Totalbpp 3
Totalbpp 3
q Process of Planning
Defines and prioritizes the segments resulting from the users' needs
discovery process. Decisions are predicated on a fact-based analysis of
end-user, customer, and channel needs, together with a detailed
understanding of the purchase process and value chain.
Translates users' and customers' needs into a specified set of products and
services that imaginatively address the needs as well as prospects' value
Analog Devices, Inc. Company Confidential I-3
I. Executive Summary
Step 9: Recommendations
Explicitly states the dependencies on, and the required actions of other
ADI entities or external organizations that are necessary if the plan is to be
successful. Particular emphasis is placed on clearly stating required new
technologies and manufacturing capacities.
Describes functional-level tactical plans that address the key success factors
itemized in Step 2, and considers the implications on the next years' Hoshin and
Business Fundamentals plans.
Figure 2.
Business Planning Process
Presentation Order vs. Working Order
1. Statement of Purpose
2. Five-Year Objectives
Start
{ 3.
4.
Customers and Channels
Competition
5. Necessary Product & Services
6. Development/Introduction Plan
7. Financial Analysis
8. Potential Problems
9. Recommendations
10. Benchmark Plan
The order of the process steps, and the questions one should answer before
advancing to the next step, are shown in Figure 3, page I-7. As mentioned
above, the process begins at Step 3. Steps 3 and 4 are the heart of the process
because, through them, the needs of the customers and positions of the
competitors are understood. The strategy is derived from this insight. The
activity then shifts to Step 5 where product (and service) proposals are
considered.
The real profit from this activity results from designing products for customer
loyalty based on imaginative understandings gained in working through Steps
5 and 6. (The concept of loyalty here goes beyond customer satisfaction and
results in a significantly lower cost of doing business than that required to
attract new customers.)
The financial analysis, Step 7, may raise questions about the practicality of the
financial objectives or the viability of the functional plans. As a result, earlier
assumptions and conclusions will need to be revisited.
As you can see, iteration through the process is a typical occurrence and a
natural consequence of the self-corroboration mechanism inherent in its
design. Discoveries made and conclusions reached at any point in the
Business Planning Process might cause a previous step to be substantially
revisited. While the process ideally doesn't require frequent revisitations of
earlier Steps, experience with the Business Planning Process suggests
otherwise. Since the objective is to create a self-consistent business plan,
revisitations are typically required.
Figure 3
q Overview
Overview
Understanding the content of the Business Planning Process, with its emphasis
on rigorous, fact-based analysis, is a demanding undertaking. Just as
challenging, although easily overlooked, is the task of effectively managing
the process. How an organization approaches the process is as important as
the analysis itself because "planning" is the real goal of the exercise, not an
elaborate plan document. The most long-lasting benefits are derived from
achieving goal consensus, focus, and forming a basis for effective
implementation.
Also, in following the process, one has to have faith in its self-corroborating
qualities. A business team will never have all the data it wants, but at some
point it is important to cut off debate and make decisions. The plan and its
assumptions can be fine-tuned later as more information is gathered. The
logic and flow of the process significantly reduce the risk of making a "wrong
turn" along the way.
Before initiating the process, there are several key decisions the general
manager and functional staff need to make. These will each be described and
then the mechanics of getting the planning team started will be discussed.
In Following the Process for the First Time, Two Basic Options are Available:
Following this method, the organization adheres to the intent of the steps
but uses existing or readily accessible data to develop a provisional plan
for the first year. Learning from the process, the group institutionalizes
new data gathering processes to validate the Benchmark plan assumptions
and to support a more sophisticated analysis the second year.
This technique may also be used when the functional staff is unable to
commit sufficient resources for original research.
The most successful practitioners of Business Planning say the process should
be considered as a tool for continuous process improvement. It can take three
or more years of business planning iterations to reach the point when the full
value of the benefits are realized. According to their experience along the
way, an organization:
q Learns more each year and gets more efficient in the process.
q Gathers better quality data.
q Achieves finer resolution and greater accuracy in testing hypotheses.
While the team should touch on all the process steps the first year, certain
steps should be given priority. The amount of effort put into the remaining
steps depends upon the extent of existing plans and how much time the staff
has available. A typical scenario for an ongoing business might be to
emphasize Steps 3/4, 2 and 8. (This assumes the organization already has a
purpose, product plans, and functional plans of some kind.) The second year
the majority of the effort would be on Steps 3/4, but additional emphasis
would be put on doing a more rigorous job with Steps 1, 5, 6, and 9.
The point is to decide what steps to emphasize given the team's experience
and the resources it is willing to commit. The other parts of the plan can then
be refined in future years.
How the team is organized and functions depends to some extent on the
situation. Those entities involved in one business typically organize one
planning team with the general manager and functional managers making the
key decisions as a unit, with extensive collaboration from the extended staff.
Entities with multiple businesses, on the other hand, have found it helpful to
establish multi-disciplinary teams for each business, usually led by a
functional manager. These teams draw most of the conclusions themselves
and then make final plan recommendations to the combined functional staff.
The General Manager is the owner of the process and is responsible for the
quality of the results. He or she:
q Teaches the team about the process and coaches them through.
q Manages process mechanics (scheduling, communications, issue
escalation).
q Helps derive and test hypotheses through fact-based analyses.
q Guides the team through successive iterations as circumstances require.
q Encourages creativity and breakthrough thinking.
q Integrates thoughts and oversees the production of deliverables.
To accomplish much of the work and involve those people with the most
detailed knowledge of the markets, technologies, and operating processes, the
GM forms a planning team consisting of the functional staff and key
department heads. This team is frequently expanded to include peer level
managers from partner organizations and other individuals whose expertise is
helpful with specific tasks.
q Guides the progress of the work groups, resolving resource issues as they
arise.
q Reviews the results and conclusions.
q Decides the classification schema used as the basis for research, user
needs segmentation approach, target markets, business strategy, and
objectives.
q Oversees functional plan development and goal congruence.
q Defines issues that form the basis for continued work and fine-tuning of
plan elements over the succeeding year.
q Integrates plan elements into a coherent aggregate-level plan for the
organization when multiple businesses exist within the entity.
To start the process, the General Manager, functional team, and facilitator
need to meet and make some key decisions.
1. They should agree on the goals and scope of the process for the next
iteration:
Visualizing what the output of the process will be for example, a set of 20
slides documenting the conclusions or a detailed 100-page
documenthelps set everyone's expectations of what the end product
looks like.
2. The staff needs to decide what resources are involved and how they are
organized:
Figure 4
Flow Diagram of the Business Planning Process
GENERAL MANAGER
• Considers process objectives and strategy
• Chooses a facilitator
FUNCTIONAL TEAM
• Defines process objectives, strategy
• Time commitment, schedule
• Procedure, organization
• Participants
KICK-OFF MEETING
• Understand process structure and expectations
• Organize teams
• Review procedures and schedule
• Communicate assignments
When the staff is clear on what they want to accomplish and how, the
next activity is to hold some sort of kick-off meeting or off-site meeting
to get the rest of the planning team behind the program.
For the first few years this meeting is very critical for building
commitment to the process and enthusiasm over the potential results.
Any equivocation on the part of the General Manager or the functional
staff will be quickly recognized. If this is perceived, then the activity
will be viewed as a "fire drill," and the process loses much of its
potency.
The work teams then define their own work plan and schedule. They
meet regularly, perhaps weekly, to track progress, share insights,
brainstorm solutions, and develop alternatives. Some groups find it
helpful, at the beginning, to develop what are called "ghost charts" to
visualize what kind of findings (tables, pie charts, and so on) they would
like to work toward gathering as they proceed.
When tasks span a long period of time, then progress review meetings
with the functional staff are advisable to confirm direction, get feedback,
and share knowledge.
Achieving Consensus:
As the steps are completed, even if the validation process is not complete,
the work groups should capture a rough draft of the conclusions in both
summary slides and supporting documentation. The material can be
revised, as needed, if conclusions change through successive process
iteration.
The facilitator then edits the final drafts into a single package as originally
agreed to by the functional staff.
One of the most potent benefits of any planning exercise is to achieve a state
where each employee has internalized enough of the key concepts of the plan
so he or she understands the mission, and can personally relate their job
objectives to the value proposition. To reach this condition, it is imperative
the General Manager and functional staff personally communicate the plan to
all employees and help them understand what it means for their work.
When such a situation occurs, part of the planning team should reconvene
to assess the situation, consider the implications, and recommend
appropriate adjustments to the plan. (An experienced Business Planning
team should be able to make such adjustments two or three times in a
single year, taking a couple of weeks for each "mini-turn" of the plan.)
The period between plans is also the time to follow through on issues raised
during the process that require ongoing work, such as gathering more data,
refining assumptions, or tuning the plan.
Sample time lines are offered for two different planning scenarios. Figure
5 shows a schedule for a first time planning effort following the "full
scale" approach. Note that five weeks are allotted for primary research.
In contrast, Figure 6 depicts a schedule for an early update to a pre-
existing plan. This assumes research is done continuously during the year
so the planning process relates exclusively to revising assumptions and
making decisions.
ACTIVITY WEEKS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
II-16
II. Leading the Business team Through the Process
Figure 6
Sample Timeline - Annual Update Process
WEEKS
ACTIVITY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Lock-Off Meeting
Validate/Revise Segmentation
3
User/Channel Needs (Customers)
4
Competitive Advantage (Competitors)
5
Update Necessary Products/Service
Revisit Purpose 1
2
Plan Approval 9
10
Benchmark Plan
II-17
II. Leading the Business team Through the Process
III. Assessing an Organization's Planning Performance
To support this, the following table has been assembled, based on the combined
experience of many different Business Planning Process users. The table provides
a series of (qualitative) metrics of planning performance. It describes three levels
of performance, beginner, intermediate, and advanced, along twelve dimensions:
q Two deal with the rationale of planning (Why create or review a plan?)
q Eight address the mechanics (What are the characteristics of a good plan?)
q Two describe the benefits (What value does the plan provide?)
In most instances, the criteria are additive as you read from left to right on a given
dimension. While the concepts are admittedly imprecise and there are shades of
gray between levels, the intent is to provide a benchmark for organizations
involved in the planning process, and a means by which they can learn what
would be required to advance to a "higher level" of planning sophistication.
Once you have calibrated where you are, the question arises whether this is where
you want to be. Consider the costs and time required to move to the right on the
mechanics dimensions and weigh this against the value of becoming more
advanced in the benefits dimensions.
RATIONALE
Motivation to • Driven by events • Focus efforts of team. • Continuous process
do planning (e.g. BMP) with • Driven by events but improvement (events
little continuity planning results become snapshots).
in plans between cumulative.
occurrences.
MECHANICS
Insight to • Use anecdotal • Conduct specific • Develop rigorous
User's needs information research into user quantitative model of
(trip reports, needs (customer chooser behavior.
customer interviews, choice • Understand target
visits). modeling, focus prospects' value chain.
groups).
MECHANICS
Insight into • List competitive • Conduct an early stage of • Perform best in class
competitive strengths and product bench-marking benchmarking.
advantage weaknesses. (incorporate direct • Understand competitive
customer feedback). advantage in context of
• Link each strength and customers' value chain.
weakness to user needs • Model implications of
and prioritize. competitors' strategies
on chooser shares.
• Have a system for
continually developing
new competitive
advantage.
MECHANICS
Quality of • Produce: Product • Produce: Product & • Produce: Product &
implementation & Marketing Services, Sales & Services,
planning plans. Marketing, • Channel & Marketing,
• Understand basics Manufacturing & Quality Manufacturing &
of cost, time-to- plans. Quality, Skills/Training
market, and • Discuss plans with & Technology plans.
functionality partner organizations. • Integrate plans with
tradeoffs. • Consider make vs. buy. partner organizations.
• Evaluate partnering • Match value delivery
options (external and system to value
internal). proposition.
• Anticipate risks of • Develop contingency
possible external events. plans for risk scenarios.
• Work issues to fine-tune
strategy decisions on a
continuous basis.
MECHANICS
Scope of • Extrapolate • Forecast based on • Forecast based on
financial revenues. market model. industry life cycle model.
analysis • Project • Produce income • Analyze cost of value
departmental statement. chain activities.
costs based on • Project capital • Implement cost-drive
ratios or investments. based interactive
headcount. • Understand cash flows. modeling tool.
• Produce pro forma
financial statements
under various risk
scenarios.
• Evaluate present value of
future cash flows.
BENEFITS • Organization • Functional plans linked • Employees understand
Internal focus objectives directly to meeting mission and can relate
achieved understood and Hoshin and key success their job objectives to the
key success factor objectives. value proposition and
factors tracked by strategic intent.
functional staff. • Key success factors
• Key elements of widely recognized and
plan com- tracked.
municated widely • Channels directed at high
to employees and probability prospects.
partners.
Section VI, Product and Technology Development was added to the ADI
Business Planning Process (BPP) in June of 1998. This section was designed to
explain the important linkages between the BPP and the New Product and
Technology Development Processes. In addition, nine new tools have been
added to Section V, Tools and Templates. These tools are based on the
research, “Revolutionizing Product Development,” by Wheelwright and Clark of
Harvard Business School and the Marketing Skills training material presented by
Chris Halliwell of The California Institute of Technology.
The numbering sequence of the BPP sections has changed to reflect the
addition of the Product and Technology Development section.
Note:
The terms "users" and "customers" are frequently used interchangeably
although they are different. "Users" are the individuals who apply the product
to solve the end problem, while "customers" are the economic buyers
responsible for approving the purchase. For simplicity in this document, we
will employ the word "users" to mean both users and customers.
Goal:
To define and prioritize market segments on the basis of market demand and
then to target specific segments on the basis of sustainable competitive
advantage.
Note:
Objective:
The purpose of Steps 3 and 4 is to target market segments that are financially
attractive and in which ADI has a high probability of achieving a leading
market position. Doing this will involve four activities:
For both the customer and competitor analyses, it is important that all of the
following issues are examined:
q Strategic Perspective
q Operational Perspective
q Financial Perspective
• Profitabilities
• Capital Intensities
• Investment Histories
• Risks
• Leverages
• Breakevens
• Economics
As stated earlier, two of the major objectives of Steps 3 and 4 are to segment
the market based on users' needs and then to target specific segments based on
ADI's ability to sustain a competitive advantage. In other words, the goal is to
match ADI's strengths and weaknesses to users' needs. To better understand
these objectives, an understanding of segmentation, competitive advantage,
and the concept of a value chain are particularly important. If the reader is
unfamiliar with these topics, refer to Section VIII, "Key Concepts".
Recommended Process:
Business Planning is an iterative process of data collection, hypothesis
generation, and validation. The information gathered in Steps 3 and 4 will
help the business team to tentatively select global market segments on which
to focus and to begin developing a strategy for competitive advantage.
However, as specific product ideas are tested, as ADI's strengths and
weaknesses are assessed, and as the financial consequences are understood,
these initial hypotheses may need to be reconsidered.
The outline for the process of Steps 3 and 4 is as follows (refer to Figure 8):
Figure 8
A Collect Existing
Information-Custom ers,
Channels, Competitors
B Analyze Market,
Pick Focus for
Investigation
la ter iteration
C Conduct Research
into N eeds, Buying
Factors, Purchase F Perform Quantitative
Process Research to Develop
Deeper Understanding
of Target Segments
(Ongoing)
D Discover M arket
Segm ents
E Analyze Market
Attractiveness and
Target Segments
Steps 1, 2
1. The goal of the first step is, therefore, to define a useful schema for
classifying potential customers with the objective of focusing the
business team's energies on those categories that seem the most
attractive. The rationale used for picking a classification schema
should include: it offers a fair probability of being a first-order
determinant of purchase behavior, and it lends itself to data capture
and quantification. (See Tool 1.)
2. Use this schema to analyze the data and quantify market size and
growth rate by category. Consider the geographical and
distribution dimensions. Where possible, compare several sources
of information to validate the estimates. (See Tools 1, 2.)
4. At this point, the business team reviews the findings and prioritizes
those market categories that offer the most promise in terms of
market size, growth rate, and competitive position. The bottom
line criteria are ability to win and size of return. (See Tool 4.)
At this stage the research can include both qualitative techniques, such
as interviews and focus groups, and more quantitative methods, such as
choice modeling. Because statistically valid research is a longer term
proposition, it is typically addressed as an ongoing implementation issue
and will be addressed more directly under F. (See Tool 12.)
This phase of the process involves using the qualitative and quantitative
needs information to segment the market along the lines of chooser
preferences.
The ongoing phase of Steps 3 and 4 is the process of refining the team's
understanding of the target segments in a statistically projectable way.
This is helpful in fine-tuning segment definitions, developing a
quantitative basis for prioritizing solution requirements, testing value
propositions or product concepts, and learning how to reach prospects.
Audit Questions:
Step 4: Competitors
q What are the competitors' strategies for the segments? What barriers to
entry and exit have they created? What is truly unique about their actions
or behaviors relative to the rest of the pack?
q Have you quantified different vendors' strengths and weaknesses relative
to each buying factor in the target market segments?
q How committed or focused is each competitor in the segment? What are
the differences, if any, between what they say and what they do?
q Have you defined a basis for sustainable competitive advantage for ADI?
For differentiation through the value chain? Do you have a strategy for
circumventing and exploiting barriers to entry?
q Do you know what positions different vendors hold in the customers'
minds today? How will their perceptions of ADI need to change in order
to meet your goals?
Resources:
Books and Articles:
Goal:
To specify a set of products and services that imaginatively address users'
needs and prospect organizations' value chains and, thereby, win customer
loyalty.
Objective:
The purpose of Step 5 is to describe what benefits or uses are to be provided
to customers, not how. These benefits are described from the potential buyers'
point of view and in their terms. Step 5 should generate the right answers
from the customer's point of view, using whatever level of abstraction
customers feel most comfortable with. (Product implementations are the
subject of Step 6.) The concepts should be considered in the context of the
prospects' value chain since this way of thinking helps define the scope of the
benefits to be addressed, and also encourages creativity in considering related
services that may increase the perceived value of the supplier.
Recommended Process:
In the first step of the process, review the needs data as a business team
to assure everyone understands what was learned and to internalize the
customers' points of view. Draw a picture of the problem and what the
customers' environment will look like in five years. The goal here is to
try to project how the customer thinks. (See Tool 30 and 30A.)
Once the team is in the right frame of mind, the idea is to first
brainstorm what customers really need or, in other words, should want.
To do this, project what problems the customers will face over the next
five year period and anticipate where these problems are likely to lead
users in terms of desired solution utility. Ask yourselves what users
"dream of" to help solve their problems? What benefits will they expect
the solution to deliver? What attributes should it have? The goal of this
exercise is to predict what a customer should want if their vision of the
alternatives was unlimited. (See Tool 30A and 31.)
The task of the group then becomes sorting between the conclusions in
Steps B and C to develop a hypothesis of needed product utility.
One analogy that can be useful when thinking about this process is of
two side-by-side amusement park carouselsÑone tracks users' needs, and
the other monitors technology developments. As the carousels pass, if
they travel in opposite directions, various combinations of needs and
technology come together and occasionally result in matches that
represent real breakthrough opportunities.
To avoid the trap of assuming the business should provide its products
and services in the same way as in the past, consider alternative ways of
delivering the benefits defined in Steps B and C in the context of the
prospects' value chains.
For example:
The data resulting from this testing should enable the organization to
prioritize product and service offerings, as well as attributes within
product offerings, and to identify segments where chooser perceptions
are the same. (See Tools 6 and 35.)
Since the customer "buys" not only the products and services of a
vendor, but also a series of intangible qualities, such as their reputation,
"look and feel," and so on, you should consider what attributes ADI
needs to be perceived as having in order to gain prospects' confidence
and hold their loyalty.
Audit Questions:
o Do the proposed product offerings meet the customers' and channels'
future needs in an imaginative way? A complete way?
o Will ADI's offering be unique in the marketplace? How will it likely
compare to where competitors are headed?
o Have you identified localization requirements to meet the market needs of
the countries you have targeted?
o Have several possible offerings been quantitatively tested with customers
to help select the best?
o Have you identified what it will take to make the prospect believe ADI
offers the preferred solution?
Resources:
o Article: "The House of Quality" by John Hauser and Don Clausing,
Harvard Business Review, May-June 1988.
o Books: Conceptual Blockbusting and The Care and Feeding of Ideas by
James L. Adams, Addison-Wesley.
Goal:
To provide a clear sense of direction for the organization and its partners.
Objective:
Step 1 describes the fundamental set of reasons for an organization's existence.
As such, it provides a context for decision-making when evaluating business
opportunities, as well as a framework individuals can use to direct their work.
If a strategic intent has been defined, the purpose statement describes the
strategy for moving in this much longer-term direction over the next 3 to 5
years.
Recommended Process:
To the extent a "strategic intent" has already been defined, it will provide
a set of boundary conditions or constraints that should influence the
organization's purpose.
The provisional plan created in Step 1 is tested later in the process. The
later definition of necessary products and services and attendant
development plans may prove or disprove the viability of the strategy.
Of course, the cost of executing the program, which is analyzed in Step
7, may also bring about a re-examination of the provisional thinking.
Research into user needs and necessary products and services (Steps 3
and 5) is frequently translated into a "vision of the future world" which
is incorporated into Step 1 on a later iteration.
Audit Questions:
Resources:
Goal:
To define a clear point of focus, a "finish line" to work toward.
Objective:
Step 2 is intended to translate the statement of purpose into a series of
measurable objectives for each function. The idea is to identify "key success
factors" and then define what results are required for each by the end of the
planning period. The resulting list of objectives should be short enough to fit
on one slide so all employees can easily remember them and know what they
imply for the employees' activities.
Recommended Process:
A. Develop a Tentative Set of Financial and Market Objectives.
Once the KSF objectives are defined, an important step is to test the
reasonableness or plausibility of meeting them.
Audit Questions:
Goal:
To define a "value offering" stream and establish functional plans
that will meet key success factor objectives.
Objective:
Step 6 addresses how the "value offering" requirements (products, services,
and vendor attributes) specified in Step 5 are to be implemented. It assesses
the broad organizational capabilities and requirements in the areas of
technology development, marketing and channel strategy, manufacturing
strategy, and resource planning.
Recommended Process:
A. Revisit the Key Success Factors
Product Development:
Marketing:
Manufacturing:
Human Resources:
As the functional plan questions suggest, the process should include the
identification of capability gaps and, therefore, dependencies on other
entities (inside or outside ADI). If you are relying on outside
organizations, give careful consideration to what kind of relationship is
desired.
Audit Questions:
o Do the action plans support the implementation of the value proposition
and the key differentiators?
o Are the functional strategies linked directly to the business strategy?
o Do the plans emphasize quality, productivity, and reduction of costs?
o Is the channel plan consistent with the marketing strategy? Was the Sales
organization involved in the planning process?
o Do the plans address how to communicate the value proposition to and
through the distribution channels?
o Have you fully examined the use of strategic alliances or third-party
agreements in development, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution?
o Are you developing the organizational capability and individual
competencies to succeed?
o Do you have a roadmap that is convincing?
o Will the plan really allow you to win?
Goal:
To determine if the financial objectives can be met under the present
development plan.
Objective:
The purpose of Step 7 is to evaluate the financial consequences of the plan and
to verify if it meets the objectives defined in Step 2. The financial models that
are developed can also be used to quantify the risk inherent in the potential
problem scenarios identified in Step 8.
Recommended Process:
Project ADI's cost of goods sold and expenses, both direct and indirect.
Items to consider include costs associated with any start-up or
obsolescence plans. A shift to or from external suppliers of parts,
products, or product development should also be examined.
