Scribd
Upload
441 views

Combline Filter Design Using HFSS To Implement The Qext and K Method

This document discusses the design of combline filters using the Qext and k method in HFSS. It begins with an overview of combline filter basics and the standard design method. It then introduces the Qext and k method, which calculates external Q and coupling coefficients directly from lowpass design values to generate physical dimensions. The rest of the document discusses simulating these values in HFSS, designing a sample filter, modeling losses, and validating the design.

Uploaded by

caglaryavuz
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
441 views

Combline Filter Design Using HFSS To Implement The Qext and K Method

This document discusses the design of combline filters using the Qext and k method in HFSS. It begins with an overview of combline filter basics and the standard design method. It then introduces the Qext and k method, which calculates external Q and coupling coefficients directly from lowpass design values to generate physical dimensions. The rest of the document discusses simulating these values in HFSS, designing a sample filter, modeling losses, and validating the design.

Uploaded by

caglaryavuz
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Combline Filter Design Using HFSS to Implement the Qext and k Method

Combline Basics
Combline Filters Basics
Tapped input connected directly to first resonator Resonators are metal cylinders or bars 30 to 70 electrical degrees long, grounded on one end Tuned to resonance with variable capacitance to ground on ungrounded end Bandwidths achievable from 1% to a full octave Preferable configuration to interdigital filters
Unloaded Q can be higher for ground plane spacing of 0.15 lambda Mechanical mounting or machining of resonators all on one side Single configuration can be tuned over wide range

Qext and k Method


Standard Method
Standard combline design uses g values to calculate coupled line transmission line model Coupled line model fails at large ground plane spacings. Yields bandwidths that are too wide. k&Q Method Calculate external Q and coupling coefficient (ks) directly from low pass g values. Generate Physical dimensions for specified Qext and ks with test configurations in the lab or on HFSS. Yields correct bandwidth. Use external ports to tune resonance & to decrease EM simulator burden

Finished HFSS Model


Cap tuner area

Resonator

Tapped Coax Input

Dominate Modes
Bandwidth expansion in coupled line model is caused by different propagation constants of TE01 and TM11 modes as ground plane spacing increases.

TE01 has H field of even mode

TM11 has E field of odd mode

Calculating Desired Qext and k


Qext and k values are calculated from standard lowpass g values:
Qext = g0 g1/w
1

kIJ = w/sqrt(gI gJ)

w = (w2- w2) /sqrt(w2 w1)

Simulating k values
Usual method involves performing a time consuming eigenmode calculation or sniffer port solution and adjusting mechanical tuners Method proposed by Swanson and Wenzel : put a port where tuning element exists and tune on linear simulatior2. Detunes resonance in EM simulator

Ports
k=(f2- f2)/f0

Shorted resonators

Simulating Qext and k12


Measure Qext and k12 using group delay method3

Ports

Input

Shorted resonator
Qext=d1w0 /4 k12=sqrt{4/ (d2w0 Qext)}

Designing the Filter


Choose a ground plane spacing for loss Qu=(Kb)sqrt(f) : b in inches, f in GHz, and good Ag 5 K~14000(b/)+200 for 0.1 < (b/ ) <0.2 5 L~4.343f0gs/(w Qu) ( in dB) Choose rod diameter ~ 0.2 to 0.4 b Form low impedance coax section for port (~10 ohms) and model coax length and stray capacitance to find minimum achievable cap value Choose to give values above minimum cap value Cap~(2f Z0tan )-1

Sample Filter
f0 = 1.3 GHz, w=0.15 n=5 Tchevbyscheff, 0.3 dB ripple Designer generates gs
g0=1, g1=0.9089, g2=1.3619, g3=1.7384

Calculate Qext and ks


Qext = 6.0598, k12 = 0.1348, k23 = 0.0975

Chose b/ = 0.165, b=1.5 inches


Qu~4400 & Loss~0.4 dB

Chose = 40 deg for cap values

Capacitor Section
Simulate capacitor section of resonator intrusion into cavity Tline cap plus stay capacitance and capacitance of tuning element Tline cap ~ L/(Zlowc)
0.03 inches protrusion 254 fF

Filter Design Continued


Simulate k and Qext test circuits and calculate physical dimensions Simulate entire filter with ports at all tuner locations Tune filter in Designer using lumped caps
Dishal method 4 Group Delay method 3

Measure completed filter k and Qext and tweak Optimize versus ideal bandpass in Designer Add loss to lumped caps to estimate insertion loss

Filter Dimensions
Dimensions (inches)
d12=1.13 d23=1.346 tap=0.604 (from gnd) b=1.5, L=1, diam=0.6 tap length = 0.3 cap port diam = 0.7
0.03 insert

Lossless filter model


coax intrusion reference plane keep here

Final Qs and Ks
Lossy caps
Parameter Q ext k 12 k 23 Desired 6.0598 0.1348 0.0975 Simulated 6.067 0.1346 0.0976

Empirical Loss modeling


Loss from Levy 5 Qu and MYJ : 0.04 dB Ideal filter with Levy 5 Qu : 0.04-0.07 dB HFFS filter with silver conductivity degraded 20% : 0.06 dB average Ideal filter with Q of cap elements set to Qu : 0.04-0.075

Simulated Filter Results

Things to keep in mind


Designer interpolation works poorly on k value test design. Use parametric sweep and plot. Should be straight line on log scale. Have adjacent shorted resonators in EM sim to include nearest neighbor interaction Remember to short all other resonators in full filter design when measuring internal resonator ks. Qext and k12 are coupled, so have single test design including both. Use group delay to measure Qext and k12. Measuring k12 by shorting input can be done, but finding proper reference plane is problematic. Remember to keep track of the reference plane bookkeeping for the capacitor.

Fun stuff : CT section

New pole

Cross coupled CT section

One Step Further

References
1. 2. 3. MYJ Swanson and Wenzel, Fast Analysis and Optimization of Combline Filters Using FEM, 2001 MTT Digest. Ness, A Unified Approach to the Design, Measurement, and Tuning of Coupled-Resonator Filters, MTT vol 46, #4, April 1998 Dishal, A Simple Design Procedure for Small Percentage Bandwidth Round-Rod Interdigital Filters, MTT-13, September 1965 Levy, Transistional Combline/Evanescent-Mode Microwave Filters, MTT vol 45, #12, December 1997

4.

5.

Dawson RF Design
Designs, prototypes, and production support from 1-200 GHz:
MMICs, MEMs, LNAs, Mixers, DROs, Gunn Oscillators Printed circuit antennas, Planar Filters, Wilkinsons, and Hybrids Capacitors, Spiral Inductors, Vias and Airbridge Structures Waveguide Couplers, Magic Tees, Hybrids, and Diplexers Waveguide Combline, Corrugated, Iris, Evanescent, and DR Filters

Phone : 818-434-6965 email:[email protected]

You might also like