4.1 Data Analysis and Inter Pretation: Table Showing The Age Group of Respondents
4.1 Data Analysis and Inter Pretation: Table Showing The Age Group of Respondents
Age Group
NO OF RESPONDEN TS
16 44 22 12 6 0 100
PERCENTAGE
Graph 1
Inference:
GENDER
NO OF RESPONDE NTS
62 38 100
PERCENTAGE
Inference:
NO OF RESPONDENTS
SALARIED SELF EMPLOYED HOUSE WIFE STUDENT RETIRED OTHERS Total 29 8 9 47 4 3 100
PERCENTAGE
29% 8% 9% 47% 4% 3% 100%
Graph 3
Inference:.
NO OF RESPONDENT S
49 12 12 27 100
PERCENTAGE
Inference:
Table 5
Table showing the list of coffee shops usually visited by the respondents
COFFEE SHOPS
NO OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
65
65%
12 23 100
Table showing the list of coffee shops usually visited by the respondents
Analysis:
Graph 5 Graph showing the list of coffee shops usually visited by the respondents:
Inference:
10
NO OF RESPONDENTS
18 52
PERCENTAGE
18% 52%
12
12%
18
18%
100
100%
11
Inference:
12
SPENDING PATTERN
<200 200 - 500 500 - 1000 1000 & ABOVE Total
NO OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
18 68 12 2 100
13
Inference:
Table 8
14
TIME
<1 HR 1HR-2HR 2HR-3HR 3& Above Total
NO OF RESPONDEN TS
21 52 21 6 100
PERCENTAGE
15
Inference:
16
NO OF RESPONDENTS
ALONE WITH ONE PERSON 2-3 PEOPLE MORE THAN 3 Total 9 58
PERCENTAGE
9% 58%
22 11 100
17
Graph 9
Inference:
18
Table 10
Table showing the influence of CCDs advertisements on consumers Perception toward CCD:
ADVERTISEMEN T STRATEGY
NO OF RESPONDENT S
54 PICTURISATION
PERCENTAGE
54%
22 18 6 100
Table showing the influence of CCDs advertisements on consumers Perception toward CCD:
Analysis:
19
Graph 10 Graph showing the influence of CCDs advertisements on consumers Perception toward CCD:
Inference:
20
Table 11 Table showing the response of respondents towards major attraction of caf coffee day:
MAIN ATTRACTION
NO OF RESPONDENTS
26 32 18 24 100
PERCENTAGE
Table showing the response of respondents towards major attraction of caf coffee day:
Analysis:
21
Graph 11 Graph showing the response of respondents towards major attraction of caf coffee day:
Inference:
22
Table 12 Table showing the respondents response towards the brand influence of CCD:
BRAND INFLUENCE
NO OF RESPONDENTS
78 22 100
PERCENTAGE
YES NO Total
Table showing the respondents response towards the brand influence of CCD: Analysis:
23
Graph 12 Graph showing the respondents response towards the brand influence of CCD:
Inference:
24
Table 13 Table showing the respondents response towards Price level of Caf coffee day
PRICE LEVEL
NO OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
18 68 14 100
Table showing the respondents response towards Price level of Caf coffee day Analysis
25
Graph 13 Graph showing the respondents response towards Price level of Caf coffee day
Inference:
26
NO OF RESPONDENTS
18 6 54 22 100
PERCENTAGE
18% 6% 54% 22% 100%
BETTER SERVICE IMPROVED QUALITY MORE QUANTITY ALL OF THE ABOVE Total
Graph 14
27
Inference:
Table 15
28
Table showing the respondents response towards the brand associations of caf coffee day:
INFORMATIO N OF OTHER BRANDS
NO OF RESPONDEN TS
79 21 100
PERCENTAGE
YES NO Total
Table showing the respondents response towards the brand associations of caf coffee day: Analysis:
Graph 15
29
Graph showing the respondents response towards the brand associations of caf coffee day:
Inference:
30
Table 16 Table showing the satisfaction level of respondents towards caf coffee day:
SATISFACTION LEVEL
NO OF RESPONDENTS
58
PERCENTAGE
58%
36 6 0 100
36% 6% 0 100%
Table showing the satisfaction level of respondents towards caf coffee day: Analysis:
Graph 16
31
Graph showing the satisfaction level of respondents towards caf coffee day
Inference:
Table 17
32
NO OF RESPONDENTS
29
PERCENTAGE
29%
ADVERTISEMENT
32 18 21 100
Table showing the respondents response towards factors to choose CCD: Analysis:
33
Graph 17 Graph showing the respondents response towards factors to choose CCD:
Inference:
34