Audit Questions:
o Does the structure of the industry (as analyzed by Porter) and business
plan support the assumptions underlying the profitability objectives over
the five-year period?
o How attractive is the return on assets and investment relative to other ADI
businesses?
o Does the return compare favorably to the competitors' return? How do
R&D investment levels compare with competitors?
o Have you considered the financial implications of the plan on ADI's
balance sheet? Return on assets? Earnings per share?
o How does the business valuation compare to shareholder perceptions? To
market values of competing firms?
o How do the market and revenue projections reconcile with third-party
economic forecasts for targeted industry and geographic markets? How
reasonable are the assumptions inherent in the plan? Have you allowed
for cannibalization of existing products?
o Have you fully estimated the total costs needed to adequately answer
exploratory research questions that you need definitive answers to?
o Have you considered time-to-market requirements and revenue and profit
sensitivity to late introductions?
o Have you identified and assessed the financial impact on other ADI
entities associated with the business plan?
o Are there financial implications of your plans on other ADI Divisions or
Product Lines? What is the best way to highlight these implications?
o Have you projected sales and marketing costs by channel?
o Are any significant changes in human resources, facilities, or capital
equipment anticipated? Major third-party investments or acquisitions?
Resources:
o Article: "Must Finance and Strategy Clash?," Patrick Barnise, Paul
Marsh and Robin Wensley, Harvard Business Review, September -
October 1989.
Goal:
To develop contingency plans to deal with potential risks and opportunities.
Objective:
The aim of Step 8 is to anticipate potential problems, assess their impact, and
create contingency plans for any major event that would require a
reformulation of the plan. The step should result in a set of offensive and
defensive action plans that would eliminate or minimize the adverse
consequences.
Recommended Process:
2. Also think through the risks of internal situations that might effect
the organization's ability to execute:
Audit Questions:
o What market, economic, or financial situations could arise to put the plan
at risk? What is their probability of occurrence? Do you have a
contingency plan for each eventuality?
o Have you assessed the potential competitive response to this plan?
o Under what conditions would you exit the business?
o Where does the greatest upside potential exist? Do you have a plan to
deal with this situation?
Resources:
o Books: Competitive Advantage, Michael Porter, Free Press, 1985,
Chapter 14, "Defensive Strategy."
Step 9: Recommendations
Goal:
To identify which interrelationships must function effectively if the plan is to
be successful.
Objective:
The purpose of Step 9 is to recognize what critical linkages exist and to
devise processes for managing relationships to achieve the desired results.
Part of the task involves itemizing key dependencies. The rest addresses
mechanisms for negotiating agreements, tracking progress, and resolving
issues when they arise.
Recommended Process:
Review the Key Success Factor objectives in Step 2, and the plan in Step
6, and draw up a list of dependencies (for example, deliverables, support,
and information) the business will need from other organizations, both
internal and external.
• reporting relationships
Audit Questions:
Goal:
To develop an action plan for the next twelve months that executes the
strategies and works towards meeting the goals of the plan.
Objectives:
The purpose of Step 10 is to translate the plan intent, described in Steps 6, 7,
8, and 9 into a specific series of tactical actions for the next year that fit within
the financial plan. The scope of the actions should span meeting both
breakthrough (Hoshin) objectives and Business Fundamentals.
Recommended Process:
For the Hoshins and the Business Fundamentals, create the next year
objective, goal, strategy, owner, performance measure and deadline. Be
sure to establish linkages down and across all levels of the organization,
including field sales and external entities, as appropriate (refer to Hoshin
Planning Process, which can be obtained from the TQM Office). Hoshin
and Business Fundamentals referred to are Quality, Cost, Delivery,
Innovation, Profitability, Sales Growth, Responsiveness and Morale.
Audit Questions:
q Tool Index
q Tools
The basic format for each tool describes the questions addressed by using the
tool, explains the strategic significance, references where in the process the
tool is used (step number and paragraph), outlines how to use the tool (if it is
not intuitively obvious), and references other resources if more information is
needed.
Tool Index
The information in parentheses references the step number and paragraph as described
in the "Recommended Process" section for each step.
2. Company Growth versus Market Growth Matrix: a technique for depicting the history
of investment in a series of markets. (Steps 3/4-B(2)-E(l))
3. Competitor Share Histogram: a technique for describing how vendors' shares have
evolved over time. (Steps 3/4-B(3))
8. Customer Interview Guide: a guide for structuring and conducting interviews covering
business needs, installed base, purchase decision criteria, and spending profile. (Steps
3/4-C(I))
9. Buying Process Coverage and Win Ratio Table: an approach to understand how
different vendors fare at each successive stage of the product investigation and purchase
process. (Steps 3/4-C(lb)E(3))
10. Major Customer Data Table: a table for summarizing ADI's status and prospects in an
account. (Steps 3/4-C(2))
11. Research Findings in Major Account Interview Summary: a format for summarizing
research findings relating to usage trends, needs, investment plans, and ADI's position.
(Steps 3/4-C(2))
12. Choice Modeling Sensitivity Analysis: a technique for analyzing which attributes have
the greatest leverage in improving chooser share. (Steps 3/4-C(3), F(1))
13. Segment Discovery Techniques: techniques for comparing prospect groups to learn
which clusters share a common set of choice criteria and needs. (Steps 3/4-D(l))
14. Segment Fact Sheet: a table for summarizing the major market parameters delimiting
each segment. (Steps 3/4-E(1))
15. Vendor Financial Data Table: a table to compare vendors' financial positions and cost
structures. Useful in understanding how growth may be constrained by capitalization
and cash flow. (Steps 3/4-E(2))
16. Competitor Profile: a format for summarizing competitors' strategies, strengths and
weaknesses. (Steps 3/4-E(2))
17. Competitor Segment Dependency Analysis: a technique for deducing how a competitor
would likely react to ADI initiatives in a particular segment. (Steps 3/4-E(2))
18. Key Buying Factor Vendor Ranking: an approach for comparing vendors on their
perceived ability to meet customers' needs
(Steps 3/4-E(2,3))
19. Users' Needs and Satisfaction (Radar) Diagram: a technique for diagramming vendors'
satisfaction of customer needs. (Steps 3/4-E(2,3))
20. Competitive Advantage Matrix: a matrix for mapping how ADI compares to a
competitor in providing the specific attributes the customers find most important.
(Steps 3/4-E(3))
21. Addressable Market Analysis: a technique for analyzing what portion of the total
market provides the highest potential for ADI and what share can be projected. (Steps
3/4-E(3))
22. Channel Flow by Segment Table: a table for summarizing how segment purchases flow
through each channel (by geography) and determining which channels are most
important. (Steps 3/4-E(4))
23. Segment Attractiveness Table: a table for summarizing, on a comparative basis, which
segments offer the greatest potential and probability for success. (Steps 3/4-E(6))
24. Segment Attractiveness Matrix: a technique for analyzing which segments appear most
attractive in terms of size, growth, and profitability. (Steps 3/4-E(6))
26. Statement of Purpose Template: a template specifying the kinds of topics a well-
rounded statement of purpose might address. (Step 1-B)
27. Value Proposition Checklist: a list of criteria to test the completeness and utility of a
value proposition. (Step l-B)
28. Forward Looking Vintage Chart: a graphical framework for projecting the sources of
revenue growth. (Step 2-A)
29. Objectives Planning Table: a table for describing what key success factors must be met
to achieve the objective, and for translating them into departmental goals. (Step 2-B)
30. User Needs 'Imagineering' Diagram: a framework for describing a customer's problem,
the present solution, and imagining creative alternate approaches to solving the
problem. (Step 5-A) 30A - "Imagineering Chart"
33. Product Concept Positioning Chart: a graphical framework for depicting the
relationship between products. (Step 5-H)
34. Product Program Chart: a timeline approach to depicting the roll-out plan for new
products over the planning horizon. (Steps 5-H, 6-C)
35. Benefit Trade-Off Simulations: an example illustrating how choice modeling can
facilitate decision making by providing chooser share reactions to alternative product
proposals. (Step 5-I)
36. Value Delivery System Deficiency Analysis: a framework for describing critical links
in the value chain and identifying areas where ADI needs to focus improvement. (Step
6-B)
37. Technology Leverage Matrix: a structure for analyzing the degree to which technology
is leveraged across product lines and identifying new leverage opportunities.
(Step 6-C)
38. Family Tree of Technology Usage: a technique for analyzing how technology (product
or process) is leveraged within a product family. (Step 6-C)
39. Revenue Projection Analysis: a method for objectively projecting revenue by methodically
evaluating several product life cycle factors. (Step 7-A)
40. Contingency Matrix: a method for considering potential external and internal occurrences
that may impact performance, and then evaluating the consequences and developing
contingency plans. (Steps 7-C, 8-A, C)
41. Cost Driver Tables: material from Michael Porter describing primary "drivers" of unit cost
of purchased inputs and asset utilization for "value" activities. (Step 7-D)
42. Channel Economics Analysis: an approach to analyzing the cost impact of changes in
channel mix. (Step 7-D)
43. Revenue and Profit by Segment Chart: a technique for comparing revenue and profit by
segment, highlighting major differences in cost structure. (Step 7-D)
44. Valuation Analysis: a sample analysis of market value based on key financial variables.
(Step 7-F)
46. Whole Product View: a graphical representation of the entire product offering or product
needs. (Steps 3 & 4)
47. Technology Adoption Model: a model representing the adoption of new technologies by
different user groups. (Steps 3 & 4)
48. Camp Development: a tool to help identify what partners need to be “recruited” into the
ADI camp to make the product successful. (Steps 3 & 4)
50. Value Based Market Segmentation Methodology: a step by step process to help determine
what are possible segmentation strategies. (Steps 3 & 4)
51. Product Type Matrix “Bubble Chart:” a tool to help graphically depict the product
development. (Step 5)
52. Product/Technology Roadmap: describes the sequencing and rhythm of new product
introductions. (Step 5)
53. Business Plan Interrelationship Diagram: describes the interrelationship between the
development, financial, and competitive goals. (Steps 1 & 2)
54. Resource Gap Analysis: identifies resource requirements and possible resource gaps in the
product development planning. (Steps 6, 7, 8, & 9)
Variable
1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Variable
•Size
•Growth
C •Rela tive
Share
Total
Questions Addressed:
• What market areas offer the greatest business potential and should be a focal point for
research?
• What variables offer a fair probability of being a first-order determinant of purchase
behavior?
Strategic Significance:
Providing a focus for more detailed user need and competitor research.
Where Used:
How To:
1. Consider a variety of market models that could serve as a basis for prioritizing areas
for further investigation.
2. The schema chosen should lend itself to data capture and quantification as well as
offer a fair probability of being a first order determinant of purchase behavior.
3. Once a matrix is constructed, the goal is to gather market size, growth rate, and
relative share data for each cell.
30%
MARKET
GROWTH RATE 4
BY SEGMENT 2
15%
0%
0% 15% 30%
ADI GROWTH BY SEGMENT
Questions Addressed:
• What is the history of investment in these markets? Where is company growth
exceeding market growth?
• What investment strategies are appropriate for each market?
Strategic Significance:
Assessing the consequences of ADI's investment strategy.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - B(2), E(1)
How To:
1. Create a square matrix scaled to the largest growth rate.
2. Draw a diagonal line representing ADI growth equal to the market rate.
3. Size circles proportional to ADI revenue.
4. The analysis could be at the aggregate worldwide, regional, or business levels.
5. Improved share positions are represented below the diagonal and typically represent
greater than average investment.
Total $
in Category)
1 00% O
O O
O O
OTHERS O
B B
B
B
B
B
COMPETITOR B
A
A
A A
A
COMPETITOR A A
ADI
ADI ADI
ADI ADI
ADI ADI
Questions Addressed:
• How does ADI's share compare to the major competitors?
• How has the position evolved over time?
• Who is growing? At whose expense?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding the dynamics of market position and the probabilities of improving it.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - B(3)
"Stars" "Questions"
Size indicates ADI's
Revenue in Market
5 4
Growth Rate
(constant $,
compound average
growth rate)
3
2
10 1.0 0.1
Questions Addressed:
• What is the operating portfolio? What market areas are Stars, Cash Cows, Traps, and
Questions?
