0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views

Graphin 2

The document provides a rubric for evaluating graphing of data. It includes categories for evaluating the type of graph chosen, the title, labeling of the x and y axes, units, accuracy of plotting points, the data table, neatness and attractiveness. For each category, criteria are given for scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1. A score of 4 represents highest quality or adherence to best practices in that category, while a score of 1 represents lowest quality or failure to meet basic standards.

Uploaded by

api-281026218
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views

Graphin 2

The document provides a rubric for evaluating graphing of data. It includes categories for evaluating the type of graph chosen, the title, labeling of the x and y axes, units, accuracy of plotting points, the data table, neatness and attractiveness. For each category, criteria are given for scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1. A score of 4 represents highest quality or adherence to best practices in that category, while a score of 1 represents lowest quality or failure to meet basic standards.

Uploaded by

api-281026218
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Graphing : Graphing Data

CATEGORY

Type of Graph
Chosen

Graph fits the data


well and makes it
easy to interpret.

Graph is adequate
and does not distort
the data, but
interpretation of the
data is somewhat
difficult.

Graph distorts the


data somewhat and
interpretation of the
data is somewhat
difficult.

Graph seriously
distorts the data
making interpretation
almost impossible.

Title

Title is creative and


clearly relates to the
problem being
graphed (includes
dependent and
independent
variable). It is
printed at the top of
the graph.

Title clearly relates A title is present at A title is not present.


to the problem being the top of the graph.
graphed (includes
dependent and
independent
variable) and is
printed at the top of
the graph.

Labeling of X axis

The X axis has a


clear, neat label that
describes the units
used for the
independent variable
(e.g, days, months,
participants\\'
names).

The X axis has a


The X axis has a
clear label that
label.
describes the units
used for the
independent variable.

The X axis is not


labeled.

Labeling of Y axis

The Y axis has a


clear, neat label that
describes the units
and the dependent
variable (e.g, % of
dogfood eaten;
degree of
satisfaction).

The Y axis has a


clear label that
describes the units
and the dependent
variable (e.g, % of
dogfood eaten;
degree of
satisfaction).

The Y axis has a


label.

The Y axis is not


labeled.

Units

All units are


described (in a key
or with labels) and
are appropriately
sized for the data set.

Most units are


described (in a key
or with labels) and
are appropriately
sized for the data set.

All units are


described (in a key
or with labels) but
are not
appropriately sized
for the data set.

Units are neither


described NOR
appropriately sized
for the data set.

Accuracy of Plot

All points are plotted All points are plotted All points are
correctly and are
correctly and are
plotted correctly.
easy to see. A ruler is easy to see.
used to neatly
connect the points or
make the bars, if not
using a computerized
graphing program.

Data Table

Data in the table is


Data in the table is
Data in the table is Data in the table is
well organized,
organized, accurate, accurate and easy to not accurate and/or
accurate, and easy to and easy to read.
read.
cannot be read.
read.

Neatness and
Attractiveness

Exceptionally well
designed, neat, and
attractive. Colors
that go well together
are used to make the
graph more readable.
A ruler and graph
paper (or graphing
computer program)
are used.

Neat and relatively Lines are neatly


attractive. A ruler
drawn but the graph
and graph paper (or appears quite plain.
graphing computer
program) are used to
make the graph more
readable.

Points are not plotted


correctly OR extra
points were included.

Appears messy
and \\"thrown
together\\" in a hurry.
Lines are visibly
crooked.

You might also like