We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16
Jacob Levinson
(ose
Robert Jay Axelrod
(oer
Alleed A. Levioson
Richard J, Levinson
seen
Riebard | Marcolas
So
Janes. Duna
ie jegans Cha Tes Ae
Mae
Siteopt nite her
ery L Goze
says ay
‘Todd D. Wace!
Matthew P. Pitre
Rosemacy B, MeGeady, MD.
Robert Y, Coole
Michael B. Fusco
Kathleen M. DiGiovanai
David A. Cook
Patrick J. Pian
Brian P. McEleay
Celine M. Viale
Kevin Bogelhard
ther Levinson Axelcod offices in Pemington,
Levinson Axelrod, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Levinson Plaza 2 Lincoln Highway, PO Box 2905, ison, NJ 08818-2905
“Tek: (132) 494-2727 Fax: (132) 494-2712
Via Certified Mail -CM 7011 2000 0001 8233 4756
March 1, 2016
State of New Jersey
Department of Children and Families
Division of Child Protection and Permanency
20 West State Street, 4* floor
P.O. Box 729
Trenton, N.J. 08625-0729
Re:_Jobn Doe v State of New Jersey et.als
Middlesex L- 915-16
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Summons and Complaint in
connection with the above matter.
Service is being made upon you by virtue of N.J. Rule 4:4-4(a).
Under the laws of New Jersey, you have thirty five (35) days in
which to file an Answer to said Complaint. I suggest you turn these
papers over to your insurance carrier or attorney.
Very truly yours,
Ronatd 8 Cnf —
RONALD B. GRAYZEL
For the Firm
RBG/Ik
Enclosure
haepy/ wu silawyerseoss
omerille/Hilsborough, Belford, Howell, Forked River and Jaesbusg/MonsoeSTATHIS & LEONARDIS LLC
Nicholas J. Leonardis - 009651992
32 South Main St.
Edison, NJ 08837
(732) 494-0600
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
LEVINSON AXELROD PA
Ronald B. Grayzel - 026771977
Levinson Plaza
2 Lincoln Highway
Edison, NJ 08818
(732)494-2727
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
JOHN DOE : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
: COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX
+ LAW DIVISION
Plains, 1 DocketNo. MID-L-915-16
vs. : Civil Action
STATE OF NEW JERSEY; STATE OF
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF : SUMMONS
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DIVISION :
OF CHILD PROTECTION AND 5
PERMANENCY , formerly known as
DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY
SERVICES; CHRISTOPHER DUGGAN;
RICHARD ROES (Un-identified case
workers, managers and/or supervisors of
case workers); CARL COES (Un-identified :
entities that were responsible for the
supervision and control of John Doe);
Defendznts,
‘THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TO THS NAMED DEFENDANT(S):
The State of New Jersey, Department of Children and Families,
Division of Child Protection and Permanency f/k/a Division of Youth
and Family Services‘The plaintiff, named above, have filed a lawsuit against you in the Superior Court of New Jersey.
‘The complaint attached to this summons states the basis for this lawsuit, If you dispute this
complaint, you or your attorney must file a written answer or motion and proof of service with the
deputy clerk of the Superior Court in the county listed above within 35 days from the date you
received this summons, not counting the date you received it. (The address of each deputy clerk
of the Superior Court is provided.) If the complaint is one in foreclosure, then you must file your
written answer or motion and proof of service with the Clerk of the Superior Court and a
completed Case Information Statement (available from the deputy clerk of the Superior Court) must
‘accompany your answer or motion when itis filed. You must also send a copy of your answer or
motion to plaintiff's attorney whose name and address appear above, or to plaintiff, if no attorney
is named above. A telephone cail will not protect your rights: you must file and serve a written
answer or motion (with fee and completed Case Information Statement) if you want the court to
hear your defense,
If you do not file and serve a written answer or motion within 35 days, the court may enter a
judgment against you for the relief plaintiff demands, plus interest and costs of suit. If judgment is
entered against you, the Sheriff may seize your money, wages or property to pay all or part of the
judgment.
