100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views8 pages

Gainesboro Case Analysis

- Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation faces questions about how much cash flow to distribute to shareholders and in what form as its core business evolves. It is transitioning from traditional manufacturing to advanced technology and software but has incurred losses during this transition. - Management is considering options for its payout policy including no dividend, a 40% dividend ratio, a residual dividend where payout depends on leftover cash, or a stock repurchase program. - The document discusses relevant concepts for payout policy including dividend theories like irrelevance and bird-in-hand, as well as stock repurchases, to help analyze the best policy for Gainesboro.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views8 pages

Gainesboro Case Analysis

- Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation faces questions about how much cash flow to distribute to shareholders and in what form as its core business evolves. It is transitioning from traditional manufacturing to advanced technology and software but has incurred losses during this transition. - Management is considering options for its payout policy including no dividend, a 40% dividend ratio, a residual dividend where payout depends on leftover cash, or a stock repurchase program. - The document discusses relevant concepts for payout policy including dividend theories like irrelevance and bird-in-hand, as well as stock repurchases, to help analyze the best policy for Gainesboro.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

GainesboroMachineToolsCorporation: PayoutPolicyforaNewIdentity

(Case8Analysis)
PresentedMarch10,2008 toDr.TonyPlath,ProfessorofFinance InPartialFulfillmentofRequirementsfor MBAD6154|GraduateAppliedFinancialManagement TheUniversityofNorthCarolinaatCharlotte


ClayFowler JabbarJamison

Case 8 Analysis: Gainesboro Machine Tools | MBAD 6154 | Spring 2008

Introduction

Profitablecompaniesregularlyfacethreeimportantquestions:(1)Howmuchofour freecashflowshouldwepassontoshareholders?(2)Shouldweprovidethiscashto stockholdersbyraisingthedividendorbyrepurchasingstock?(3)Shouldwemaintaina stable,consistentpaymentpolicy,orshouldweletthepaymentsvaryasconditions change? (Brigham,Ehrhardt,Ch.18.p361) GainesboroMachineToolsCorporationfacesthesequestionsastheircorebusiness evolvestomeettechnologicalinnovationsandincreasinginternationaldemand.For decadestheywereafavoriteofincomeinvestorsfortheirsolidearningsandstrong dividends,butin2005thescenehadchanged.Afteryearsofplanningand restructuring,theynowfindthemselvesasakeyplayerinanewindustry.Going forward,Gainesboroisprojectingthatthreequartersofsalesrevenuewillcomefrom theadvancedtechnologyperipheralsandCAD/CAMsoftwarebusiness,withthe remaindercomingfromtheircorebusinessofold,electricalequipmentandmachine toolsmanufacturing.Gainesborohaspositioneditselfforsuccessinanewindustrybut itsrealignmenthascomewithsignificantcostsnetlossesof$61.3millionand$140 million,in2002and2004respectively.Inthefaceoftheseextraordinarylosses, Gainesborohastappedlinesofcreditinordertocontinuetopayhighdividends, ballooningdebttoitshighestever.In2004,itsuccumbed,cuttingitsdividendpayout, andhasevenfailedtopaydividendsinthelasttwoquarters.Thesetroublingsigns, combinedwiththeoverallmarketlullintheaftermathofHurricaneKatrina,havesent Gainesborossharepricespiralingdownward,currentlyoff25%fromjustoneyearago. So,thequestionremains:CanGainesboroincreaseitsvaluethroughitschoiceof distributionpolicy,definedasthelevelofdistributions,theformofdistributions,and thestabilityofdistributions? Inthisstudywellexplorekeyconceptsinmanagingfirmequityandhowitpertainsto GainesboroTools.Wewillsystematicallyexplorepayoutpolicygoals,distribution theories,dividendandstockrepurchasepolicies,andhowtheseconceptsmayaffect investorandfirmwealth.Wellthenuseandconsumethisinformationtoformulatea payoutpolicyrecommendationforGainesboromanagement. Fowler/Jamison Page2

