100% found this document useful (1 vote)
5K views

Job Mix For Bituminous Macadam

This document outlines the job mix formula for a bituminous macadam road project in Kheda Palela, India. It provides the sieve analysis results from three trials, with the third trial found to have the best gradation based on cumulative deviations. The optimum binder content was determined to be 3.50% based on the trials. Key metrics of the job mix formula include a maximum density of 2.163 gm/cc at the optimum binder content, along with requirements for air voids, flow value, voids in mineral aggregate, Marshall stability, and voids filled with bitumen.

Uploaded by

Arun Kogta
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
5K views

Job Mix For Bituminous Macadam

This document outlines the job mix formula for a bituminous macadam road project in Kheda Palela, India. It provides the sieve analysis results from three trials, with the third trial found to have the best gradation based on cumulative deviations. The optimum binder content was determined to be 3.50% based on the trials. Key metrics of the job mix formula include a maximum density of 2.163 gm/cc at the optimum binder content, along with requirements for air voids, flow value, voids in mineral aggregate, Marshall stability, and voids filled with bitumen.

Uploaded by

Arun Kogta
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

JOB MIX FORMULA ( BITUMINOUS MACADUM )

NAME OF WORK

: CONS. OF KOTHIA AGUCHA VIA KHEDA PALELA ROAD

NAME OF CONTRACTOR : M/S GIRIRAJ CONSTRUCTION, BIJAINAGAR


SOURCE OF MATERIAL

: BIJAINAGAR

(A) SIEVE ANALYSIS

SIEVE SIZE

MORTH

MEAN

IN MM

RANGE %

VALUE

LAB JOB NO. 160

INDIVIDUAL SIEVE ANALYSIS

22.4

13.2

11.2

TRIAL %

6.7

22.4
COMB GR

13.2
5

11.2

30

II TRIAL %

6.7

40

22.4
25

COMB GR

13.2
5

11.2

30

III TRIAL %

6.7

35

22.4
30

COMB GR

10%

13.2
30%

11.2
30%

SUMMAR

6.7
30%

S. No.
COMB GR

26.5

100

100

100

100

100

100

30

40

25

100

30

35

30

100

10

30

30

30

100

19

90-100

95

65.34

100

100

100

3.27

30

40

25

98.26

3.27

30

35

30

98.26

6.53

30

30

30

96.53

13.2

56-88

72

1.16

43.42

98.86

100

0.06

13.03

39.54

25

77.62

0.06

13.03

34.6

30

77.68

13.03

29.65

30

72.67

4.75

16-36

26

0.22

1.66

70.14

0.07

0.66

17.53

18.26

0.07

0.58

21.04

21.68

0.07

0.5

21.04

21.6

2.36

4 to 19

11.5

42.56

10.64

10.64

12.76

12.76

12.76

12.76

0.3

2 to 10

3.44

0.86

0.86

1.03

1.03

1.03

1.03

0.08

0-8

1.4

0.35

0.35

0.42

0.42

0.42

0.42

314.5

Note : ( A ) TRIAL III is the Best Gradation since the Cumulative sums of all Negative / Positive deviations ( irrespective of signs ) is minimum i.e. 9.49
( B ) Optimum Binder Content (80/100 ) = 3.50 %
( C ) Maximum Density At Optimum Binder Content = 2.163 gm/cc

Executive Engineer

Assistant Engineer

PWD SI & QC Division

PWD SI & QC

Bhilwara

Sub. Division Asind

SUMMARY OF JOB MIX

% BINDER / ITEM

Density gm/cc
% Air Voids (VIM)
Flow Value (mm)
% Voids in mineral agg (VMA)
Marshall Stability (Kg at 60)
% Voids Filled with Bitumen (VFB)

3.50%

You might also like