AISC K Factors
AISC K Factors
May 8, 2014
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
Copyright Materials
This presentation is protected by US and International
Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and
use of the presentation without written permission of
AISC is prohibited.
The American Institute of Steel Construction 2014
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
Course Description
So you want to use K-factors, do you?
May 8, 2014
With the introduction of AISC 360-05, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings,
the direct analysis method with K = 1.0 for frames in which sidesway is not
prevented was introduced. To understand the significant benefit to the designer
in taking K = 1.0, this presentation will discuss what is meant by a rational
method of analysis as required by the 1963 Specification, will consider the Kfactor alignment charts first introduced in the Commentary to the 1963
Specification, and will show comparisons between values obtained through the
alignment chart and those obtained through rational methods of analysis.
Results from design examples implementing the effective length method, that is
K by a rational analysis, and the direct analysis method will be discussed and
recommendations on selecting the appropriate method will be given.
Learning Objectives
Become familiar with the history of K-factor in the AISC
Specification.
Learn and understand the assumptions built into the
alignment charts used to determine K.
Learn and understand what is meant by a rational method of
analysis as required by the Specification.
Gain an understanding on how to select an appropriate
method of analysis through the comparison of design
examples using the effective length method vs. the direct
analysis method.
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
AISC Webinar
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
Outline
Some History
Pieter van Musschenbroek, 1729
Empirical formula for rectangular columns
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
10
Some History
Prior to the 1961 AISC Specification, columns
were designed based on their length.
Several general styles of equations have been
proposed over the years.
Straight-line, parabolic, Rankin, and others
Some History
Straight-line formulas:
s1 s
where
L
r
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
12
Some History
Straight-line formulas:
Suggested by William H. Burr in 1882
Widely used in US practice after 1885
Good results for L/r from 50 to 120
1892 Carnegie Phipps & Co. Ltd.
L
50
r
L
L
16, 000 55 for 50
r
r
13
Some History
16000
14000
12000
10000
1892
1903
1911
8000
1921
1932
6000
4000
2000
0
0
50
100
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
150
200
250
14
Some History
Parabolic formulas:
where
L
s1 s
r
Some History
Parabolic formulas:
Proposed by J. B. Johnson in 1910
Good results for L/r from 0 to 140
1936 AISC
2
L
L
Fa 17, 000 0.485 for 120
r
r
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
16
Some History
18000
16000
14000
12000
1892
1903
10000
1911
Parabolic
1921
8000
1932
1936
6000
4000
2000
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
17
Some History
Rankine-Gordon formulas:
s1
where
L
1
r
s1 the allowable stress
L length of column
r radius of gyration
an empirical constant
s an arbitrary constant
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
18
Some History
Rankine-Gordon formulas:
Thomas Tredgold first introduced in 1822
Gordon adapted it at a date unknown
between 1840 and 1858
Rankine modified it before 1866
Schwarz (1854) and Laissle and Schubler
(1857) independently came up with the same
formula.
19
Some History
Rankine-Gordon formulas:
1919 Cambria Steel
12,500
Fa
1
1 L
36, 000 r
L
60
r
18, 000
1 L
18, 000 r
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
for
L
60
r
20
10
Some History
18000
16000
14000
12000
1892
1903
1911
10000
1919
1921
8000
1923
Rankine-Gordon
1919, 1923
6000
1932
1936
4000
2000
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
21
Some History
Modern design formulas
Column Research Council proposals
Curve fit for elastic and inelastic buckling
1961 AISC, effective length concept introduced
Fa
L
1 r
2Cc2
F .S .
L
Cc
r
2
L
L
for C
r
r
Fy for
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
22
11
Some History
Modern design formulas
Column Research Council proposals
Curve fit for elastic and inelastic buckling
1963 AISC, effective length factor introduced
KL
1
r
2Cc2
KL
Fa
Fy for
Cc
F .S .
r
2
KL
for
149, 000, 000 KL
C
r
r
23
Some History
Modern design formulas
Column Research Council proposals
Curve fit for elastic and inelastic buckling
2005 AISC, first unified specification
Fy
Fa
0.658 Fe Fy
1.67
for
KL
E
4.71
r
Fy
0.877 Fe
KL
E
for
4.71
1.67
r
Fy
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
where
Fe
2 E
KL
24
12
Some History
25000
20000
2005, Fy = 36 ksi
L
1892
1903
1911
15000
1919
1921
1923
1932
10000
1936
1961 , Fy = 36 ksi
1961
2005
5000
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
25
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
26
13
ELM
Limited
applicability
Must determine
K-factors
Uses actual
modulus of
elasticity
No limits to
applicability
K-factor always
taken as unity
Uses a reduced
modulus of
elasticity
27
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
Assumptions
P
Perfectly elastic
Perfectly straight
Constant cross section
Pin ends
Equilibrium at a point on a free body
in the displaced configuration
P
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
M x Py
28
14
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
From the principles of mechanics
using small displacement theory
M
d2y
x
2
dx
EI
d2y P
y0
dx 2 EI
29
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
Define
k2
x
P
EI
d2y
k2y 0
2
dx
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
30
15
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
Solution
y A sin kx B cos kx
x
B0
A sin kL 0
31
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
Thus,
and
x
sin kL 0
kL n
y A sin
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
nx
L
32
16
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
Remembering that
k2
x
P
and kL n
EI
thus,
P n 2 2
k
2
EI
L
2
33
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
The solution for the differential
equation is
n 2 2 EI
P
L2
n 1
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
34
17
Stability
Determine the elastic buckling load for a
column.
Thus, we have the well known
Euler Equation for the elastic
buckling load:
x
2 EI
Pcr 2
L
35
n=1
n=2
n=3
n=4
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
36
18
Pe
EI
L2
1
2
K exact
2 EI
Pcr
( K exact L) 2
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
38
19
L
L/2
K = 1.0
K = 0.5
L/3
K = 0.33
L/4
K = 0.25
K exact
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
Beginning the
recognition that
real columns are
not exact.
40
20
KL
KL
41
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
42
21
K K 0
o
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
eigenvalue
1
load ratio
44
22
0.01P
10.0 ft
20.0 ft
All members W8x24
45
400
0
0
12
16
20
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
46
23
47
Nomograph Assumptions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
48
24
Nomograph Assumptions:
5. In sidesway permitted frames (moment frames),
rotations at opposite ends of restraining beams are
equal producing reverse curvature
6. Stiffness parameter L P EI of all columns is
equal
7. Joint restraint is distributed to column above and
below in proportion to I/L
8. All columns buckle simultaneously
9. No significant axial force in girders
49
GAGB ( K ) 36
K
6(GA GB )
tan K
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
50
25
Effective
Length
Nomograph or
Alignment Chart
for Braced Frame
At each end, A and B
I L c
I L g
51
Effective
Length
Nomograph or
Alignment Chart
for Moment Frame
At each end, A and B
I L c
I L g
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
52
26
53
Effects of Inelasticity
Inelastic buckling residual stresses
When the stress-strain relationship is no
longer linear, use the Tangent Modulus of
Elasticity at the level of loading.
ET
Stress, F
Fy
Plastic Behavior
Elastic
ET
E
Strain,
Inelastic
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
54
27
Effects of Inelasticity
Look at the stiffness ratio at each end of the
column. The derivation had originally included E.
Gelastic
EI L c
E I L g
I L c
I L g
E I L g
E I L g
b Gelastic
55
Effects of Inelasticity
Depends on the level of axial stress in the
member given by ratio of required strength
to yield strength:
when Pr Py 0.5;
b 1.0
when Pr Py 0.5;
P
b 4 r
Py
1.0 (LRFD)
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
(C2-2a)
Pr
1
Py
(C2-2b)
1.6 (ASD)
56
28
Effects of Inelasticity
Moment Frame Column
Beams W16x36, L= 24 ft, Ix = 448 in.3
Columns W10x88, L = 14 ft, Ix = 534 in.3
At each end, A and B
Gelastic
I L c
I L g
534
2
14
2.04
448
2
24
K 1.6
Theres always a solution in steel!
57
Effects of Inelasticity
Moment Frame Column
If the LRFD load on the column is Pu =
950 kips,
Pr
950
0.731 0.5
Py
50 26.0
P P
b 4 r 1 r
Py
Py
4 0.7311 0.731 0.786
K 1.5
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
58
29
59
EI
2.66
232
Pcr 10(12)
P
10.0 ft
20.0 ft
All members
W8x24
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
Nomograph
K = 2.63
The structure and loading are
close to satisfying the
derivation assumptions. Thus,
the results are close.
60
30
EI
1.89
Pcr 10(12)
460
P
Nomograph
K = 2.63
10.0 ft
20.0 ft
All members
W8x24
61
10.0 ft
10.0 ft
All members
W8x24
20.0 ft
Sidesway Prevented
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
62
31
Nomograph
Kupper = 0.88
10.0 ft
Klower = 0.95
10.0 ft
20.0 ft
Elastic Buckling
Kupper = 1.09
All members
W8x24
Klower = 0.77
63
10.0 ft
10.0 ft
All members
W8x24
20.0 ft
Sidesway Permitted
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
64
32
10.0 ft
10.0 ft
All members
W8x24
20.0 ft
65
10.0 ft
10.0 ft
All members
W8x24
20.0 ft
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
66
33
Kupper = 1.79
Klower = 3.18
20.0 ft
All members
W8x24
67
Kupper = 1.79
Klower = 3.18
Nomograph
Klower = 2.38
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
68
34
10.0 ft
1
2
20.0 ft
10.0 ft
20.0 ft
All members
W8x24
69
10.0 ft
1
2
20.0 ft
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
10.0 ft
20.0 ft
All members
W8x24
70
35
10.0 ft
1
2
20.0 ft
10.0 ft
20.0 ft
All members
W8x24
71
Loading; P, P, P
K1 0.919, K 2 1.84, K 3 1.84, K 4 1.84
Loading; P, P, 0.5P,
K1 1.16
K 2 1.45
K 3 1.79
K 4 1.28
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
72
36
73
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
74
37
Restraining
Columns
P/2
P/2
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
76
38
Q
L
77
Q
MBA
Q
L
D
L
Q
L
MAB
P
Using the same model as that used for developing the nomographs
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
78
39
GAGB ( / K ) 2 36 Q
/ K Q
6 tan( / 2 K ) Q Q
1
1
0
6(GA GB )
P
tan(
/
K
)
P
(
G
A GB )( / 2 K ) P P
Q = 0, K = 2.0
Equal loads on restraining and
gravity only column
Q/P = 1, K = 2.7
Other combinations
Q/P = 2, K = 3.25
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
80
40
81
(P+Q)
Q
L
Q
M P Q
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
P+Q
M P Q
N40.82
41
P Q
EI
2
Ko L
P+Q
M P Q
83
2 EI
Kn L
P
M P
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
84
42
2 EI
L2
2 EI
2 EI
2
K o P Q and
K n2 P
2
2
L
L
PQ
Q
Ko 1
P
P
85
Kn Ko 1
Q
P
Q = 0, K = 2.0
Q/P = 1, K = 2.8
Other combinations
Q/P = 2, K = 3.46
Q/P = 10, K = 6.63
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
86
43
AISC 360-10
Alternate Methods of Design for Stability
App.7.1. General Stability Requirements
General requirements from Chapter C
still apply subject to limitations given in App.7.
87
B2
2 nd order
1.5
1st order
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
88
44
89
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
90
45
91
Example 1 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
300 kips
20 kips
300 kips
PL 420 kips
rigid element
W 20.0 kips
W14x90
Column A
PD 75.0 kips
15 ft
Column B
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
92
46
Example 1 (LRFD)
First-order elastic analysis
300 kips
300 kips
20 kips
W14x90
15 ft
Column B
1st
M ux 300 ft-kips
K ox 2.0
rigid element
Column A
Pu 300 kips
K oy 1.0
Lb 15 ft
Pl 3
20(15)3 (1728)
1.34 in.
3b EI 3 1.0 (29000)(999)
93
Example 1 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Notional load
Yi 300 300 600 kips
N i 0.002(600) 1.2 kips
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
94
47
Example 1 (LRFD)
Stiffness reduction b 1.0 for
P
4 r
Py
Pr
0.5
Py
Pr
1
Py
Pr
0.5
for
P
Pr
1.0(300)
0.23 0.5
Py
50 ksi 26.5 in.2
Thus
b 1.0
No need to reconsider
deflection or consider
inelastic buckling
N40.95
Example 1 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
member effect.
Since there are no moments in this example without
lateral displacement, there is no need for B1
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
96
48
Example 1 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
1.0
Pstory
Pe story
97
Example 1 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
Pmf
RM 1 0.15
P
story
Pe story RM
300
1 0.15
0.925
600
20 15.0 12
HL
0.925
2, 490 kips
H
1.34
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
98
49
Example 1 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
1.32 1st 1.5
2 nd
1.0 600
1
2490
99
Example 1 (LRFD)
Second-order moment
M r B1M nt B2 M lt
(A-8-1)
Pr Pnt B2 Plt
(A-8-2)
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
100
50
Example 1 (LRFD)
Determine the effective length, including
the gravity only column
K ox 2.0 (for a cantilever column)
Pgravity
Pstability
300
2.83
300
derived earlier
101
Example 1 (LRFD)
Determine member strength
K nx L 2.83 15.0 ft =42.5 ft
c Pn 721 kips
K oy L 15.0 ft
Lb 15.0 ft
b M n 574 ft-kips
300 8 396
1.03 1.0 ng
721 9 574
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
102
51
Example 1 (LRFD)
Had you not considered the gravity only
columns impact on K
K ox L 2.0 15.0 ft =30.0 ft
c Pn 929 kips
K oy L 15.0 ft
Lb 15.0 ft
b M n 574 ft-kips
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
390kips
9 kips
390 kips
PL 420 kips
rigid element
W 20.0 kips
W14x90
Column A
PD 75.0 kips
15 ft
Column B
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
104
52
Example 1 (ASD)
First-order elastic analysis
390 kips
390 kips
9 kips
W14x90
15 ft
Column B
1st
M ax 135 ft-kips
K ox 2.0
rigid element
Column A
Pa 390 kips
K oy 1.0
Lb 15 ft
Pl 3
9(15)3 (1728)
0.603 in.
3b EI 3 1.0 (29000)(999)
105
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Notional load
Yi 390 390 780 kips
N i 0.002(780) 1.56 kips
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
106
53
Example 1 (ASD)
Stiffness reduction b 1.0 for
P
4 r
Py
Pr
0.5
Py
Pr
1
Py
Pr
0.5
for
P
Pr
1.6(390)
0.47 0.5
Py
50 ksi 26.5 in.2
Thus
b 1.0
No need to reconsider
deflection or consider
inelastic buckling
107
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
member effect.
Since there are no moments in this example without
lateral displacement, there is no need for B1
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
108
54
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
1.0
Pstory
Pe story
109
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
Pmf
RM 1 0.15
P
story
Pe story RM
390
1 0.15
0.925
780
9 15.0 12
HL
0.925
2, 490 kips
H
0.603
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
110
55
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
2.00 1st 1.5
2 nd
1.6 780
1
2490
111
Example 1 (ASD)
Consider the Direct Analysis Method
390kips
9 kips
390 kips
PL 420 kips
rigid element
W 20.0 kips
W14x90
Column A
PD 75.0 kips
15 ft
Column B
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
112
56
Example 1 (ASD)
First-order elastic analysis
390 kips
390 kips
9 kips
W14x90
15 ft
Column B
1st
M ax 135 ft-kips
K ox 1.0
rigid element
Column A
Pa 390 kips
K oy 1.0
Lb 15 ft
Pl 3
9(15)3 (1728)
0.755 in.
3b EI 3 1.0 0.8 (29000)(999)
113
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Direct Analysis method
Notional load
Yi 390 390 780 kips
N i 0.002(780) 1.56 kips
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
114
57
Example 1 (ASD)
Pa 390 kips
390 kips
M ax 135 23.4
158 ft-kips
rigid element
W14x90
Column A
15 ft
K ox 1.0
K oy 1.0
Column B
Lb 15 ft
1st
Pl 3
9(15)3 (1728)
0.755 in.
3b EI 3 1.0 0.8 (29000)(999)
115
Example 1 (ASD)
Stiffness reduction b 1.0 for
P
4 r
Py
Pr
0.5
Py
Pr
1
Py
Pr
0.5
for
P
Pr
1.6(390)
0.47 0.5
Py
50 ksi 26.5 in.2
Thus
b 1.0
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
No need to reconsider
deflection or consider
inelastic buckling
116
58
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Direct Analysis Method
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
member effect.
Since there are no moments in this example without
lateral displacement, there is no need for B1
117
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Direct Analysis Method
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
1.0
Pstory
Pe story
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
118
59
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Direct Analysis Method
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
Pmf
RM 1 0.15
P
story
Pe story RM
390
1 0.15
0.925
780
9 15.0 12
HL
0.925
1,980 kips
H
0.755
119
Example 1 (ASD)
Design by Direct Analysis Method
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
2.70 1st 1.5
2 nd
1.6 780
1
1980
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
120
60
Example 1 (ASD)
Second-order moment
M r B1M nt B2 M lt
(A-8-1)
Pr Pnt B2 Plt
(A-8-2)
Example 1 (ASD)
Determine member strength
K nx L 15.0 ft
Pn
667 kips
K oy L 15.0 ft
Lb 15.0 ft
Mn
382 ft-kips
390 8 427
1.58 1.0 ng
667 9 382
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
122
61
Example 2 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
300 kips
Column A load
PD 75.0 kips
500 kips
Column B load
20 kips
PD 125.0 kips
rigid element
PL 420 kips
W14x90
15 ft
PL 700 kips
W 20.0 kips
Column A
Column B
Example 2 (LRFD)
First-order elastic analysis
300 kips
500 kips
20 kips
W14x90
15 ft
Column B
1st
M ux 300 ft-kips
K ox 2.0
rigid element
Column A
Pu 300 kips
K oy 1.0
Lb 15 ft
Pl 3
20(15)3 (1728)
1.34 in.
3b EI 3 1.0 (29000)(999)
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
124
62
Example 2 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Notional load
Yi 300 500 800 kips
N i 0.002(800) 1.6 kips
Example 2 (LRFD)
Stiffness reduction b 1.0 for
P
4 r
Py
Pr
0.5
Py
Pr
1
Py
Pr
0.5
for
P
Pr
1.0(300)
0.23 0.5
Py
50 ksi 26.5 in.2
Thus
b 1.0
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
No need to reconsider
deflection or consider
inelastic buckling
126
63
Example 2 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
member effect.
Since there are no moments in this example without
lateral displacement, there is no need for B1
127
Example 2 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
1.0
Pstory
Pe story
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
128
64
Example 2 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
Pmf
RM 1 0.15
P
story
Pe story RM
300
1 0.15
0.94
800
20 15.0 12
HL
0.94
2,530 kips
H
1.34
129
Example 2 (LRFD)
Design by Effective Length Method (App. 7.2)
Amplify first-order analysis; Appendix 8
structure effect
B2
1
1.46 1st 1.5
2 nd
1.0 800
1
2,530
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
130
65
Example 2 (LRFD)
Second-order moment
M r B1M nt B2 M lt
(A-8-1)
Pr Pnt B2 Plt
(A-8-2)
Example 2 (LRFD)
Determine the effective length, including
the gravity only column
K ox 2.0 (for a cantilever column)
Pgravity
Pstability
500
3.27
300
derived earlier
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
132
66
Example 2 (LRFD)
Determine member strength
K nx L 3.27 15.0 ft =49.0 ft
c Pn 610 kips
K oy L 15.0 ft
Lb 15.0 ft
b M n 574 ft-kips
300 8 396
1.11 1.0 ng
610 9 574
Theres always a solution in steel!
133
Examples
Note that load on the gravity only column
has significant impact on the restraining or
stability column.
In these examples, we had one gravity
only column and one restraining column.
In real structures we can expect multiple
numbers of each type column.
Using the correct K-factor is critical.
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
134
67
OR
Use the Direct Analysis method of AISC
360-10 Chapter C with
K 1
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
136
68
Thank You
American Institute of Steel Construction
One East Wacker Drive, Suite 700
Chicago, IL 60601
137
CEU Certificates
Within 1 business day
You will receive an email on how to report attendance
from: [email protected]
Be on the lookout: Check your spam filter! Check
your junk folder!
Completely fill out online form. Dont forget to check
the boxes next to each attendees name!
OR
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
69
CEU Certificates
Access available in 24 hours
Go to:
http://www.wynjade.com/aisc14/webinarceu
Username: Your Attendee ID (found on your reg. receipt)
Password: Your Last Name
Completely fill out online form. Dont forget to check
the boxes next to each attendees name!
Questions? Please email us at [email protected].
Copyright 2014
American Institute of Steel Construction
70