• Which markets are cash generators versus cash consumers? Which cash consumers
have the highest potential for providing value to ADI?
• What investment strategies are appropriate for each market?
Strategic Significance:
Defining the mix of the businesses ADI should strive toward.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - B(4), E(3)
How To:
1. Construct the horizontal axis by dividing ADI's market share by the share of the
largest competitor in each market.
2. Divide the vertical axis at the average of the market growth rates (in constant dollars).
3. Size the circles in proportion to served available market or ADI revenue.
4. Optional: Use colors to distinguish between various levels of cash flow or
profitability.
A X%
B
C Percent of sample
D including attribute
in top 5
E
F
G
H
I Arrange attributes in
descending average
J
importa nce
K
L
M
Questions Addressed:
• What product, service, or vendor attributes are most important to the user?
• What is the relative worth of each of the attributes?
Strategic Significance:
Determining what combination of attributes (at what price) will result in a winning
product strategy.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(1a)
How To:
1. Gather relative ratings of product attributes by importance to the customer from
market survey data and customer visit information.
2. Arrange data in histogram form, arranged with attribute receiving the highest average
importance ranking to that receiving the lowest.
3. At the end of each bar, indicate the percent of the sample including the attribute in the
top five attributes.
Other Resources:
o Books: Market Research and Analysis, Donald R. Lehmann, Irwin, Boston, 1989.
o Consultants: Decision Research, Lexington, MA., Mars & Co., Greenwich, CT.
o Consultants: Dr. Paul Green, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA.
Correlation Type:
Strong positive
Positive
x Negative
* Strong Negative
x
x x
Engineering Characteristics
of Competitors
Full Pwr. BW
Perceptions
Full Lin. BW
Importance
Customer
Reference
Die size
Process
Voltage
S/N +D
Internal
of want
Supply
THD
Customer Wants - +
Four Channel 10
Conversion x
High Resolution 7 x
High Speed 6
x
Low Price 3
1 x
Low Power
400KHz
1MHz
80dB
-90dB
3V
Yes
=3
Target Values =1
- x
ADI
x
Engineering
Competitive Maxim
Assessment x x x x x
Crystal x
+
x
Questions Addressed:
• What do buyers perceive as important about products?
• What engineering characteristics are critical for improving product performance in
areas identified as important to the customer?
• How do ADI's products compare to competitors' both with respect to buyer
perceptions and in terms of relative performance on engineering characteristics?
• Where should product development efforts be focused to improve ADI performance?
Strategic Significance:
Assuring that product design and manufacturing process specifications focus on meeting
customer priorities.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(1a), 5-I, 6-C
How To:
Consult TQM office.
Other Resources:
q Book: Concept Engineering, The Key to Operationally Defining Your Customer's
Requirements, Document 7I, CQM, Cambridge, Sept. 1992.
q Article: "The House of Quality," John Hauser and Don Clausing, Harvard Business
Review, May-June, 1988.
q Book: The VOC Reference Guide, Fred Pouliot, ADI, May 5, 1993.
q Book: Quality Function Deployment – Integrating Customer Requirements into
Product Design, Yigi Okeo, ed., Productivity Press, Cambridge, 1988.
High (Invest-Biggest
(Maintain
Position) Payoff)
F
E
Importance
Average
B
C
G
D (? - Contradictory
Situation Requires
(Trade off to Focus on Case-by-Case
Low Investment Opportunities) Analysis)
Current Satisfaction
(A-G are product attributes (Value of Improvement)
or user needs)
Questions Addressed:
• What is the relative satisfaction level with those attributes perceived to be most
important?
• Investments in which attributes offer the greatest payback?
Strategic Significance:
Maximizing return on R&D investment in terms of impact on customer satisfaction.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(1a)
How To:
1. Gather relative ratings of user needs by importance to the customer and by value of
improvement from market survey data, customer visit information, choice modeling,
and so on.
2. Determine midpoint lines by taking the average of importance ratings for each axis.
3. Plot points based on importance and improvement of each attribute.
4. Most points should fall in the invest, maintain, or trade off segments.
5. Question marks are contradictory situations that need to be re-evaluated on a case-by-
case basis.
Questions Addressed:
• What to cover in a customer interview.
• How to record feedback on the following:
– Business needs
– Installed base
Strategic Significance:
Learning the differentiating needs that should be the focal point for product strategy.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(1)
How To:
The template shown on the following pages should only be viewed as a suggestion. You
will note that many of the questions asked are similar to those typically asked in VOCs.
This questionnaire is not as image-oriented as VOC, but does address the customer's
needs and wants. In addition, it helps to quantify ADI and competitors share histories and
potentials.
Date: Interviewer:
Interviewee:
Title:
Company Name:
City/State/Zip:
Category/Segment:
(Page 2 of 6)
2. What are the industry and company issues that are affecting the
business environment and the economics of purchase decisions?
Spending Profile
Next I would like you to estimate your shipments of products using ADI (or competitor’s) products.
(Estimates should be in units, if not, then $, if not, then rank, where 1 is the highest.)
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Total 100% 100% 100%
66
IV&V-65
IV & V. Executing the 10-Step Process & Tools & Templates
(Page 4 of 6)
A. Current Needs
I would like you to recall a recent (or currently planned) purchase. Based on that
experience, I'd like you to answer some questions that will help me understand the
key needs and decisions criteria that influenced your purchase decision.
Think ahead to the future for a moment. Assuming continued growth in your
company, and the changes you foresee in the technology and usage environment, if
you were making a similar purchase decision three years down the road, what changes
would you expect in the needs and criteria you have identified?
A. Describe the prod. or serv. needs and wants that influence your selection. F. Which are properly considered as differentiating needs or wants
B. What tests or decisions criteria do you apply to tell if the need is satisfied? (i.e., not an absolute but much desired)?
C. What measurement do you use to determine if a vendor’s system satisfied G. How do you rank you wants?
these criteria? H. If you had $100 with which to purchase your wants, how much
D. How would you evaluate ADI on each of these dimensions? would you be willing to pay for each want?
E. Which of these needs are classified as musts? (i.e., needed to I. In terms of wants, evaluate your largest vendor?
qualify for the business?) Evaluate the vendor who seems to be growing fastest.
IV & V-68
Customer Interview Guide
(Page 6 of 6)
For the same purchase or a planned purchase, describe the decision process.
% Purchase Vendor
Name Title Role Decision Preferences
Technical Buyer
Economic Buyer
Influencer
User
Other
Additional Questions:
A. What information is used by the decision makers at each stage? What are the sources of the data?
B. How and when is cost considered?
C. How long does the buying process take?
D. How will the process change over the next five years?
E. What is the influence of standards, vendor preference, or applications on buying process?
IV & V. Executing the 10-Step Process & Tools & Templates
IV & V-69
IV & V. Executing the 10-Step Process & Tools & Templates
Product ADI
Comparison b%
Product ADI
Trial c%
Percent ADI
Purchasing d%
Win Ratio
d%
(% purchasing/
% considering) a%
Questions Addressed:
• How do different vendors fare at each successive stage of the product investigation
and purchase process?
• How often is ADI considered? How often does ADI win?
• At what stages is ADI at the greatest disadvantage? What does this imply for the
marketing strategy?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding what ADI needs to do in its marketing programs in order to achieve a
higher win percentage.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(1b), E(3)
How To:
1. During customer interviews, discuss the different stages of the buying process and for
each stage inquire (relative to some past purchase decision):
XYZ Corporation
Major Groups ABC Div ision DEF Division GHI Division JKL Division
Major Product
Line
Sales Forcecast
for Acct for Last
3 Years
Product Type 1
Product Type 2
Product Type 3
Total
ADI Position
ADI Trend
Questions Addressed:
• For each major area of activity, what is the customer's purchase history and what is
ADI's position?
• How has ADI revenue from the account evolved over the last few years?
• What is the overall trend for ADI business in the account?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding ADI's position in an important account and the prospect for the future.
(This tool is most applicable to businesses with significant customer concentration –– for
example, if 90% of revenue is derived from ten customers.)
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(2)
How To:
Category/Segment
Category/Segment
Account Function
Customer
Needs?
Situation Dynamics
(Metric - Account
Market Share)
Questions Addressed:
• What is the overall trend for usage of a product type in the account?
• Where is the customer investing and what is ADI's position?
• What are the implications for ADI doing business in the account?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding the key success factors to winning business in those areas where the
customers will be investing.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(2)
How To:
1. Use these templates to record findings from multiple interviews within a major
account spanning several functions.
3. Then for each function (area) where the products are used, distill the user needs
interview information into an account profile. Describe:
• Specific usage trends.
• User and customer needs.
• ADI's current position.
• Key requirements for winning follow-up or new business.
• Specific areas (programs or projects) planned for future investments.
Potential
% Market Share Potential
Product Total lost if attribute % Market Share
Attributes Leve rage * becomes worst gained if attribute
possible were greatly improved
C ( )
A ( )
( )
D
Questions Addressed:
• What attributes have the greatest leverage in improving potential market share if ADI
is perceived as superior? Which would have the greatest negative impact if ADI's
performance drops?
• Considering the probabilities of ADI differentiating itself, investments in which
attributes offer the greatest payback?
• Along what dimensions is ADI most at risk to competitors' moves?
Strategic Significance:
Evaluating what combination of attributes (at what price) promises the greatest chooser
share.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - C(3), F(1)
How To:
o Article: "Redesigning Product Lines with Conjoint Analysis: How Sunbeam Does
It," Albert L. Page and Harold F. Rosenbaum, Journal of Product Innovation
Management, 1987, Nov. 4, pp. 120-137.
Key
Buying
(KBF)
Fa ctors Ca tegory 1 KBF Ca tegory 2 KBF Ca tegory 3
A A A
%
%
B B B
C C C
D D D
E E E
F F F
G G G
H H H
I I I
J J J
Percent
Percentincluding
including Box length indicates
attribute
attributeon
in top
top 10
5 average rank of factor
$100 I H I
Maximum H
to spend H
G G
on all G
attributes F
F F
E
E E
D
D D
C C
C
B B
A
A
$0 A
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
A to I = Attributes
Questions Addressed:
• What groups of prospects share a common set of choice criteria and attribute
weighting?
• How do these groups differ in their needs? How do they differ along other
dimensions (for example, demographics, and so on)?
• How should users' needs segments be defined?
Strategic Significance:
Determining the parameters that describe prospects who share a common set of needs.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - D(1)
How To:
1. The process involves stratifying the sample into clusters with common sets of
needs.
2. Techniques, such as the key buying factor analysis, or the $100 test, help by
summarizing needs in a way that allows sorting groups of prospects.
3. Once "segments" are identified, look for variables that help explain how these
buyers are characterized and located.
4. Test to make sure differences between segment needs and characteristics are
significant.
De finition/Description
Size
Ne eds
Musts
Differentiating
($ 100 Test weighting)
Price Sensitivity
Trends in Usage
Co mpetitors
Prima ry Channels
Target Accounts
Questions Addressed:
• What are the major market parameters delimiting each segment?
• How do the segments compare?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding relative opportunities and risks of segment alternatives.
Where Used:
Assets
Equity
Debt
Return on Sales
Asset Turnover
Return on Assets
Return on Equity
Debt Equity
Sales by Line
Prod Line 1
Prod Line 2
Prod Line 3
R&D Investment
A1 A2
(mm) by product
Program A B1 B2
Program B
Program C C1 C2
A1 A2 + B1 B2 + C1 C2
Total Engr. Months
Questions Addressed:
• How do vendors' financial positions and cost structures compare?
• How do they fund growth? How is their ability to grown constrained by their
capitalization and cash flow?
• What is their strategy for investment of R&D resources? How are their resources
committed and what kind of resources are available for new initiatives?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding to what extent the financial position and capitalization of the competing
vendors limit their flexibility in pursuing strategic options.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(2)
How To:
1. Gather financial information from publicly available sources, such as annual reports
and 10Ks.
