The Common Core State Standards: Tennessee's Transition Plan
The Common Core State Standards: Tennessee's Transition Plan
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
TN ranks 46th in 4th grade math and 41st in 4th grade reading nationally
Tennessees Competitiveness
Source: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2018 (The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce), 2011 NCES NAEP data, ACT
This transition gives us the opportunity to make an immediate impact on learning and results
Year 2011-2012 Assessment TCAP and EOC Target
Average growth of at least 3-5% increase in percent of students proficient/advanced 4th Math: 4 points scale score growth for all students 8th Math: 5 points scale score growth for all students Other subjects: greater than national average growth Average growth of at least 3-5% increase in percent of students proficient/advanced
2012-2013
NAEP
2013-2014
2014-2015
PARCC
(WHY we teach)
Common Core State Standards provide a vision of excellence for WHAT we teach
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Common Core State Standards will help our results match our potential
Tennessee students are as talented as any in the nation.
The Common Core State Standards will strengthen teaching and learning with standards that are:
Focused, coherent, clear, and rigorous Internationally benchmarked Anchored in college and career readiness Evidence- and research-based
This is the next step in the path to reflect what is most important for career and college readiness
Spring 2015
Spring 2011
TCAP scores begin to rise
Tennessee receives an F from the US Chamber of Commerce in rigor and approves Tennessee Diploma Project standards
7
The Common Core State Standards represent six key instructional shifts
MATH: 1. Focus strongly where the Standards focus
2.
3.
Coherence: think across grades, and link to major topics within grades
Rigor: require conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application with intensity.
ELA: 1. 2. Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational texts Reading and writing grounded in evidence from text
3.
English/Language Arts
4th grade: TN.4.5.SPI.4: List all possible outcomes of a given Kindergarten: TN.K.8.GLE.4: Identify basic literary situation or event. elements.
With precious instructional time, every minute must be focused on the skills and content students need to compete.
9
Standard 7 Media
CLE 3002.7.1. Evaluate the aural, visual, and written images and other special effects used in television, radio, film, and the Internet for their ability to inform, persuade, and entertain.
CU 3002.7.1 Recognize the effects of sound, visual images, and language on audience. SPI 3002.7.1 Draw an inference from a non-print medium. SPI 3002.7.2 Select the type of conflict represented in a non-print medium. SPI 3002.7.6 Infer the mood represented in a non-print medium.
10
11
113
25
There are 1,119 Tennessee ELA standards not covered in the Common Core
CLE 45 CU 501 GLE 109 SPI 464 Grand Total 1119
12
and deeper.
3rd Grade Math
3OA.3 (Operations and Algebraic thinking): Use multiplication and division within 100 to solve word problems in situations involving equal groups, arrays, and measurement quantities, e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problems.
There were 28 cookies on a plate. Five children each ate 1 cookie. Two children each ate 3 cookies. One child ate 5 cookies. The rest of the children each ate 2 cookies. Then the plate was empty How many children ate 2 cookies? Use multiplication equations and other operations, if needed, to show how you found your answer. Jane thinks this question can be solved by dividing 28 by 2. She is wrong. Explain using equations and operations why this is not possible.
13
Collectively the PARCC states educate more than 31 million students nearly 63% of K-12 students attending American public schools PARCC assessments will begin in 14-15 for grades 3-11 in ELA and math
Source: Achieve
14
PARCC timeline
SY 2010-11
Launch and design phase
SY 2011-12
Development begins
SY 2012-13
Development continues
SY 2013-14
Pilot/field testing and related research and data collection
SY 2014-15
Full administration of PARCC assessments Achievement and college-ready performance levels set in summer 2015
Source: PARCC
15
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
16
We believe there are three legs to the stool in our implementation plan
Effective communication about the standards, importance, and potential
Assessment alignment and transparency
Student achievement
Quality training & meaningful support Instructional materials and curriculum
We will place significant focus on involvement of school and district leaders throughout Common Core implementation. Without committed leadership, especially at the building level, we believe our preparation will be significantly compromised.
Quality training & meaningful support Instructional materials and curriculum
We will begin state-wide implementation of 3-8 math standards this coming school year
2011-12 Grades K-2 Math and ELA 2012-13 2013-14
Grades 3-8
Math (partial)
Grades 9-12
Grades 6-12
19
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
20
We will identify TNCore Focus Standards for each grade level for mathematics in grades 3-8
The 3-8 Math TNCore Focus Standards for the 2012-2013 school-year are:
Grade 3rd Grade TNCore Focus Standards Represent and solve problems involving multiplication and division Understand properties of multiplication and the relationship between multiplication and division Extend understanding of fraction equivalence and ordering Build fractions from unit fractions by applying and extending previous understanding of operations on whole numbers Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions Apply and extend previous understanding of multiplication and division to multiply and divide fractions Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems Apply and extend previous understanding of arithmetic to algebraic expressions Analyze proportional relationships and use them to solve real-world and mathematical problems Solve real-life and mathematical problems using numerical and algebraic expressions and equations Define, evaluate, and compare functions Understand the connections between proportional relationships, lines, and linear equations
4th Grade
5th Grade
8th Grade
21
We will narrow the focus of the TCAP and expand use of Constructed Response Assessments
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
TCAP We will remove 15-25% of SPIs that are not reflected in Common Core State Standards from the TCAP NEXT year. The specific list of SPIs will be shared on May 1.
Constructed Response We will expand the constructed response assessment for all grades 3-8, focused on the TNCore focus standards for math.
NAEP
NAEP
PARCC
22
October
CRA 1 (paper and online option, scored by teachers in Field Service Center region, reported by school team)
February
CRA 2 (paper and online option, scored by teachers in Field Service Center region, reported by school team)
May
Official Constructed Response Assessment (paper-based only, scored by state, results reported in July)
23
Selection and training of Core Coaches Orientation for district leaders and supervisors Optional units for post-TCAP preparation Videos explicating TNCore Focus Standards released May
Summer
3-day summer training for school teams* Online courses released for all teachers on TNCore Focus Standards
Core Coaches available for questions and PLC support Optional follow-up Saturdays for school-teams to review student work Ongoing online courses, model units, and lesson plan sharing
Spring
Fall/Winter
* The full building administrative team will be needed at all three days of training.
24
Day One
Model Instructional Task lesson Key Instructional Strategies to support student achievement Content review of focus standards Selecting and facilitating instructional tasks
Day Three
Day Two
Afternoon: (same-role) Orientation to the standards through Performance-Based Assessments Overview of the Constructed Response Assessment
Afternoon (school-team) Looking at vertical alignment of content and assessments Planning for how to bring lessons learned back to full school
25
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
26
ELA pilots
This year, we want to broadly support districts with interest to begin piloting implementation of Common Core State Standards in 3-12 ELA. Piloting this coming year will support better preparation at a school, district, and state level for full implementation in 13-14 There will be no changes to the ELA TCAP or End of Course Exams this year. However, strengthening student performance in the key shifts of the Common Core State Standards will support student performance on Tennessee Diploma Project standards and assessments. We will be releasing TNCore focus standards for each grade level in 3-12 ELA and supporting resources and online courses to support implementation of ELA standards. These will be released by April 15. We will select ELA Core Coaches to serve as peer leaders in the implementation of Common Core State Standards and inform training for the following summer
27
We hope many districts will join the ELA pilots this year
Districts will commit to: Ensuring all 3-12 ELA teachers complete state-provided online courses Administering 4 writing assessments throughout the year in each ELA classroom (state will provide prompts and scoring guides) Forming a 2-5 person district-level ELA team to attend four grand division meetings with other pilot districts to share best practices
The TDOE will support districts by: Organizing and convening the four grand division consortium meetings Developing and making available two online modules focusing on the key instructional shifts for ELA Providing a $2,500 travel-offset stipend per district
Districts will be asked to sign up for the ELA pilot in March with the first meeting of ELA district teams in June
28
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
29
* The TDOE is not endorsing a specific curriculum but the approach of explicit instruction grounded in the science of reading
30
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
31
This year, we will: Work with State Board of Education to review all high school math course offerings and strengthen policy connection between high school mathematics and postsecondary math readiness Convene a group of Core Coaches to implement the Common Core State Standards in Algebra I and II Encourage Geometry teachers to incorporate Geometry and Algebra standards from the Common Core State Standards
32
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
33
Select and convene Core Coaches in social studies, science, CTE, fine arts, and physical education to embed literacy (and, where appropriate, math) standards into instruction. We will select a group of Core Coaches focused in middle school and a group of Core Coaches for high school.
Explore writing assessments based on informational texts in the relevant content area
34
Todays agenda
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
35
Working with all possible partner organizations and technology providers to prepare a state-wide readiness plan by September, 2012
36
1)
We want to work closely with institutions of teacher preparation to ensure candidates graduating across the next few years are fully prepared to teach Common Core content
1)
We want to work to align postsecondary admissions and placement policies with a meaningful definition of college- and career-ready indicators The TDOE will launch a collaborative process with THEC to review creditbearing courses and report out by September, 2012
37
Closely monitor TASL credit approval for all Common Core trainings
Focus the Technology and LEAD conferences on sharing information about cutting-edge solutions for content delivery and PD supports
38
Expect More, Achieve More website will be updated with information about Common Core implementation
39
Common Core Leadership Council: Susie Bunch, Director of Schools, Lexington City John Prince, Math Instructional Coach, Trenton Special School District Sharon Cooksey, Facilitator for Curriculum and Professional Learning, Franklin Special School District Tammy Shelton, Supervisor of Instruction, Lincoln County Bobby Cox, Assistant Director for Teaching and Learning, Warren County Sharon Harper, Director of Research and Evaluation, Bradley County Millicent Smith, Director of Professional Development & Social Studies Supervisor, Knox County Theresa Nixon, Science Supervisor, Knox County Vicki Kirk, Director of Schools, Greene County Linda Kennard, Director of Curriculum & Instruction, Memphis City Schools David Stephens, Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction, Shelby County Schools Jared Myracle, Assistant Principal, Gibson County High School, Gibson County Jeanne Ray, Associate Director of Learning, Lebanon Special School District
STRATEGIC PLAN