Sometimes
We
Laugh
in
Horror
at
Brutal
Acts
by
Jane
Gilgun
This
article
describes
a
case
of
a
man
who
committed
multiple
acts
of
cruelty
against
his
wife.
When
I
read
the
catalogue
of
brutal
acts,
I
was
so
horrified
I
laughed,
not
because
I
thought
the
acts
were
funny
but
because
I
was
shocked.
He
was
cruel
beyond
any
expectations
I
had.
Laughter
often
arises
in
response
to
incongruence.
The
judge
must
rule
whether
the
man
acted
with
particular
cruelty.
My
response?
Duh?
About
the
Author
Jane
F.
Gilgun,
Ph.D.,
LICSW,
is
a
professor,
School
of
Social
Work,
University
of
Minnesota,
Twin
Cities,
USA.
See
Professor
Gilguns
other
articles,
books,
and
childrens
stories
on
scribd.
Amazon,
iBooks,
and
other
internet
booksellers.
Sometimes
We
Laugh
Because
There
is
no
Other
Way
to
Handle
Horrific
Acts
THE
JUDGE
IN
A
CASE
NOW
ON
APPEAL
has
to
rule
whether
Gordon
Weaver
acted
with
particular
cruelty
in
the
death
of
his
wife
Jean.
If
the
judge
so
rules,
Weavers
sentence
will
be
longer.
More
than
ten
years
ago,
Gordon
argued
with
Jean.
What
they
argued
about
is
not
clear.
The
argument
could
have
been
about
which
of
them
would
attend
their
sons
soccer
game
later
that
day
in
at
a
Minnesota,
USA,
high
school
or
about
Jeans
desire
for
a
divorce.
Gordon
got
angry
and
pushed
Jean.
Her
head
hit
a
concrete
laundry
tub.
Gordon
saw
she
was
not
breathing.
She
had
no
pulse.
He
set
their
house
on
fire.
After
being
freed
on
$300,000
bail,
he
took
off.
The
police
found
him
four
years
later
living
in
Oregon
under
another
name.
The
medical
doctors
who
did
the
autopsy
said
Jean
died
from
carbon
monoxide
poisoning.
The
skull
fracture
from
the
fall
was
a
contributing
factor.
Other
medical
doctors
said
it
wasnt
possible
to
know
whether
the
carbon
monoxide
or
the
skull
fracture
caused
Jean
to
die.
Gordons
attorney
said
Jean
Weavers
death
was
simply
a
tragic
accident.
He
further
contended
that
Gordon
is
not
guilty
of
two
counts
or
second
degree
murder,
but
that
at
most
he
is
guilty
of
arson
and
second
degree
manslaughter.
He
said
the
judge
must
establish
a
connection
between
Jeans
death,
her
skull
fracture,
and
the
fire.
The
prosecuting
attorney
argued
that
it
doesnt
matter
where
Jean
Weaver
died
of
carbon
monoxide
poisoning
or
the
skull
fracture
because
Gordon
Weaver
is
responsible
for
both.
When
I
read
the
judge
had
to
rule
whether
Gordon
acted
with
particular
cruelty,
I
laughed
at
the
absurdity.
Duh?
If
what
Gordon
did
is
not
cruel
then
what
on
this
earth
is?
Sometimes
I
laugh
when
situations
are
absurd
and
horrific.
Gordon
Weaver
would
feel
so
much
better
about
himself
if
he
just
admitted
he
did
a
horrible,
terrible,
awful
thing.
I
imagine
it
would
help
his
son
who
probably
feels
guilty
because
his
parents
may
have
argued
over
his
game.
I
wonder
if
anyone
has
thought
about
how
cruel
and
unfair
Gordons
murder
is
to
his
son.
Can
he
be
accountable
for
his
sons
sake?
Apparently
not.
What
a
guy.