0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views5 pages

By Robert Prieto, Associate Professor, Universidad: Power Electronics Technology March 2005

Trafo 5
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views5 pages

By Robert Prieto, Associate Professor, Universidad: Power Electronics Technology March 2005

Trafo 5
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

By Robert Prieto, Associate Professor, Universidad Politcnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, and J.

Mark Christini, Senior Application Engineer, Ansoft Corp., Pittsburgh

Using finite element analysis (FEA) techniques, a simulation tool generates frequency-dependent models of integrated magnetic components, accounting for the materials and winding layout of the magnetic component.

he use of integrated magnetics is a promising technique to help reduce the size of the magnetic components, achieve higher power density and improve the behavior of the circuit. [3, 4, 5, 6] As more power electronics are utilized within the automotive, aerospace/defense and power supply industries, the drive to further reduce the size and profile and increase

T
d

the performance and reliability of these components continues at a rapid pace. However, the design of these components is not a trivial task because the selection of the core, air gaps and winding setup is not evident. The availability of a valid electrical model allows the designer to select the appropriate constructive parameters in order to obtain the expected behavior. Ansofts PExprt software is capable of creating accurate models for these complex components, letting the designer select the appropriate winding strategy without time-consuming prototyping iterations. PExprt uses powerful finite element analysis (FEA) techniques to generate frequency-dependent models of integrated magnetic components, which include the materials and winding layout of the magnetic component.

Model Basis
(a)

(b) Fig. 1. The model structure for a 3-winding component consists of the windings model (a) and core model (b) shown here. Power Electronics Technology March 2005

The use of virtual models aids the designer in selecting the appropriate constructive parameters to obtain the expected behavior without the time and expense of buildtest iterations. PExprt provides a straight-forward design procedure for generating a model from the FEA field solution. While a 3D simulation is preferred, 3D FEA solvers are not as efficient as 2D FEA solvers in terms of computation time for devices with a high number of turns. As an alternative, PExprt uses a novel 2D approach based on the application of the Double 2D technique [1] to increase computation speed yet preserve accuracy. The model structure is based on the one presented in [1] 14
www.powerelectronics.com

Intelligent
MotionControl
Size: 6mm2 Enlarged View: 4x

MAGNETIC COMPONENTS

the MC73110

Fig. 2. The Double 2D procedure application depicts the 3D structure and the associated 2D simulations.

Brushless MotorControllerIC
Ultra high-performance Low cost Sinusoidal or 6-step commutation Internal profile generation High-speed index capture 6 signal PWM with shoot through protection Digital current loop Velocity loop

The Best Engineered Products in Motion


Fig. 3. An EI core shape and size is selected from the PExprt library.

PERFORMANCE MOTION DEVICES

www.pmdcorp.com
2004 Performance Motion Devices, Inc.

MOTORDRIVES AMPLIFIERS CONTROLLERS


Power Electronics Technology March 2005

and [7]. The structure of the model is shown in Fig. 1 for a 3-winding component (assuming one winding in each core leg). There is an electric submodel (top) coupled with a magnetic submodel (bottom). In Fig. 1, the impedance Z11 represents the windings impedance (magnetic energy and power losses) when the net current is only flowing though winding 1. Therefore, the impedance Z11 is not the self-impedance of winding 1, because losses and energy at the whole component (except the core 16

area) are considered in this impedance value. The meaning of impedances Z22 and Z33 is equivalent to the one of impedance Z 11 when net current flows through windings 2 and 3, respectively. Z12 represents the windings impedance (magnetic energy and power losses) factor due to the simultaneous conduction of net current through winding 1 and winding 2. In other words, the energy and the losses in the windings when the current is flowing simultaneously through windings
www.powerelectronics.com

CIRCLE 213 on Reader Service Card or freeproductinfo.net/pet

MAGNETIC COMPONENTS
are considered. The model also is frequency dependent and is valid for nonsinusoidal waveforms. Another benefit is that the couplings between each pair of windings are accurately calculated. Speed is another advantage. The solution time is fastthe average time for common components is less than 15 min. Furthermore, the model generation is completely implemented in PExprt, so the user does not need to learn how to use the FEA solver. PExprt creates the FEA project automatically and solves the fields.

Fig. 4. After winding setups are defined, a cross-sectional view of the component is created by PExprt.

Generating the Model


Defining the core shape, size and material. The selection of the core shape and size is simple. PExprt provides libraries containing most of the commercially available cores. The appropriate core shape for an integrated structure can be directly selected from the library. An EI shape is selected for this example, as shown in Fig. 3. Defining the winding setup. Once the core is selected, the winding setup for each core leg should be defined. PExprt provides a flexible user interface that allows the user defining any winding connection. The turns can be connected either in parallel or series, creating any possible interleaving structures. A different winding strategy can be defined and assigned for each core leg. Once the winding setups are created and assigned to each core leg, a cross-section view of the component can be visualized, as shown in Fig. 4. For this device all windings are on the outer core legs only. Defining the pc-board conductors. The thickness and width of each planar track can be defined easily to obtain the real behavior (resistance, coupling, leakage and magnetizing inductances, and capacitive effects) of the component. The pc-board conductors are defined through easy-to-use menus such as that shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. A menu in PExprt enables users to define the pc-board conductors.