2. Estimate engineering man-months expended on each major product program.
3. Compare these estimates to that of the total staff to determine resources available
for new product development.
4. Reconcile this difference with the vendor's history of new product initiatives.
Competitor
Segment
Sales/
R&D Manufacturing Distribution Marketing Support
Functional
Strategy
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities Threats
Questions Addressed:
• What are the competitors' product and functional strategies in each segment?
• What are their strengths and weaknesses relative to the leader? To ADI?
• What are ADI's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding a competitor's strategy for a market and points of vulnerability.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(2)
Share of vendor
Percent of total revenue
in segment
derived from segment sales
0%
Segment 3 $37M
20%
% of Revenue
$20M 40%
Segment 1
60%
Segment 2 $18M
Segment 6 $13M
80%
$9M
Segment 4
$7M
Segment 5 100%
Questions Addressed:
• How is a competitor likely to react to ADI initiatives in a particular segment?
• Are major competitors too dependent on declining segments or are they well
positioned in high growth segments?
• Which segments provide the best opportunity for ADI from a competitive intensity
standpoint?
Strategic Significance:
Deducing how aggressively a competitor will resist an initiative by ADI in specific target
segments.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(2)
How To:
1. Using vendor financial statements, research-firm data, and primary research try to
estimate revenue by segment.
2. Portray segment revenue, in descending order, with the vertical axis representing
share of revenue.
3. Scale the bar width (horizontal axis) by share of market.
(KBF) A %
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Percent including
attribute on top 10
Bar size represents
average rating of vendor
Questions Addressed:
• How are vendors perceived with regards to their ability to meet customers' and users'
needs in each segment?
• How is ADI ranked relative to other vendors?
• In what segments is ADI strongest? Weakest?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding the perception customers have of ADI's ability to meet their needs relative
to the competition and the challenge this represents as far as success in the market is
concerned.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(2,3)
How To:
1. Sort previously obtained market research and customer interview data, eliminating
data on customers not in target segment.
2. Arrange attribute ratings within this segment in order of decreasing average
importance.
3. Indicate ADI's and competitors' ratings on these attributes.
A
100%
B
H
0%
G C
D
F
ADI E
Competitor A
A to H are attributes of users' needs.
Questions Addressed:
• How are vendors perceived as far as their ability to meet customers' and users' needs
in each segment?
• How close does the leader come to satisfying the customer? How is ADI ranked?
Strategic Significance:
Evaluating ADI competitiveness.
Where Used:
High
E
Importance of D
Attribute
to Customer
A G
B
C
F
Low
Weak 0 Strong
ADI ADI
Disadvantage Advantage
(When customers rated (When customers rated
competitor higher than ADI) ADI higher than competitor)
A to G are attributes or users' needs
Questions Addressed:
• How does ADI compare to a competitor in providing the specific attribute the
customer in a segment find most important?
• Overall, who is the strongest position?
Strategic Significance:
Assessing the true extent of any competitive advantage ADI might have.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(3)
How To:
$ Addressable
market
Difficult to Win
Addressable Reach Coverage Ratio Share
Market (describe)
25% 5% 1.25%
Na tural Toward
$
ADI (describe)
70% 10% 7%
Fa vors ADI
$ (describe)
90% 25% 22.5%
Questions Addressed:
• What portion of the total market provides the highest potential for ADI?
• Why are the remaining portions less attractive? How does accessibility differ by
segment? Are there means for expanding the addressable market?
• What share can be projected for ADI in its addressable segments?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding what share of a market ADI can reasonably expect to attract.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(3)
How To:
1. Gather data from research sources, outside experts, and interview findings.
2. Estimate portions of the market not addressed due to product fit, strategic
relationships, distribution coverage, and so on, to determine addressable market.
3. From the coverage and win ratio analysis conclusions, assess ADI's ability to reach
and ultimately appear to customers. Use vendor and product benchmark
information to determine competitive capability at this point.
4. Compare the conclusion from number 3 to present share, or share in similar
markets, as a test of reasonableness. Consider what has to happen in the
marketplace to cause purchase behavior to change to this degree? Is it likely?
CHANNELS
DIRECT DISTRIB OTHER TOTAL
ADI
%
$
Comp. A.
%
$
Comp. B.
%
$
TOTAL
U.S.
Europe
Japan
ROW
Questions Addressed:
Strategic Significance:
Understanding which channels are most important to success in a given market.
Where Used:
Questions Addressed:
• On a comparative basis, which segments offer the greatest potential and probability
for success?
• What linkages exist between segments?
Strategic Significance:
Choosing a set of segments that offer an attractive financial return and a good probability
of competitive advantage.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(6)
How To:
Under "Opportunity to Change Game," consider Porter's five industry factors: rivalry
among existing firms, threats of new entrants, bargaining power of buyers, bargaining
power of suppliers, and threats of substitute products.
Segment 1
Vertical axis repre-
sents relative size Segment 3
Segment 4
Small Segment 2
Growth
Low High
Questions Addressed:
Which segments appear most attractive in terms of size, growth, and profitability?
Strategic Significance:
Choosing segments on the basis of most attractive financial return.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - E(6)
How To:
1. Gather information as best you can from secondary and primary sources. When
segment-specific figures are not readily available, extrapolate from closest available
data points.
2. Profitability may be inferred by searching for companies that generate a majority of
their revenues from these segments. ADI's profitability is also a useful point of
reference.
ADI
Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C
Questions Addressed:
Strategic Significance:
Objectively evaluating how ADI is perceived by customers and the degree of difficulty in
changing their opinions.
Where Used:
Steps 3/4 - F(1)
How To:
1. Books: Market Research and Analysis, Donald R. Lehmann, Irwin, Boston, 1989.
2. Consultants: Decision Research, Lexington, MA., Mars & Co., Greenwich, CT.
3. Consultants: Dr. Paul Green, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA.
– Product Types
– Customer Types
– Differentiation Variables
– Price Points
– Distribution Channels
Questions Addressed:
• How to describe a Statement of Purpose?
• What topics to cover?
Strategic Significance:
Providing a succinct description that can be internalized by all employees.
Where Used:
Steps 1-B
Other Resources:
q See "Strategic Intent" and "Value Proposition" in Section VII, Key Concepts.
Questions Addressed:
Strategic Significance:
Providing a common focal point for the organization's efforts.
Where Used:
Steps 1-B
Other Resources:
6
Revenue in each year is
disaggregated by year product
was introduced
Yearly Revenue $
5 5
4
3
3
4
2 3
Yr 2
1
1 2
3
Yr 2
Yr
0 1
0
0
2
0 1 1
Yr-1 Current Yr+1 Yr+2 Yr+3 Yr+4 Yr+5
Year
Questions Addressed:
Strategic Significance:
Setting expectations for product generation activities.
Where Used:
Steps 2-A
How To:
Other Resources:
q Refer to the Hoshin Planning Process Manual, which can be obtained from the TQM
Office, for additional formats and planning models.
Page of
Objectives:
Questions Addressed:
• What are the key success factors (KSFs) in achieving the objectives?
• How do the objectives translate into constituent departmental goals?
Strategic Significance:
Verifying if a sufficient number of the underlying requirements to achieving the
objectives are addressed in order to guarantee program success.
Where Used:
Steps 2-B
How To:
1. Consider long-range objectives under the categories of: growth, profit, return on
assets, market share, customer satisfaction, operating effectiveness, and new
products.
2. For each objective established, define what underlying requirements must be met to
guarantee performance. These are key success factors (KSFs).
3. Translate each KSF into a series of specific goals, as appropriate, for R&D,
manufacturing, marketing, sales support, human resources, and so on.
Other Resources:
o Refer to the Hoshin Planning Process Manual, which can be obtained from the TQM
Office, for additional formats and planning models.
Baseband
Synthesizer Switch
Converter
Speech Channel De- Decrypt Channel
DAC Decode Decode Interleave Equalizer De-
modulator
Speaker Down-converter
Embedded H8 Microcontroller
Questions Addressed:
Strategic Significance:
Developing a unique approach to solving a problem (not obvious to competitors) that may
provide a strategic advantage.
Where Used:
Steps 5-A
How To:
Next X Years
Target Job Title: Environment:
(B4) What forces will be
Diagram Present Usage Situation influencing change in the
(A) How does the present solution nature of the work or
fit into the context of the customer’s problems?
Today
environment?
Forces
(B1) Why does this job exists?
What business problems consume
the majority of the person’s time?
(B5) How will these problems
Key Differentiators What issues keep them awake at
change given the dynamic
(D) What could be the key differentiators night?
nature of this person’s
of you as a vendor in this future business?
Problems
environment?
Tool 30A: "Imagineering" Chart
Activities
these benefits?
Benefits
IV&V-107
IV & V. Executing the 10-Step Process & Tools & Templates
Questions Addressed:
Strategic Significance:
Enabling teams to imagine what product or services customers might want and why they
might want them.
Where Used:
Steps 5-B
How To:
1. In a team setting, step through each questions in sequence, starting with (A) and
moving through to (D).
2. Pick a particular account and a person in the account; the more specific, the easier
the visualization process about problems, needs, and trends.
3. Repeat several items for different jobs and/or different accounts, until the team feels
that the most important decision makers or consumers of the product or service have
been covered.
4. It is not necessary to get the team's discussion onto the Imagineering Chart as
shown; writing up the conclusions or summaries from (C) and (D) for all the charts
generated is key in capturing the possible needs for the rest of Step 5 and for Step 6.
Product Attributes:
Service Attributes:
Vendor Attributes:
Channels:
Questions Addressed:
• What benefits will be required to address the users' problems in five years?
• What product, service, and vendor attributes are implied by these benefits?
Strategic Significance:
Visualizing what customers should want to solve their problems in the future.
Where Used:
Steps 5-B
How To:
1. Begin by describing what problems the user is trying to solve today with the product.
2. Contrast this with the problems the user and organization will likely face in their
business in five years.
3. Deduce what benefits will be desirable from a product/solution in order to address this
future usage environment.
4. Infer the product, service, and vendor attributes which, taken together, would deliver
these desirable benefits.
5. Consider what channels would be the logical ones to purchase or obtain support for
such a solution.
High
YR 4
$ 3
Med YR 3
2
YR 2
2
1 1
YR 1
1
0 0
Low 0 0
YR2 YR3 YR4 YR2 YR3 YR4
Current Current
Year Year
Questions Addressed:
• What is a competitor's likely product strategy in the face of the customer needs
situation?
• How is it different from ADI's?
• What revenue will the program produce?
Strategic Significance:
Comparing a competitor's strategy against ADI's to test degree of differentiation.
Where Used:
Steps 5-F
Need Dimension X
X1 X2 X 3
Product
Concept A
2
Y
Need Dimension Y
Product Concept C
1
Questions Addressed:
Strategic Significance:
Clarifying thinking about focus of product (and product line) strategy.
Where Used:
Steps 5-H
Y- 1 Current Year Y +1 Y +2 Y+ 3 Y+ 4
High
• • •
• •
•
Price/Performance Categories
Med
• • •
•
• • • •
•
Low • •
Questions Addressed:
• What is the roll-out plan for new products over the planning horizon?
• How are the products positioned relative to one another?
• What gaps exist that could be exploited by the competition?
• What possible or likely technological discontinuities could occur? What effect
would they have on product coverage?
Strategic Significance:
Verifying product coverage and determining technology linkages and synergies.
Where Used:
Steps 5-H, 6-C
Choice modeling collects information from prospective customers on what attributes are most
important to them and how they see differences between competitors in in their ability to deliver
these benefits. This informa tion becomes a database which can be used to run simulations.
Example 1: If the speed of product A was doubled, what market share would
be gained?
Possible share goes from
4.9 to 7.1. There is a
Product A 4.9 large benefit segment that
wants high speed.
Product A
with twice 7.1
the speed
Example 2: If product A was available with either single or dual supply, what market share would
be gained?
"Single Supply Only" loses
share, but combination
Single Supply Only increases share from 3.8 to
3.8 9.2. We can gain from
serving two benefit
segments.
Both single and dual
9.2
supply
Questions Addressed:
• What bundle of attributes promises the greatest chooser share?
• What combinations of products offer the greatest share potential?
• How sensitive is chooser share to specific competitor initiatives?
Strategic Significance:
Providing a rigorous basis for trade-off decisions related to product (and product line)
strategy.
Where Used:
Steps 5-I
How to:
1. Article: "Redesigning Product Lines with Conjoint Analysis: How Sunbeam Does
It," Albert L. Page and Harold F. Rosenbaum, Journal of Product Innovation
Management, 1987, Nov. 4, pp. 120-137.
Platforms
- Small/medium - Applications - Compatible --Implementation - Within 10% - "ADI provides - Disti 25%
- Third party - Demonstrated
companies fit growth path services/assist of superior total
SW support knowledge of
serving PC add- competition solution & - Software
business,
in market - Vendor - High reliability - Capacity for initial assistance to suppliers 50%
- Cross industry,
Knowledge functional application planning tools/ price & insure better &
- Design of business - Multiple consulting on-going faster decisions
integrated
engineer configuration cost of in your business,
applic. S/W - FAE
I/O parts Consulting - Ease of ownership now and in the
- Marketing
IV&V-116
IV & V. Executing the 10-Step Process & Tools & Templates
Questions Addressed:
• What are the critical "links in the chain" to deliver the value proposition to the
customer?
• In what areas is ADI deficient?
• How can the organization fill this gap?
Strategic Significance:
Assuring that the key success factors in delivery of the value proposition are explicitly
addressed in an integrated fashion.
Where Used:
Step 6-B
How To:
Building Block 1 A G J N, M Q
Block 2 B D H, I M P
Block 3 H L P
Block 4 A D P, R
E G M, N
C J, K Q, R
C J
N
Block N J Q
Questions Addressed:
• What "generic" technologies are used throughout the product line?
• To what extent is the investment in technology leveraged from product family to
product family?
• What new opportunities exist for utilizing the technology?
Strategic Significance:
Increasing the return on technology investment.
Where Used:
Step 6-C
How To:
New Product 4A
Technology
3B
General Purpose
Products Produc t 3
Specialized
3A Version
New Process
Transitions ( ) Technology
in corporate new product Low Cost
and/or process technology Produc t 2 Products 2B
2A
Imp roved
Reliability
Nich e Product Version
Questions Addressed:
• How has the product line evolved over time?
• How is technology leveraged within a product family? Among product families?
Strategic Significance:
Increasing the return on technology investment.
Where Used:
Step 6-C
How To:
1. Starting with "parent" products, map the evolution of the product line.
2. At transition points, note the role of new product or process technologies.
3. Consider the opportunities to leverage technology for future product strategy.
Direct
t t t t t t
Distribution
• • •
Questions Addressed:
• What ADI revenue can be expected for the product program?
• How will life-cycle dynamics (such as average sales price erosion) effect ADI share
and revenue?
• How is the revenue generated by geography? By channel?
Strategic Significance:
Evaluating business potential over the life cycle.
Where Used:
Step 7-A
How To:
1. Project cumulative unit volume, by channel, over the period to product maturity.
Based this projection on the user need segment size estimates developed in Step 4.
Take into consideration price-volume relationships.
2. Deduce yearly sales volume.
3. Forecast ADI's potential share of the unit volume from ADI's expected competitive
position. Use the results of existing quantitative market research.
4. Construct a growth curve for ADI sales over the period of maturation. Take into
consideration cannibalization of existing products.
5. Consider the evolution of prices over the industry (product category) life cycle when
calculating revenue.
Favorable Market
Scenario 1 Scenario 2
summarize the
major assumptions
Scenario 3 Scenario 4 for each scenario
Unfavorable Market
ADI does not ADI executes
execute well. well.
Revenues
$.75 8 $ .7 58
$ .7 58 $ .7 58
$.58 $.58
89 89 94
94
Unfavorable Market
ADI does not ADI executes
execute well. well.
Profits
10% 1 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
-10% -10%
89 94 89 94
Unfavorable Market
ADI does not ADI executes
execute well. well.
Questions Addressed:
• What external and internal situations might occur that would cause a serious deviation
in results?
• What is the likelihood of their occurrence?
• What are the financial implications of these scenarios?
• What actions should be taken if the situations happen?
Strategic Significance:
Understanding the range of performance possible as a result of the plan.
Where Used:
Step 7-C, 8-A, C
How To:
Cost Driver
Cost Applied to
Driver Procurement Description
Economies of scale Purchasing scale. The volume of purchasing with a given supplier
affects bargaining power.
Interrelationships Shared purchasing with other Combining purchases with sister business units can
business units. improve bargaining power with suppliers.
Integration Make versus buy. Integration may raise or lower the cost of an input.
Location Supplier location. Location of suppliers can affect the cost of inputs
through the cost of transportation and the ease of
communication.
Institutional factors Government and union. Government policy can restrict access to inputs or
affect their cost through tariffs, taxes, and other
means. Unions may affect the ability to out-source
or whether nonunion suppliers can be used.
* See Other Resources
Scale Purchasing Plant Scale. Scale of Scale of Regional scale. National Order scale.
scale (that facilities. facilities. scale.
determined
influence
over supplier
delivery.)
Policies Safety Safety stock. Production Logistics Aging and Systems Payment
stocks, Aging and technology. technology. curing technology. terms. Credit
Payment curing Speed of requirements. policy.
Schedule to requirements. construction Delivery time Accounts
suppliers. of facilities. customers. Receivable
monitoring
technology.
IV & V. Executing the 10-Step Process & Tools & Templates
IV&V-127
IV & V. Executing the 10-Step Process & Tools & Templates
Questions Addressed:
• What are the primary cost drivers affecting procurement and asset utilization?
• What are the greatest contributors to product cost?
• Where should cost reduction efforts be focused?
Strategic Significance:
Enabling cost competitiveness in value activities.
Where Used:
Step 7-D
Other Resources:
% Distributor
Third % Distributor
Margin
Party %
% Imp rovements:
•
•
Distributor % Factory Mktg
Factory
Marke ting % Imp rovements:
% •
%
•
Questions Addressed:
• How is channel mix expected to change over time?
• what impact could these trends have on e Sales and Marketing Cost Envelope
(SMCE)?
• What actions are needed to meet SMCE objectives?
Strategic Significance:
Developing a cost-effective channel strategy.
Where Used:
Step 7-D
How To:
Segment A
Segment B
Segment C
Segment D
Segment E
Segment F Loss
Segment G
100% Revenue
Questions Addressed:
• What are the cost issues by market segment?
• Which markets match ADI's abilities and provide the most profitability? The least?
• Can profitability be improved by existing (or downsizing) some of the less profitable
segments and/or expanding those that are more profitable? To what extent do shared
costs have an impact on these decisions?
Strategic Significance:
Defining most desirable mix of markets.
Where Used:
Step 7-D
How To:
Consult Division Controller for relevant data.
ASSUMPTIONS: INPU
T
Rev. Growth Rate 20.00 * Fixed and working capital
% requirements are
Oper Margin 12.00 defined as incremental asset
% investments as
CapEx % Rev. Chg* 25.00 a percentage of incremental revenue
% growth
W/C % Rev Chg* 15.00 (that is, to generate $1 in
% incremental
Cash Tax 34.00 revenue, what must be invested in
Rate % fixed
Cost of 14.00 and working
Capital % capital?).
Period O Revenue (Actual) $1,00
0
Period O Oper Profit $120
(Actual)
Number of Shares Out (M) 240
Period O
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
Revenues 1,000 1,200 1,440 1,728 2,074 2,488 2,986 3,583 4,300 5,160 6,192
Op Profit 120 144 173 207 249 299 358 430 516 619 743
•Capital Exp -50 -60 -72 -86 -104 -124 -149 -179 -215 -258
•WC Investments -30 -36 -43 -52 -62 -75 -90 -107 -129 -155
•Cash Taxes -49 -59 -71 -85 -102 -122 -146 -175 -211 -253
Questions Addressed:
• What market value should result from the financial projections and variability in
potential returns?
• How does the value conclusion compare with market expectations?
Strategic Significance:
Evaluating what actions should be taken to increase shareholder value.
Where Used:
Step 7-F
How To:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Questions Addressed:
• What situations should be emphasized in contingency planning?
• What situations represent the greatest danger? What situations are most likely to
occur?
Strategic Significance:
Focusing the team's energies on the highest priority problems.
Where Used:
Step 8-B, C
How To:
Consult Division Controller.
Potential Product
Augumented Product
Expected
Product
Generic
Product
Questions Addressed:
• What are the critical customer problems that ADI intends to solve?
• How can/should ADI differentiate its product offering from its competition?
• What market partnerships are required to gain a leadership position?
Strategic Significance:
The Whole Product View illustrates the intended economic or business value that will be
delivered. This tool allows you to graphically represent the business as a complete customer
solution.
Where Used:
This tool should be used in BPP Steps 3, 4 and 5. For Steps 3 and 4, this tool can be used to
define what the customer requires from ADI and what ADI’s competition is offering. For
Step 5, it can be used to illustrate ADI’s entire product offering.
How To Use This Tool:
Generic Product is the device or basic product you are selling
Expected Product is determined by other factors relating to your product. These factors
include competition, alliances, pricing, standards, service and support, distribution or the
sales cycles.
Augmented Product can be determined by understanding your customer’s businesses. What
markets? Who is my customer’s competition and on what basis do they compete?
Augmented product usually involves increasing integration or defining new delivery or
packaging.
Potential Product describes all the traditional marketing activities that increase the value of
your offering. Marketing communications, branding, distribution channel support are all
examples.
Early Majority
Late Majority
Early Adopters
Late Adopters/
Laggards
Innovators
Time
Questions Addressed:
• What customer applications offer the best match to Product Line capabilities and where
are they in their Technology Adoption Process?
• What is the likelihood and extent of adopting the new product idea with respect to the
community of customers and their needs?
• What are the barriers to the customer to integrate the new idea (technology) into a
practical application? What chasms need to be over come for the customer/community?
Strategic Significance:
Helps provide a focus on user needs and determine the likelihood that a customer will use the
new product/idea. In addition, this tool helps determine efficient use of Marketing and
Development resources by focusing on only the attractive Segments/Channels/Customers.
Where Used:
BBP Step 3 in conjunction with the Classification Schema Examples tools graphically depict
where customers are in their Technology Adoption Process. It also can be used with Tool 9,
Buying Process Coverage and Win Ratio Table.
Customer
Customer’s Customer
Press / Analysts
Industry Luminaries
Distribution Partners
Source:
Key Customers
McKenna
The Regis Touch
Company
Questions Addressed:
• Who are the market influencers, educators, information sources, and luminaries?
• Who are the partners that will fundamentally enable the market, help drive standards, and
lower overall adoption costs?
• What users will provide leadership for the mainstream market in adopting your product?
Strategic Significance:
Products developed with “Camp” relationships should have less risk and lower adoption
costs.
Where Used:
BPP Step 3. This tool should also help in Step 5 by considering alternative ways to provide
value to the customers. This tool also can help address the PSD factors.
How To Use This Tool:
1. Define the target segment and whole product requirements
2. Identify who are the targets of each partner type
3. Identify what is the perspective, business model and the alignment of each target
4. Program definition and resource commitment
• Recruitment, support and vision definition
• Joint Sales and market development
• Infrastructure communications and evidence building
5. Assign ownership and track program milestones
Competitive Positioning
Step 2 Step 3
Step 1
Questions Addressed:
• How can ADI differentiate its product offering to maximize the benefit for its customers.
Strategic Significance:
This tool provides a framework for developing competitive differentiation in ADI’s product
offerings.
Where Used:
This tool should be used in BPP Steps 3 and 4 to facilitate an understanding of customers
require.
Step 2 - Build a description of the value profile of the target customer segment. Include all
aspects of the whole product identified in Step 1.
