FDI
FDI
Abstract
Since the last decade of the twentieth century, due to liberalization of policies
and globalisation, the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows are on an
increasing trend. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and liberalization/
globalisation has been one of the most fascinating and hot topics among
researchers in the field of international trade and commerce. It is an important
form of fast international expansion to increase ownership of assets, drive
location-specific advantages and acquire additional knowledge. FDI in
industrial sectors in India has become a point of discussion due to various
reasons. Starting from the service sector, information technology,
telecommunication sector, manufacturing etc there is a continuous fluctuation
in FDI inflows over the years. Earlier FDI was the target for manufacturing
industries, automobile industries, transportation industry etc., but since a
couple of years Service Sector has been seen attracting the highest FDI
inflows The present study is conducted to study the Sector-wise FDI inflows
in India and the reasons for industrial sectors attracting the highest FDI
inflows. The study is conducted from 2000-2009.
Introduction
Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows in India is a defining feature of free market,
liberalisation and globalization. The important aspect is that how and through what
channels impact of FDI inflows affect the performance of companies in developing
countries.One major channel through which inflows of foreign capital, of foreign
direct investment (FDI) in particular, affect labour markets in developing countries is
economic growth. If capital inflows enable the recipient developing countries to
increase the investment rate beyond what they could sustain with their domestic
246 Syed Khaja Safiuddin
Review of Literature
A brief review of literature on FDI and related aspects is provided below
Hymer (1960), Caves (1996), Dunning (1993) found that MNEs have both
tangible and intangible resources, or explicit and tacit knowledge, in the form of
technologies, managerial skill, international networks, capital, and brand names and
goodwill (Hymer 1960, Caves 1996, Dunning 1993).
Teece (19770 stated that the MNEs can supply these resources to local firms in
equity joint ventures (intra-firm), in non-equity strategic alliances, or in arm’s-length
transactions through the external market. The transfer mechanism through the market
or intra-firm depends on transaction costs (Teece 1977).
Lucas (1990) has also analyzed the issue by examining the question of why capital
does not flow from rich to poor countries and critically explored some candidate
answers that are based on human capital and capital market imperfections. With
regard to human capital, he shows that the rich country’s optimal policy is to retard
capital flows so as to maintain real wages at artificially low levels in the poor
country. As far as capital market imperfections are concerned, Lucas’s paper analyzes
a borrowing contract between poor and rich countries. In this paper, the focus is on
linkages and on the rational behavior of different foreign investors in the face of
reform uncertainty.
Cheng, (1993) noted the growing importance of cross-border R & D activities and
suggested that additional research on FDI should be done on why firms
internationalize their R & D
Anand and Delios (1996) documented that the relatively slow growth of FDI
from Japanese MNCs in India as compared to China is attributed to the desire to gain
only market access in India.
Garg, et al. (1996) documented that along with the regulation of product prices,
since 1986 the Indian government has limited the profits pharmaceutical companies
can earn to approximately 6 percent of sales turnover. From 1970 through the early
1990s, industry pre-tax profitability as a percent of sales declined consistently, one
reason for which was the rate of return constraint. Indeed, in 1977- 1978 industry
profitability 11.7 percent. In 1982-1983 this dropped to 7.5 percent, further declining
to 3.5 percent in 1987-1988. Since 1992, industry profitability has been rising, and by
1996 it had reached approximately 10 percent of sales (Garg, et al., 1996).
Lee and Mansfield (1996) found that the developing country technology polices
have often favored the objective of national self-determination at the expense of
Direct Investment Inflows in India- Opportunities and Benefits 247
study reveals that higher proportion of FDI will result into better performance of
companies. As far as export performance is concerned, the performance of FDI based
pharmaceutical companies in India.
Tanay Kumar Nandi and Ritankar Saher (2007) in their work made an attempt to
study the Foreign Direct Investment In India with a special focus on Retail Trade.
This paper stresses the need of FDI in India in retail sector and uses the augment that
FDI is allowed in multiple sectors and the effects have been quite good without
harming the domestic economy. The study also suggests that FDI in retail sector must
be allowed.