1 and 2 (transformer mode) are not the addition of the ones obtained when current is flowing through winding 1 and winding 2 alternatively (inductor mode). This effect is taken into consideration by Z12. The rest of the impedances, Zij, are analogous to Z12, describing the windings impedance due to simultaneous conduction of net current through the other pairs of windings. The core part of the magnetic component is represented by a set of reluctances and mmf sources. There is a reluctance for each core column (C) and another for each gap (G). It is possible to replace the core reluctance with a nonlinear core model (such as the Jiles-Atherton model) to represent hysteresis and eddy current losses. The simulation procedure proposed in this work is based on the Double 2D approach presented in [2].
Power Electronics Technology March 2005

This approach is based on the division of the windings of the magnetic component in two parts. Each part produces field distribution in different planes of the space. In this way, it is possible to use 2D FEA solvers to study these structures. Fig. 2 shows the actual 3D structure and the double 2D simulations needed to simulate it. The double 2D process requires simulation of four 2D structures. However, the simulations that account for the field distribution in the air for each leg (side views) are very simple. Therefore, the solution time for these three cases is extremely short. The FEA model offers several advantages. Because it is based on FEA calculations, it is accurate (error below 10% for most of the application range) and 2D effects (such as the fringing flux effect around the air gap) 18

Exploring the Results


PExprt contains a model generation engine that connects the FEA
www.powerelectronics.com

MAGNETIC COMPONENTS
solver with the equivalent circuit model. Once the model is obtained, it can be exported to a circuit simulator (Simplorer, PSpice) or it can be used in PExprt to explore the small-signal behavior of the component. The resistance and leakage inductance as a function of frequency can be plotted using the tool. The dc resistance, magnetizing inductance and parasitic capacitive effects also can be obtained. Fig. 6 shows the resistance as a function of the frequency. Once the integrated magnetic model is generated with PExprt Modeler, you can use that circuit model in Simplorer to explore the performance of your entire circuit. The resulting schematic is represented in Fig. 7.

Validating Results
To demonstrate how to use PExprt, we model a push-pull forward converter with integrated magnetics for a voltage regulator module (VRM) that produces a 1.2-V, 70-A output from a 48-V input.

Fig. 6. The tool can plot parameters such as resistance versus frequency.

More power to you.


Custom SMPS Magnetics

For standard parts tailored to your application or a custom device for your specific requirement, contact an ICE engineer today to quickly realize your design goals.

Innovative Designs Award-Winning Customer Service Low Cost Fast Turn-Around

Helping Engineer the Technology of Power w w w. i c e c o m p o n e n t s . c o m ( 8 0 0 ) 7 2 9 - 2 0 9 9 ISO 9001/9002

CIRCLE 216 on Reader Service Card or freeproductinfo.net/pet Power Electronics Technology March 2005

CIRCLE 217 on Reader Service Card or freeproductinfo.net/pet

20

www.powerelectronics.com

MAGNETIC COMPONENTS
leg and no air gap in the two outer legs. Fig. 8 shows the topology selected for this example. The validity of the integrated magnetics component model was confirmed in the lab where the measured results for the device closely matched those simulated by PExprt. PETech

References
1. Asensi, R.; Cobos, J.A.; Garcia, O.; Prieto, R.; and Uceda, J. A Full Procedure to Model High Frequency Transformer Windings. Fig. 7. A circuit model of the magnetic component generated in PExprt Modeler can be ported in Simplorer for Power Electronics Specialist simulation of the entire circuit. Conference (PESC) 1994. 2. Prieto, R.; Cobos, J.A.; Garcia, O.; Alou, P.; and Uceda, J. SR2 _ a c Model of Integrated Magnetics by Means of Double 2D Finite Element a p Q2 Analysis Techniques. Power ElectronVo Co ics Specialist Conference (PESC) 1994. p d Vin 3. Xu, P; Ye, M; Wong, P; Lee, F.C. De+ q + sign of 48-V Voltage Regulator Modules q Cs with a Novel Integrated Magnetics. SR1 b Power Electronics IEEE Transactions, e b Vol. 17, No. 6 (November 2002), pp. Q1 990-998. 4. Wei, J.; Xu, P.; Lee, F.C. A High EffiSR2 ciency Topology for 12-V VRM-Pushc a n:n:1 Pull Buck and Its Integrated Magnetics Q1 p Implementations. Applied Power Elecq Vo Lo2 Co tronics Conference and Exposition b 2002. Seventeenth Annual IEEE, Vol. 2, + + Vin n:n:1 2002, pp. 679-685. d 5. Xu, P. and Lee, F.C. Design of HighCs b Input Voltage Regulator Modules with Lo1 q a Novel Integrated Magnetics. Applied SR1 p Power Electronics Conference and ExQ1 a position 2001. Sixteenth Annual IEEE, e Vol.1, 2001, pp. 262-267. 6. Chen, W.; Hua, G.; Sable, D.; Lee, F. Fig. 8. The design example consists of a push-pull converter with integrated magnetics. Shown Design of High-Efficiency, Low-Profile, here are the actual implementation (a) and the equivalent electrical circuit (b). Low-voltage Converter with Integrated Magnetics. Applied Power Electronics The example is based on the paper, The transformer windings (primary Conference and Exposition, 1997. 12th Design of 48-V Voltage Regulator 1 and primary 2) as well as the inducAnnual, Vol. 2, Feb. 23-27, 1997, pp. Modules with a Novel Integrated tor winding (secondary) are wound 911-917. Magnetics. [3] In this structure, all the on the two outer legs. The interleav7. Prieto, R; Asensi, R; Cobos, J; and magnetic components, including ining winding technique is used to Uceda, J. A Full Procedure to Model put filter inductor, step-down transminimize the leakage inductance of Integrated Magnetics based on FEA. former and output filter inductors, are the integrated transformer. The core APEC 2004 Conference Proceedings. integrated into a single EI or EE core. structure has an air gap in the center
Power Electronics Technology March 2005

22

www.powerelectronics.com

You might also like