Step 3 - Rank each of the competitive products against your product offering. Summarize
the results. (Are we good at what is important to our customers?)
Step 4 - Validate the findings using third parties or other analysis tools. Adjust based on
this validation.
Step 6 - Take the appropriate action based on this mapping. Do we have a winning
position? Can we fix problems in the appropriate time? Can we change or
redefine the market? Can we educate the segment to value other attributes?
Value-Based Market
Segmentation Methodology
Questions Addressed:
• What target market segments should ADI focus its efforts on?
Strategic Significance:
This tool provides a framework for segmenting a target market. Target customers are
selected and serviced within the context of a technology adoption cycle.
Where Used:
This tool should be used in BPP Steps 3 and 4 to determine what are possible market
segments to target.
Next Generation
Core Product
Platform /
Next Generation
Addition to
Product Family
Enhancements
/ Derivatives
Add-ons and
Enhancements
Low Risk
Questions Addressed:
• What is the breakdown of products in development into the three categories,
Breakthrough, Platform, Derivative?
• Is this the right balance to win in our chosen markets?
• Are resources available and focused in the right areas?
• Are the core competencies in place to develop the projects?
Strategic Significance:
The Bubble chart helps to ensure that the development projects are vehicles for executing the
Business Strategy…. i.e. The development projects list and the BPP should be mirror
images..
Where Used:
This tool should be considered in BPP Steps 5 and 6. It also facilitates linkages to the New
Product Development process, specifically factors 1, 5, 6, 7,10, 11 and 12 of PSD0.
The three classifications used in the Product Type Matrix have been defined to assist in
planning and tracking of time and cost to market metrics. These classifications are defined as
follows:
Platform Products - Those products that achieve new levels of performance but do so by
using only 1 to 2 “process innovations”. Examples include process migration of existing
architectures, new levels of integration, new functions or architectures on existing
manufacturing processes. These products normally form the basis for creating derivative
products. Development risks are moderate to high.
Derivative Products - are low risk variants of proven products. Examples include a new
feature, a different pin-out, metal mask changes, trim or test variants, and package variants.
Over the product life cycle, redesigns to reduce costs, improve reliability, and increase
performance levels would fall into this category. Development risks are low.
Platform 1
Leveraged Platform
Derivative
Next Generation
Platform 2
Cost Reduction
Cost Reduction
Platform 3
Platform
Questions Addressed:
• How to proactively manage the evolution of the Product Line Architecture i.e. derivative
strategy, through use of the product/process road map?
• How often to introduce a new platform and/or derivatives so that scarce financial,
technical and human resources are successfully leveraged?
• What are the critical path innovations that gate a new product development?
Strategic Significance:
Describes the product or technology roadmap indicating the sequencing and rhythm of new
product introductions. This tool can also highlight key organizational interdependencies.
Where Used:
• This tool is useful in BPP Step 5, and helps link the BPP to Factors 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 10,
11and 12 of PSD0.
• This tool facilitates linkage between BPP Step 3 (customers and channels), Step 4
(competition), Step 5 (products and services), Step 6 (development and introduction plan),
Step 7 (financial analysis) and Step 8 (potential problems).
Financial Goals
Competitive Goals
• Earnings
• Market Share
• ROI
• Market Entry
• Growth
Development Goals
• Number and type of new products
• Sequencing of new projects
• Cycle times
• Project Costs
Questions Addressed:
• How can I summarize my overall business plan, including the linkage between
development and business planning
Strategic Significance:
This template helps summarize the interrelationships between development, financial, and
competitive goals.
Where Used:
This template can be used in BPP Step 2 as a summary of the organization’s 5-year business
plan.
ADI Part Project 9807 9808 9809 9810 9811 9812 9901 9902 9903 9904 9905 9906
Number Name MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
AD1000 Project 1 3.5 2.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 1.0
AD2000 Project 2 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
AD3000 Project 2.1 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
AD4000 Project 3 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0
AD5000 Project 3.1 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0
AD6000 Project 3.2 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
AD7000 Project 4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
AD8000 Project 5 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Total Resources Required 16.0 15.0 19.0 19.0 17.5 18.5 18.0 17.0 15.0 12.0 10.0 9.0
Total Resources Available 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8
Figures are in person-months
Questions Addressed:
• Is the new product development capacity (resource availability) in balance with new-
product development plans? (Product / Technology Roadmap)
• Will time to market objectives of the new product development programs be met with the
current resource allocation plan?
• Should the Product / Technology Roadmap be revised to account for resource
constraints?
Strategic Significance:
This tool ensures that adequate resource levels are available to execute the new-product
development strategy as described by the product / technology roadmap. Ensuring adequate
available resources contributes to improved time to market performance in addition to
promoting stronger morale among development teams.
Where Used:
This tool should be considered during BPP Step 5 and completed in detail as part of Step 6.
The tool provides linkage to the PSD process by ensuring that sufficient resources are
available in aggregate before a new project is begun.
4. Imbalances are corrected either through revision of the product / technology roadmap, or
through development of a resource expansion plan.
5. Additional detail can be added to the resource gap analysis with respect to function (i.e.,
design engineering, test engineering, trim engineering, etc.) and experience level to
ensure the proper mix of resource types are available.
q Introduction
Introduction
The following diagram depicts how all the pieces of ADI’s business planning “fit
together”. Using BPP steps 1-5 as initial inputs into the process, technology and
market assessments help create the strategic plan and product / service portfolio.
The execution of this plan creates learning, from which subsequent business
planning is developed and refined.
Learning
Technology Strategy
WWMfg BPP
Technology
Assessment and
Forecasting
This section describes the linkage between the Business Planning Process and the
Product and Technology Development Process. Also, this section identifies some
“new” tools to help facilitate this linkage.
The following matrix shows the relationship between the BPP Steps and the
Product Start Document Process (PSD). Recommended tools and where they may
be used are also described.
All the tools described in this section help facilitate the linkage of ADI’s Business
Planning Process to product and technology development. These tools also help
direct the BPP to provide the necessary information to complete the PSD0
Factors.
Nine “new” tools have been identified to help assist in creating a linkage between
the BPP and product/technology development. These tools (Tools 46-54) are
described in more detail in Section V of this document. The tools identified are
only recommended, with individuals finding additional tools useful for
development of their business and development planning. When beginning the
Business Planning Process, please refer to the Business Planning Manual section
on Tools and Templates for a complete listing of all the tools available.
Tool 46 - Whole Product View The Whole Product View Tool can
be used to graphically illustrate the
intended economic or business
value that customers require. This
tool assists in helping identify the
complete customer solution.
Us vs
Tool 49 - Competitive This tool provides a framework for
Them Differentiation Process evaluation and development of
competitive differentiation. The
process includes a six-step process
for determining a product's proper
positioning.
Tool 46 - Whole Product View The Whole Product View Tool can
ADI
also be used to describe the “whole
product” offering by ADI. Ideally,
this should match the view that
customers require, as described in
Step 3.
Revenue ($ millions)
8
$15 – ADI has 21% market share (#2) 4
– ADI has ~60% GM 3
$12
$4 – CAGR ~ 3%
2
$0 – Computer - 20%
FY95- FY9 FY9 FY0 FY0 • µMRelay could service ~50% of $6
FY97 8 9 1 2 market
FY0 $5
– N/A for voltage switching $4
($2) 0
– Limited by activation speed
$2
$0
($4) $0
MUX SPST SPDT XPOINT
ADI Year Product/Function
High Integration Bipolar Integration ATE P/E (DCL) ASIC DCL w/ PMU ASIC
ASICs w/ µMRelay I/O
ATE P/E Std. Product
FY00 FY01 FY02
w/ µMRelay I/O
The graph in the upper left-hand corner describes the 5-year financial objectives
for the µMachine Relay project. Operating profit and revenue are plotted on the
Y-axis. Three production ramp options are provide because this is a start-up
business based on new technology.
The graph in the upper right hand corner is a plot of ADI’s current market share
for analog switches. The first two products will be a quad-switch and 8:1 MUX.
These products could service 50% of the market.
These products were selected to optimize the technology adoption rate described
in Steps 3 & 4 of the BPP. The µMachine Relay products provide a new solution
to an existing product. Once the visionaries have adopted this new technology,
increased integration of products will be offered. This is described in the lower
box, the Product Roadmap.
EDP/Business
Key Suppliers & ‘96 Sales Customers
Telecommunications Consumer
OMRON $680M
Siemens $500M Ericsson HVAC
Motorola
Matsushita $500M Appliances
Nokia
Fujitsu $270M Nortel Commercial Equipment
NEC $230M Mitsubishi
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
U.S. Suppliers & ‘96 Sales ATE Process Control / Instrumentation CONSUMPTION [$ millions]
Teradyne Honeywell
C.P. Clare $100M
Advantest Hewlett-Packard
Teledyne $35M ANDO Allen-Bradley • Top 10 represent 63% of
Coto $16M market ($2.9 billion)
Hewlett-Packard YEC
Foxboro / Siebe • 70% sold through reps.
This slide summarizes the µMachine Relay market segmentation. The upper left-
hand pie chart describes the target market for this technology with some key
attributes such as CAGR and key performance attributes. Customer and
competitor information is described below the pie chart. To the right of the slide,
there is a bar graph describing the application segmentation.
This information was extracted from industry sources and customer interviews.
Section V of the BPP Manual has more details on the tools and methods for
extracting and analyzing this type of data. In addition to the existing tools in
Section V, two new tools have been added by the SLT based on the work of Chris
Halliwell from California Institute of Technology. These are the Competitive
Differentiation Process (Tool 49) and the Value Based Market Segmentation
Methodology (Tool 50). Both of these tools provide frameworks or
methodologies to determine what customers may provide the greatest
opportunities.
Built in Self-Test
RF
Filters
Mech.
Interps
Products Containing µMRelays
DCL w/
Audio/Video
µMRelay I/O
Muxes
“ADI Inside”
Reliability ESD
Lower Isolation Reconf.
Discrete µWave
Cost
Delivery µ M Relay Switch
Analog
of Cell
Test RF Switch Generic
Arrays
Product Packaging
“Ideal”
Switch Channel
Expected Card
Crosspoint Product on a Chip
Arrays
Augmented
Product
µM Logic
Potential
Product
There are only two things you need to know about your product at any time. What
is needed by your customers and who is going to buy it! This slide summarizes
the “What” using the Whole Product View (Tool 46). The “Who” is summarized
in the following slide.
For the µMachine Relay business, the “What” is described starting with the center
circle of the Whole Product View - Generic Product. The Generic Product is the
minimum requirements or the core product or device you are describing. In this
case, it is the relay device.
The second layer, the Expected Product, describes any additional products needed
to complete the solution, e.g., ESD protection or packaging.
The third layer is the Augmented Product. This layer describes any additional
differentiation. For the µMachine Relay business, the ability to provide post
processed relays to existing ADI products offers a level of integration other
µMachine Relay technologies can not support.
The fourth layer is the Potential Product. This layer describes additional aspects
of your product offering that may influence or affect your core product.
(Imagineering)
97 01 03 05
This slide describes the “Who” is going to buy your product. For the µMachine
Relay business, it is not obvious who will be the early adopters and who will be
the followers and laggards. This information is critical to rolling out new
technologies and products. Choosing the wrong customer, (i.e. followers or
laggards), at the beginning of the development process, will lead to frustration and
wasted effort. By using the Technology Adoption Model (Tool 47), we hope to
better understand which customers will be ready for the µMachine Relay
technology, when it becomes available.
ATE P/E
Next Gen. (DCL ASIC)
Product
8:1
Multiplexer
Addition to Derivative
Family 8:1 Multiplexer Video
(SMT) Crosspoint/Mux
Crosspoint
Add-ons / Quad SPST
Switch
(SMT)
Enhancements Differential
Switch/Mux
The Product Type Matrix (Tool 51) or “Bubble Chart” helps ensure that the
development projects in the queue are in sync with the business strategy. The
advanced development requirements are listed in the box in the upper left-hand
corner. This research activity needs to be resourced, funded, and coordinated with
the technology development groups within ADI. The bubbles represent product
plans plotted in relationship to the level of innovation (Breakthrough, Platform,
Derivative).