The review of literature reveals that on a particular sector FDI has a direct impact
and on a particular sector it has an indirect impact. A study on the impact of FDI on
manufacturing sector reveals that FDI inflows in chemicals, electrical and electronics
shows direct impact and FDI inflow in drugs and pharmaceutical sectors shows
indirect impact (spillover effects). (Rajit Kumar Sahoo, 2005)
Automatic Route
Under the RBI’s Automatic Route, the Indian companies can issue shares up to
prescribed percentage to persons resident outside India without obtaining prior
permission either of the Government or RBI. These companies must be engaged in the
permissible activities under the FEMA. Companies engaged in manufacture of items
reserved for SSI sector or those manufacturing items requiring industrial license or
engaged in areas such as, defence, atomic energy or aerospace will not be able to avail
of the Automatic Route.
incorporated outside India and such issuances may not be allowed under the
Automatic Route or any other general/special permissions. In such cases, it will be
necessary to apply to the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). Approvals are
granted by FIPB on a case-by-case basis. The Reserve Bank has granted general
permission to Indian companies for issue and export of shares/securities to foreign
investors to acquire such shares in respect of such investments approved by
SIA/FIPB.
Importance of FDI
The importance of FDI extends beyond the financial capital that flows into the
country. In addition, FDI inflows can be a tool for bringing knowledge, managerial
skills and capability, product design, quality characteristics, brand names, channels
for international marketing of products, etc. and consequent integration into global
production chains, which are the foundation of a successful exports strategy.
Facilitating flows of FDI, including the technology transfer associated with it,
may require the direct and active involvement of the home countries of transnational
corporations (TNCs). UNCTAD research has found that providing tax breaks for
small and medium-sized enterprises in developed countries that are willing to invest
in developing countries could stimulate such flows. Home country incentive schemes
to stimulate linkages between foreign affiliates and domestic firms in developing
countries could also help developing countries benefit more from foreign direct
investment.
The liberalisation of government policies that restrict foreign direct investment
(FDI) is a recent phenomenon. Although trade policies have been liberalised for
many years through the elimination of quotas and the reduction of import tariffs,
liberalisation of investment policies is more recent, stimulated by the World Trade
Organisation (WTO) in 1995. Liberalisation of FDI policies offers opportunities for
firms as well as threats. If FDI (and trade) liberalisation results in faster growing
national economies, then firms face larger, faster-growing markets domestically. In
addition, more foreign-invested firms means more potential customers locally with
strong purchasing power, and more chances for linkages with them. If technology
spillovers occur from foreign firms to other firms in the industry, then those firms can
achieve better technical performance.
FDI could benefit both the domestic industry as well as the consumer, by
providing opportunities for technological transfer and up gradation, access to global
managerial skills and practices, optimal utilization of human capabilities and natural
resources, making industry internationally competitive, opening up export markets,
providing backward and forward linkages and access to international quality goods
and services and augmenting employment opportunities. For all these reasons, FDI is
regarded as an important vehicle for economic development particularly for
developing economies. FDI flows are usually preferred over other forms of external
finance because they are non-debt creating, non-volatile19 and their returns depend on
the performance of the projects financed by the investors. In a world of increased
competition and rapid technological change, their complimentary and catalytic role
can be very valuable.
250 Syed Khaja Safiuddin
across the globe. The government of India has taken measures to ensure pro-active
and positive policies to boost the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to
telecommunications sector in India. Tremendous growth has taken place in this sector
in recent years.A number of telecom service providers are working in both the private
and public sector. The two most crucial causes behind the huge success of the telecom
sector are the growing demand for mobile phone services and private sector
participation in the telecommunication industry. The private sector participation in the
telecommunication sector in India is increasing at a rapid pace.
Real estate is one of the major sectors under construction activities and also it is
one of the most booming sectors that has contributed leaps and bounds to the Indian
industry. The real estate sector in India is highly fragmented. According to the
estimates of 2004- 2005, the real estate sector in India was worth US$ 12 billion. The
majority of the developers in the real estate sector in India have only a regional
presence. The involvement of large corporations is limited in the real estate sector in
the country. The profit margins are higher in the sector of real estate in India in
comparison to the foreign markets that are developed.
The automobile sector in the Indian industry is one of the high performing sectors
of the Indian economy. This has contributed largely in making India a prime
destination for many international players in the automobile industry who wish to set
up their businesses in India. The automobile industry in India is growing by 18
percent per year. The production level of the automobile sector has increased from 2
million in 1991 to 9.7 million in 2006 after the participation of global players in the
sector.
The power sector in India has grown significantly and is an important part of
infrastructure. Investment potential in the power sector of India is huge due to the
market size and returns on investment capital. Past few years have witnessed an
outstanding growth in the power sector especially the sectors based on renewable
sources of energy. The total installed capacity of the electric power generation
stations in India according to estimates of January 2007 is 128182.47 MW and the
government of India aims at reaching 2, 00,000 MW by the year 2012. The regional
transmission network along with inter-regional capacity to transmit power will be
expanded to ensure this growth. The total power generation in India has increased
from 264.3 Billion Units (BUs) during 1990-91 to 551.7 Billion Units during 2006-
07(up to Jan.'07). The investments required in the execution of this task will be
generated from public-private partnerships in the sector.
The chemicals industry in India was worth more than US$ 40 billion in 2004-
2005. The industry of chemicals in India is an important part of the economy of the
country, for it constitutes around 6% of the country's GDP. The total amount of
exports from the chemicals industry in India stood at US$ 12 billion in 2004- 2005.
The chemicals industry in India produces over 70,000 varieties of products.
As per the estimates of 2004 the drugs and pharmaceuticals industry of India was
worth 8.8 billion US dollars, contributing 1.3% to India's GDP. The domestic market
in the drugs and pharmaceuticals industry in India is worth more than US$ 4.8 billion.
The industry of drugs and pharmaceuticals in India is highly fragmented with more
than 3,000 medium and small sized producers. The major domestic companies in the
252 Syed Khaja Safiuddin
drugs and pharmaceuticals industry of India are Ranbaxy, Dr. Reddy's, and Cipla. The
major international companies having presence in the industry of drugs and
pharmaceuticals in India are Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, and Glaxo
SmithKline.
The electrical equipments industry that includes, electronics and computer
hardware in India, has registered growth in the flow of foreign direct investment,
which has resulted in the growth and development of the industry. The electrical
equipments industry in India produces various kinds of products such as transformers,
electrical motors, switchboards, furnaces, panels, and aluminum conductors.
The metallurgical industries in India generated revenue more than US$ 13 billion
in 2004- 2005 and it provides employment to around one million people. India ranks
among the top ten suppliers of aluminum and steel across the globe.The metallurgical
industries in India are the biggest manufacturers of sponge iron across the world and
they also produce around 35 million tonnes of steel each year. The metallurgical
industries in India are largely dominated by the public sector. The major companies in
the metallurgical industries in India are Tata Steel, Nalco, SAIL, Sterlite, and
Hindalco.
The electronics industry in India is estimated to be worth USD 11 billion. India
has a share of 0.6 percent in the international market in terms of electronics hardware.
The electronics industry in India designs and manufactures a wide range of electronics
hardware namely, consumer electronics, industrial electronics, computers, telecom
equipment, and electronic components. Capacitors, resistors, wound components, CD-
ROMs, color picture tubes, and the like are highly export-oriented products
manufactured by the electronics industry in India. Some leading international players
of electronics industry which have set up manufacturing units in India are Siemens,
Texas Instruments, Matsushita, Alcatel, LG, Samsung, Sharp and Lenovo. Some of
the international players have also established R&D centers in India.
The hotel and tourism industry is growing faster for the past few years, bringing in
large revenues through foreign as well as domestic tourists in various parts of the
country. There was a major surge in inbound tourism in India in 2006. There was a
double-digit rise in the arrival of foreign tourists to India in the same year. The major
rise in the tourist arrivals in India has led to an increase in India's share in world
arrivals from 0.37 percent in 2001 to 0.53 percent in 2006. Tourism industry
contributes to around 5.9 percent of India GDP and provides employment to around
41.8 million people in the country. The foreign tourist arrivals have witnessed a
growth of 12.4 percent during the first ten months of 2007 and touched 3.89 million
as against 3.46 million during the same period in 2006. With the advent of foreign
tourists, the foreign exchange earnings also witnessed a growth of 25.6 percent during
January-October 2007 and reached USD 6.32 billion as against USD 5.03 billion
during January-October 2006. The foreign exchange earnings grew by 14.6 percent in
2006 to reach USD 6.56 billion as against USD 5.73 billion in 2005.
(i). Sector-wise FDI inflows in India from April 2000 – Dec 2009
Graph showing Top ten sectors attracting FDI inflows in India since April 2000 –
Dec 2009
3% 3%
4%
6%
32%
6%
10%
11% 13%
12%
(ii). Ranking of Sector-wise FDI Inflows in India since April 2000 – Dec2009
References
[1] Anand, J. and Delios, A., “Competing globally: How Japanese MNCs have
matched goals and strategies in India and China”, Journal of World Business.
31, 3, Fall 1996, pp.50-62.
[2] Aditya KR Bajaj and Swastik Nigam (Dec 2007) “Globalization in the Indian
Pharmaceutical Industry – FDI spillovers and implications on Domestic
Productivity: 1991-2007”, is a research project done under IIM Ahmedabad.
[3] FDI Inflows in Indian Industry and Bhupal Singh (2005). “Methodology,
Compilation and Reporting of Foreign Direct Investment Statistics: The Indian
Experience,” Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai
[4] Caves, Richard. 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, 2nd
ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Cheng, Joseph L.C. 1993, “ The management of Multinational R& D : A
neglected topic in international business research”, Journal of International
Business Studies, 24(1) ;1-18.
[6] Dijkstra, A. Geske. 2000. “Trade Liberalization and Industrial Development in
Latin America,” World Development, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1567-1582.
[7] Feinberg, Susan & Majumdar, Sumit K. 2001. “Technology spillovers from
foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry,” Journal of
International Business Studies, vol. 32, no. 3 (Third Quarter), pp. 421-437
[8] Fujita, Masahisa, Paul Krugman, and Anthony J. Venables, 1999, The Spatial
Economy (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press). Lee, J.Y. & Mansfield,
E. 1996. Intellectual Property Protection and US Foreign Direct Investment.
Review of Economics and Statistics, 78: 181-186.
[9] Garg, R., G. Kumra, A. Padhi & A. Puri. 1996. Four Opportunities in India.s
Pharmaceuticals Market. McKinsey Quarterly, 4: 132-144.
[10] Hymer, Stephen. 1960. The International Operations of National Firms: A
Study of Direct Investment. Ph.D. dissertation. Boston: MIT Press.
[11] Jaya Gupta(2007), “Gloablisationa and Indian Economy: Sector-wise Analysis
of FDI inflows
[12] Jayashree Bose(2007), “FDI Inflows in India and China – A Sectoral
Experiences”, ICFAI University Press, Hyderabad
[13] Krugman, Paul, 1991, “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,” Journal
of Political Economy, Vol.99 (June), pp.483-99.
[14] Lucas, Robert E. Jr., 1990, “Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor
Countries?” American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 92-96.
[15] Rajih Kumar Sahoo (2005), “Foreign Direct Investment and Growth of
Manufacturing Sector: An Empirical Study on Post Reforms India”, is a
doctoral thesis submitted to the University of Mysore 2005.
[16] Reserve Bank of India (2002), “Report of the Committee on Compilation of
Foreign Direct Investment in India.”
Direct Investment Inflows in India- Opportunities and Benefits 259