLE (same as above) Palpation BREAST, AREOLA, NIPPLE and TAIL OF SPENCE
Adopted and reproduced with permission from: Skillen DL & Day R. (Eds). 1998. A syllabus for adult health assessment (pp.61-62). Edmonton: University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing.