Scribd
Upload
725 views

Traditional Learning Vs Elearning

This document compares traditional learning and eLearning. While traditional learning involves teacher-centered instruction within a classroom, eLearning offers more flexible, student-centered options. Research shows that eLearning can be at least as effective as traditional learning and may improve student achievement, satisfaction, and motivation. eLearning allows for enhanced communication, easier access to information, and learning that more closely mirrors real-world experiences.

Uploaded by

RusuMarian
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
725 views

Traditional Learning Vs Elearning

This document compares traditional learning and eLearning. While traditional learning involves teacher-centered instruction within a classroom, eLearning offers more flexible, student-centered options. Research shows that eLearning can be at least as effective as traditional learning and may improve student achievement, satisfaction, and motivation. eLearning allows for enhanced communication, easier access to information, and learning that more closely mirrors real-world experiences.

Uploaded by

RusuMarian
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Traditional Learning vs. eLearning David Rashty, rashty@addwise.

com

Traditional Learning vs. eLearning


Once we free ourselves from the mental limits of viewing this technology as a weak sister to face-toface synchronous education, the potentials to revolutionize education and learning become readily apparent

Turrof, 1995

Introduction
There is an argument that traditional learning is the best way of maintaining a learning process. Other models are always considered to be inferior or less efficient. There is no finding to support this argument, and research shows that eLearning models are at least as good as traditional learning.

Comparing traditional Learning and eLearning


When comparing learning an identical course in a traditional framework to a computer mediated learning framework, students have expressed higher satisfaction from the computermediated learning, and rated the learning as more effective than in the traditional framework. In other studies, too, it was argued that computer mediated or online learning is more effective and interactive. Findings of research conducted in the seventies and eighties, comparing the use of computers as a learning environment, also indicated a slight improvement in the students achievements following use of a computer. eLearning includes many components that are familiar from traditional learning, such as: presentation of ideas by the students, group discussions, arguments and many other forms of conveying information and accumulating knowledge. The contents of the courses curriculum might be organized according to subjects and in a serial manner. eLearning also includes advantages which are not found in traditional learning, such as: time for digesting the information and responding, enhanced communication among the learners, both as regards quality and as regards urgency, knowledge being acquired and transferred among the learners themselves, the ability to conduct an open discussion, where each learner gets more of an equal standing than in a face-to-face discussion, access to information and to discussion ability, responses may be made around the clock with no restrictions, a higher motivation and involvement in the process on the part of the learners.

Traditional Learning vs. eLearning, Page 1

Traditional Learning vs. eLearning David Rashty, [email protected] The very use of technology for learning has been found to have a positive effect on the students commitment to the learning process. Also, use of technology creates a greater commitment on the students part to learning. The following table summarizes several opinions regarding the comparison between traditional learning and eLearning: Traditional Learning The teacher usually talks more than the student The learning is conducted with the whole class participating; there is almost no group or individual study The teacher conducts the lesson according to the study program and the existing curriculum eLearning The student talks at least as much as or more than the teacher Most of the learning process takes place in groups or by the individual student. The student participates in determining the subject matter; the studying is based on various sources of information, including web data banks and net-experts located by the student. The students learn how and less what; the learning includes research study which combines searching for and collecting information from web data banks and authorities on the communications network; the learning is better connected to the real world, the subject matter is richer and includes material in different formats. The students motivation is high due to the involvement in matters that are closer to them and to the use of technology. The teacher directs the student to the information. The learning takes place with no fixed location The structure of the lesson is affected by the group dynamics.

Classroom Discussions

Learning Process

Subject Matter

Emphases in the Learning Process

The students learn what and not how; the students and the teachers are busy completing the required subject matter quota; the students are not involved in inquiry-based education and in solving problems, but rather in tasks set by the teacher.

Motivation

The students motivation is low, and the subject matter is distant from them.

Teachers Role Location of Learning

The teacher is the authority The learning takes place within the classroom and the school The teacher dictates the structure of the lesson and the division of time

Lesson Structure

Traditional Learning vs. eLearning, Page 2

You might also like