If you cannot afford an attorney, you may call the Legal Services office in the county where you
live. A list of these offices is provided. If you do not have an attomey and are not eligible for free
legal assistance, you may obtain a referral to an attorney by calling one of the Lawyer Referral
Services. A list of these numbers is also provided.
Dated: March 1, 2016 Js Michelle M. Smith
Clerk of the Superior Court
Name of Defendant to be served
‘The State of New Jersey, Department of Children and Families , Division of Child Protection and
Permanency é/k/a Division of Youth and Family Services
Address for service
State of New Jersey
Tort Claims Unit
Department of the Treasury
Division of Risk Management
20 West State Street, 6° Floor
P.O. Box 620
‘Trenton, NJ. 08625
State of New Jersey
Department of Children and Families
20 West State Street, Fourth Floor
P.O, Box 729
‘Trenton, N.J. 08625~0729State of New Jersey
Department of Children and Families
Division of Child Protection and Permanency
ifk/a Division of Youth & Family Services
50 East State Street
P.O, Box 717
‘Trenton, NJ. 08625-0717STATHIS & LEONARDIS LLC
Nicholas J. Leonardis - 009651992
32 South Main St.
Edison, NJ 08837
(732) 494 -0600
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
LEVINSON AXELROD PA.
Ronald B. Grayzel - 026771977
Levinson Plaza
2 Lincoln Highway
Edison, NJ 08818
(732)494-2727
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
JOHN DOE
Plaintiffs,
vs.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY; STATE OF
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF 7
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DIVISION :
OF CHILD PROTECTION AND :
PERMANENCY , formerly known as
DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY
SERVICES; CHRISTOPHER DUGGAN;
RICHARD ROES (Un-identified case
workers, managers and/or supervisors of
case workers); CARL COES (Un-identified :
entities that were responsible far the
supervision and control of John Doe);
MATTHEW V. BROOKS
Defendants.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX
LAW DIVISION
Docket No. L-9)5. ly
Civil Action
COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
‘The plaintiff, ohn Dos, residing at in the Township of South Brunswick, in Middlesex
County, New Jersey, complaining of the defendants says that:FIRST COUN
1. John Doe is an aduli male who was victimized by sexual assault and battery as 2
minor. John Doe wishes to protect his identity to assure his privacy end avoid public
humilistion and embarrassment.
2, Arall timos relevant hereto, the State of Now Iersey, the New Jersey Department of
Children and Familics, Division of Youth and Family Services and Christopher Duggan and
Richard Roes were responsible for the oversight and protection of the health, safety and welfare
of children.
3, Onor about April 8, 2011, defendants the State of New Jerscy, the New Jersey
Department of Children and Families, Division of Youth and Family Services and Christopher
Duggan, placed and/or approved the placement of John Doe, a minor, in the custody and control
of MEE PUI os his temporary goeidien, John Dee was pleced inthe home oa
BAI under his sole custody and control.
4, These defendants failed to determine whether or not the consenting parent that
executed the authorizing document had the eapacity or authority to consent to the guardianship.
5. The defensianis failed to exercise reasonable care in the investigation, review,
oversight or control of the “waiver of parental rights” of plainti?’s biological parents and the
assignment of MII SI as plaintiff's guardizn,
6: These defendants had previously exercised and subsequently ‘assumed the role of
parents patriae role over Joan Doe.7. Richard Roes are unknown case workers and supervisors who were assigned and
performed services for John Doe and/or were responsible for supervising Christopher Duggan
andor the placement and the evaluation of the placément of John Doe,
8, Prior to placement, these defendants failed to conduct an investigation into the
background, suitability and qualifications of the guardian, Mi OI.
9. Defendants failed to have Mg BEE undergo professional evaluations
including but not limited to evaluations by social workers, psychologists and/or other
professionals,
10. ‘These defendants failed to conduct a criminal background check or other
background check on Mi FI.
