`
Which ARB is Suitable For Your Patients?
Tirta Kristina / Scientific Communication / Medical Affairs
Panduan Terapi Hipertensi
ARBs: Compelling Indications
Diuretic BB ACEI ARB CCB AA
CHF Post-MI CAD risk Diabetes mellitus
Renal disease
Recurrent stroke prevention
New studies
Mechanism Of Action
Angiotensinogen
Renin
Kidney
Angiotensin I
Alternative pathway (Chymase)
Inactive Prorenin
Bradykinin
ACE
Angiotensin II
Inactive fragments
Active Prorenin
ARB
AT1R
CNS Vascular Edothelium Cardiac Smooth (myocrdial) cells muscle
AT2R
Adrenal cortex
Prorenin receptor
Aldosterone Fibrosis Kidney Kidney Endhotelial dysfuntion Inflammation
Sympathetic activation
Individual cell growth
Sodium retention
Kaplans Clinical Hypertension, 2010
Angiotensin-II Receptor Antagonist
Angiotensin Reseptor Blocker (ARB) :
Losartan Valsartan Irbesartan Candesartan Telmisartan
Which ARB is Suitable For Your Patients?
Tirta Kristina/ Scientific Communication / Medical Affairs
Pharmacokinetic
Number of AT1-Receptor Binding Sites for Different Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists
2 sites - losartan 3 sites - valsartan
4 sites - candesartan
Hydrogen bonds between ligand and receptor are shown as red dotted lines with hydrogen bond lengths. Carbon atoms of the ligands are coloured light blue and those of the receptors are green
Bhuiyan et al 2009
Insurmountable and Surmountable Antagonism: Relation to Duration of Binding
100 80
Insurmountability (%) telmisartan
olmesartan
candesartan
60
40
irbesartan
EXP 3174
valsartan
20
losartan
0 0 20 40
Dissociation t1/2
60
80
100
120
Van Liefde et al 2009
EFIKASI
PENURUNAN TEKANAN DARAH
Ideal Antihypertensive Agents
Duration of action which is appropriate for once-daily administration High trough:peak ratio which is consistent over the recommended dosage range
Maintenance of control of blood pressure fully and consistently throughout 24 h
Maintenance of control of blood pressure beyond 24 h despite poor compliance with treatment No increases in blood pressure variability
Meredith et al, 1995
Range of T/P Ratio
Candesartan Losartan
8-16 mg 50-100 mg
Irbesartan
150-300 mg
Valsartan
80 mg
Range of trough-to-peak ratio at once daily dosinhg (pacebo adjusted) as measured in various studies (DBP)1 Gordon McInnes. Pocket Reference to Angiotensin II Antagonists. Science Press
Candesartan Cilexetil vs Losartan : Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Systolic ABP
Hours after dose 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
-2
-4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14
Losartan 100mg
p=0.004
Candesartan cilexetil 16mg -16 Maintenance of control of blood pressure fully and consistently throughout 24 h -18 Maintenance of control of blood pressure beyond 24 h despite poor compliance with Change in SBP (mm Hg) treatment
Lacourcire & Asmar 1999
Meta-Analysis Based on US New Drug Application Evaluation Reports
-0 Reduction in diastolic BP (mmHg)
-2
Losartan Valsartan Irbesartan
-4
-6
Candesartan
0 0 0 0 25 80 75 4 50 160 150 8 100 mg 320 mg 300 mg 16 mg Losartan Valsartan Irbesartan Candesartan
Elmfeldt et al 2002
Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, 2012; 34(2): 8691
Effect of Switching from Telmisartan, Valsartan, Olmesartan, or Losartan to Candesartan on Morning Hypertension
Hiroshi Hasegawa,1 Hiroyuki Takano,1 Yoshihito Kameda,1 Akihiko Kubota,1 Yoshio Kobayashi,1 Issei Komuro2 1Department of Cardiovascular Science and Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan, 2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
Method:
Seventy-eight mild to moderate hypertensive patients, who were treated with the standard doses of ARBs except candesartan (losartan, 50 mg; valsartan, 80 mg;
telmisartan, 40 mg; or olmesartan, 20 mg), were entered into 12-week treatment
period with candesartan 8 mg according to a multicenter, open-label design.
