Ipcrf Tin 2015
Ipcrf Tin 2015
Form
Name of Employee: MARIA CRISTINA C. IBASCO
Position: Teacher I
School/Office: GUMAUS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Rating Period:
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELI
NE
Weight Per
KRA
ACTUAL RESULTS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Q
37%
1. Utilized multimedia
as
instructional
materials suited to the
needs of the learners in
71-80 sessions in all
subjects handled.
Basic
Educati
on
Service
s
[Type text]
TEACHING
LEARNING
PROCESS
June,
2015
to
March
, 2016
(15%)
RATING
(Outstanding)
Utilized
multimedia
as
instructional
materials suited to the needs of
the learners in 71-80 sessions
in all subjects handled.
4 (Very Satisfactory) Utilized
multimedia
as
instructional
materials suited to the needs of
the learners in 61-70 sessions
in all subjects handled.
3 (Satisfactory) Utilized
multimedia
as
instructional
materials suited to the needs of
the learners in 51-60 sessions
in all subjects handled.
2 (Unsatisfactory) Utilized
multimedia
as
instructional
materials suited to the needs of
the learners in 41-50 sessions
in all subjects handled.
1 (Poor) Utilized multimedia
as instructional materials suited
to the needs of the learners in
31-40 sessions in all subjects
Ave.
SCORE*
handled.
(15%)
2.
Prepared
and
executed 150-180 daily
lesson logs.
June,
2015
to
March
, 2016
(7%)
3. Monitored
attendance, classroom
orderliness/cleanliness,
physical facilities for
150-170 days.
June,
2015
to
March
, 2016
Indicators:
1 Monitored attendance only
2 Monitored classroom
orderliness/cleanliness only
3 Monitored physical facilities
only
4 Monitored attendance and
classroom orderliness
5 (Outstanding) All
indicators met
4 (Very Satisfactory) 3
indicators met
3 (Satisfactory) 2 indicators
met
2 (Unsatisfactory) 1 indicator
met
[Type text]
STUDENT
OUTCOME
S
JuneDece
mber
2015
(10%)
(10%)
2. Achieved 2%
increase in NAT result
in English over the
previous year.
June
2015
to
March
2016
(10%)
[Type text]
5- (Outstanding) - Determined
the reading levels of
80-100
Grade 7 students through the
use of PHIL IRRI.
4 (Very Satisfactory) Determined the reading levels
of 60-79 Grade 7 students
through the use of PHIL IRRI.
3 (Satisfactory) - Determined
the reading levels of
40-59
Grade 7 students through the
use of PHIL IRRI.
2
(Unsatisfactory)
5- (Outstanding) Achieved 2%
increase over the previous year.
4 (Very Satisfactory)
Achieved 1% increase over the
previous year.
3 (Satisfactory) Maintained
the students rating in NAT.
2 (Unsatisfactory) Decreased
by 1% in the result over the
previous year.
1 (Poor) Decreased by 2% in
the result over the previous
year.
3. Conducted Remedial
Lesson in Reading for
50-60 hours within the
school year.
June
2015
to
March
2016
5- (Outstanding) Conducted
50-60 hours of remedial lessons
in reading within the school
year.
4 (Very Satisfactory) Conducted
40-49
hours
of
remedial lessons in reading
within the school year.
3 (Satisfactory) - Conducted
30-39 hours of remedial lessons
in reading within the school
year.
2 (Unsatisfactory) - Conducted
20-29 hours of remedial lessons
in reading within the school
year.
1 (Poor) Conducted 10-19
hours of remedial lessons in
reading within the school year.
18%
COMMUNIT
Y
INVOLVEM
ENT
[Type text]
1. Attended and
participated actively as
Secretary of
GPTA/Board Meetings
and made 8 Minutes of
the Meetings.
June
2015
to
March
2016
(6%)
5- (Outstanding) . Attended
and participated actively as
Secretary of GPTA/Board
Meetings and made 8 Minutes
of the Meetings.
4 (Very Satisfactory) Attended and participated
actively as Secretary of GPTA/
Board Meetings and made 7
Minutes of the Meetings.
3 (Satisfactory) Attended
(6%)
2. Prepared and
submitted 4 approved
resolutions.
June
2015
to
March
2016
(6%)
3. Participated in 4
community programs or
activities.
June
2015
to
March
2016
5- (Outstanding) Participated
in 4 community programs or
activities.
4 (Very Satisfactory) Participated in 3 community
[Type text]
programs or activities.
3 (Satisfactory) - Participated
in 2 community programs or
activities.
2 (Unsatisfactory) Participated in 1 community
program or activity.
1 (Poor) Did not participate
in any community program or
activity.
15%
1. Prepared or assisted
in the groundwork and
execution of 4 schoolbased/cluster-based
project proposals
within the year.
PROFESSIO
NAL
GROWTH/
DEVELOPM
ENT
[Type text]
June
2015
to
March
2016
(5%)
5- (Outstanding) - Prepared or
assisted in the groundwork and
execution of 4 schoolbased/cluster-based project
proposals within the year.
4 (Very Satisfactory) Prepared or assisted in the
groundwork and execution of 3
school-based/cluster-based
project proposals within the
year.
3 (Satisfactory) - Prepared or
assisted in the groundwork and
execution of 2 schoolbased/cluster-based project
proposals within the year.
2 (Unsatisfactory) - Prepared
or assisted in the groundwork
and execution of 1 schoolbased/cluster-based project
proposals within the year.
1 (Poor) Did not prepare nor
assisted in the groundwork and
execution of schoolbased/cluster-based project
June
2015
to
March
2016
(5%)
5- (Outstanding) - Made 5
personal researches on the
different teaching strategies
and wrote reflection papers on
each.
4 (Very Satisfactory) Made 4
personal researches on the
different teaching strategies
and wrote reflection papers on
each.
3 (Satisfactory) Made 3
personal researches on the
different teaching strategies
and wrote reflection papers on
each.
2 (Unsatisfactory) - Made 2
personal researches on the
different teaching strategies
and wrote reflection papers on
each.
1 (Poor) - Made 1 personal
research on the different
teaching strategies and wrote
reflection papers on each.
(5%)
3. Attended 4 seminars,
workshops and
trainings.
[Type text]
June
2015
to
March
2016
5 (Outstanding) Attended 4
seminars, workshops and
trainings.
4 (Very Satisfactory)
Attended 3 seminars,
workshops and trainings.
3 (Satisfactory) Attended 2
seminars, workshops and
trainings.
2 (Unsatisfactory) Attended 1
seminar, workshops and
trainings.
1 (Poor) Did not attend any
seminar workshop and training.
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
[Type text]
OVERALL RATING
FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS