Cause and Effect Writing Assignment
Cause and Effect Writing Assignment
Effects
1|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
2. Try asking questions and writing assertions about the problem or phenomenon? What effects are
not obvious? Add these to your chart in a different color of ink or number them 2.
3. Discuss your topic with a friend. Ask her or his opinion on the topics causes, effects, of both. Add
these to your chart in a different color of ink or number them 3.
4. Ask a friend to interview you about the topic. Try to explain causes, effects, or both as clearly as
possible.
What are your primary causes and/or effects? What makes them primary?
2|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
Mistaking chronology for causation. Avoid the post hoc, ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore
because of this) fallacy the assumption that because event B followed even A in time, A caused
B to occur. For example, suppose you decide against having a cup of coffee on morning, and
later the same day you score higher than ever before on a political science exam. Although one
even followed the other in time, you cannot assume that reducing your coffee intake cause the high
grade.
To avoid the post hoc fallacy, look for evidence that one even did indeed cause the other.
Plausible evidence might include testimony from others who experienced the same sequence of
events or documentation proving a causal relationship between the events.
Mistaking correlation for causation. Just because two events occur at about the same time does not
mean they are causally related. For example, suppose sales of snow shovels in a city increased at
the same time sales of gloves and mittens increased. The fact that the two events occurred
simultaneously does not mean that snow shoveling causes people to buy more mittens and gloves.
Most likely, a period of cold, snowy weather caused the increased sales of these items. Again,
remember that evidence is needed to verify that the two events are related and that a causal
relationship exists.
Unsupported assumptions. Assumptions are ideas or generalizations that you or your readers
accept as truths without questioning their validity. Although assumptions can be true, in many cases
people make sweeping generalization that are untrue. For instance, it is untrue to say that all
senior citizens are nonproductive members of society because the evidence suggests that many
seniors continue to work or contribute to their communities in other ways. May assumptions are
based on stereotypes generalizations about the characteristics or behaviors of an entire groups
of people of things based on the characteristics of behavior of some members of the group.
Because unsupported assumptions can interfere with your reasoning and lead to erroneous
statements of cause and effect, examine your ideas carefully to be sure you avoid making this
error.
Developing Your Thesis
Once you are satisfied with you causes and effects and the evidence you have generated to support them,
your next step is to develop a working thesis As noted earlier, the thesis for a causal analysis identifies the
topic, makes and assertion about the topic and tells whether the essay focused on causes, effects, or both.
WRITE YOUR THESIS HERE:
After each of the bulleted tips, explain how your thesis follows the suggestion, or needs to be adjusted.
State the cause-and-effect relationship. Do not leave it to you reader to figure out the causal
relationship. In the following example, not that the original thesis is weak and vague, whereas the
revision clearly states the causal relationship.
o Breathing paint fumes in a closed environment can be dangerous. People suffering from
asthma and emphysema are particularly vulnerable.
o Breathing paint fumes in a closed environment can be dangerous for people suffering
from asthma and emphysema because their lungs are especially sensitive to irritants.
The revised thesis makes the cause-and- effect connection explicit by using the word because and
by including necessary information about the problem.
3|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
Avoid overly broad or absolute assertions. They are difficult or impossible to support.
o Drugs are the root cause of inner-city crime.
o Drugs are a major cause of inner-city crime.
The revised thesis acknowledges drugs as one cause of crime but does not claim that drugs are the
only cause.
How does your thesis avoid broad assertions?
Use qualifying words. Unless a cause-and-effect relationship is well established and accepted,
qualify your thesis statement.
o Overemphasizing competitive sports is harmful to the psychological development of young
children.
o Overemphasizing competitive sports may be harmful to the psychological development of
young children.
Changing the verb from is to may be qualifies the statement, allowing room for doubt.
Where do you use qualifying words in your thesis?
Avoid an overly assertive of dogmatic tone. The tone of your essay, including your thesis, should
be confident but not overbearing.
o There is no question that American youths have changed in response to the culture in which
they live.
o Substantial evidence suggests that American youths have changed in response to the
culture in which they live.
The phrase substantial evidences suggests creates a less dogmatic tone than there is no question.
What words in your theses convey your tone? What tone to they convey?
WORKING THESIS: The physical abuse of children often stems from parents emotional instability
and family history of child abuse.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS: If a person was physically abused as a child, how likely is that person to
become an abusive parent?
What kinds of emotional problems seems to trigger the physical abuse of children?
Which cause is more significant a family history of abuse or emotional problems?
Is there more physical abuse of children now than there was in the past, or is more abuse being
reported?
A working thesis and a list of research questions will enable you to approach your research in a focused
way. Instead of running helter-skelter from one aspect of your topic to another, you will be able to zero in
on the specific information you need from sources.
Write your WORKING THESIS:
Gathering Evidence
A convincing cause-and-effect essay must give a complete explanation of each primary cause or effect
that you include. To explain your causes and effects, youll probably use one or more other patterns of
development. For example, you may need to narrate events, present descriptive details, define important
terms, explain processes unfamiliar to the reader, include examples that illustrate a cause or an effect, or
make comparisons to explain unfamiliar concepts.
Try to discover several types of evidence, including facts, expert opinions, personal observation,
quotations, and statistics.
CHOOSING and EVALUATING USEFUL SOURCES
Choosing Relevant Sources. A relevant source contains information that helps you to answer one or more
of your research questions. Answering the following questions will help you determine whether a source is
relevant.
1. Is the source too general or too specialized for your intended audience? Some sources may
not contain the detailed information your audience require; others may be too technical and
require background knowledge that your audience does not have. For example, suppose you
are researching the environmental effects of recycling cans and bottles. If you audience
consists of science majors, an article in Readers Digest might be too general. Conversely, and
article in Environmental Science and Technology would be written for scientist and may be a
bit too technical for your purposes.
5|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
Using the sources youve found so far, evaluate and explain whether each source is too
specialized or too general?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Do you need to find any different sources?
2. Is the source recent enough for your purposes? In rapidly changing field of study, outdated
sources arent useful, except when you need to give a historical perspective. For example, a
five-year-old article on using airbags to improve car safety may not include information on
recent discoveries about the dangers that air bags pose to children riding in the front
passenger seat.
Using the sources youve found so far, write the author and date of publication. If it hasnt
been published in the last five years, why is it still relevant?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Do you need to find any different sources?
Choosing reliable sources. A reliable source is honest, accurate, and credible. Answer the following
questions to help you determine if the source is reliable.
1. Is the source scholarly? Although scholars often disagree with each other, they make a serious
attempt to present accurate information. In addition, an article that appears in a scholarly journal
or textbook has been reviewed by a panel of professionals in the field prior to publication.
Therefore, scholarly sources tend to be trustworthy.
Using the sources youve found so far, describe whether they would be considered scholarly.
If not, why would it be considered reliable?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Do you need to find any different sources?
6|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
2. Does the source have a solid reputation? Some magazines, such as Time and Newsweek, are
known for responsible reporting, whereas other periodicals have a reputation for sensationalism
and should be avoided or approached skeptically. This is especially true for websites.
Using the sources youve found so far, describe whether they would be considered to have a
solid reputation. If not, why would it be considered reliable?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Do you need to find any different sources?
3. Is the author an expert in the field? Check the authors credentials. Information about authors
may be given in a headnote, at the end of an article, on a home page or a title page, or in the
preface of a book. You might also check a reference book such as Contemporary Authors to verify
an authors credentials.
Using the sources youve found so far, describe whether the authors would be consideren an
expert in the field. If not, why would it be considered reliable?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Do you need to find any different sources?
4. Does the author approach the topic fairly and objectively? A writer who states a strong opinion or
assertion is not necessarily biased. However, a writer who ignores opposing views, distorts facts,
or ignores information that does not fit his or her opinion may present a biased and incomplete
view on a topic. Although you can use a biased source to understand a particular viewpoint, you
must also see out other sources that present the alternative views.
Using the sources youve found so far, identify the bias of the author. Do you have a balance
of opinions or outlooks in your sources?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Do you need to find any different sources?
7|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
DUE:
Introduction
Background
information about
the event or
phenomenon
Thesis statement
Background information
Thesis statement
Body
Paragraphs
Body
Paragraphs
Conclusion
Introduction
Reminder of Thesis
Final statement
Introduction
Conclusion
Reminder of Thesis
Final statement
Body
Paragraphs
Conclusion
Reminder of Thesis
Final statement
8|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
Which of the previous structures presents your ideas most effectively? Why is this the best organizational
structure for you?
Revision:
DUE 03/
Take some time after youve written your first draft before you reread or revise it. As you review your draft,
concentrate on how you organize and present your ideas, not on grammar, punctuation, or mechanics (that for our
next revision)
Start by reading your work aloud and having a conversations on your areas of success and growth: Read your essay
aloud, have your partner create an outline to see if all of your work flows successfully and makes sense structurally;
then have them compare it to the three organizational patterns given in the pre-writing section of this packet.
Could your partner correctly identify which organizational pattern you chose? What made that possible? Or
what made it difficult for them to identify?
9|Page
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
Do you see a way to organize your ideas more effectively for your readers? How?
After reading your piece aloud, exchange papers and complete the following checklist. (Check the circle if you can
answer with a definite and impassioned yes! to the question. If not, dont check it. ):
Highlight the thesis.
o Does it express a qualified, manageable assertion?
o Can it be proven?
o Is the purpose of the essay clear?
Place a checkmark by each cause.
Mark an X by each effect.
o Does the essay focus clearly on causes?
o Does the essay focus clearly on effect?
o Does the essay focus clearly on causes and effects?
Place brackets around the explanation of each cause or effect.
o Is each explained fully?
Circle sections where you have recognized readers assumptions and either supported or challenged
them.
o Are these sections complete and effective?
Underline each topic sentence.
o Is each paragraph focused on a separate cause or effect?
Put a star next to the introduction and conclusion.
o Were they both effective?
Examine your syntax and consider these writing strategies to strengthen your sentence structure:
Begin your sentences in a variety of ways (No Two Sentences Start with the Same Word).
Vary the length of your sentences (not all long, complex or short, choppy sentences).
Feel free to use coordinating conjunctions to make compound sentences (but dont forget your
commas Ms. Lange hates that).
Make sure no sentences end in a preposition.
Avoid starting sentences with a coordinating conjunction.
Read your paper aloud to someone; it should have an easy flow and rhythm.
Look for and revise wordy sentences. When explaining causal relationships, writers often use complex and
compound-complex sentence. These sentences can sometimes become wordy and confusing. Look for ways to
eliminate empty phrases and simplify your wording.
10 | P a g e
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
o
o
As you are already well aware, viruses of certain types in a computer file often create errors that you
cannot explain in documents and may eventually result in lost data.
Certain types of computer virus often create errors that you cannot explain and may eventually result in lost
data.
Revise to eliminate mixed constructions. A mixed construction happen when a wrtier connects phrase, clauses, or both
that dont work together in a sentence.
o
o
Samantha, although she was late for work, but was not was not reprimanded by her boss.
Although she was late for work Samantha, was not reprimanded by her boss.
Review your diction and consider these strategies to strengthen your word choice:
DUE: 3/
Please check your Roosevelt Writing Guide for any possible errors. Circle or highlight these for your partner.
Make sure you avoid the awkward expressions is when or is where in defining your term. Instead name the
class to which the term belongs.
Make sure subjects and verbs agree in number.
Use a comma between coordinate adjectives that are not joined by and.
o Kaiden was a confident, skilled pianist.
You can tell if you need a comma because they can be switched and it still makes sense:
Kaiden was a skilled, confident pianist.
Do not use commas between cumulative adjectives.
o Two frightened brown eyes peered at us from under the sofa.
You wouldnt write frightened two brown eyes.
Use a hyphen to connect two words that work together as an adjective before a noun.
o Well-used book
o Perfect-fitting shoes
o Foil-wrapped pizza
Use a comma before a coordinating conjunction when joining two independent clauses.
o I love writing descriptive papers, but they seem out of place when they are not integrated into a
full essay.
Look at adjective and adverbs and their degrees of comparison positive, comparative, and superlative.
o Make sure you change the form of adjective and adverbs when you compare two items
(comparative) and when you compare three or more items (superlative).
Both The Others and Hannibal were suspenseful, but I liked The Others better (not best).
Make sure that items in a pair linked by correlative conjunction (either or, neither nor, not only but
also) are in the same grammatical form.
o The Grand Canyon is not only a spectacular tourist attraction, but also scientists consider it a useful
geological record for scientists.
Writing Reflection
What do you consider your greatest strength in this paper?
11 | P a g e
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
What part of this paper would you revise again if you could?
What do you think youve improved the most in the writing of this paper?
What was the most difficult thing you wrestled with in writing this paper?
What would you like Ms. Lange to think about as shes reading your paper?
I Want an A Checklist
Topic
Prompt has been answered: Select an
important value or concept that lies at the
12 | P a g e
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.
Term
Class
Characteristics
Thesis includes an explanation of why
Structure
Introduction introduces the term
Introduction provides any needed
background information
Introduction states your thesis
Strong opening sentence(s)
Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas
connect
Each paragraph encompasses a
distinguishing characteristic of the term
Supporting details are included in each body
paragraph
Sequencing that is logical and effective
Pacing is effective (writer knows when to
elaborate with details or to pick up the pace
and move on)
Paragraph structure matches the purpose of
writing and flows smoothly
Solid closing sentences that drives home the
dominant impression or theme
Conclusion brings essay to a satisfying close
Diction
No weak verbs or adjectives are included
Included vocabulary that is striking and
varied
Consistent tense is used throughout writing
No dead words or untouchables
Transitions are used to make reading clear
and smooth (oh, look! Its in two sections)
Syntax
Complete sentences are used throughout the
writing
Sentences begin with a variety of ways
(NTSSWTSW)
13 | P a g e
McWhorter, Kathleen. Successful College Writing. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2006.