Scribd
Upload
3K views9 pages

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar

This document analyzes investment options for Lockheed Tristar and provides summaries of the analysis in four parts: Part A evaluates three investment options and recommends the option with the highest IRR and NPV. Part B evaluates an additional investment option and recommends choosing the option with the highest NPV. Part C evaluates subsidy options for an airport project and recommends the option with the lowest cost to the city. Part D analyzes the financial details of a production program and determines that pursuing the program adversely affected shareholder value.

Uploaded by

Rajesh Kumar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views9 pages

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar

This document analyzes investment options for Lockheed Tristar and provides summaries of the analysis in four parts: Part A evaluates three investment options and recommends the option with the highest IRR and NPV. Part B evaluates an additional investment option and recommends choosing the option with the highest NPV. Part C evaluates subsidy options for an airport project and recommends the option with the lowest cost to the city. Part D analyzes the financial details of a production program and determines that pursuing the program adversely affected shareholder value.

Uploaded by

Rajesh Kumar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar

Rainbow Products
Part A
Cash Flow
-35000

5000

Payback period
IRR
NPV
Decision

5000

5000

5000

5000

5000

11.49%
(Rs.945.68)
NO

WACC

12%

WACC

12%

-35000
4500

Payback period
IRR
NPV
Decision

Payback period
IRR
NPV
Decision

5000

7 years

Part B
Cash Flow
Initial
Yr 1 to infinity

Part C
Cash Flow
-35000

5000

7.78 years
12.86 %
2500
Yes

4000

4160

4326.4 4499.456 4679.434 4866.612 5061.276 5263.727

7.65 years
15.43 %
15000
Yes

5000

5000

5000

5000

5000

5474.276 5693.247 5920.977 6157.816 till infinity

5000

5000

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar

Add a new window


Update existing equipment
Build a new stand
Rent a larger stand

Inv.
-75000
-50000
-125000
-1000

CF yr 1
44000
23000
70000
12000

CF yr 2
44000
23000
70000
13000

a) IRR rule is misleading due to difference in size of investment.


b) Using NPV rule, we recommend "Build a new stand".
c) The difference in ranking is explained by the size of investment.

CF yr 3
44000
23000
70000
14000

IRR
34.6%
18.0%
31.2%
1207.6%

NPV@15%
$25,462
$2,514
$34,826
$28,470

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar

Cash flows w/o subsidy


A) IRR 25%
Cost to city
PV of Cost to city @20%
B) 2-year Payback
Cost to city
PV of Cost to city @20%
C) NPV 75000 @20%
Cost to city
PV of Cost to city @20%
D) ARR 40%
Cost to city
PV of Cost to city @20%

CF 0
-1000000

CF1
371739

CF 2
371739

CF 3
371739

CF 4
371739

-877899

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

628261

371739

371739

122101
122,101
-1000000

256522
178140
-887334

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

684783

112666
112,666
-1000000

313044
150966

NPV subsidy option (C) is least costly to the city.

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar


a) NPV of project = 210,000 - 110,000 = 100,000

Amount of new equity to be raised = 110,000


Suppose,
N = no. of new shares to be issued
P = final share price

and
So,
or,

N*P = 110,000
(10,000+N)*P = 1210,000 = total value of assets after the project
(10,000+N)/N = 11
N = 1,000
P = $ 110

b) 1000 new shares to be issued @$110


c) The project increases the value of the stock of the existing shareholders by $10 (from $100 to $110)

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar


a) Prodn. Level = 210 units = 35 units per year for 6 years
Prod. Cost = $14 mn per unit
Sale price = $16 mn per unit
Prodn
Year
t
Inv
Costs
Rev
1967
0
-100
1968
1
-200
1969
2
-200
1970
3
-200
1971
4
-200
-490
1972
5
-490
1973
6
-490
1974
7
-490
1975
8
-490
1976
9
-490
1977
10
-490
Total
-900
-3430
Accounting profit
NPV @10%
b) Prodn. Level = 300 units = 50 units per year for 6 years
Prod. Cost = $12.5 mn per unit
Sale price = $16 mn per unit
Prodn
Year
t
Inv
Costs
Rev
1967
0
-100
1968
1
-200
1969
2
-200
1970
3
-200
1971
4
-200
-625
1972
5
-625
1973
6
-625
1974
7
-625
1975
8
-625
1976
9
-625
1977
10
Total
-900
-3750
Accounting profit
NPV @10%

Cash Flow
-100
-200
-200
-60
-550
70
70
70
70
-70
420
-480

140
140
560
560
560
560
420
420
3360
-480
(Rs.584)

Cash Flow

200
200
800
800
800
800
600
600
4800

-100
-200
-200
0
-625
175
175
175
175
-25
600
150

150
(Rs.274)

c) Prodn. Level = 400 units = 67 units per year for 5 years and 65 units in year 6
Prod. Cost = $11.75 mn per unit
Sale price = $16 mn per unit
Prodn
Year
t
Inv
Costs
Rev
Cash Flow
1967
0
-100
-100
1968
1
-200
-200
1969
2
-200
-200

1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total

-200
-200

-900

-787
-787
-787
-787
-787
-764
-4700

Accounting profit
NPV @10%

268
268
1072
1072
1072
1064
804
780
6400

68
-719.25
284.75
284.75
284.75
276.75
40.25
780
800

800
Rs.43

d) The decision to pursue the program was not sound. It affected the shareholder value adversely.
e) Prodn. Level = 210 units = 35 units per year for 6 years
Prod. Cost = $14 mn per unit
Sale price = $16 mn per unit
Govt. to bear the sunk cost of $700 mn till 1970.
Prodn
Year
t
Inv
Costs
Rev
1967
0
1968
1
1969
2
1970
3
1971
4
-200
-490
1972
5
-490
1973
6
-490
1974
7
-490
1975
8
-490
1976
9
-490
1977
10
-490
Total
-200
-3430
Accounting profit
NPV @10%

Cash Flow

140
140
560
560
560
560
420
420
3360
220
Rs.16

140
-550
70
70
70
70
-70
420
220

11.74627

You might also like