FCE - Essay
FCE - Essay
[PLANNING]
- Use the task input to help you plan but try to avoid copying phrases from the input in
Part 1. Use your own words.
[GENERAL]
- DO use a relatively formal register and an objective tone. Do not be too emotional.
- Remember to use linking adverbials to organise your ideas and to make it easy for the
reader to follow your argument.
- In the exam, allow yourself time to check your grammar, spelling and punctuation
thoroughly.
To show a sequence: First of all / then / after that / eventually / in the end / finally
To add information: In addition / moreover / what is more / besides / too / furthermore / and
On the other hand, governments spend a lot of money on museums and keeping historic sites in
good condition when poor people need houses to live in and businesses need better roads for
transporting their goods.
Another argument is that by making heritage sites attractive for tourists -for example, by putting on
entertainment - we give a very untrue picture of the past and sometimes damage the local
environment.
To conclude, while there are strong arguments for not spending too much on preserving the past, I
believe it is important to protect the most famous sites for the future generations but it is not realistic
to try and save everything. We need to invest in the future too.
(+/- 190 words)
One way in which science could be made more attractive would be to have lively television
programmes presented by celebrities, with subjects which were relevant to the experience of the
young. We live in a celebrity culture and children identify with well-known young people.
Another idea would be to set up interactive science museums in every town, where parents could
take their children. It is much better to teach children the principles of science through hands-on
experiments than to lecture them in a classroom.
Of course, there would be more incentives if the average scientit were better paid and young people
were made aware of the range of jobs available. A lot of people are put off a scientific career
because they think it means working in a badly paid job in a boring laboratory.
Whichever way we choose, it is vital that more young people are attracted to science, since society's
prosperity depends largely on continuous scientific progress.
(+/- 190 words)
The main advantage of living alone is that there is nobody to tell you what to do, so you can live your
life in your own way. What is more, you can organise or decorate your house as you want. There is
no one else to disagree with.
On the other hand, it can be quite lonely for some people. By nature, we are social animals.
Secondly, it is more expensive because you have to pay all the rent and bills yourself, so you have
less money to enjoy yourself. Last but not least, it can be quite hard to find a nice flat for one person,
so you might not be able to live in the best area.
To sum up, there are strong arguments on both sides. In conclusion, I believe that living alone is
better for older people who have more money and like privacy but not for young people who need to
share the costs.
(+/- 180 words)
Take money, for example. Money doesn't automatically make us happy. In fact, it makes some
people very unhappy because they are frightened of losing what they've got. On the other hand, if
we're not greedy and don't spend it foolishly, it can reduce stress and give us security.
Then consider health. If we eat badly, get too little sleep and don't exercise, our health will decline
and make us miserable. Eating well and going for lovely long walks in the countryside can make us
feel better generally.
The third thing I think is important is to have a positive outlook on life. We should all enluy things like
music and being with our friends. At the same time, it's important to spend time alone and live as
simply as possible, which is not easy in the 21st century!
All these make a big difference to our happiness, no matter what our natural temperament.
(+/- 170 words)