11. Defendants failed to utilize procedural safeguards to ensure a safe and appropriate
placement.
12. During the time that John Doe was under the control and supervision of Mg
‘HQ, John Doe was physically and sexually assazited by MIE OE he was subjected
‘to physical and emotional abuse; he was not housed in a safe and appropriate environment, he
‘was subjected to consumption of alcohol and/or other unsafe conditions.
13, These defendants failed to properly supervise the placement, failed to monitor the
sninor in the placement, failed to conduct regular end periodic visits of the home in which he was
placed, failed to make reasonable inquiries into the health and welfare of John Doe, failed to
Snvestgate his stats wih the locel Board of Eévcation, and filed o respond wo inguities and
complaints about the minor's well-being.14, Asa direct and proximate consequence of the negligence of the defendants, their
palpably unreasonable conduct and their reckless disregard of John Doe’s welfare and well-
being, John Doe was caused to suffer serious and permanent physical injuries and
emotional/psychological injuries and has been caused to experience physical and emotional pain
and suffering and has undergone medical treatment and incurred medical expenses.
15. Defendants are legally responsible for John Doe's injuries under principles of
negligence, gross negligence and due to their reckless disregard of plaintif's rights. Defendants’
conduct was palpably unreasonable. Defendants breached their duties toward plaintiff under the
‘New Jersey Torts Claims Act.
‘Wherefore, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants aforesaid, on the First
Count, jointly and severally, for:
Compensatory damages;
Medical expenses;
Reasonable attomey’s fees;
Interest and costs of suit; and,
For such other relief as the Court may deem equitable and just.
poop
SECOND COUNT
1. Plaintiff repeats and reiterates the facts and contentions set forth inthe First Count and
repeats them herein,
‘2: * During the time that John Doe was under the custody, control and supervision of the “~~ ~~ ~
defendants, State of New Jersey, State of New Jersey Department of Children and Families,
Division of Youth and Family Services, Christopher Duggan, and Richard Roes, John Doe hadcertain rights and privileges guaranteed by NJ.S.A. 9:6B-1, et seq, the Child Placement Bill of
Right Act and The Child Welfare Act, N.I.S.A. 9:6-1 et se0,
3. These New Jersey statutes and the regulations promulgated under them provided that
John Doc had the right to be free from physical and psychological abuse; fo have and receive
adequate, safe and appropriate food, clothing and housing; to receive adequate and appropriate
meiiical care; to be free from wawarranted physical restraint and isolation; and to have services
of a high quality thet are designed to maintain and advance the child’s mental and physical well-
being.
4, Atall relevant times herein, these defendants acted in a negligent, careless, palpably
unreasonable, reckiess manner with deliberate indifference and with reckless disregard of the
safety and well- being of Fohn Doe, violating the terms and provision of the Child Placement Bill
of Rights Act and The Child Welfare Act.
5. These defendants are directly and/or vicariously liable for the actions and inactions of
these defendants and/or their agents, representatives or employees.
6. The defendants are directly and/or vicariously liable for the actions and conduct of
ed
7. Asadireot aud proximate consequence of the violation of their legal obligations under
these New Jersey statutes and regulations and statutory violations of John Doe's right and
leges, John Doe was caused to suffer serious and permanent injuries, both physical and
emotional, and sustained other losses and damages which will continue into the future,‘Wherefore, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants aforesaid, on the Second
Count, jointly and severally, for:
Compensatory damages;
Medical expenses;
Reasonable attorney's fees;
Interest and costs of suit; and,
For such other relief as the Court may deem equitable and just.
ppose
THIRD COUNT
1. Plaintiff repeats and reiterates the facts and contentions set forth in the previous
counts and repeats them herein.
2. Atall times relevant hereto, there may have been unidentified individuals that served as
case workers, managers and Jor supervisors of case workers who had job duties and/ or
performed services regarding John Doe.
3. These unidentified individuals have been designated in the Caption of the Complaint as
Richard Roes.