Case 8 Analysis: Gainesboro Machine Tools | MBAD 6154 | Spring 2008

CaseDilemma (When)askedifthecompanyplannedtostartpayingadividendorinitiateastock buybackprogram,"Atthistime,wehavenoplanstodoeither.Wedon'tthinkit'sour jobtomanageourshareholders.It'sourjobasthemanagementteamtomanagethe company,tomanageitthroughwhenthestockpriceisgoingupandtomanageitwhen thestockpriceisgoingdown. StevenJobs(Hillis,ApplePlansnoDividendorbuyback) Dividendsarerealmoney.That'sthehallmarkofabluechipstock.Ifacompanydoesn't payadividend,it'saspeculation. GeraldineWeiss(Sullivan,DividendStocksPayOff) TheseopinionsareindicativeofthedilemmafacingGainesboromanagement,whoin theirdecisionsmustnotonlyconsidertheirinternalpreferencesfortheuseoffreecash flow,theymustalsoconsiderinvestorspreferences.Theirdecisions,upthispoint,have ledthemtoacorporaterepositioningasahighgrowthfirmintheindustrialsoftware andadvancedtechnologyindustry,maintainingasmallelement(25%ofrevenue)of theiroldidentityinamaturemanufacturingmarket.Inpursuitofthisnewcourse,two expensivereorganizations,slowingsalesintheirtraditionalline,andlowmarginsintheir newlinehadleftthemwithextraordinarylossesandnoexcesscashonhand. Regardless,managementwantedandexpectedtogrowata15%compoundrate annuallyinanticipationofreaching$2billioninsalesby2011andwasconsidering revampingthecompanybrandtoprojecttheirnewlineofbusiness.Gainesborohad paidforanewcorporateidentity,butthemarketwasconfusedastowhatthatimage was:dependableincomestock,or,opportunistichighgrowthstock? Managementisconsideringthefollowingpayoutoptions:(a)azerodividendpayout, optingnottopaydividendstoshareholders,(b)a40%dividendratio,translatingtoan approximate$.20pershareperquartercashdistribution,(c)aresidualdividendpayout, wheredividendswouldbepaidonlyifleftovercashremainedafternewinvestments andcapitalprojectswerefunded,and(d)astockrepurchaseprogram,wherefunds wouldbeusedtorepurchasestockinsteadofpayingoutadividend. Beforearecommendationcanbemade,relevantfinancialconceptsandmarketpayout theoriesshouldbeexplored.

Fowler/Jamison Page3

Case 8 Analysis: Gainesboro Machine Tools | MBAD 6154 | Spring 2008

ConceptsofPayoutPolicy

Thegoalofanearningspayoutpolicyistodistributethefirmsearningstotheowner shareholdersofthecompanywhilemaximizingbothfirmandshareholderwealth.A firmgenerallyhasthreeprimaryoptionsindistributingexcesscashflowsgenerated frominternaloperations:payacashdividendtoinvestors,repurchaseaportionoftheir outstandingstock,andretainearnings.Thefirstoptiontobeconsideredisretention. Retainedexcesscashcanlaterbeusedtoinvestinfuturegrowthopportunitiesforthe firm.Withreinvestments,afirmmayyieldagreaterreturnthaninvestorscould otherwisegenerateinanalternateinvestmentofsimilarrisk.Thisisthestrategyused bythemajorityofgrowthfirmsasanattempttocompeteandgainmarketshareaway fromcompetitors.Aftergrowthopportunitiesandcapitalprojectsareconsidered,the firmcouldpayoutaportionorallremainingexcesscash.Wellexplorethefollowing relevanttheoriesinordertoadequatelyunderstandthereasonsandconsequencesof doingso.
DividendsandDividendTheories

Adividendisdefinedasaportionofcorporateearningspaidouttoshareholders.The relevanceofdividendshasbeendebatedthroughoutacademiaandthecorporateworld butnoconclusiveevidencehasbeenpresentedtonameanyonetheorydominant.For thepurposeofthispaperwewilldiscussthree:dividendirrelevance,birdinhand,and taxpreferencetheory. Thedividendirrelevancetheorem,championedbyMillerandModigiliani,statesthat thevalueofafirmisdeterminedonlybytheincomeproducedbyitsassets,notbyhow thisincomeisdistributed.Ifaninvestordesiresacashpaymentbutthefirmdoesnot paydividends,hehastheabilitytocreateadividendbysellingsharesofstock.Onthe otherhand,ifaninvestordoesnotdesireregularincomefromadividendpayingfirm, hehastheabilitytousehisdividendtopurchaseadditionalsharesofthefirm.In simplifyingthetheory,MillerandModigilianiignoretaxesconsequencesand transactionfeesandpresuppose100%freecashflowpayout,gapingassumptionswhich aresharplycriticizedbymanyandstillarguedovertoday. Anothertheory,theclienteleeffect,isimportanttodiscusswiththedividend irrelevancetheorem.Itexplainsthatdifferentgroupsofinvestors(calledclientele) preferdifferentpayoutmethods.Retirees,pensionfunds,andendowmentsgenerally prefercashpayoutsbecausetheyhavelowornotaxliabilityandseektoavoid unnecessarytransactioncosts.Conversely,peakearninginvestorsinhightaxbrackets wouldprefertodefertaxliabilitybyoptingforincreasedvalueinstockpriceinsteadof cashdistributions.Theclienteleeffectstatesthatnomatterthepolicyacompany adopts,thestockwillattractinvestorsandoneclienteleisagoodasanother. Additionally,ithighlightsthatfrequentchangestopayoutpolicyisunattractiveto Fowler/Jamison Page4

Case 8 Analysis: Gainesboro Machine Tools | MBAD 6154 | Spring 2008

investorsduetoexcessivebrokeragecosts,unnecessarytaxliability,andapotential shortageofinvestorswhopreferthenewpolicy. Thebirdinhandtheorysuggeststhatdividendsarepreferredovercapitalgains.This theorystatesthatstockpriceispositivelyaffectedbydividendpayoutbecauseinvestors aremoreconfidentinreliabledividendsthantheyareofvariablecapitalgains potentiallyachievedfromretainedearnings.Opponentsarguethatifthisweretrue, highdividendstockswouldconsistentlytradeabovetheirzerodividendpeers,which studieshaveshownisnotthecase. Thetaxpreferencetheorystatesthatinvestorsprefercapitalgainsoverdividends.It suggeststhatsomeinvestorsmayavoiddividendsbecauseoftheannualtaxliability. Capitalgainstax,however,canbeavoidedanddeferredbysimplynotselling.Thetime valueeffectsofdeferringtaxesalsomaymagnifythepreferenceforcapitalgains.In theory,thesetaxadvantageswouldcompelinvestorstopaymoreforalowpayout companythanasimilarhighpayoutcompany.
StockRepurchases

Astockrepurchaseoccurswhenafirmbuysbackitssharesintheopenmarketorina tendertransaction.Anopenmarkettransactionisexecutedafterthefirmannouncesits intenttobuybackacertainamountofsharesorpresetamountofdollarsintheopen market.Thefirmmakesopportunisticbuyswhenitbelievesthatitsstockis undervaluedinthemarket.Atendertransactioniswhenthefirmbuysbacksharesata premiumtothecurrentmarketprice.Themajoradvantagesofarepurchaseprogram includeboostingearningspershare(EPS),adjustingcapitalstructure,andsignaling confidenceinfutureearningspotential.Repurchasesarealsoviewedasbeingmore flexiblethandividends,sinceacertainelementoftimingcanbeemployed. Repurchasinghasbecomesoprevalentintodaysmarketthatfinancialexpertshave pronouncedrepurchasesasthedominantformofpayout.DouglasSkinner,ofthe UniversityofChicago,goessofarastoproclaimdividendonlyfirmsasextinct,(Skinner). Repurchasesareincreasinglyusedinplaceofdividendsbecauseofitsflexibilityand signalsofselfconfidence,evenforfirmsthatcontinuetopaydividends.
Signaling

Whenitisdecidedthatacompanyshouldinitiateorchangeapayoutpolicy,potential consequencesoftheannouncementshouldbeconsideredfirst.Changesinpayout policyimplicitlyreveal,orsignal,informationcontentregardingearningspotentialto themarket,andthemarketwillusethisnewinformationtomakedecisionsaboutthe firm.Empiricalstudiesshowthatonaverage,firmsthatreducedividendshavehadpoor earningsinthequartersleadinguptothecut,butmosthaveactuallyimprovedearnings insubsequentyears,(Bernartzi,Michaely,Thaley).Thisusuallyoccursbecausethe excesscashcaninsteadbeusedformoreconstructivepurposes,likepayingdowndebt, makingshortterminvestments,andenteringotheropportunities.Studiesalsoshow thatfirmsthatincreasedividendsarelesslikelythandividendidlefirmstoexperiencea Fowler/Jamison Page5

Case 8 Analysis: Gainesboro Machine Tools | MBAD 6154 | Spring 2008

dropinfutureearnings,and,thatstockpricetendstofallwhenpayoutprogramsarecut butstockpricesdonotalwaysrisewhenpayoutsareelevated.Knowingthis,the markettypicallyexpectsequivalentactivityaftersimilarannouncements.


PayoutEvolution

Anothernoteworthyobservationisthatfirmstoday,regardlessoftheirprofitabilityand othercharacteristics,havebecomelesslikelytopaydividends.Theproportionoffirms payingcashdividendsfellfrom66.5%in1978to20.8%in1999.Morepubliclytraded firmsthaneverbeforearesmallbusinesseswithlowprofitabilitybutstronggrowth opportunities.Itisalsobecausefirmshavealowerpropensitytopaydividendssince thecommonpresumptionisthatvariousfactorsmakedividendslessvaluablethan capitalgains,(Fama).Inarecentsurveyof384financialexecutives,maintaining dividendlevel(fordividendpayingfirms)isfoundtobeequallyasimportantasother investmentdecisions.Fortheexecutives,projectingstabilityofearningsisimportant, buttheyfeltthelinkbetweenearningsanddividendshaswaned.Manynowfavor repurchasesbecauseofitsbuiltinflexibilityanditseffectstoearningspershare.(Brav, Graham,Harvey,Michaely). Recommendation Payoutpoliciesvarygreatlyfromoneindustrytoanother.Maturemarketstendtopay highdividendsbecausetherearefewopportunitiesforgrowth.Forexample,the utilitiessectorisstrictlyregulated,limitingacquisitionsandinnovations,therefore earningsmaybedistributedinlargequantitieswithminimalneedforsavings.The technologysector,ontheotherhand,tendstopaynodividendsbecausethereare considerableopportunitiesforgrowth,includingcontinualresearchanddevelopment, marketshareinitiatives,andacquisitions.Afirminanindustrywithabundantgrowth prospectsmayprefertohaveexcesscashonhandtoexploitthemanymoneymaking opportunities,however,theoptimalpayoutpolicyforeachindividualfirmwillvary. Gainesborohistoricallyemployedhighdividendswhenitscorebusinesswasinmature industries.Themachinetoolsandmanufacturingindustryofferedfewopportunitiesfor growth.Gainesborosnewinitiativestakeplaceinthesoftwareandhightechnology industry,anindustryripewithinvestmentandgrowthopportunities,bothdomesticand international.Gainesborosmanagementengagedintheseexploitswithhighdividend payoutsandhasbeenpunishedforitwithextraordinarylosses.Itiswiththisreason thatwerecommendGainesborointroduceazerodividendpolicy. Wefeelazerodividendpolicycoupledwitharesidualstockrepurchaseprogramisthe optimalpayoutpolicyforGainesboro.Aclear,stablezerodividendpolicyeffectively communicatesthatGainesboroisaggressivelypursuingopportunitiesforgrowthina rapidlyexpandingindustry.Aresidualstockrepurchaseprogramisrecommended becauseofitsflexibilityandsignalingeffects.Announcingsuchaninitiativewould publiclycommunicatethatthecompanyhasfullfaithandconfidenceinfutureearnings. Fowler/Jamison Page6

Case 8 Analysis: Gainesboro Machine Tools | MBAD 6154 | Spring 2008

RepurchasingshareswouldservetoinflateEPS,and,althoughnoassurancescanbe made,mayinfluencethesharepriceupward. Incomeseeksmaybeunattractedtoazerodividendpolicybutthisinvestorgrouphas alreadybeenactivelydivesting.Thefirmstraditionalclientelehasbeenturningover sincetheinitialdividendcutin2004,a30%decreaseasseeninexhibit4.Growth investors,uponhearingthatGainesborowillreinvestinitself,expanddomestically,and pursueinternationalprospects,shouldbereattractedtothestock,assuggestedbythe clienteleeffect. NoneofGainesborospeersintheindustrialhightechsoftwareindustrypaydividends, (Autodesk,withalow6%payout,beingtheonlyexception),asseeninexhibit6. Identifiedalsoinexhibit6areGainesborospeersintheelectricalequipment manufacturingindustry.ItspeersinthisindustrytradewithaP/Eratiointhe1617 range,regardlessofpayoutratio.NotethatbothHubbellandThomas&Bettstradeat 17.6P/EeventhoughHubbellpaysdividendsof52%ofnetincomeandThomas&Betts donotpaydividendsatall.Itseemseithereachfirmhasfounddependableclientele investorsorpayoutformisirrelevanttoinvestorsinthisindustry. Gainesboroshouldalsomoveforwardwithrebranding.Thenewname,Gainesboro AdvancedSystemsInternational,moreaccuratelyrepresentstheirproductsandtheir business,willhelptoprojecttheirgrowthpotentialintheadvancedsystemsindustry.It willalsoassistintheattractionofgrowthinvestorclienteleinthehighgrowthsoftware industry. Gainesborosnewimageandnewpayoutpolicywillpositionthemforsuccessintheir newindustry.

Fowler/Jamison

Page7

Case 8 Analysis: Gainesboro Machine Tools | MBAD 6154 | Spring 2008

CitedWorksandRecommendedReadings

Benartzi,Shlomo.Michaely,Roni.Thaler,Richard.1997.Dochangesindividendssignalthe futureorthepast?.TheJournalofFinance.Vol.52,No.3,pg10071034. Brav,Alon.Graham,JohnR..Harvey,CampbellR..Michaely,Roni.2005.Payoutpolicyinthe 21stcentury.JournalofFinancialEconomics.Vol77,pg483527. Brigham,EugeneF..Ehrhardt,MichaelC..Chapter18.DistributionstoShareholders:Dividends andRepurchases.FinancialManagement:TheoryandPractice,11thEdition.2005 Canina,Linda.1999.Themarketsperceptionoftheinformationconveyedbydividend announcements.JournalofMultinationalFinancialManagement.Vol9,pg113. Chen,Chung.Wu,Chunchi.1999.Thedynamicsofdividends,earningsandprices:evidenceand implicationsfordividendsmoothingandsignaling.JournalofEmpiricalFinance.Vol6, pg2958. DeAngelo,Harry.DeAngelo,Linda.2005.TheirrelevanceoftheMMdividendirrelevance theorem.JournalofFinancialEconomics.Vol.79,pg293315. DeAngelo,Harry.DeAngelo,Linda.2008.Replyto:dividendpolicy:reconcilingDDwithMM. JournalofFinancialEconomics.Vol87,pg532533. Fama,Eugene.French,KennethR..2000.Disappearingdividends:changingfirmcharacteristics orlowerpropensitytopay?.JournalofFinancialEconomics.Vol60,pg343. Handley,JohnC.2007.Dividendpolicy:reconcilingDDwithMM.JournalofFinancial Economics.Vol.87,pg528531. Hillis,Scott.ApplePlansnoDividendorBuyback.Reuters.2008March3rd. Http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080304/bs_nm/apple_dc_2.Accessed2008March 8th. Miller,MertonH..Modigliani,Franco.1961.DividendPolicy,Growth,andtheValuationof Shares.JournalofBusiness.Vol.34,No.4,pg411433. Skinner,Douglas.2008.Theevolvingrelationbetweenearnings,dividends,andstock repurchases.JournalofFinancialEconomics. Sullivan,Missy.DividendStocksPayOff.Forbes.2002February12th. http://www.forbes.com/2002/02/12/0212adviser.html.Accessed2008March8th.

Fowler/Jamison

Page8

You might also like