To control morning BPs, well-tolerated antihypertensive agents with long durations of action are required.
10.1 10.5/4.5 8.4 mmHg
13.1 17.3/6.2 11.3 mm Hg
Candesartan treatment significantly reduced the morning and office BPs compared with other ARBs in Japanese patients with morning hypertension.
TROPHY
TRial Of Preventing HYpertension
TROPHY : Study objectives
TROPHY evaluated 2 years of treatment with candesartan in individuals with prehypertension* Primary objective: Determine if the incidence of HTN can be reduced for up to 2 years after discontinuation of active treatment Secondary objective:
Evaluate the incidence of HTN during 2 years of treatment with candesartan of
placebo
Average BP 130139/89 mm Hg; or 139/8589 mm Hg Julius S et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1685-97.
TROPHY study design
Placebo Placebo n 400
Non-pharmacological treatment
Qualifying period*
Non-pharmacological treatment
Candesartan cilexetil 16 mg daily Placebo
n 400
Two Years
Two Years
*Clinic BP reading of 130-139/ 89 mm Hg
or 139/85-89 mm Hg
Julius et al, Hypertension 2006
TROPHY: Reduction in new-onset hypertension
N = 772
Candesartan vs Placebo Placebo only 15.6%* 66.3%*
the effect of active treatment on delaying the onset of hypertension can
*Relative risk reduction P < 0.001; P = 0.007 Julius S et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1685-97. extend to up to two years after the discontinuation of treatment.
MENCEGAH KERUSAKAN ORGAN TARGET
Scientific Communication / Medical Affairs
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan (8 mg OD in the morning) can reduce the risk of stroke in elderly patients with isolated systolic
hypertension (ISH).
SCOPE
Candesartan mampu menurunkan risiko stroke (fatal dan non fatal) sebesar 42%
Metode: 269 patients who had persistent proteinuria (1 g/d) despite 7 wk of treatment with the highest approved dosage of candesartan (16 mg/d) to 16, 64, or 128 mg/d candesartan for 30 wk
Objective:
To evaluated whether supramaximal dosages of candesartan would
reduce proteinuria to a greater extent than the maximum approved
antihypertensive dosage
J Am Soc Nephrol : , 2009
Penurunan Proteinuria Candesartan (SMART Study)
Proteinuria can be reduced by increasing the dosage of candesartan
Ellen Burgess, SMART investigators, et all, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2009, Supramaximal Dose of Candesartan in Proteinuric Renal Disease.
Relative Effects of Telmisartan, Candesartan and Losartan on Alleviating Arterial Stiffness in Patients with Hypertension Complicated by Diabetes Mellitus: An Evaluation Using the Cardio Ankle Vascular Index
Method
95 pasien hipertensi-DM tipe II ditreatment selama 12 bulan dengan telmisartan 40mg/hari (n=31), candesartan 8mg/hari (n=40) atau losartan 50mg/hari (n=24) Evaluation
CAVI measurement and changes in blood pressure, blood glucose, HbA1c,
triglyceride, HDL
The Journal of International Medical Research 2008; 36: 1094-1102
Candesartan is a potentially useful therapy against arterial stifness in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Comparison of Anti-arteriosclerotic Effects of Candesartan and Valsartan in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Hypertension Evaluation by Flow-mediated Dilatation (FMD)
Auteur(s) / Author(s) UEHARA Goro ; MORI Kanako ; SAKAI Takako ; MORITA Yasuko ; TAKEDA Hiroshi ;
Rsum / Abstract Objective To compare the effects of candesartan and valsartan on endothelial function assessed by measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension. Methods Subjects who were receiving treatment with valsartan prior to registration were switched to candesartan 8 mg/day (VC group, n=21) whereas those who were receiving candesartan were switched to valsartan 80 mg/day (CV group, n=19) for an observation period lasting 3 months. Percent FMD, blood pressure, and HbA1c were examined at baseline and 3 months after starting treatment. Results The two groups did not differ in terms of patients' baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory data. At 3 months, there were no significant changes in blood pressure and HbA1c in both groups. In the VC group percent FMD significantly increased at 3 months (from 4.7% to 5.8% ; p<0.001), while in the CV group it significantly decreased (from 4.7% to 4.3% ; p<0.001). Moreover, percent FMD at 3 months in the VC group was significantly higher than that in the CV group (p< 0.05). Conclusions This study indicates that suppression of progression of endothelial dysfunction by
different ARBs is not a class effect ; candesartan
is more effective against progression of arterial sclerosis than valsartan.
2009, vol. 37, no9, pp. 757-762 [6 page(s) (article)]
Profil Lipid
Pemakaian Candesartan
menurunkan level kolesterol total dan LDL lebih superior dibandingkan
mampu
dengan ARB lainnya.
Hellenic J Cardiol, 2006, Effects of Antihypertensive Treatment with Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Lipid Profile
Safety and Tolerability (Mortality & Morbidity)
Scientific Communication / Medical Affairs
CHARM Program: Reduction in mortality and morbidity
CHARM-Overall: Reduction in new-onset diabetes
CHARM is the only study to provide clear evidence of the effects of an ARB in preventing DM in heart failure patients, most of whom were receiving a diuretic
Treatment with candesartan reduced the incidence of new- onset diabetes in patients with heart failure by 22%
Candesartan aman untuk penderita ASMA
Bioequivalence Study of Candesartan Cilexetil
(manufactured by PT Dexa Medica)
Quality of Assurance Drug
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of candesartan in human subjects (n=24) after oral administration of 16 mg candesartan cilexetil tablet produced by PT Dexa Medica (Test Drug = Candesartan Cilexetil 16 mg) and the Reference (Reference Drug = Blopress 16 mg)
16 mg Candesartan cilexetil tablets produced by PT Dexa Medica and the Reference (BLOPRESS 16mg, PT Takeda Indonesia - Indonesia) are BIOEQUIVALENT
PROFILE PRODUCT
INDIKASI
HIPERTENSI Pengobatan pada pasien dengan gagal jantung dan gangguan fungsi sistolik ventrikel kiri (LVEF < 40%) ketika obat penghambat ACE tidak ditolelir
DOSIS dan CARA PEMBERIAN
DOSIS PADA HIPERTENSI Dosis awal Canderin adalah 4 mg per hari. Dosis dinaikkan sesuai dengan respons pengobatan sampai maksimum 16 mg sehari (Efek Maksimal dicapai dalam 4 minggu-6 minggu). Pasien dengan gagal ginjal sedang sampai berat, tidak memerlukan penyesuaian dosis, tapi disarankan diberikan dosis awal 2 mg. Pasien dengan gangguan hati ringan sampai sedang, direkomendasikan dosis awal 2 mg per hari.
DOSIS dan CARA PEMBERIAN
DOSIS PADA GAGAL JANTUNG Dosis awal 4 mg/hari. Peningkatan dosis sampai 32 mg/hari atau dosis tertinggi yang dpt ditoleransi dalam interval waktu minimal 2 minggu. Pasien lanjut usia dan pasien dengan pengurangan volume intravaskular, gangguan ginjal, dan gangguan hati ringan sampai sedang tidak perlu penyesuaian dosis. CARA PEMBERIAN Sekali sehari sebelum makan atau setelah makan
KONTRAINDIKASI
Penderita yang sensitif terhadap komponen CANDERIN. Wanita hamil dan menyusui Kerusakan hati yang berat dan/atau kolestasis
Kesimpulan
Pharmacokinetics
Afinitas lebih tinggi, durasi ikatan lebih panjang Efikasi: Penurunan tekanan darah lebih baik Efek proteksi terhadap ginjal, otak, jantung Pleiotropic effect: menurunkan kekakuan arteri, memperbaiki profil lipid Aman untuk pasien asma Bioekivalen dengan originator Lebih cost effective
Pharmacodinamics
Tolerability
Quality of Assurance Drug Cost
Tirta Kristina/ Scientific Communication / Medical Affairs
PRODUK
2013
Terima kasih atas dukungan dan kepercayaan dokter terhadap produk-produk PT Dexa Medica
Akses juga melalui:
http://cme.medicinus.co/
Untuk berlangganan hubungi: Email: [email protected] (u.p. Ninda)/ [email protected]