C. Lecture 2 - Process Evaluation
C. Lecture 2 - Process Evaluation
Sharon Barnhardt
Assistant Professor, IFMR Research Director, Centre for Microfinance [email protected]
August 27, 2012
Goals
Appreciate the importance of formalizing the program theory for better programs and better evaluations. Understand why process evaluation is critical for impact evaluation.
Design Program
Needs Assessment
Issue Why Who Context
Main Players
Needs Assessment
Gather information to clarify the need for a program that addresses a specific issue for a target population
Combine primary and secondary Primary data (household surveys, interviews, focus groups, etc.) Secondary data (official records, test scores, population surveys, etc.)
Urban poor often live in slums that lack basic public services
Program Theory
Process Evaluation Impact Evaluation Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Program Theory
Series of hypotheses that identify how change will occur at each step towards obtaining desired results Clearly lays out the sequence of activities & behaviors we expect to see happen in this specific environment If they happen as expected, the program should have an impact Ideas come from many sources (academic literature, successful programs in other places, best practices)
Logic Model
Inputs, Activities
Human, financial, community resources Actions that convert inputs to outputs
Output
Outcome
Short-term Objectives: Change in participant behavior, knowledge, skills, etc.
Impact
Long-term Objectives: Change at community, and/or system level
Process Evaluation
Impact Evaluation
Output
Houses built Bidi workers take mortgages Get possession
Outcome
Impact
Assumptions / Threats
Can get inputs Collaboration across players to build houses Bidi workers and their families will leave neighborhoods where their families live in order to get better housing Will stay in the house Wont sell Urban setting means transportation to work possible from anywhere Low mortgage payments free up money for other investments Previous locations density caused health problems
Outputs
Assumptions / Threats
Can get inputs Collaboration across players to build houses Bidi workers and their families will leave neighborhoods where their families live in order to get better housing Will stay in the house Wont sell Urban setting means transportation to work possible from anywhere Low payments free up money for other investments Previous locations density caused health problems
Outputs
Measurement
Indicators: metrics that quantify and measure specific program effects.
Choosing proper indicators is an important step in determining the overall success of the intervention. Indicators should be SMART Specific Measurable Action-oriented Realistic Timed
Goals of Measurement
Appropriate indicators to accurately capture desired info
Needs Assessment Process Evaluation Impact Evaluation
Field visits
Housing Project
What are the relevant data that should have been collected for the housing project?
Indicators
Legal rights to land; Lottery dates; list of winners; other public facilities available. Construction matches plans? Down payments made? Who moved reasons why not. Moved in/out/ length of time in house? Repaying mortgage? Neighborhood quality? Job changes? Employed; income? Alive? Suffering health problem? Schooling completion? Education of s/d-in-law?
Assumptions / Threats
Can get inputs Collaboration across players to build houses Bidi workers and their families will leave neighborhoods where their families live in order to get better housing Will stay/ Wont sell Urban setting means transportation to work possible from anywhere Low payments free up money for other investments Previous locations density caused health problems
Outputs
Program Theory
Process Evaluation
Impact Evaluation Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Monitoring
Plans & Targets Inputs, Activities Outputs Outcomes
Implementation
Continuous collection of data relevant to implementation Examples: population served, resources used, services provided Aims to inform and improve an interventions design, implementation and management strategies
Process Evaluation
Plans & Targets Inputs, Activities Outputs Outcomes
Implementation
Assess whether program is implemented as designed, and extent that it reaches intended participants Identify problems Improve delivery
Confirms what program is being evaluated, provides data required to investigate variation in results.
Program Theory
Process Evaluation
Impact Evaluation
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Collect Endline Data, Evaluate Impacts Use results to further improve program
Impact Evaluation
Plans & Targets Inputs, Activities Outputs Outcomes
Impact Did the program achieve its ultimate goals? Is the Program Theory aligned with the results? What are the differences between the logic model and what actually happened? How will these results feedback into future program design?