Magnet Lesson Plan
Magnet Lesson Plan
Safety Note:
Make sure the students know that they should not put the magnets or
any of the test objects in their mouths (choking hazard).
Magnets should not be put near phones or computers
Magnets and other items should be used appropriately (out of mouths,
in hands, away from friends) or they will be taken away for a period of
time.
b. Procedure: (Kinesthetic, Visual, Auditory)
2nd E: Explore first hand experiences using magnets to test for attraction,
application of learned terms (attraction, attracted, non-attractive),
opportunity to test out new ideas
1. Review safety notes and expectations for working in partners. Partners
will be determined by proximity at tables. If magnets, or items, are
used incorrectly (thrown, put in mouth, used as on another person)
they will be taken away. Demonstrate how to test objects and make
two piles: one for attracted to magnets, and one for items not
attracted to magnets, offer a third pile for items students are not sure
of.
2. For the next 3-5 minutes (or more if necessary) students are free to
explore the items with their magnets. They should test items to
see if they are attracted to a magnet or not attracted to the
magnet and sort the items into piles accordingly (attracted to a
magnet/not attracted to a magnet).
* Advanced groups may come up with a third category: repelled
by magnets
3. Once finished going through all the items, groups can re-check items to
make sure items are in the correct pile
4. The teacher should circulate the room and ask students to draw
conclusions based on the two piles:
Look at the two/three piles you made. What are
similarities between items in each pile?
Possible student answers: These items are all one color. These
items are all hard. These items are all shiny. These items all
have metal. Those items are all different shapes. These items
are all small. Etc.
Why do you think these items are attracted to magnets and
the other ones arent?
Because thats what magnets do. Because magnets attract
some items and not others. Because magnets attract metal
objects.
o Items can include, but are not limited to: paper clips, pennies,
rubber bands, cotton balls, feathers, pieces of cork, stones, nails,
crayons, modeling clay, Styrofoam, silverware, nails, screws,
plastic straws, playing cards, magnetic letters, etc.
Mystery bag with assorted large items (magnetic and nonmagnetic)
rolling pin, whisk, book, metal cup, plastic cup, washcloth, wooden
spoon, fork, banana, etc.
The students did not completely meet my objectives. This is my first lesson
introducing a completely new topic that has not already been covered in the
classroom. I may have set my objectives too high for an intro lesson. My
objectives are more realistic for the end of the first week of a unit, or even a
units end. By the end of the lesson I realized that the students were getting
used to the concept of magnets, but still a little confused. Many students
said that things were made of plastic when they were metal, or called a
penny a quarter basic knowledge of the materials that things are made of
is a necessary part of understanding in this standard and will take more than
one lesson to build. Overall, I think the students got positive experiences
with using scientific techniques and have the begun building a base of
knowledge about what types of objects attract/do not attract magnets.
I focused my measurement for student knowledge on the sorting activity; I
thought this would be a clear way to see where students were grasping the
concept or struggling with it. In reality, the students were so excited to use
the magnets they were distracted with the task of testing them out. Even
though I had demonstrated how to sort the objects and checked to see if the
students understood, few groups actually sorted the objects. Many had a
large pile or had divided the objects into one pile for each partner. It may
have been a little much to expect the students to be able to focus on sorting
when exposed to such new and exciting materials. I also could have
structured the exploration part of the lesson differently, but will be discussed
later in the reflection.
I know that many students did not meet the objectives because of my
observations during the lesson. I wandered from table to table during the
exploration part of the lesson and observed how pairs of students were
sorting objects. Many of the groups were not sorting them, and were instead
absorbed by picking up as many things as they could with a magnet or
making magnets swirl around. I was happy to see the engagement and
involvement and tried to prompt students to make two piles, but was largely
unsuccessful except with a few tame sets of students. Even the students that
were not sorting were gaining knowledge about magnets and testing the
limits of the materials, so I was okay with their actions and made note to
maybe restructure or recalibrate my expectations for the lesson.
During the group sort, most of the students remembered correctly which
items were attracted to magnets and which ones were not. If a student was
unsure, they could use a magnet to retest and figure it out. Classroom
management at this point in the lesson got a little out of hand and many
students were yelling out answers, I addressed it, but it was hard to tell if the
first few students actually knew where to put the objects or if they were
swayed by the group.
During the closure of the lesson, most (about 70%) of the predictions
students made were correct. Some students made false predictions due to
confusion about the material the item was made of (ie, thinking a golden pail
was plastic instead of metal). According to this part of the lesson, it was a
successful lesson, but some students need a little more time to explore with
magnets and test out what materials they attract.
I think the partner work and hands on nature of the lesson did accommodate
most of my learners. This class has one child that has been a real challenge
for the teacher. He is always moving, often distracted or distracting the class,
and does not do well when asked to complete tasks independently. He really
enjoyed this lesson. He got to interact with a peer, be active (moving around
the room at times), and was rewarded with some participation opportunities
9
for sitting nicely with the group during the discussion. I was happy to see
that he was able to be included in the lesson. Another student is an
advanced learner and sometimes causes distractions when he is not
engaged. He was so excited about the hands on materials and came up with
some very unique tricks with the magnets (making the magnets spin and
dance across the table, making a chain of paperclips, etc).
The strengths of the lesson were in the hands-on nature of it. The students
loved getting to use real magnets and test whatever objects they wanted to.
Students found lots of items in the classroom that were attracted to magnets
and were very excited to see the connection between testing items at their
tables and testing objects in the room.
We started the lesson off by pretending to put on our science thinking caps,
lab coats, and protective eyewear. This got the students very excited and
zoned in on the task at hand. It would be fun to establish this as a regular
routine before science lessons. It would also be an easy way to refer to
scientific thinking outside of the classroom or designated science time block.
Students could have homework to wear their science thinking caps over
the weekend and come up with questions, predictions, and observations of
the world outside of school.
The items I selected for the test objects were all real objects that students
encounter at school and home (nails, bobby pins, erasers, playing cards,
game tiles, marbles, feathers, paperclips, key rings, etc.). This helped relate
the lesson to the world outside of school. The majority of students should be
able to repeat the activity at home with caregivers and siblings.
10
How would you change the lesson if you could teach it again?
The Kindergarteners have a behavior chart and clips that can be moved up
for good behavior or down for misbehavior. I did not feel comfortable moving
clips. I felt that was the role of the teacher and that it was outside of my
territory as a practicum student. The students caught on to this and saw that
the normal consequences for misbehavior did not apply during my lesson. As
a result, they acted out more often than normal. If I were to do the lesson
again, I would ask the classroom teacher ahead of time about me moving
students clips. This is something she mentioned in the feedback as a
management suggestion. Having students move their clips would have sent
a message to all students that I am the teacher of the lesson and that I know
how their class works.
11
As mentioned earlier, I would also change the structure of the sort. I would
introduce the activity 2 parts, free exploration and a sort. I would make a
clear procedure for transitioning from exploration to the sort using the
classroom chime. The activity would begin with 3-5 minutes of pure, free
exploration. To signal the transition into soting I would use the classroom
chime to get student attention (make sure all eyes are on me and hands are
away from the magnets/table) and let students know they should begin to
sort the items and that I would be coming around to check their work. I also
might hand out a paper T-chart that students for students to use to
designate the two piles. I originally had this as a material in the lesson, but
took it away because I wanted to see how students would chose to sort if
uninstructed. I now see that they needed that additional structure for this
introductory lesson, and to understand exactly what I was looking for.
Students who grasped the sort could be asked to find alternative ways to sort
without the T-chart as a lesson extension.
If I were to do the lesson again, I might break it up into two or even three
lessons and make it shorter. An hour was a long time, even though it was
broken up into 10 or 15-minute sections.
The last thing I might change is the bags of test items. The items I chose
were from around my house and the manipulatives from the science lab.
Many of the items were small and some were sharp. None of the students
used the materials inappropriately, but many of the items ended up all over
the place and Im not sure I got them all back. Using fewer, larger items (i.e.
just a playing card, feather, wooden cube, big metal washer, big paperclip,
and key) would still allow students to explore them thoroughly and then let
them go on to the sort afterwards. I may have overwhelmed the students
with so many objects (approximately 20 assorted objects in each bag).
Simplifying it in this way would not detract too much from the objectives, and
12
would still allow for students to experience a variety of materials, but would
make the lesson more manageable and keep goals more attainable.
How would you follow up the lesson if this were your classroom?
I would follow up this lesson with more explorations about the effect of
magnets on other magnets and practical applications of magnets. I would
incorporate either a test station (similar to the exploration piece of this
lesson, items to test with a magnet for attraction) and/or a container of the
pipe cleaner pieces and a magnet as a station in the science center or
science rotation to allow students to continue to build on the information
they learned concerning the properties of magnets. Incorporating a test
station into the science center of the classroom would allow for a rotation of
everyday objects, a way to expose students to many objects a small batch at
a time. I would also be sure to introduce some books about magnets to the
classroom library, both nonfiction books and fiction books such as What
Makes a Magnet? By Franklyn M. Branley and True Kelley, Magnets: Pulling
Together, Pushing Apart by Natalie M. Rosinsky and Sheree Boyd, What
Magnets Can Do by Ann Fowler, Martas Magnets by Wendy Pfeffer, Shivers
in the Fridge by Fran Manushkin, and The Magic of Magnets y Mary Fetzner.
13