Scribd
Upload
37 views1 page

Mod FGassmnt

This document provides a rubric for assessing written presentations in Modules F and G. It evaluates presentations based on 4 criteria: Content and Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics. Each criterion has descriptors to assess performance from excellent to poor. Points are assigned for each criterion and deducted based on length or formatting issues. The total possible score is 40 points.

Uploaded by

api-3803355
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views1 page

Mod FGassmnt

This document provides a rubric for assessing written presentations in Modules F and G. It evaluates presentations based on 4 criteria: Content and Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics. Each criterion has descriptors to assess performance from excellent to poor. Points are assigned for each criterion and deducted based on length or formatting issues. The total possible score is 40 points.

Uploaded by

api-3803355
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

State of Israel

Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport


English Inspectorate

Rubric for Assessing Written Presentation - Modules F and G 2 0 0 6


Criteria Descriptors
• information is relevant to the • some information is • information is irrelevant to
topic irrelevant to the topic the topic
• text is well organized • text is fairly well organized • text is poorly organized
• content is easily understood • content is sometimes • content cannot be understood
Content and • text is written mostly in pupil's difficult to follow • text is not written in pupil's
Organization own words • chunks of the text are not own words
written in pupil's own words
8 6 4 2 0
• correct use of varied and rich • correct use of appropriate • very limited or inappropriate
vocabulary vocabulary vocabulary
• appropriate choice of • several errors in choice of • frequent errors in choice of
Vocabulary word/idiom word/idiom word/idiom
• use of appropriate register • occasional use of • use of inappropriate register
inappropriate register
8 6 4 2 0
• correct use of advanced • correct use of basic language • consistent incorrect use of
language structures structures basic language structures
• hardly any errors of word • incorrect or no use of • frequent errors of word order,
order, connectors, pronouns, advanced language structures connectors, pronouns,
Language Use
prepositions • several errors of word order, prepositions
connectors, pronouns,
prepositions
16 12 8 4 0
• hardly any errors of spelling, • several errors of spelling, • frequent errors of spelling,
punctuation, capitalization, punctuation, capitalization, punctuation, capitalization,
Mechanics
correct use of paragraphing run-ons, limited use of run-ons, no paragraphing
paragraphing
8 6 4 2 0
Teachers can give in-between grades e.g. 14 pts.

Deduction for length:

# of Words Point Deduction # of Words Point Deduction


120 - 140 --- 70 – 80 13 - 17
110 – 120 1-3 60 – 70 17 - 20
100 - 110 3-7 50 - 60 20 - 23
90 – 100 7 - 10 less than 50 40
80 - 90 10 - 13

Deduction for letter format:


• If the format of presentation does not include all the required elements, deduct 2 - 4 points.

TOTAL: ___ / 40

You might also like