4, Atall times relevant hereto there may have been unidentified entities or organizations
that were responsible for the custody, control, supervision and monitoring of John Doe.
5. These unidentified entities have been designated in the Caption of the Complaint as Carl
Coes.
6. ‘These unidentified individuals, Richards Roes, and the unidentified entities, Carl Coes,
the performance of their duties and failed to comply with their statutory duties.
7. In the event these unidentified individuals and/or entities are identified, plaintiff hereby
reserves the right to amend the Complaint to include these defendants. |‘Wherefore, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants aforesaid, on the Third
Count, jointly and severally, for:
Compensatory damages;
‘Medical expenses;
Reasonable attorney's fees;
Interest and costs of suit; and,
For such other relief as the Court may deem equitable and just,
sao ee
FOURTH COUNT
1. Atall times relevant hereto, MEI PAI) bad custody and control of John Doe.
2. During this time period, defendant IM intentionally, recklessly and negligently
assaulted, and sexually assaulted John Doe.
3. PAE intentionally, recklessly and negligently inflicted emotional distress on John Doe.
4, BAIN engaged in outrageous conducted thet harmed the plaintiff
5. TIMI foiled to exercise reasonable supervisory care over Jokm Doe.
6. Asa direct and proximete consequence ofthe intentional, reckless, and negligent conduct
of ME BIE, John Doc was caused to suffer serious and permanent injuries and has
sustained other losses and damages into the future,
Wherefore, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants aforesaid, on the Fourth
Count, jointly and severally, for:
Compensatory damages;
Medical expenses;
Reasonable attomey’s fees;
Interest and costs of suit; and,
For such other relief as the Court mey deem equitable and just,
epee eeFIFTH COUNT
1. Plaintiff repeats and reiterates the facts and contentions set forth in the previous Counts
and repeats them herein,
2. Atall times relevant hereto, John Doe wes the victim of sexual abuse committed by
defendant Mi a.
3. Atall times relevant hereto, defendants State of New Jersey, State of New Jersey
Department of Children and Families, Division of Youth and Family Services , Christopher
Duggan and Richard Roes stood in loco parentis with John Doe.
4, Asa direct and proximate consequence of this sexual abuse, John Doe was caused to
suffer serious and permanent physical and emotional injuries which are permanent and will
continue into the future,
5. Defendant Mg HEED is legally responsible for John Doe’s injuries under the terms
aad provisions of NIS.A. 2A: 61B. et seq.
6. The State of New Jersey public entities, including The State of New Jersey, the State of
‘New Jersey Department of Children and Families, Division of Youth and Family Services are
directly and vicariously responsible for John Doe's injuries under N.J.S.A. 2A: 61 B. et seq. and
ace directly and vicariously responsible for the injuries caused by Michael Brooks.‘Wherefore, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants aforesaid, on the Fifth
Count, jointly and severally, for:
Compensatory damages;
‘Medical expenses,
Reasonable attorney's fees;
Taterest anid costs of suit; and,
For such other relief as the Court may deem equitable and just.
o pore
JURY DEMAND
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the plaintiff, pursuant to R. 4:35, demands a trial by jury.
Plaintiff hereby designates Nicholas Leonardis, Hsq. and Ronald Grayzel, Esq. as trial
‘counsel on all issues.
CERTIFICATION
Thereby certify that this matier is not the subject matter of any other suit presently
pending in any otter Court or in any American Arbitration proceedings. At this time, no other
Court proceeding or American Arbitration proceeding is contemplated
STATHIS & LEONARDIS LEVINSON AXELROD, PA
Attomeys for Pleintiff John Doe Attomeys for Plaintiff John Doe
‘i
By 4q
RONALD B. GRAYZEL, ESQ.
() i
UMIDDLESEX VICINAGE CIVIL DIVISION
PO BOX 2633,
56 PATERSON STREET
NEW BRUNSWICK NJ 08903-2633,
TRACK ASSIGNMENT NOTICE
COURT TELEPHONE NO. (732) 519-3728
COURT HOURS 8:30 AM - 4:30 PM
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2016
RE: DOB JOHN VS STATE OF NEW JERSEY
DOCKET: MID L -000915 16
THE ABOVE CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO: TRACK 3.