Understanding the makeup of a product line’s risk profile is very important. The
Product Type Matrix helps describe this risk, and highlight possible mismatches
with overall business planning.
High Integration Bipolar Integration ATE P/E (DCL) ASIC DCL w/ PMU ASIC
ASICs w/ µMRelay I/O
ATE P/E Std. Product
FY00 FY01 w/ µMRelay I/O
FY02
This slide contains two tools. The first is the Product / Technology Roadmap.
(Tool 52) The Product / Technology Roadmap describes the sequencing and
rhythm of new product introductions. This slide also highlights key organization
interdependencies such as the technology development required to support
product development. Well-planned technology and product development plans
will - “KEEP INNOVATION OUT OF THE CRITICAL PATH.”
For the µMachine Relay, the first product is a simple quad-switch in a ceramic
cavity package. This product is offered first to solve any new technology adoption
fears. As innovation progresses and technology becomes more stable, higher
levels of integration for the µMachine Relays will be offered. It is important to
note the interdependencies described. For example, Wafer Level Capping and
CMOS process integration are two technology development activities that would
be “show stoppers” if not developed ahead of product requirements.
The second tool is the Resource Gap Analysis (Tool 54). The Resource Gap
Analysis describes the differences between the resources available and the
resources needed to support the product development requirements. The
Resource Gap Analysis is similar to a simplified manufacturing capacity plan,
with resource constraints clearly identified.
q Adaptation Introduction
Adaptation Introduction
Tactical Strategic
Time Horizon 6 Mo to 1 year 1 to 3 years
Today Future
Core Competencies
Value Proposition
Development Priorities & Plan
Sales Plan
Support Operations Plan
Marketing (Communications) People & Organization
Plan
Financial Implications
Resources Plan
Financial Consequences
Country
Step Field Sales Management
Country Management
Step Field Sales
Key Questions:
Preparation
• What are the value propositions (Step 1), objectives (Step 2), target
segments and customers (Step 3), necessary product, services and vendor
attributes (Step 5) from the business plans of the Product Line
Organization you support?
• What is your vision of ADI's role in the local market in five years? The
types of channels and services you will be required to provide the value
desired by your customers?
• What necessary and sufficient activities (key success factors) must you
accomplish to be confident you will meet these objectives?
• Why aren't you selling to other people who are buying these kind of
products from your competitors? Are their needs or expectations
different? How and why?
• How are the marketplace's needs and required benefits changing? Why?
What forces are causing the change? How will new product directions
impact this?
• What kind of channels are you selling through today? Which ones are
attracted to what you offer? What are their dissatisfiers in terms of your
operations? How are their needs and required benefits changing? Why?
What forces are causing this?
• Given how products and needs may be evolving, how will end-user
"prospects" want to buy products or services in the future? Through what
kinds of channels? With what kind of "delivery attributes?"
• Who are your principal competitors and what are their strategies? What
segments do they target? What end-user customers do they seem to
attract? What channels do they distribute through?
• Where are they most vulnerable? What would their likely response be to
aggressive moves by you?
• Where are you most vulnerable to change in the market? What could you
do to minimize the impact of a competitor exploiting this or the
probability that they would want to try?
• What target end-user customers have you selected to make the focus of
your "value delivery system?"
• What is your plan for deploying the direct sales effort? What segments?
• How will you develop and market the unique local solutions described in
Step 5?
• What new product lines will you need to complement what you presently
distribute and better meet customers' needs?
• What orders, revenue, costs and profit should result form this plan? What
return on assets?
• In what areas is your plan most as risk? What is the probability of these
situations occurring? What might be the consequences? What actions
can you take to minimize their impact?
• What will the likely response be from your competitors when you plan is
implemented?
• What internal dependencies or linkages exist that are the biggest cause for
concern?
• During the first year, what does each department need to do to implement
these plans? To address the key success factors described in Step 2?
Appendix
• Who are the competitors? What are their market shares? Among similar
customers, why do some buy from you and others prefer alternative
sources?
• What does your success suggest about what markets you best serve?
What position do you hold in customers' minds?
• What will be the economic climate over the next few years?
• What problems are driving them? What benefits do they require? What
value are they trying to deliver to their customers?
• Are there clusters of customers who prefer similar benefits? What are
the differences between the clusters? The differentiating needs?
Steps 5, 1, 2
• What are the market growth plans over the planning horizon by industry?
Size of business?
• What trade or tariff policy changes are expected that will affect
consumption? Pricing?
• What will be the impact of greater ADI brand awareness and preference
on our ability to increase market penetration?
A
Assess Business &
Investment Climate in
B Geography
– Market Access
– Vendor Preference
C
Key Questions:
Service Activity
• What is your vision of the type of services required in five years as ADI
evolves?
• What objectives or milestones have you set for key success factor
metrics?
• What is your role in ADI's value chain? How has this changed over the
last year? How will it change over the next five years?
• What factors are influencing the requirements for services at these points
in the value chain? How are needs and expected benefits likely to
evolve?
• What internal or external forces will affect your ability to deliver cost
effective services over this period?
• How does your approach and cost structure compare to "best practices" in
the industry in general?
• Are there alternative sources of supply for these services? What are their
advantages and disadvantages?
• What are your customers' perceptions of the quality and cost effectiveness
of your services?
• For those points in ADI's value chain where you contribute, what services
and supplier attributes will be required to meet (internal) customer
expectations and make ADI more competitive?
• What are your plans for enhancing existing services? For developing new
services?
• In what areas is your plan most at risk? What is the probability of these
situations occurring? What might the consequences be to your plan?
What actions would you take?
– Employees
ØBy Segment
ØBy Function/Department
ØDevelopment Plan
ØMarketing Plan
ØImplementation/Operations Plan
Step Eight: Potential External Situations That Could Affect Meeting Business
Objectives
– Country to Business
– Country to Country
– Market Assumptions
– Employees
– FESS Requirements
ØDevelopment Plan
ØMarketing Plan
ØImplementation/Operations Plan
Step Eight: Potential External Situations That Could Affect Meeting Business
Objectives
– Country to Business
– Country to Country
q Introduction
q Strategic Intent
q Value Proposition
q Market Segmentation
q Competitive Advantage
q Value Chain
q Industry Analysis
Introduction
Throughout this document, references have been made to various key concepts.
These concepts, although not unique or inherent to the Business Planning Process,
are nevertheless, useful tools or perspectives for looking at the tasks involved in
various steps. In this section, we will briefly describe what the following concepts
mean and how they relate the Business Planning Process:
q Strategic intent.
q Value proposition.
q Market segmentation.
q Competitive advantage.
q Value chain.
q Industry analysis.
Figure 1 shows where, in the Business Planning Process, these concepts are most
relevant and can make the greatest contribution.
Figure 1
Contributing Concepts
7. Financial Analysis
8. Potential Problems
9. Recommendations
Strategic Intent
The concept of strategic intent has been described by Hamel and Prahalad* as "an
obsession with winning that encompasses an entire company and is sustained over
the 10 to 20 year quest for global leadership." The authors found that companies
that have risen to global leadership invariably began with ambitions that were out
of all proportion to their resources and capabilities.
Strategic intent is the glue that holds the different facets of the company together.
It is the motivator to keep improving one's basic disciplines, developing and
protecting one's core competencies, and creating the competitive endurance to
establish the global infrastructure. Strategic intent fills the area between corporate
objectives and strategic business units plans.
q It is NOT strategic planning. The question of how, or if, one can achieve
strategic intent should not inhibit its definition. The strategic intent lasts
longer than is successfully forecasted.
Value Proposition
A value proposition is a simple, clear statement of who the target customers are
and precisely what key benefits and price will be delivered to them. In order to
succeed, businesses must choose, deliver, and communicate a superior value to
target customers. The end product of choosing a superior value is the value
proposition.
In effect, businesses are seen as "value delivery systems." All elements of the
business are viewed as vehicles or support structures to deliver value to
customers. Value is defined as benefits minus price, as perceived by customers.
Benefits are the results desired by the customer. Price is the total cost of buying
and using the product or service.
q Is it clear how this value proposition is superior for the target segment?
Market Segmentation
Hiavacek and Ames, in their article, "Segmenting Industrial and High Technology
Markets,"* describe a couple of examples of organizations who have used
segmentation successfully:
To avoid having too few, too many, or unreachable market segments, Hiavacek
and Ames go on to suggest the following criteria for segmentation:
q For each identified segment, one should know the present and future key
success factors necessary to serve the segment effectively.
q For each identified segment, one should know what capabilities the company
has or needs to develop, or acquire, to serve the segment profitability.
These criteria should be used to ensure that you have examined your segments
carefully. They should not be applied rigidly.
Variable Example
Myth 4: Segments are FOREVER. Segments change along with the needs of
customers. Therefore, it is critical that research on user and
customer needs is conducted continuously.
Competitive Advantage
Value Chain
The value chain for an ADI division will consist of internal activities that are
linked horizontally. Its vertical linkages may represent strategic alliances, joint
ventures, mergers, and license agreements with external organizations, or it may
represent linkages with other ADI divisions. Competitive advantage is often
derived by isolating linkages and focusing on their coordination and optimization.
The process of value chain definition starts with a macro-level look and proceeds
into successively finer linkages, component, and activity break downs as needed
to isolate the activities that lead to competitive advantage.
Competitive advantage stems from these many discrete activities that contribute to
a firm's relative cost position and create a basis for differentiation. A cost
advantage may result from such disparate sources as a low-cost physical
distribution system, a highly efficient assembly process, or superior sales force
As a result, a value chain analysis is helpful in addressing the following three key
strategic questions:
q What is an appropriate contribution for the firm in the industry's value chain?
Value chain is a contributing tool for strategic planning and is particularly useful
in Steps 3, 4, and 6 of Business Planning.
Figure 2
The Value System
Business
Unit Value
Chain
Partner
Value
Chain
Figure 3
Generic Value Chain
Model
Firm Infrastructure
Support { Human Resources Management
Ma
Activities Technology Department
r gi
Procurement
M n
ar g
Primary in
Activities
Industry Analysis
Michael Porter has also developed a model to help companies analyze the forces
they must battle to succeed in their industry. Companies have found Porter's ideas
very useful in understanding competitive forces for the industry segments they
have chosen.
Porter describes five forces that govern the competitiveness of any industry.
q Potential entrants.
q Threat of substitution.
"Then the strategist can devise a plan of action that may include (1) positioning
the company so that its capabilities provide the best defense against the
competitive force; and/or (2) influencing the balance of forces through strategic
moves, thereby improving the company's position; and/or (3) anticipating shifts in
the factors underlying the forces and responding to them with the hope of
exploiting change by choosing a strategy appropriate for the new competitive
balance before opponents recognize it. (Michael Porter, "How Competitive
Forces Shape Strategy," Harvard Business Review, March April 1979, p. 143).
Porter describes his points in the article noted above, and in two books cited in the
listing of resources.
All these concepts are highly compatible with Business Planning. They provide
an excellent perspective on the types of competitors you can analyze in Step 4.
They also suggest how the team can use the results to help develop a winning plan
of action against these competitive forces.
Section IX - Resources
q Books
q Article
q Consultants
Books:
Articles:
Articles (con't):
q "Six Basics for General Managers," Andrall E. Pearson, Harvard Business Review,
July-August 1989.
q "Segmenting Industrial and High Technology Markets," Hiavacek and Ames, Journal of
Business Strategy, Fall, 1986.
q "Strategic Intent," Gary Hamel, C.K. Prahalad, Harvard Business Review, May-June
1989.
q "The House of Quality," John Hauser and Don Clausing, Harvard Business Review,
May-June, 1988.
Consultants:
o Consultants: Decision Research, Lexington, MA., Mars & Co., Greenwich, CT.
o Consultants: Dr. Paul Green, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA