Generation Control in Small Isolated Power Systems: M. Milošević, Student Member IEEE, G. Andersson, Fellow IEEE
Generation Control in Small Isolated Power Systems: M. Milošević, Student Member IEEE, G. Andersson, Fellow IEEE
Systems
M. Milošević, Student Member IEEE, G. Andersson, Fellow IEEE
The detailed model of the synchronous generator can be There are switching constraints that include capacitors (or
found in [4]. The generator is modeled using the following voltage sources) which cannot be short-circuited, and
stator winding equations: inductances (or current sources) which cannot be open-
circuited. Therefore, the two switching cells of the phase leg
U dr = − Ra I dr + x 'q I qr + E 'd should be complementary. That means that only one of the
(1) switches can be closed at any time. In other words, in order to
U qr = − Ra I qr − x 'd I dr + E 'q
prevent the current source to be open-circuited, one of the
switches has to be closed at any time. Let T be the switching
where, Ra is the stator winding resistance, x 'd and x 'q , period and m p be the duty cycle of the top switch s p , and mn
and E 'd and E 'q are d-axis and q-axis transient be the duty cycle of the down switch sn . It can be obtained the
resistances and voltages, respectively. voltage and current relationships in average, assuming the
The rotor winding equations are given by: voltage udc and the current iL are continuous:
dPr
Tp + Pr = Ps (u ) − Pt (u ); Pl = Pr + Pt (u ) (14)
dt
dQr Fig. 5. Isolated power network with DC battery storage
Tq Qr = Qs (u ) − Qt (u ); Ql = Qr + Qt (u ) (15)
dt
where Pr and Qr are the corresponding load states, Tp and Tq IV. ACTIVE POWER AND VOLTAGE CONTROL
Fig. 9. Simulation results when the active power fed to the load through
the VSI is controlled (dashed lines present the system with initial load,
and solid line with load changes)
Fig. 11. Simulation results with grid voltage control when there is a DC
battery storage in the isolated network
B. Simulation Results with Grid Voltage Control
The simulation results of the network controlling the grid Similar behavior of the system is obtained if there are
voltage are given in Fig. 10. It can be seen that the grid oscillations in the PV active power production (Fig. 12).
voltage is kept constant which indirectly implies the control of
the frequency of the generator, since the active power load
consumption is compensated by the controllable DC current
source, not by the generator’s production.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Financial support from the Alliance of Global Sustainability
(AGS) is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] M. N. Marwali, Jin-Woo Jung; A. Keyhani, Control of distributed
generation systems - Part II: Load sharing control, pp. 1551- 1561.
[2] J. W. Black, M. Ilic, Demand-based frequency control for distributed
generation, IEEE PES Summer Meeting, 21-25 July 2002, Vol.1, pp.
427 – 432
[3] J.S.G. Ehnberg, M.H.J.Bollen, Generation reliability for small isolated
power systems entirely based on renewable sources, IEEE PES General
Meeting, June 2004, Vol.2, pp. 2322 – 2327.
[4] Chee-Mun Ong, Dynamic Simulation of Electric Machinery, Prentice
Fig. 13. Simulation results when the storage current frequency is controlled Hall, 1998.
[5] Z. Ye, Modelling and control of parallel three-phase PWM converters,
PhD dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, September 2000.
[6] D. J. Hill, Nonlinear dynamic load models with recovery for voltage
Comparing Fig. 11 and Fig. 13 it can be seen that the stability studies, IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 8 (1), 1993, pp.
method that uses the grid voltage control brings the generator 166-176.
frequency to its nominal value faster. On the other hand, the [7] D. Karlsson, D. J. Hill, Modelling and identification of nonlinear
method that uses the frequency control of the storage current dynamic loads in power systems, IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 9
(1), 1994, pp. 157-166.
needs more time to bring the grid voltage magnitude to its [8] P. G. Barbosa et al., Novel control strategy for grid-connected DC-AC
nominal value. converters with load power factor and MPPT control,
Fig. 14 shows a comparison between these two methods for http://www.solar.coppe.ufrj.br/rolim.html
the load/generation control. It can be seen that the voltage [9] R. Lasseter et al., Integration of distributed energy resources, CERTS,
April 2002. ; http:/certs.lbl.gov/pdf/LBNL_50829.pdf
control method needs less time to bring the system frequency [10] W. Xu, Y. Mansour, Voltage stability analysis using generic dynamic
back to its nominal value. load models, IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 9 (1), 1994, pp. 479-
493.
[11] P. Kundur, Power system stability and control,McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994.
Fig. 14. Comparison between two methods for the load/generation control
VI. CONCLUSION
Two different methods for generation control in a small
isolated power network are presented. The grid voltage
control method has better performance with respect to the time
needed for the system recovery after the load disturbance. The
frequency control method needs more time to bring the
voltage back to its nominal values after a load disturbance.