DISCOVERY IS 450 DAYS AND RUNS FROM THE FIRST ANSWER OR 90 DAYS
FROM SERVICE ON THE FIRST DEFENDANT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.
THE PRETRIAL JUDGE ASSIGNED IS: HON PHILLIP 1. PALEY
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, CONTACT TEAM 001
(732) 519-3728 EXT 3728.
IF YOU BELIEVE THAT THR TRACK IS INAPPROPRIATE YOU MUST FILE A
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD CAUSE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE FILING OF YOUR PLEADING.
PLAINTIFF MUST SERVE COPIES OF THIS FORM ON ALL OTHER PARTIES IN ACCORDANCE
WITH R.4:5A-2.
ATTENTION:
ATT: NICHOLAS J. LBONARDIS
STATHIS & LEONARDIS LLC
32 SOUTH MAIN ST
EDISON Ng 08837-3452
JOMPOMOAppendix XU-B1
CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT —fParuenrveeLlex Lies hice
(cls) feo
Use for intial Law Division oT
Chil Part pleadings (not motions) under Rule 4:5-4
Pleading will be rejected for filing, under Rule 1:5-6(c), [Ovewanieur
if information above the black bar is not completed s,
‘or attorney's signature is not affixed Bararrensen:
"RITORNEY PRO GE WANE "TELEPHONE NUMBER (COUNTY OF VENUE,
Ronald B. Grayzal (732) 498-2727 Middlesex °:
FIRM WANE (Fanpleabey rat
ee rae
‘OFACE ADDRESS BOCOWENE TBE
2 Lincoln Highway P.O. Box 2505 ‘Complain
Edison, N.J. 08818-2905
URYDEMAND Byes O.N9.
NAME OF PARTY (eg, John Boe, iit ‘CAPTION
John Doe, Plaintif John Doe v State of New Jersey, State of New Jersey Department of
CChiléren and Farities, at. als,
CASETYPENUWBER | HURRICANE SANDY
(Gee reverse aide forlising) | RELATED? ISTHIS A PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE CASE? OvEs No
Presa, Co) [2 BNO | evouaveo-mcwtp es; sees 9 2NE8A BY AND APPCABLE CASELAN
REGARDING YOUN O81/GNTION TOFLEAN AFF OAV OF MERI
'RELATED GASES PENDING? IFYES, UST DOCKE? NUMBERS
O ves Bno
‘DO YOU ANTICIPATE ADDING ANY PARTIES, NAME OF DEFENDANTS PRIMARY INSURANCE COMPANY (known
(arin out of came tineacon a oocumer ea)? 1 Nowe
aves wo BE Usenwn
‘CASE CHARACTERISTICS FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING IF CASES APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION
'DO PARTIES HAVE A CURRENT. PASTOR TFYES, IS THAT RELATIONSHIP:
RECURRENT RELATIONSHIP? CD awtovenevrtoves D Fremencicimcs —f OTHER fexpbin)
BE ves One Grr TF usvess under sunantalon and cont of sks,
[DOES THE STATUTE GOVERNING THIS GASE PROVIDEFORPAYMENT GFFEESEYTHELOSNG PARTY? U1 YS __BLNO
{USE THIS SPAGE TO ALERT THE COURT TO ANY SPECIAL CAS= CHARAGTERISTION THAT WAY WARRANT NOIIDUAL MANAGEWENT OR
ACCELERATED DISPOSITION
Plaintiff requests Track Il designation as this is a camplex case involving potential liability of Tite 89 defendants for
sexual abuse of a minor.
TBS YBUGR YOUR GLEN NEED ANY DSRGNTYACUOMVODATONG? | TF VEG FLERE WENT WE REDUETED RIGERAACOATION
Owes 1 No
‘WL av INTERFSTER oC NEEDED? TF VEE FOR VRAT ONGRADRT
O ves a No
‘certify that confidential personal Identifiers have been redacted from documents now submitted to the court and will be
redacted from all documents submitted in the future in necordance with Rule 1:38-7(b).
ee
UU
cree css 10 toe peoCIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT
(cls)
Use forint ploacings (not motions) under Rule 4:5-1
CASE TYPES (Choose one and enter number of case type in appropriate space cn the reverse side.)
“Track! - 160 days' discovery
151 NAME CHANGE
S75 FORFEMTURE
‘M2 TENANCY
1300 REAL PROPERTY (othr than Tonancy, Canlact Condemnaton, Complex General or Consruton)
‘502 BOOK ACCOUNT {dob oolecon malls oni)
1505 OTHERINSURANCE CLAIM (ncluing deere ldgrent actions}
506. PIP COVERAGE
‘B10 Ub or UIM CLAIM (overage sus ont)
S811 ACTION ON NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT
512 LEMON LA
801 SUMMARY ACTION
(B02 OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (sume seer)
898 OTHER (ute describe nature of action)
‘Track Il = 200 days’ discovery
1308 “CONSTRUCTION
509 EMPLOYMENT (cthr than CEPA or LAD)
889. CONTRACTICONMERCIAL TRANSACTION
{803N ALTO NEGLIGENCE ~ PERSONAL IRJURY (non-verbal tyeenol)
{80SY ALTO NEGLIGENCE - PERSONAL INJURY (verbal Proshoi}
605) PERSONAL INIURY
610 AUTO NEGLIGENCE — PROPERTY DAMAGE
621 UM or UM CLAIM (acuaes body rium)
688. TORT OTHER
‘Trackilt ~ 450 days’ discovery
‘005 CHIL RIGHTS
30) CONDEMNATION
‘602 ASSAULT AND BATTERY
(604 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
{606 PRODUCT LIRSILTY.
607 PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
08 TOXIC TORT
600 DEFAMATION
{816 WHISTLEELOWER / CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT (CEPA) GASES
617 INVERSE CONDEMNATION
{618 LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (.A0] CASES
‘Track V ~ Active Case Management by Individual Judge / 460 days' discovery
185 ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL COVERAGE LITIGATION.
303. MMT LAUREL
Bk COMPLEX Conmenciat
815. COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION
S14 INSURANCE FRAUD
620 FALSE CLAIMS ACT.
Ot ACTIONGIN LIEU OF PREROGATIVE WRITS
‘Multicounty Litigation (Track IV)
265 HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY (HRT) 288 PRUDENTIAL TORT LITIGATION,
271 ACCUTANEASOTRETINON, 280 REGAN
274 PISPERDALISEROQUELIZYPREXA 280 POMPTON LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION
27R ZOMETNAREDIA 281 PELVIG MESHIGYNECARE
279 GADOLINUM 282 PELVIC MESHIBARD
222 BRISTOL-MVERS SQUIBE ENVIRONMENTAL 268 OEPUY ASR FUP IMPLANT LITIGATION
| _____ 282. FosAMAK ss “BOS ALLODERM REGENERATIVE TISSUE MATRIX
Zed VARIN DGG STAYKER AEJUVENATEIMIG MODULAR FIP STEM COMPONENTS
285 STRYKER TRIDENT HP IMPLANTS 287 MIRENA CONTRACEPTIVE ORVICE
288 LEVAQUIN fant assestos
287 YAZYASMINOGELLA 823 PROPECIA
‘you boliove thin case roquires a track ether than that provided above, please indicate the reagan on Side %,
Inthe space under"Gase Charactorates.
Please check off each applicable category [] Putative Class Action Title 58
Elective 08-48-2013, CN 10517-Eagls pega? 0f2
Terry J. Walker V County of Gloucester, Salem County Correctional Facility Warden Raymond Skradzinski, Former Salem County Corrections Officer Elbert B. Johnson II