Microfridge Case
Microfridge Case
SEC B
DISKHA MAHAJAN 14P077
NIDHI KUMAR 14P091
PRANATI GOSWAMI 14P092
SHWETA AGARWAL 14P109
PALLAVI MISHRA 14P112
VARUN DAVE 14P118
WHAT IS MICROFRIDGE?
A 3 IN 1 DEVICE FULFILLING ALL 3 FUNCTIONS OF A REFRIGERATOR, FREEZER, AND MICROWAVE UNIT
TARGETED AT THE GROWING A HOME AWAY FROM HOME SEGMENT
EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT 10% OF ALL SUCH ROOMS
RESTLESS IN HIS PRESENT JOB
DESIRES TO START HIS OWN COMPANY
HIS FORTE - SALES
A UNIQUE IDEA COMBINATION OF MICROWAVE OVEN + REFRIGERATOR
VALUE PROPOSITION
Revenue
Models
Product
Portfolio
18%
Colleges
Military
2%
Motels
55%
Assisted Living
Apartments
25%
Colleges
Campus
wide
installation
Campus rental program
The rental price was
$110 and students were
charged $130 as rent
Selling and Renting
Motels/Hotels
Other Markets
3 million in the US
out of which 2
million had no
restaurant space
Microfridge ideal for
budget hotels and
small town motels
Small Individual
apartments
1 million in the
US,
numbers
expected to grow
Run
by
Microfridge
All
operations
carried out by
Microfridge
Yearly rental fee
was $160
THEY ALSO PROVIDED ALL THE REQUIRED MARKET INFORMATION NEEDED FOR
THE SUCCESSFUL FORECASTS
FOR EXAMPLE THE FORECASTS FOR COLLEGES CONSIDERED ALL FACTORS SUCH
AS NUMBER OF ROOMS, NUMBER OF STUDENTS, TERMS OF CONTRACT, SURVEYS
ETC.
SIMILARLY FOR ARMY/MILITARY BASES AND MOTELS ADEQUATE CARE WAS TAKEN
TO FORECAST SALES AND PROVIDE QUALITY AND PROMPT SERVICE TO EACH OF
THEM
INDUSTRY ATTRACTIVENESS
Threat of new entrants: Medium
No product difference
Patent Sharing
Non compete Agreement Getting expired in 3 years
No strategic advantage in distribution network
Profitable industry with high Market potential
Threat of substitutes: Medium
Price differential between stand alone components(fridge and oven) and
Microfridge
Refrigerator leasing companies with regional presence
Low innovation
Bargaining
power oflevel
customers: Low
Few alternatives
High Switching Cost
Bargaining power of supplier: Low
Low product differential
No switching cost for Microfridge
Intensity of competitive Rivalry: Low
No competitor due to patent protection
STRATEGIC CHOICES
SELL OR RENT?
WAY AHEAD
U
O
Y
K
N
A
TH